Résumé
Objective:To evaluate balloon compression-assisted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (bc-EIS) for the treatment of esophageal varices.Methods:From June 2019 to November 2020, cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices who received endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly divided into the bc-EIS group and the traditional EIS group. The number of treatments to eradicate varicose veins, the dose of sclerosing agent used in the first treatment, the number of injection points in the first treatment, the rebleeding rate within 10 months after the operation and the incidence of complications or adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:Ninety-two cases were initially included in the study, and 7 cases were excluded based on exclusion criteria. Finally, 85 cases were included in the data analysis, 47 in the bc-EIS group and 38 in the traditional EIS group. The first eradication rate, the second cumulative eradication rate and the third cumulative eradication rate were 82.98% (39/47), 91.49% (43/47) and 100.00% (47/47) in the bc-EIS group, and they were 10.53% (4/38) ( χ 2=44.125, P<0.001), 31.58% (12/38) ( χ 2=33.023, P<0.001) and 63.16% (24/38) ( χ 2=20.730, P<0.001), respectively in the traditional EIS group, and the differences were statistically significant. The treatment times of eradicating varicose veins in the bc-EIS group and the traditional EIS group were 1.25±0.60 and 3.21±1.41, respectively, with significant difference. The dosage of sclerosing agent in first treatment in the bc-EIS group and the traditional EIS group was 17.66±7.14 mL and 22.92±6.84 mL, respectively ( t=3.441, P=0.001). The numbers of initial injection points in the bc-EIS group and the traditional EIS group were 2.70±0.86 and 2.78±1.04, respectively and the difference was not statistically significant ( t=1.847, P=0.065). The rebleeding rates of the two groups within 10 months after the operation were 2.13% (1/47) and 18.42% (7/38) respectively ( χ 2=4.771, P=0.029). There were no serious complications in the two groups. The incidences of retrosternal pain, nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension and ulcer were 2.13% (1/47), 2.13% (1/47), 4.26% (2/47) and 0.00% (0/47) in the bc-EIS group, and in the traditional EIS group, they were 5.26% (2/38) ( χ 2=0.035, P=0.851), 5.26% (2/38) ( χ 2=0.035, P=0.851), 7.89% (3/38) ( χ 2=0.060, P=0.806) and 7.89% (3/38) ( χ 2=1.877, P=0.171), respectively, without significant difference. Conclusion:Bc-EIS is more effective than traditional EIS for the treatment of esophageal varices with lower postoperative rebleeding rate, which shows better clinical application value.
Résumé
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of balloon compression-assisted endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (bc-EIS) for esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.Methods:From December 2020 to April 2021, cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices who planned to receive endoscopic treatment in the Department of Gastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were selected and randomly divided into the trial group (treated with bc-EIS) and the control group [treated with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL)] through computer randomization. The varices eradication rate, rebleeding rate and postoperative adverse reactions in the two groups were studied.Results:During the study, 93 cases were initially included according to inclusion criteria, among which 9 cases were excluded by exclusion criteria. Finally, 84 cases were included for data analysis, with 42 cases in each group. The esophageal varices eradication rate after the first treatment in the trial group was 88.10% (37/42), which was significantly higher than that in the control group [33.33% (14/42)] ( χ2=26.40, P<0.001). The esophageal varices eradication rate after 1 to 2 times and 1 to 3 times of treatment in the trial group were both significantly higher than those in the control group [97.62% (41/42) VS 40.48% (17/42), χ2=29.47, P<0.001; 100.00% (42/42) VS 45.24% (19/42), P<0.001]. The maximum follow-up period was 6 months, and none of the patients had rebleeding in the trial group, and the rebleeding rate in the control group was 4.76% (2/42) ( P=0.494). The incidence of thoracic and abdominal discomfort, nausea and vomiting, and abdominal distension in the trial group and control group were 26.19% (11/42) and 35.71% (15/42) ( χ2=0.51, P=0.474), 2.38% (1/42) and 7.14% (3/42) ( χ2=0.26, P=0.608), and 4.76% (2/42) and 11.90% (5/42) ( χ2=0.62, P=0.430), respectively. No other adverse events such as infection, dysphagia, perforation, esophageal tracheal fistula, esophageal stenosis, or ectopic embolism occurred in any group. Conclusion:Bc-EIS is effective and safe for the treatment of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis, with a one-time varices eradication rate of more than 85%, and can be completely eradicated after 1 to 3 times of treatment.