RÉSUMÉ
Objective To investigate the relationship between anti mutated citrullinated vimentin (MCV) antibody, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody with disease activity and bone erosion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), so as to provide evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods The anti-CCP antibody and anti-MCV antibody were detected using the enzyme-linked immune adsorption method (ELISA) for 634 patients with RA. At the same time, the clinical and laboratory data were collected, and the X-ray images of hands or feet were taken. Disease activity score (DAS)28 score was calculated, and all patients were divided into high disease activity group, moderatedisease activity group, low disease activity group and stable disease group on the basis of the DAS28 score. We analyzed the relationship between the degree of anti MCV, anti CCP antibodies, and disease activity of patients by Spearman correlation. And anti CCP, anti MCV antibodies, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C reactive protein (CRP) of these patients were compared at different period of bone erosion and disease activity by the Wilcoxon rank sum test and nemenyi. Results ① Positive correlation could be detected between anti-MCV antibody and ESR, CRP, number of tender joint, DAS28 score (r=0.115, P=0.004; r=0.120, P=0.003; r=0.124, P=0.002; r=0.085, P=0.032), and anti CCP antibody had no correlation with these index. The anti MCV antibodies in high disease activity group [694 (156, 1 000)] U/ml, and moderate activity group [911 (190, 1 000)] U/ml were higher than that of the low disease activity [248(150, 731)] U/ml or stable group [275(62, 928)] U/ml (U=2.29, P=0.023;U=2.25, P=0.024; U=2.45, P=0.014; U=2.4, P=0.018), and anti CCP antibody in the moderate disease activity group [499(180, 1 370)] U/ml was higher than low disease activity group [297(83, 574)] U/ml and stable group [187(67, 1 153)] U/ml (U=2.53, P=0.012; U=2.22, P=0.026). ②The anti MCV, anti CCP antibody in the bone erosion group were higher than those without bone erosion group (U=4.64, P<0.01;U=2.69, P=0.007). The anti MCV antibodies in stage Ⅱ[722(259, 1 000)] U/ml and Ⅲ group [714 (216, 1 000)] U/ml was significantly higher than that in stage Ⅰ [316(98, 1 000)] U/ml(U=3.46, P<0.01; U=4.28, P<0.01). The anti CCP antibody level in stage Ⅱ [394(180, 1 000)] U/ml and Ⅲ[391(181,1305)] U/ml was higher compared with stage Ⅰ[277 (98,898)] U/ml (U=1.99, P=0.046; U=2.92, P=0.004), and that in phase Ⅲ was higher than Ⅳ [218(71, 911)] U/ml (U=2.06, P=0.041). Conclusion Compared with anti-CCP antibody, anti-MCV antibody is closely related with disease activity, and has a better predictive value for bone erosion. Patients with higher ESR and CRP are more susceptible to bone erosion.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To detect anti-cell membrane DNA ( cmDNA) antibody with human B lym-phocyte Raji cells and human promyelocytic leukemia HL60 cells as substrates and to compare the diagnostic value of anti-cmDNA antibody with that of anti-nucleosome antibody ( AnuA ) , anti-Sm antibody and anti-double-stranded DNA ( dsDNA) antibody in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus ( JSLE) patients. Meth-ods We recruited 92 JSLE patients and 71 patients with other rheumatic diseases. Anti-cmDNA antibody an-dantinuclear antibody ( ANA ) was detected in patient serum by indirect immunofluorescence assays ( IIF ) . Anti-dsDNA antibody were detected by combining enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay ( ELISA) and IIF. Anti-Sm antibody were detected by double immunodiffusion assay and immunoblotting, while anti-nucleosome antibody ( AnuA) were detected by ELISA. We collected concurrent clinical data. Results Anti-cmDNA antibody demonstrated stronger intensity of fluorescent patterns in using Raji cells as substrate than HL60 cells. JSLE patients had a significantly higher positive percentage of anti-cmDNA than patients with other rheu-matoid diseases. The sensitivity of anti-cmDNA on cell line Raji was higher than that of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm (P0. 05) and was lower than anti-Sm and AnuA (P0. 05) and the specificity was lower than AnuA (P<0. 01). The sensitivities of anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm and AnuA by combining with an-ti-cmDNA were much higher than that of the above antibody detected respectively ( P<0. 05 ) . Anti-cmDNA had no correlation with SLE disease activity index ( P=0. 907 ) . Conclusion The high sensitivity and speci-ficity of anti-cmDNA antibody make it a valuable diagnostic tool for JSLE. Combined detection of anti-cmDNA and other autoantibody might further improve the sensitivity in JSLE. Anti-cmDNA detected with IIF on cell line Raji was better than cell line HL60.
RÉSUMÉ
ObjectiveTo evaluate the frequency of antinucleosome antibody(AnuA) in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus(JSLE),comparing it to that observed for anti-dsDNA,anti-Sm antibodies,and explore the correlation of these antibodies with clinical manifestations and disease activity.MethodsWe included 80 children with JSLE and 56 children with other rheumatic diseases into this study.Clinical records were reviewed.AnuA,antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-Sm antibody were detected by ELISA,ⅡF and Western-blot respectively.Anti-DNA were detected by ELISA and ⅡF.Disease activity was assessed by SLEDAI score.ResultsAnuA showed sensitivity of 76.25％ and specificity of 98.21％.AnuA combine with anti-dsDNA antibody or anti-Sm antibody was detected,the sensitivities and specificities were 83.05％,86.44％ and 96.43％,98.21％,respectively.It showed that the sensitivity was higher than any one of the three.The presence of AnuA was associated with red blood cell count,hemoglobin level,ESR,hematuria,low complement levels and anti-dsDNA antibody (r=-0.499,-0.503,0.388,0.227,0.303,0.531,P=0.000,0.000,0.000,0.042,0.006,0.000).The presence of AnuA was associated with the SLEDAI score(P=0.000). Conclusion AunA hasthe highest sensitivity and specificityamongthese autoabtibodies,particularly,when combined with anti-dsDNA antibody or anti-Sm antibody.The level of AnuA is associated with the disease activity of JSLE.AnuA is not only useful for the diagnosis of JSLE but also for evaluation of the disease activity.