Résumé
Objective:To explore the predictive value of renal resistive index (RRI) joint with semiquantitative power Doppler ultrasound (PDU) score to acute kidney injury (AKI) in non-septic critically ill patients.Methods:This prospective observational study enrolled non-septic critically ill patients admitted to the Emergency Intensive Care Unit of Cangzhou Central Hospital from January 2018 to August 2019. In addition to general data, RRI and PDU scores were measured with medical ultrasonic instrument within 6 h after admission. Renal function was assessed on the 5th day in accordance with kidney disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. The patients who progressed to AKI stage 3 within 5 days after admission were classified into the AKI 3 group, and the rest were classified into the AKI 0-2 group. The difference of each index was compared between the two groups in non-septic critically ill patients and patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Normal distributed continuous variables were compared using independent sample t-tests, whereas Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine the differences in variables without a normal distribution. Categorical data were compared with the Chi-square test. Receiver operator characteristic curves were plotted to examine the values of RRI, PDU score, RRI-RDU/10 (subtraction of RRI and 1/10 of PDU score), RRI/PDU (the ratio of RRI to PDU score), and RRI+PDU (the prediction probability of the combination of RRI and PDU score for AKI stage 3 obtained by logistic regression analysis) in predicting AKI 3. Delong's test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) between predictors. Results:A total of 110 non-septic critically ill patients (51 patients with no AKI, 21 with AKI stage 1, 11 with AKI stage 2, and 27 with AKI stage 3) were recruited. Among them, there were 63 patients with AHF (21 patients with no AKI, 15 with AKI stage 1, 7 with AKI stage 2, and 20 with AKI stage 3). Among the non-septic critically ill patients as well as its subgroup of AHF, compared with the AKI 0-2 group, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-Ⅱ score, sequential organ failure assessment score, arterial lactate concentration, mechanical ventilation rate, proportion of vasoactive drugs, 28-day mortality, serum creatinine, RRI, RRI-RDU/10, RRI/PDU, RRI+PDU, and rate of continuous renal replacement therapy were higher in the AKI 3 group, and urine output and PDU score were lower ( all P<0.05). As for non-septic critically ill patients, RRI/PDU [AUC=0.915, 95% confidence interval ( CI): 0.846-0.959, P<0.01] and RRI+PDU (AUC=0.914, 95% CI: 0.845-0.959, P<0.01) performed best in predicting AKI 3, and the AUCs were higher than RRI (AUC=0.804, 95% CI: 0.718-0.874, P<0.01) and PDU score (AUC=0.868, 95% CI: 0.791-0.925, P<0.01). The optimal cutoff for RRI/PDU was > 0.355 (sensitivity 92.6%, specificity 81.9%, Youden index 0.745). The predictive value of RRI-RDU/10 for AKI 3 (AUC=0.899, 95% CI: 0.827-0.948, P<0.01) was also better than RRI and PDU scores, but slightly worse than RRI/PDU and RRI+PDU, with statistically difference only between RRI and RRI-RDU/10 ( P<0.05). As for patients with AHF, RRI/PDU (AUC=0.962, 95% CI: 0.880-0.994, P<0.01) and RRI+PDU (AUC=0.962, 95% CI: 0.880-0.994, P<0.01) also performed best in predicting AKI 3, and the AUCs were higher than RRI (AUC=0.845, 95% CI: 0.731-0.924, P<0.01) and PDU score (AUC=0.913, 95% CI: 0.814-0.969, P<0.01) with statistically differences (all P<0.05). The optimal cutoff for RRI/PDU was > 0.360 (sensitivity 95.0%, specificity 90.7%, Youden index 0.857). The predictive value of RRI-RDU/10 for AKI 3 (AUC=0.950, 95% CI: 0.864-0.989, P<0.01) was also better than RRI and PDU score, but slightly worse than RRI/PDU and RRI+PDU, with statistically difference only between RRI and RRI-RDU/10 ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The combination of RRI and PDU score could effectively predict AKI 3 in non-septic critically ill patients, especially in patients with AHF. The ratio of RRI to PDU score is recommended for clinical application because of its excellent predictive value for AKI and its practicability.
Résumé
Objective:To explore the diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasound measurement of limb skeletal muscle thickness for intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.Methods:A prospective observational study was conducted. Patients receiving mechanical ventilation admitted to the emergency ICU of Cangzhou Central Hospital from June 2018 to March 2020 were enrolled. The demographic data were collected. Medical Research Council (MRC) score was used to assess muscle strength and to determine the presence of ICU-AW once the patients were awake. The thicknesses of biceps brachii (BB), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), rectus femoris (RF) and tibialis anterior (TA) were measured by bedside ultrasound. The difference of each index was compared between the patients in ICU-AW group and in non-ICU-AW group. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to examine the values of the thicknesses of these four muscles in diagnosing ICU-AW.Results:Forty-one patients receiving mechanical ventilation (15 patients with ICU-AW, 26 patients without ICU-AW) were recruited. Compared with the non-ICU-AW group, the MRC score, the thicknesses of FCR, RF and TA were lower in the ICU-AW group [MRC score: 36 (30, 40) vs. 60 (56, 60), FCR (cm): 1.09±0.19 vs. 1.30±0.28, RF (cm): 1.57±0.58 vs. 2.23±0.58, TA (cm): 1.76±0.33 vs. 2.21±0.43, all P < 0.05], and the length of ICU stay was longer [days: 15 (9, 26) vs. 10 (4, 12), P < 0.05]. Although the thickness of BB was also lower in the ICU-AW group, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (cm: 2.45±0.57 vs. 2.70±0.61, P = 0.205). ROC curve showed that the thicknesses of FCR, RF and TA had diagnostic values for ICU-AW [area under ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.742 (0.582-0.866), 0.787 (0.631-0.899), 0.817 (0.665-0.920), respectively, all P < 0.01]. The thicknesses of BB couldn't diagnose ICU-AW (AUC = 0.597, 95% CI was 0.433-0.747, P = 0.296). Conclusion:The thicknesses of FCR, RF and TA measured by bedside ultrasound in patients with mechanical ventilation had diagnostic values for ICU-AW, while the thickness of BB could not diagnose ICU-AW.
Résumé
Objective To investigate the effect of a stabilization device for maintaining the balance of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performer during ambulance transportation on quality of CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed. 167 OHCA patients with cardiac arrest (CA) time < 10 minutes admitted to Cangzhou Central Hospital from October 2014 to January 2017 were enrolled, and divided into armed stabilization device group (n = 86) and unarmed stabilization device group (n = 81) by random number table. Restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate, 24-hour survival rate and survival rate of discharge were evaluated.Results Compared with unarmed stabilization device group, ROSC rate (29.1% vs. 9.9%,χ2 = 9.691,P = 0.002), 24-hour survival rate (20.9% vs. 6.2%,χ2 = 7.649,P = 0.006) and survival rate of discharge (12.8% vs. 3.7%,χ2 = 4.485,P = 0.035) were significant increased in armed stabilization device group. Conclusion CPR with stabilization device during ambulance transport could effectively ensure quality of CPR and improve prognosis in OHCA.Clinical Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IPR-14005337.
Résumé
Objective To investigate the effect of a stabilization device for maintaining the balance of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performer during ambulance transportation on quality of CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed. 167 OHCA patients with cardiac arrest (CA) time < 10 minutes admitted to Cangzhou Central Hospital from October 2014 to January 2017 were enrolled, and divided into armed stabilization device group (n = 86) and unarmed stabilization device group (n = 81) by random number table. Restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate, 24-hour survival rate and survival rate of discharge were evaluated.Results Compared with unarmed stabilization device group, ROSC rate (29.1% vs. 9.9%,χ2 = 9.691,P = 0.002), 24-hour survival rate (20.9% vs. 6.2%,χ2 = 7.649,P = 0.006) and survival rate of discharge (12.8% vs. 3.7%,χ2 = 4.485,P = 0.035) were significant increased in armed stabilization device group. Conclusion CPR with stabilization device during ambulance transport could effectively ensure quality of CPR and improve prognosis in OHCA.Clinical Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IPR-14005337.