RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE：To desig n and sy nthesize poly （γ-glutamic acid ）-ampelopsin（γ-PGA-AMP），and to characterize it and evaluate its anti-tumor activity in vitro . METHODS ：Synthetic product was produced through an esterification reaction between γ-PGA and ampelopsin. The structure of synthetic product was characterized by the UV spectrophotometry ，Fourier transform infrared（FT-IR）spectroscopy，1H-NMR spectra and the quantitative elemental analysis. The content of ampelopsin in synthetic product was determined by UV absorption spectrometry at 292 nm. Using 5-FU as positive control ，MTT assay was used to determine inhibitory effects of γ-PGA-AMP and ampelopsin on human breast cancer cell MCF- 7，human liver cancer cell HepG 2 and human lung cancer cell A 549. The IC 50 was calculated. RESULTS ：The results showed that the free 7-hydroxyl group of ampelopsin and the a-carboxyl group of γ-polyglutamic acid had been esterified to obtain γ-PGA-AMP；the yield of γ-PGA-AMP was 55.7％，and the content of ampelopsin was 32.3％. The inhibitory effect of γ-PGA-AMP and ampelopsin on MCF- 7，HepG2 and A 549 cells was obvious. IC 50 of γ-PGA-AMP（to 3 above tumor cells ）were 40.19，28.29 and 55.23 μg/mL，those of ampelopsin were 105.30，81.23，130.10 μg/mL，those of 5-FU were 24.72，87.98，30.99 μg/mL，respectively. CONCLUSIONS ：γ-PGA-AMP with anti-tumor effect in vitro is synthesized successfully ，and its anti-tumor effect is stronger than that of ampelopsin.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To assess the image quality of iterative model reconstruction algorithm (IMR) compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (iDose4) for hypovascular hepatic metastases.Methods Medical history and pathological results of 33 cases with primary malignant tumor were retrospective analyzed.Follow-up with enhanced CT or enhanced MRI at more than 3 months confirmed hypovascular metastases in these patients.All patients underwent abdominal CT scanning and dynamic enhanced CT scanning.Portal vein phase of low dose scanning data were taken as the research object.According to the different tube currents and reconstruction algorithm,the images were divided into 4 groups.Group A included images with tube current of 175 mAs and IMR post-processing (17 cases).Group B included images with tube current of 175 mAs and iDose4 post-processing (17 cases).Group C included images with tube current of 125 mAs and IMR post-processing (16 cases).Group D included images with tube current of 125 mAs and iDose4 post-processing (16 cases).In the cases with multiple lesions,the largest lesion was selected to evaluate.For each image of the objective evaluation [including noise,the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),contrast to noise ratio (CNR)] and subjective evaluation (including lesion sharpness,necrosis interface and diagnostic confidence).The CT dose index of each scanning was recorded.The objective evaluation,subjective evaluation indexes were compared by paired samples t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.Results The tube current of Group A and Group B were (7.7± 1.8) and (12.8±3.7)HU,while CNR were 10.3 ±2.6 and 5.6± 1.4,SNR were 13.2±3.2 and 8.1 ± 2.2,and the differences were statistically significant (t values were 9.966,12.670,9.203;P＜0.01).The tube current of Group C and Group D were (7.2±1.3) and (9.9±1.8)HU,while CNR were 7.4±2.0 and 3.7±0.9,SNR were 13.9±2.9 and 9.8±1.9,and the differences were statistically significant (t values were 9.209,12.320,9.628;P＜0.01).The lesion sharpness score of Group A and Group B were 4.95±0.24 and 4.29±0.59,while the necrosis interface score were 4.76 ± 0.36 and 3.68 ± 0.30,diagnostic confidence score were 4.94± 0.24 and 4.44 ±0.56,and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The lesion sharpness score of Group C and Group D were 3.94±0.68 and 3.56±0.63,while the necrosis interface score were 3.91±0.64 and 3.03±0.50,diagnostic confidence score were 4.19±0.40 and 3.94±0.44,and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).CTDIvol of 175 mAs group and 125 m As group were (11.83±0.28) and (8.44±0.24) mGy respectively.Conclusion Compared with iDose4,iterative reconstruction technology IMR significantly reduces the image noise and enhances image quality of hypovascular hepatic metastases.
RÉSUMÉ
desflurane. The one of hepatotoxic mechanism of inhatational anesthetics may be to inhibit the proliferation and albumin secretion.
RÉSUMÉ
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of transtracheal doppler (TTD) cardiac output monitoring. Eleven mongrel dogs (weight: 8～15kg) were anesthetized with intravenous thiopental 20mg?kg~(-1), and the doppler tube was inserted into trachea and fixed at a proper position where clear signal was received, and the catheter with thermistor was passed into pulmonary artery via femoral vein. CO were measured simultanously by thermodilution (TD) and TTD in the basic state, during 10 mins after intravenous administration of propofol 2mg?kg~(-1), in 30 mins following intravenous dopamine 100?g?kg~(-1) or under condition of isovolumic hemodilution in sequence. The results demonstrated that the CO measured by TTD correlated positively with that by TD (r=0.88, P
RÉSUMÉ
objective: The aim of this study was to investigate effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on coronary circulation in dogs and to compare its effects with those of isoflurane. Method:Eighteen mongrel dogs were anesthetized with sodium pentothal 20mg/kg and atracurium 0.8mg/kg. After intubation, thoracotomy was performed and a 3.0 or 3.5mm pulsed Doppler flow probe was placed around the left anterior descending coronary artery. The dogs were randomly assigned to receive desflurane,sevoflurane or isoflurane with the values of MAC being 7.2%, 2.3% and 1.28%,respectively. Coronary blood flow(CBF)were recorded 20 min after the period of equilibration at the desired endtidal concentration. Result:CBF was significantly increased in desflurane and isoflurane group at giving concentrations. Unlike isoflurane,CBF in sevoflurane group decreased slightly at low concentration,but increased significantly at high concentration. Conclusion: The effects of desflurane and isoflurane on coronary circulation are similar, but those of sevoflurane and isoflurane are different.