RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the efficacy, prognosis and safety of decitabine combined with low-dose CAG regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia （AML）.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 40 elderly patients with relapsed/refractory AML （69-85 years old） admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to August 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. 40 patients were divided into combination therapy group and CAG group according to different treatment methods. 20 patients of the combination therepy group were treated with decitabine combined with low-dose CAG （decitabine, 15 mg/m, d 1; aclarithromycin, 10 mg/m, d 3-6; Cytidine, 10 mg/m, d 1-14; recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor （G-CSF） for injection, 200 μg/（m·d）, d 1-14）. 20 patients of CAG group were treated by the standard CAG protocol （acralmycin 20 mg/m, d 1-4; cytarabine for injection, 15 mg/m, d 1-14; G-CSF 400 μg/（m·d）, d 1-14）. One course of treatment lasted for 2 weeks, after 2 courses of continuous medication, the complete remission rate （CR）, overall remission rate （ORR）, overall survival （OS）, 1-year survival rate, hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelets improvement, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared.@*RESULTS@#In combination therapy group the CR was 55.00% （11/20）, OR was 85.00% （17/20）, but in the CAG group CR was 30.00% （6/20）, and OR was 50.00% （10/20）. Till to February 2018, out of 40 patients 17 survived, 20 died, and 3 failed to be followed-up. The median follow-up time was 12 （2 to 35） months; the median survival time in the comtination therapy group was 13 （2-35） months, and the 1-year OS rate was 70.00%, and the median survival time of the CAG group was 10 （2-31） months, and the 1-year OS rate was 50.00%, without staistical significance between the 2 groups （P>0.05）. After treatment, the WBC and Plt counts in the combination therapy group were higher than those in the CAG group, but the Hb level was lower than that in the CAG group with statistically significant difference （P<0.05）. In the combination therapy group, the incidence of lung infection, nausea and vomiting was higher than that of the CAG group （65.00% vs 25.00%, 50.00% vs 20.00%）, with statistically significant difference （P<0.05）.@*CONCLUSION@#Decitabine combined with low-dose CAG regimen is effective for the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML in the elderly. Compared with the standard CAG regimen, the long-term efficacy of this regimen is not different significantly, but its adverse reactions are increase, thus the preventive treatment should be given in time.