Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 139
Filtrer
1.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1030617

RÉSUMÉ

@#The treatment of patients with advanced lung cancer has been revolutionized with the advent of immunotherapy. However, not all patients can benefit equally from immunotherapy. In recent years, the relationship between intestinal flora and the efficacy of immunotherapy has gradually attracted scholars' attention. During the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the use of antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors and other drugs will affect the patient's intestinal flora, thus affecting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, leading to poor prognosis of patients. This review will discuss that antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy by affecting the diversity of intestinal flora, in order to facilitate the rational use of related drugs in clinical practice and improve the patient's outcomes.

2.
Organ Transplantation ; (6): 648-652, 2024.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1038435

RÉSUMÉ

As a cation with abundant intracellular contents and extensive functions, magnesium plays an active role in immune function and captivates widespread attention. Under the influence of multiple factors, such as use of calcineurin inhibitors, hypomagnesemia post-kidney transplantation is not uncommon. Infection is a common complication post-kidney transplantation and one of the main causes of death of kidney transplant recipients. Recent clinical studies have shown that hypomagnesemia post-kidney transplantation is closely associated with the risk of infection post-transplantation. Emphasizing and monitoring magnesium concentration in kidney transplant recipients may help prevent infection and improve clinical prognosis of both recipients and grafts. Therefore, research progress in magnesium and immune response, the causes of hypomagnesemia post-kidney transplantation and hypomagnesemia and infection post-kidney transplantation was reviewed, aiming to provide reference for the prevention and treatment of infection post-kidney transplantation.

3.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 27(2): 191-196, April-June 2023. tab, graf
Article de Anglais | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1440217

RÉSUMÉ

Abstract Introduction Contact granulomas (CGs) and intubation granulomas (IGs) are known to have different clinical manifestations despite having the same pathological features. Objectives The purpose of the present study was to analyze the treatment results for CG and IG and to obtain clinical information. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with vocal process granuloma (VPG) between January 2015 and December 2018. The patient's age, sex, medical history, lesion size, lesion type, reflux finding score (RFS), response to treatment, duration of treatment, and follow-up period were compared. Results Eighteen patients with CG and 14 patients with IG were included in the study. The IG group had more female patients (p = 0.0009), showed better response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and steroid inhalation (SI) (p = 0.036), and had a shorter treatment period (p = 0.0029) than the CG group. Five patients who received botulinum toxin injections in their vocal cords had complete remission. Conclusions Compared with CG, IG was more responsive to treatment with PPI and SI and required a shorter duration of treatment.

4.
Chinese Journal of Digestion ; (12): 670-676, 2023.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1029614

RÉSUMÉ

Objective:To explore the clinical application value of salivary pepsin test (Peptest) in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods:From April to October 2022, at the Department of Gastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, a total of 81 patients with typical reflux and (or) heartburn symptoms for more than 1 month, who were diagnosed with GERD and completed 24-hour esophageal pH impedance monitoring (24 h MII-pH) and high-resolution esophageal manometry were enrolled. Salivary samples were collected after lunch, at the onset of symptoms, and at random time point on the day of intubation, and all patients received standard dose of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for 2 weeks. The 24 h MII-pH results were taken as the gold standard for diagnosing GERD. The optimal time point of Peptest and the diagnostic value of combination of Peptest and PPI test in GERD diagnosis were analyzed. The 24 h MII-pH negative patients were further divided into Peptest-positive group and Peptest-negative group. The heartbrun scores, gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q), reflux characteristics, and esophageal motility between the 2 groups were compared and to investigate the differential diagnostic value of Peptest in 24 h MII-pH negative patients. Chi-square test and non-parametric test were used for statistical analysis.Results:The results of 24 h MII-pH indicated that 21 patients (25.9%, 21/81) were diagnosed GERD and 60 patients were negative for 24 h MII-pH. The onset of symptoms was the optimal time point for Peptest, with a sensitivity of 80.9%, a specificity of 50.0%, and an accuracy of 58.0%. The specificity and accuracy of Peptest at the onset of symptoms combined with PPI test in GERD diagnosis were higher than those of Peptest at the onset of symptoms alone (75.0% vs. 50.0%, 74.1% vs. 58.0%), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=8.00 and 4.65, P=0.005 and 0.031). Among 60 cases of 24 h MII-pH negative patients, 30 were positive for Peptest at the onset of symptoms and 30 were negative for Peptest at the onset of symptoms. The heartburn scores and GERD-Q scores of Peptest-positive group were both higher than those of Peptest-negative group (3.0 (2.0, 3.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0, 2.3), 12.0 (9.8, 13.0) vs. 9.0 (6.0, 11.0) ); the clearance time of acid reflux of Peptest-positive group was longer than that of Peptest-negative group (57.0 s (22.3 s, 88.0 s) vs. 18.3 s (9.6 s, 32.1 s) ); the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and integrated relaxation pressure were lower than those of Peptest-negative group (10.40 mmHg (5.75 mmHg, 18.95 mmHg) vs. 21.45 mmHg (10.65 mmHg, 31.70 mmHg), 3.90 mmHg (2.05 mmHg, 5.35 mmHg) vs. 4.90 mmHg (3.76 mmHg, 8.25 mmHg); 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa); the distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance, the distal contractile integral and esophagogastric junction contractile integral were all lower than those of Peptest-negative group ( 1 783 Ω (1 660 Ω, 2 157 Ω) vs. 2 300 Ω(1 805 Ω, 2 370 Ω), 1 416 mmHg·s·cm (919 mmHg·s·cm, 2 176 mmHg·s·cm) vs. 1 858 mmHg·s·cm (1 395 mmHg·s·cm, 2 880 mmHg·s·cm), 27.7 mmHg·cm (19.8 mmHg·cm, 39.5 mmHg·cm) vs. 52.6 mmHg·cm (27.7 mmHg·cm, 74.6 mmHg·cm) ), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-4.00, -3.53, -3.31, -2.34, -2.13, -2.75, -2.14 and -2.43; P<0.001, <0.001, =0.001, =0.019, =0.033, =0.006, =0.032 and =0.015). Conclusions:Peptest may be better at diagnosing GERD at the onset of symptoms compared to postprandial, random time points, and the accuracy of diagnosing GERD further improves when combined with PPI test. Peptest at the onset of symptoms may have differential diagnostic value for GERD patients in 24 h MII-pH negative patients.

5.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-991174

RÉSUMÉ

During the analysis of benziamidazole-class irreversible proton pump inhibitors,an unusual mass spectral response with the mass-to-charge ratio at[M+10]+intrigued us,as it couldn't be assigned to any literature known relevant structure,intermediate or adduct ion.Moreover,this mysterious mass pattern of[M+10]+has been gradually observed by series of marketed proton pump inhibitors,viz.omeprazole,pantoprazole,lansoprazole and rabeprazole.All the previous attempts to isolate the corresponding component were unsuccessful.The investigation of present work addresses this kind of signal to a pyridinium thiocyanate mass spectral intermediate(10),which is the common fragment ion of series of labile aggregates.The origin of such aggregates can be traced to the reactive intermediates formed by acid-promoted degradation.These reactive intermediates tend to react with each other and give raise series of complicated aggregates systematically in a water/acetonitrile solution by electrospray ioniza-tion.The structure of the corresponding pyridinium thiocyanate species of omeprazole(10a)has been eventually characterized with the help of synthetic specimen(10a').Our structural proposal as well as its origin was supported by in situ nuclear magnetic resonance,chemical derivatization and colorimetric experiments.

6.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-990507

RÉSUMÉ

Stress-related digestive tract mucosal disease is a common complication in pediatric intensive care unit(PICU). It may progress to stress ulcer and severe ulcer bleeding, which may lead to death.Currently, stress ulcer prophylaxis is recommended for critically ill children with high risk factors for stress ulcer, and the most commonly used acid suppression drugs are proton pump inhibitor and histamine-2 receptor antagonist.However, excessive prophylactic acid suppression is common and can increase the risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia and clostridium difficile infection in PICU.This review aimed to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of preventive acid suppressant therapy and promote the rational use of acid suppressant in PICU.

7.
J Indian Med Assoc ; 2022 Jul; 120(7): 67-72
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-216573

RÉSUMÉ

Goal : This is a subjective survey to assess the knowledge, awareness, and practices (KAP) of physicians while prescribing Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in acid peptic disorder (APD) patients in India. Background : APD represents a variety of gastric anomalies in which PPIs form the mainstay of management. Many of the APD patients are associated with comorbidities, resulting in polypharmacy and increased risk of drugdrug interactions. Therefore, it is essential that physicians be aware of PPI drug interactions while prescribing them to patients with comorbidities. In developing countries like India, studies assessing the KAP of Physicians are limited. Study Design : This questionnaire-based study consisted of 3 domains: (A) Study objectives and consent; (B) Participants’ socio-demographic details; (C) Questions on KAP of Physicians around various aspects of APD management and PPI usage. Results : A total of 110 Physicians completed the survey. 92% observed stress as the most common risk factor; Obesity (46), Diabetes Mellitus (41%) and Cardiovascular Disease (33%) as the most frequent comorbidities, in APD. Almost all Physicians (99%) considered patient’s comorbidity important while choosing PPI. 84% participants felt that anticoagulants when co-prescribed with PPI have higher chance of drug-drug interactions. 60% ranked Rabeprazole in the top, in terms of safety and tolerability among PPIs. Conclusion: The present study mapped the awareness of Indian Physicians on APD, PPI usage, their adverse effects, drug-drug interactions; patient compliance and satisfaction with PPIs. These findings can be used to plan future interventions targeting HCPs, to ensure safe and appropriate use of PPIs

8.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 897-910, 2022.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-923590

RÉSUMÉ

In order to further s tandardize the clinical application of proton pump inhibitors and provide reference for prescription suitability review ,under the guidance of Guiding Principles for Clinical Use of Proton Pump Inhibitor which was promulgated by the General Office of National Health Commission of the People ’s Republic of China ,Pharmaceutical Admini- stration Committee of Chongqing Hospital Association initiates “the formulation Project on Prescription Review Rules for Proton Pump Inhibitors ”. The First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University takes the lead and cooperates with clinical experts , pharmaceutical experts and evidence-based experts from many domestic medical institutions to discuss the indications ,usage and dosage,medication for special groups and drug interactions of proton pump inhibitors ,and finally forms this consensus. The main contents of the consensus include the basic prescription review rules of omeprazole ,esmeprazole,pantoprazole,rabeprazole, lansoprazole and iprazole (including injection and oral preparations ,calculated by common name ),and 12 prescription review recommendations for some clinical applications not covered on the basic prescription review rules ,in order to provide reference for medical institutions at all levels.

9.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-933610

RÉSUMÉ

Objective:to analyze the risk factors for the side effect of anti-reflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with regards to relief of reflux symptom, dysphagia and postoperative satisfaction.Method:The incidence of disappointing chief complaint among 192 patients who underwent anti-reflux surgery was analyzed. The related independent risk factors were identified by multivariate analysis.Results:The incidence of non-relief of reflux symptom was approximately 21.8% (42 cases), of which the risk factors were identified as preoperative depression and long-term PPI administration. The incidence of persistent dysphagia was 7.3% (14 cases), of which the risk factors were identified as preoperative depression and weak peristalsis of esophageal body. The incidence of postoperative dissatisfaction was 26.0% (50 cases), of which the risk factors were identified as long-term PPI administration and moderate-severe depression. The GERD patients with hiatal hernia and low pressure of lower esophageal sphincter were more likely benefit from anti-reflux surgery and had a higher postoperative satisfaction rate.Conclusion:Hiatal hernia and low pressure of lower esophageal sphincter are the favorable factors predicting good result of anti-reflux surgery. Long-term PPI administration and preoperative depression is an indication for poor result of anti-reflux surgery.

10.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-934088

RÉSUMÉ

Clinical data of 26 patients with proton pump inhibitor dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who underwent anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from July 2017 to December 2020 were reviewed, and the GERD questionnaire (GERD-Q) score, the short-form reflux-qual (RQS) score, esophageal motility and 24 h esophageal pH parameters before and after ARMS were compared. With a median follow-up period of 18.4 months (6-27 months), 23 (88.5%) patients reported symptomatic improvement and 15 (57.7%) patients discontinued the use of proton pump inhibitors. After ARMS, the mean scores of GERD-Q (6.23 VS 13.19, P=0.004) and RQS (26.67 VS 10.98, P<0.001) were significantly improved, the mean DeMeester score (10.69 VS 53.15, P<0.001), the mean acid exposure time percentage (3.56% VS 9.92%, P<0.001) and the mean number of acid reflux episodes (36.9 VS 139.9, P=0.001) were lower, and the mean rest pressure at lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (25.19 mmHg VS 13.63 mmHg, P<0.001) and the mean distal contractile integral (1 819.15 mmHg·s·cm VS 1 007.67 mmHg·s·cm, P<0.001) were significantly increased compared with those before surgery. ARMS has significant short-term efficacy in the treatment of proton pump inhibitor dependent GERD, which can effectively improve reflux symptoms and life quality of patients, and strengthen the rest pressure of LES and peristalsis of the esophageal body.

11.
Clinics ; Clinics;77: 100058, 2022. tab, graf
Article de Anglais | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1394292

RÉSUMÉ

Abstract Background and aims: Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers (P-CABs) have been used in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapies in recent years. However, the efficacy and safety of P-CABs compared to ProtonPump Inhibitors (PPIs) in this setting remain controversial. Methods: The efficacy and safety of P-CABs and PPIs for H. pylori eradication were compared in a meta-analysis based on a systematic literature search of major electronic databases for relevant Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Results: Seven studies and 1,168 patients were included. The pooled eradication rate determined by Intention-ToTreat (ITT) analysis was 90.2% for P-CAB-based and 75.5% for PPI-based triple therapy (pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.17 [1.08-1.28], p < 0.001). The Per-Protocol (PP) analysis also demonstrated significant superiority of P-CABs (pooled eradication rate = 92.4% vs. 77.8%; pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.14 [1.03-1.26], p < 0.01). In a subgroup evaluation, P-CABs were significantly better than PPIs as a first-line eradication therapy, in both the ITT analysis (pooled eradication rate = 91.8% vs. 76.4%; pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.18 [1.10-1.28], p < 0.0001) and the PP analysis (pooled eradication rate = 93.0% vs. 78.6%; pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.13 [1.02 -1.26], p < 0.05). However, P-CABs were not superior to PPIs when administered as salvage therapy, as determined in the ITT (75.0% vs. 66.0%, pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.11 [0.69-1.78], p = 0.66) and PP (85.7% vs. 70.0%, pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.20 [0.82-1.75], p = 0.34) analyses. In a subgroup analysis limited to Japanese patients, both the ITT analysis (pooled eradication rate = 89.6% vs. 73.9%; RR [95% CI] = 1.21 [1.14 -1.29], p < 0.01) and the PP analysis (pooled eradication rate = 92.0% vs. 75.7%; RR [95% CI] = 1.18 [1.06 -1.32], p < 0.01) showed that P-CABs were significantly superior compared to PPIs as triple eradication therapy. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients from other countries, there was no significant difference in either the ITT analysis (pooled eradication rate = 93.8% vs. 85.2%; RR [95% CI] = 1.10 [0.99-1.22], p = 0.07) or PP analysis (pooled eradication rate = 95.0% vs. 90.8%; RR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.98-1.14], p = 0.17). The incidence of adverse events associated with the two regimens did not significantly differ (P-CABs vs. PPIs: 33.6% vs. 40.0%; RR [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.71‒1.00], p = 0.05). The incidence of serious adverse events and dropout rate due to adverse events also did not differ (p = 0.44 and p = 0.67, respectively). Conclusions: The efficacy of P-CAB-based triple therapy is superior to that of PPI-based triple therapy as a first-line approach to H. pylori eradication, particularly in Japanese patients. As salvage therapy, the efficacy of the two treatments did not significantly differ. The tolerability of P-CAB-based and PPI-based triple therapy was comparable, as was the incidence of adverse events. HIGHLIGHTS The efficacy of P-CAB-based triple therapy is superior to that of PPI-based triple therapy as a first-line approach to H. pylori eradication, particularly in Japanese patients. P-CABs were not superior to PPIs as a salvage triple eradication therapy. The safety and tolerability of P-CAB are comparable to PPI in H. pylori triple eradication therapies. Further large RCTs conducted in multiple regions and countries are necessary.

12.
Arch. argent. pediatr ; 119(6): S222-S235, dic. 2021. tab, ilus
Article de Espagnol | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1353097

RÉSUMÉ

El reflujo gastroesofágico es una situación frecuente en el primer año de vida. En ausencia de signos y síntomas de alarma, se lo considera fisiológico. No requiere estudios y puede ser abordado por el pediatra con medidas no farmacológicas. La enfermedad por reflujo (definidaporsíntomasmolestosocomplicaciones) debe ser manejada por el gastroenterólogo. Los exámenes complementarios tienen indicaciones precisas y el tratamiento incluye medidas no farmacológicas, farmacológicas y quirúrgicas (si fuera necesario). Nuestro objetivo es describir los diferentes métodos diagnósticos, sus indicaciones y limitaciones, así como los recursos terapéuticos disponibles, incluidas las indicaciones y los efectos adversos


Gastro esophageal reflux is a frequent condition in infants. In the absence of warning symptoms and signs, it is considered physiologic. No exam is required and a non-pharmacologic approach can be instituted by pediatricians. Gastro esophageal reflux disease is characterized by troublesome symptoms or complications and should be managed by a pediatric gastroenterologist. Diagnostic tests have accurate indications and treatment includes pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic measures as well as surgery. Our objective is to describe the different diagnostic methods, their indications and limitations as well as the therapeutic resources available, including indications and adverse effects.


Sujet(s)
Humains , Nourrisson , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Enfant , Adolescent , Reflux gastro-oesophagien/diagnostic , Reflux gastro-oesophagien/thérapie
13.
Acta méd. colomb ; 46(4): 8-13, Oct.-Dec. 2021. tab, graf
Article de Anglais | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1374083

RÉSUMÉ

Abstract Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) affects 50% of the human population. The efficacy of the usual treatments has decreased due to increased antibiotic resistance, except for that of amoxicillin, tetracycline, furazolidone and bismuth. Recently, there has been a new interest in dual therapy with high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and amoxicillin as initial and rescue treatment. There are no studies on this topic in our setting. Objective: to determine the efficacy of dual therapy with high-dose IPP and amoxicillin for eradicating H. pylori. Materials and methods: this was a quasi-experimental study carried out from December 2019 to July 2020 in people over the age of 18 with histologically confirmed H. pylori. All received 40 mg of esomeprazole half an hour before breakfast, lunch and dinner, plus 1 gram of oral amoxicillin every eight hours for 14 days. Eradication was determined by fecal antigens (OnSiteTM H. pylori Biotech Inc.) after four weeks of treatment. Results: 108 patients with an average age of 67 years were included, 70% of whom were women. Eradication per protocol (PP) and intention to treat (ITT) was 86% (95%CI 79.4-92.5%) for both. In previously treated patients (26%) the efficacy was 85.7% (95%CI 71.8-99.5%). Adverse events were mild in 31%, especially nausea (16%) and abdominal distension (14%). Treatment was not suspended in any patient. Conclusion: Dual therapy is effective, easy to administer, and has few adverse effects. It would be a good option in our setting as initial or rescue therapy. Larger studies are needed to confirm our results. (Acta Med Colomb 2021; 46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2021.2091).

14.
Arq. gastroenterol ; Arq. gastroenterol;58(3): 364-369, July-Sept. 2021. tab, graf
Article de Anglais | LILACS | ID: biblio-1345292

RÉSUMÉ

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Dyspeptic symptoms are among the eight symptoms that most lead to the use of self-medication globally. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of use and profile of the population doing self-medication to control dyspeptic symptoms in a capital from South Brazil. METHODS: Application of a survey consisting of topics regarding individual's socio-cultural data, self-reported comorbidities, use of self-medication in the 15 days prior to the interview and information on the use of this medication. Statistical analysis was performed on the data collected to determine the prevalence of self-medication for dyspeptic symptoms (SMDS) and to establish correlations with independent factors, such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), education, family income and self-reported comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 719 individuals from the public health system were interviewed. Overall, 67.7% were female, 65.3% had a BMI greater than 25; 28.4% presented with self-reported hypertension, 21.4% with depression and 13.8% with diabetes. The prevalence of self-medication to control digestive symptoms in this population was 28.7% (95%CI: 25.3-32), 91.8% (n=189) due to complaints of dyspeptic origin. Proton pump inhibitors were the most used class of medication (67%), followed by antacids (15%). There was a relationship between SMDS and age >38 years (OR=1.734, 95%CI: 1.177-2.580, P=0.001), BMI >26 (OR=1.660, 95%CI: 1.166-2.362, P<0.001) and self-reported depression (OR=1.471, 95%CI: 0.983-2.201, P=0.04). CONCLUSION: There was a higher prevalence of the use of self-medication to control dyspeptic symptoms in relation to previous data from the literature. Age >38 years, BMI >26 and self-reported depression were associated with SMDS.


RESUMO CONTEXTO: Os sintomas dispépticos estão entre os oito sintomas que mais levam uso de automedicação. OBJETIVO: O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a prevalência e o perfil da população que utiliza automedicação para controle dos sintomas dispépticos em uma capital do Sul do Brasil. MÉTODOS: Aplicação de inquérito composto por tópicos relativos aos dados socioculturais do indivíduo, comorbidades autorreferidas, uso de automedicação nos 15 dias anteriores à entrevista e informações sobre o uso deste medicamento. Foi realizada a análise estatística dos dados coletados para determinar a prevalência de automedicação para controle dos sintomas dispépticos e estabelecer correlações com fatores independentes, como sexo, idade, índice de massa corporal (IMC), escolaridade, renda familiar e comorbidades autorrelatadas. RESULTADOS: Foram entrevistados 719 indivíduos atendidos pela atenção primária. Destes, 67,7% de indivíduos do sexo feminino, 65,3% apresentavam IMC maior que 25 kg/m², 28,4% autorrelataram apresentar hipertensão arterial sistêmica, 21,4% depressão e 13,8% diabetes. A prevalência de uso de automedicação para controle de sintomas digestivos nesta população foi de 28,7% (n=206, IC95% 25,3-32), 91,8% (n=189) por queixas de origem dispéptica. A classe de medicação mais utilizada foi a dos inibidores de bomba de prótons (67%), seguidos dos antiácidos (15%). Houve relação entre o uso deste tipo de automedicação e idade maior de 38 anos (OR=1,734, IC95% 1,177-2,580, P=0,001), IMC acima de 26 kg/m² (OR=1,660, IC95% 1,166-2,362, P<0,001) e presença de autorrelato de depressão (OR= 1,471, IC95% 0,983-2,201, P=0,04). CONCLUSÃO: O presente estudo revelou uma alta prevalência do uso de automedicação para controle dos sintomas dispépticos em comparação com dados da literatura, sendo os inibidores de bomba de prótons a classe de droga mais utilizada. Idade maior que 38 anos, índice de massa corporal maior 26 kg/m² e autorrelato de depressão foram associados ao uso de automedicação para sintomas dispépticos.


Sujet(s)
Humains , Femelle , Adulte , Soins de santé primaires , Brésil/épidémiologie , Prévalence , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Autorapport
15.
Rev. colomb. gastroenterol ; 36(1): 73-80, ene.-mar. 2021. graf
Article de Espagnol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1251524

RÉSUMÉ

Resumen La enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) se define como el tránsito anormal del contenido gástrico hacia el esófago, que se da por una alteración de la barrera antirreflujo, causando síntomas o complicaciones. Para su correcto diagnóstico y abordaje terapéutico, se requiere de la integración de hallazgos clínicos, endoscópicos y monitorización del pH esofágico en 24 horas con o sin impedanciometría, la cual debe ser realizada con especificaciones técnicas, y su interpretación debe basarse en la mejor evidencia clínica disponible, con el objetivo de tener diagnósticos precisos que permitan tomar las mejores decisiones con los pacientes. Recientemente, en el Consenso de Lyon se han incorporado nuevas directrices para el diagnóstico de ERGE por monitorización de pH esofágico, las cuales se revisan en este artículo.


Abstract Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as the abnormal transit of gastric contents into the esophagus. It is caused by an alteration of the anti-reflux barrier, causing multiple symptoms or complications. In order to achieve accurate diagnosis and proper therapeutic approach, integration of clinical findings, endoscopic findings and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, with or without impedancometry, is required. These tests must be performed following technical specifications and their interpretation must be based on the best clinical evidence available to obtain accurate diagnoses that allow making the best decisions to the benefit of patients. Recently, the Lyon Consensus incorporated new guidelines for the diagnosis of GERD by esophageal pH monitoring, which are reviewed in this paper.


Sujet(s)
Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Thérapeutique , Reflux gastro-oesophagien , Impédance électrique , pHmétrie oesophagienne , Maladie
16.
Chinese Journal of Digestion ; (12): 599-605, 2021.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-912215

RÉSUMÉ

Objective:To explore the effects and underlying mechanisms of azintamide on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal hormone secretion in proton pump inhibitor related low gastric acid environment.Methods:A total of 60 rats were selected and randomly divided into low gastric acid control group, low gastric acid model group, low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group, high gastric acid control group, high gastric acid model group and high gastric acid and azintamide intervention group by random number table, with 10 rats in each group. The rats of low gastric acid control group and high gastric acid control group were all treated with 0.9% sodium chloride solution. The rats of low gastric acid model group and high gastric acid model group were established by intraperitoneal injection of 20 mg/kg omeprazole once per day for seven days, and subcutaneous injection of 2 mg/kg penta gastrin once per day for three days, respectively. The rats of low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group and high gastric acid and azintamide intervention group were gavaged with azintamide 50 mg/kg once per day for three days on the basis of low gastric acid model group and high gastric acid model group, respectively. Only the rats in three low gastric acid groups were analyzed. At Day 0, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th after modeling, the body weight of rats were compared. After modeling, the weight of gastric contents and pH of gastric fluid was measured and compared, and the peripheral blood levels of pepsinogen A (PGA), gastrin and cholecystokinin (CCK) were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey′s honestly significant difference post-hoc test were used for statistical analysis.Results:The pH value of gastric fluid in low gastric acid model group and low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group were both higher than that in the low gastric acid control group (2.17±0.53, 2.03±0.69 vs. 1.32±0.17), and the differences were statistically significant ( P=0.026 and 0.041, respectively). While there was no significant difference in pH value between the low gastric acid model group and low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group ( P>0.05). On the Day 0, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th after modeling, the body weight of rats of low gastric acid control group, low gastric acid model group and low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group was (285.40±10.86), (283.40±6.38), (282.00±5.04) g; (287.10±10.73), (283.20±5.83), (284.00±5.72) g; (292.20±11.18), (281.90±6.23), (289.00±5.82) g; (296.40±11.12), (277.70±6.96), (292.00±6.82) g; (300.80±11.29), (274.30±8.84), (297.00±4.17) g, respectively. On the Day 6th and 8th after modeling, the body weight of rats of low gastric acid model group was lower than that of the low gastric acid control group; and the body weight of rats of low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group was higher than that of low gastric acid model group, and the differences were statistically significant (both P<0.01). On the Day 0, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th, there was no statistically significant difference in body weight of rats between low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group and low gastric acid control group ( P>0.05). On the Day 0, 2nd, 4th, there were no statistically significant differences in body weight of rats between low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group and low gastric acid model group, and between low gastric acid model group and low gastric acid control group (both P>0.05). The weight of gastric contents of low gastric acid model group was heavier than that of low gastric acid control group ((2.36±0.11) g vs. (1.85±0.20) g), the weight of gastric contents of low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group was lighter than that of low gastric acid model group ((1.87±0.42) g vs. (2.36±0.11) g), and the differences were statistically significant ( P=0.019 and 0.016, respectively), and there was no statistically significant difference in weight of gastric contents between the low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group and the low gastric acid control group ( P>0.05). The peripheral blood level of PGA of rats of low gastric acid model group was lower than that of low gastric acid control group ((551.80±190.00) ng/L vs. (857.00±164.80) ng/L), while the peripheral blood level of PGA of the low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group was higher than that of the low gastric acid model group ((799.90±97.80) ng/L vs. (551.80±190.00) ng/L), and the differences were statistically significant ( P=0.011 and 0.037, respectively). There was no significant difference in peripheral blood level of PGA between the low gastric acid control group and the low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group ( P>0.05). The peripheral blood level of gastrin of the low gastric acid model group was higher than that of the low gastric acid control group ((49.31±11.93) ng/L vs. (35.59±5.29) ng/L), and the CCK level of the low gastric acid model group was lower than that of low gastric acid control group ((10.26±5.32) ng/L vs. (25.55±11.62) ng/L), and the differences were statistically significant ( P=0.037 and 0.035, respectively). The peripheral blood level of gastrin of the low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group was lower than that of low gastric acid model group ((35.65±6.49) ng/L vs. (49.31±11.93) ng/L), the level of CCK of the low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group was higher than that of low gastric acid model group ((27.59±11.22) ng/L vs. (10.26±5.32) ng/L), and the differences were statistically significant ( P=0.048 and 0.021, respectively). There were no significant differences in CCK and gastrin between low gastric acid and azintamide intervention group and low gastric acid control group (both P>0.05). Conclusion:Azintamide regulates the levels of gastrointestinal hormones CCK and gastrin under the condition of low gastric acid and affects the expression of pepsinogen A, thereby promoting gastric emptying in a low gastric acid environment.

17.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-194610

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is a common condition worldwide frequently leads to hospital admission also has a significant associated morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. A systematic diagnostic and definite therapeutic approach is essential to establish a diagnosis, relevant to specific investigations for appropriate treatment in tertiary medical care center.Methods: A comparative trial was done on n=109 cases with an objective to find out the different causes of UGI bleed in population, to assess the requirement of blood transfusion in patients with massive GI Bleed and to compare the treatment outcome of Proton pump inhibitors over Tranexamic acid and Octreotide in non-variceal UGI bleed. The cases were assigned to three different groups by lottery system. Proton pump inhibitors (Omeprazole), Somatostatin (Octreotide), Anti-fibrinolytic (Tranexamic acid), outcome was assessed after complete treatment and follow up.Results: Out of 150 cases, 109 were diagnosed with non-variceal GI bleed, 35 cases were treated with Omeprazole out of which 11.42% cases received blood transfusion, and 4 had history of re bleeding, Mean Duration of stay in hospital was 4.4±1.75, when compared to the other two group the duration of hospitalization was least as the P value was <0.0001.Conclusions: In this study it was demonstrated the use of PPI in case of Non-Variceal Bleeding significantly reduces the need of blood transfusion. Even it reduces the cases of re bleeding and duration of hospital stay.

18.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-212030

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Proton pump inhibitors are one of the most commonly used drugs worldwide. Often they are used for inappropriate indications too, imposing economic burden to patients and governments. Many studies have showed equipotent efficacy of oral and intravenous proton pump inhibitor therapy. Despite that, most of the hospitalized patients receive intravenous proton pump inhibitor without appropriate indications. This study aimed to assess use of proton pump inhibitors in government hospital.Methods: It was an observational cross-sectional study done in the general medicine department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Eastern India, including 800 noncritical patients. Objective was to assess the use of proton pump inhibitors (indications, route of administration, dosing frequency).Results: 100% patient received intravenous proton pump inhibitor irrespective of diagnosis. 80% of them received it twice daily and 18% received it once daily. Majority of the patients received intravenous proton pump inhibitor despite taking other drugs by oral route.Conclusions: Most of the PPI administration was done without appropriate indication. All patients received Intravenous proton pump inhibitors, which may impose economic burden on a government hospital. Majority of the patients received proton pump inhibitors twice daily. These approaches are not cost effective and need to be rectified.

19.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-799003

RÉSUMÉ

Objective@#The consistency of 24-hour oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring and proton pump inhibitor(PPI) test in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) was investigated.@*Methods@#Sixty patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) related symptoms who had never received PPI treatment were assessed by reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) between October 2017 and October 2018, including 28 males and 38 females, aged from 16 to 72 years, with a medium age of 38 years. Prior to treatment, all patients were evaluated with 24 hours oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring(Restech). After empiric therapy with PPI twice-daily for 8 weeks, the efficacy was evaluated according to posttreatment RSI score.The data was analysed with Kruskal-Wallis test, Student Newman Keuls test and consistency check.@*Results@#(1)Among all 60 patients,13 patients (21.7%) had pathologic Ryan score and all resulted responsive to PPI;27 patients (45.0%) with a negative Ryan score were unresponsive to PPI; 20 patients (33.3%) despite a negative Ryan score resulted responsive to PPI therapy. Considering responsiveness to PPI therapy as the gold standard for the diagnosis of LPRD, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Ryan score were 39.4%, 100%, 100% and 57.4% respectively. The Kappa value was 0.369 (P<0.01). (2)Among 34 patients (56.7%) with positive Dx-pH results (24-hour oropharyngeal acid reflux events≥ 3 times), 29 patients were positive and 5 patients were negative in PPI test. Among 26 patients with negative Dx-pH results (24-hour oropharyngeal acid reflux events<3 times), 4 patients were positive and 22 patients were negative in PPI test. Considering responsiveness to PPI therapy as the gold standard for the diagnosis of LPRD, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 24-hour oropharyngeal acid reflux events were 87.9%, 81.5%, 85.3% and 84.6% respectively. The Kappa value was 0.696(P<0.01).@*Conclusions@#There is a positive correlation between 24-hour oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring positive results (24-hour oropharyngeal acid reflux events≥3 times) and PPI test in the diagnosis of LPRD. The 24-hour oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring can be a promising tool for the diagnosis of suspected LPRD patients, and more sensitive and accurate Dx-pH diagnostic index will be required in the clinic.

20.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-843879

RÉSUMÉ

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnesium aluminum suspension spraying in treating gastric ulcer after endoscopic submocosal dissection (ESD). Methods We made a prospective analysis of patients with gastric ESD surgery performed between January 2016 and June 2019. They were divided into control group, spraying group, and spraying + oral group on the basis of treatment method. All patients were followed up for 8 weeks to evaluate endoscopic ulcer healing and recovery rate. At the same time, postoperative symptoms and complications such as bleeding were also recorded. SPSS 24.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 330 eligible cases were randomly divided into control group (124 cases), spraying group (108 cases), and spraying + oral group (98 cases). The results showed that the postoperative pain incidence in spraying group and spraying + oral group was significantly better than that in the control group (35.48% vs. 17.59%, P<0.01; 35.48% vs. 20.41%, P=0.01). The 4-week ulcer recovery rate was better in spraying + oral group than in the control group. It should be noted that ulcer healing rate achieved 100% for the antrum of patients in spraying + oral group. At the same time, the incidence of postoperative bleeding decreased, and no significant adverse drug reactions were observed during the follow-up. Conclusion Almagate suspension spraying is safe and effective in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal ESD postoperative ulcer. In addition, it can also relieve postoperative pain.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE