RÉSUMÉ
Objective To compare the effects of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(DEB-TACE)and conventional TACE(c-TACE)on liver fibrosis and liver function in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods A total of 40 patients diagnosed with HCC at Xuzhou Municipal Cancer Hospital of China between October 2020 and October 2022 were enrolled in this study.According to therapeutic scheme,the patients were divided into DEB-TACE group(n=20)and c-TACE group(n=20).The preoperative,and postoperative 5-day and one-month hyaluronidase(HA),type Ⅲ procollagen peptide(P Ⅲ NP),type Ⅳ collagen(CⅣ)and laminin(LN),alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),total bilirubin(TBil),albumin(Alb),and prothrombin time(PT)were compared between the two groups.Results The technical success rate was 100％in both groups,and tumor staining completely disappeared immediately after TACE in all patients.The postoperative 5-day levels of HA,LN,P Ⅲ NP,and CⅣ in both groups were remarkably higher than the preoperative ones(P＜0.05).One month after TACE,HA level in the DEB-TACE group was prominently higher than its preoperative value(P＜0.05);HA and LN levels in the c-TACE group were obviously higher than their preoperative values(P＜0.05);and the HA and LN levels in c-TACE group were significantly higher than those in DEB-TACE group(P＜0.05).Five days after TACE,in the DEB-TACE group the AST and PT levels were higher than their preoperative values while the Alb level was lower than its preoperative value(P＜0.05);in the c-TACE group the ALT,AST,TBiL and PT were higher than their preoperative values while the Alb level was lower than its preoperative value(P＜0.05);the ALT and AST levels in the c-TACE group were strikingly higher than those in the DEB-TACE group while Alb level was strikingly lower than that in the DEB-TACE group(P＜0.05).Conclusion Both CalliSpheres DEB-TACE and c-TACE can aggravate liver fibrosis and cause liver function damage.However,the degree of liver fibrosis and liver function damage caused by CalliSpheres DEB-TACE is less than that caused by c-TACE.(J Intervent Radiol,2024,33:259-263)
RÉSUMÉ
Objective@#To compare the clinical significance of human epididymis protein 4(HE4), CA125, ROMA in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer.@*Methods@#From May 2016 to October 2017, 240 patients with ovarian tumor in Xuzhou Cancer Hospital were selected.According to the result of postoperative pathology, the patients were divided into benign ovarian disease group(n=120) and ovarian cancer group(n=120). And 100 healthy women from medical examination center were selected as control group.The electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) technique was used to assess the serum levels of CA125, HE4, and ROMA was calculated.The clinical significance of HE4, CA125, ROMA in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer was analyzed by statistic methods.@*Results@#The CA125, HE4 concentrations and ROMA in the ovarian cancer group[(370.9±213.2)U/mL, (364.4±227.0)pmpl/L, (80.2±26.1)%]were higher than those in the benign ovarian disease group and the health control group(all P<0.01), there were no statistically significant differences between the benign ovarian disease group and the healthy control group(P=0.356, P=0.321, P=0.292). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy of ROMA were higher than those of HE4 and CA125.By using the ROC analysis, the AUC for CA125, HE4, ROMA were 0.832, 0.888, 0.960, respectively, AUC(CA125)<AUC(HE4)<AUC(ROMA).@*Conclusion@#CA125 and HE4 have important value in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, but the ROMA shows the best diagnostic performance and actual value.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To compare the clinical significance of human epididymis protein 4(HE4),CA125, ROMA in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer.Methods From May 2016 to October 2017,240 patients with ovarian tumor in Xuzhou Cancer Hospital were selected .According to the result of postoperative pathology ,the patients were divided into benign ovarian disease group ( n =120 ) and ovarian cancer group ( n =120 ) .And 100 healthy women from medical examination center were selected as control group .The electrochemiluminescence ( ECLIA ) technique was used to assess the serum levels of CA 125,HE4,and ROMA was calculated .The clinical significance of HE4,CA125,ROMA in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer was analyzed by statistic methods .Results The CA125,HE4 concentrations and ROMA in the ovarian cancer group [(370.9 ±213.2) U/mL,(364.4 ±227.0) pmpl/L, (80.2 ±26.1)％] were higher than those in the benign ovarian disease group and the health control group ( all P<0.01),there were no statistically significant differences between the benign ovarian disease group and the healthy control group(P=0.356,P=0.321,P=0.292).The sensitivity,specificity,positive and negative predictive values , accuracy of ROMA were higher than those of HE 4 and CA125.By using the ROC analysis ,the AUC for CA125,HE4, ROMA were 0.832,0.888,0.960,respectively,AUC(CA125) <AUC(HE4) <AUC(ROMA).Conclusion CA125 and HE4 have important value in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer ,but the ROMA shows the best diagnostic performance and actual value .
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To evaluate the correlation of the ion selectivity electrode assay and arsenazo Ⅲ assay for serum calcium determination and compare the differences between two methods.Methods 142 serum samples were collected from patients and detected by ion selectivity electrode assay and arsenazo Ⅲ assay,the differences of two methods were compared,person correlation and Bland -Altman was used to discuss the correlation.Results The serum calcium concentration detected by ion selectivity electrode assay was (2.23 ±0.10)mmol/L and detected by arsenazo Ⅲ assay was (2.24 ±0.12)mmol/L,the difference between the two methods was not statistically significant (t =-1.09,P >0.05).The person correlation analysis demonstrated that the two methods had a positive correlation (r =0.393,P <0.01).The Bland -Altman consistency analysis showed that ion selectivity electrode assay was agreed with arsenazo Ⅲ assay.Conclusion The two methods for serum calcium concentration determination,the ion selectivity electrode assay was coincidence with the arsenazo Ⅲ assay.