Arthroscopic debridement combined with platelet-rich plasma injection for the treatment of Kellgren-Lawrence gradeⅠ-Ⅲ knee osteoarthritis / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To explore clinical effect of arthroscopic debridement combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection for Kellgren-Lawrence(K-L) gradeⅠ-Ⅲ knee osteoarthritis (KOA) .@*METHODS@#Totally 117 patients with KOA who underwent arthroscopic debridement combined with injection from November 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different injection drugs, the patients were divided into sodium hyaluronate group(group A) and PRP group(group B). In group A, there were 60 patients, including 27 males and 33 females, aged from 49 to 67 years old with an average age of (54.1±4.8) years old;12 patients with gradeⅠ, 23 patients with gradeⅡand 25 patients with grade Ⅲ according to K-L clssification, 2 ml(20 g) sodium hyaluronate was injected into knee joint after intraoperative, 1, 2, 3 weeks after operation for 4 times. In group B, there were 57 patients, including 25 males and 32 females, aged from 47 to 70 years old with an average of (55.8±5.0) years old, 10 patients with gradeⅠ, 20 patients with gradeⅡand 27 patients with grade Ⅲ according to K-L classification, injected 5 ml PRP at the same time. Postoperative complications was recorded between two groups. Postoperative visual analogue scale(VAS) and Lysholm score at 3, 6, 12 months were used to evaluate improvement of knee pain and joint function.@*RESULTS@#All patients were followed up for 12 to 19 months with an average of (14.1±1.6) months. There was no significant difference in postopertaive complications between group A and group B (P>0.05). Postoperative VAS score in group A at 3, 6, 12 months were 3.0±0.8, 2.0±0.8, 2.6±0.9 respectively, and 2.9±0.8, 1.9±0.7, 2.2±0.8 in group B respectively; and no differnece at 3 and 6 months after operation between two groups (P<0.05), while VAS score in group B was higher than group A at 12 months after operation(P<0.05). Postoperative Lysholm score in group A at 1, 6, 12 months (86.6±1.8, 93.1±2.0, 86.7±1.7) were lower than group B(88.9±1.9, 95.0±2.0, 89.0±1.9)(P<0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Arthroscopic debridement combined with sodium hyaluronate or PRP injection for K-L gradeⅠ-Ⅲ KOA could effectively relieve pain and improve joint function with higher safety in short term, but the medium-long-term effect of PRP injection is stable.

Comparative study of the effect and safety of arthroscopic debridement and intercondylar fossa angioplasty in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly / 重庆医学

Objective To compare the effect and safety of arthroscopic debridement enmbined with intercondylar fossa angioplasty in the elder with knee osteoarthritis.Methods Six-eight elderly with knee osteoarthritis were selected from June 2012 to December 2014 in this hospital and they were averagely and randomly divided into group A and B.Patients in group A were given arthroscopic debridement,while in group B were given and arthroscopic debridement,intercondylar fossa angioplasty.The levels of VAS scores,Lysholm scores,WOMAC scores and joint range of motion were measured and compared between the two groups after 3 months,6 months and 12 months of operation.The adverse events of the two groups were supervised and compared as well.Results All elder in the two groups had apparently decreasing in VAS scores and WOMAC scores (P＜0.05) after operation.Compared with group A,patients in group B had lower levels of VAS scores and WOMAC scores(P＜0.05) at 12 months after operation.The level of Lysholm score was significantly increased in the two groups after treatment(P＜0.05),while group B had a higher level at 12 months after treatment than group A (P＜0.05).The joint range of motion in the two groups were improved after treatment(P＜0.05).The elder patients in group B had better joint range of motion than group A at 6 and 12 months after operation (P＜0.05).Early postoperative swelling in the joints was the adverse event after operation,but there was no statistically difference between two groups.Conclusion The combination of arthroscopic debridement and intercondylar fossa angioplasty is effective to release knee pain,increase the clinical efficacy and improve the knee function.

Clinical effect of arthroscopic debridement combined with patellofemoral peripheral denervated operation in treating patellofemoral arthritis / 重庆医学

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of arthroscopic debridement combined with patellofemoral peripheral denervated operation in treating patellofemoral arthritis.Methods One hundred cases of patellofemoral arthritis anterior knee pain in this hospital from January 2014 to September 2015 were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and control group,50 cases in each group.The control group was given the arthroscopic debridement treatment,while the observation group was given the arthroscopic debridement combined with patellofemoral peripheral denervated operation.The visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after treatment,and Lysholm and Kujala scores after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the VAS score before treatment between the two groups (P＞0.05).After treatment,the VAS score in the two groups were significantly decreased,moreover the VAS score in the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P＜0.05).After treatment,the Lysholm scores in the observation group and the control group were (80.93±4.21) points and (74.29±4.48) points,the knee Lysholm scores of claudication,joint noose,bearing weight,pain,instability,up and down stairs,jump,run,joint swollen and pain,squats were significantly better than those in the control group (P＜0.05);aftertreatment,the Kujala total score in the observation group and the control group were (76.48±6.54) points and (68.34-±-6.22) points respectively,the Kujala scores of claudication,walking distance,bearing weight,squat,up and down stairs,jumping,running,knee pain,long time kneebend,abnormal patellofemoral activity,anterior knee swelling,knee bending limitation,thigh muscle atrophy in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group(P＜0.05).Conclusion Arthroscopic debridement combined with patellofemoral peripheral denervation surgery in the treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis can obviously relieve pain and improves the knee function and patellofemoral joint function.

Regression analysis of factors affecting efficacy of arthroscopic treatment for knee osteoarthritis / 局解手术学杂志

Objective To investigate the factors that affecting the efficacy of arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of knee osteoar-thritis. Methods The clinical data of patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with arthroscopic debridement in our hospital from January 2009 to December 2013 was retrospectively analyzed,and the treatment effect was evaluated by Lysholm score. The factors that may affect the efficacy were selected to make a single factor analysis,and then made a multiple logistic regression analysis with the factors which were of sta-tistical significance through single factor analysis. Results Single factor analysis showed that age,course of disease,body mass index,psycho-logical factor,preoperative VAS score,preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grade,preoperative Lysholm score and postoperative rehabilitation exer-cise were the factors that affected the efficacy of knee arthroscopy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Further multivariate analysis showed that high body mass index,high preoperative VAS pain score,low Ly-sholm score,high psychological expectations and high preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grading were expected to be the independent risk fac-tors of knee arthroscopy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Strict compliance with the postoperative rehabilitation exercise was the protect factor. Conclusion High body mass index,high preoperative VAS pain score,low preoperative Lysholm score,high preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence grading,and high psychological expectations were expected to reduce the effect of surgery,while strict compliance with the postoper-ative rehabilitation exercise can improve the curative effect.

Efficacy of Arthroscopic Debridement Combined with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis / 沈阳医学院学报

Objective:To analyze the curative effect of arthroscopic debridement combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Methods:All cases were divided into 2 groups:the control group were treated with arthroscopic debridement,the treatment group were treated with arthroscopic debridement combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy. The Lysholm score and VAS score was used to determine the changes in patients. Results:After 1 months and 3 months, Lysholm score in the two groups of patients was higher than that before operation (P<0.05) . Lysholm score in the treatment group were higher than that in the control group, VAS score was lower than that in control group (P<0.05) . After 6 months, Lysholm score and VAS score showed no significant difference in 2 groups (P>0.05) . Conclusion:Arthroscopic debridement combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy in early stage can achieve the functional recovery and pain-relief effect, can better improve the patient's joint function and quality of life.

Detection of uPA,MMP-3,MMP-9,MMP-13,and MMP-14 expression levels in synovial fluid of OA patients before and after arthroscopic debridement and its significance / 吉林大学学报(医学版)

Objective To detect the expression levels of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3),MMP-9,MMP-13 and MMP-14 in the patients with osteoarthritis(OA)before and after arthroscopic debridement,and to explore the influence of arthroscopic debridement in the expressions of uPA, MMP-3,MMP-9,MMP-13, and MMP-14.Methods 420 cases of synovial fluid from knee OA patients undergoing arthroscopic debridement were obtained before operation. After six months follow-up, 350 cases of synovial fluid samples were obtained and according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 228 synovial fluid were selected to analyze.The expression levels of uPA,MMP-3,MMP-9,MMP-13,and MMP-14 were measured by ELISA assay.Pain intensity of these patients before operation and six months after operation were recorded using the Visual Analogue Scale/Score(VAS).The differences of the expression levels of uPA,MMP-3,MMP-9, MMP-13,and MMP-14 between before operation and after operation were compared.The relationship between the expression levels of uPA, and MMP-3, MMP-9, MMP-13, MMP-14 and VAS was analyzed with Spearman analysis.Results All the patients were followed up for 36.5 months. Compared with before operation, the expression levels of uPA and MMP-3 in the synovial fluid of the patients after arthroscopic debridement were significantly decreased(P<0.01),the expression levels of MMP-9 and MMP-13 were also decreased (P<0.05), but the MMP-14 expression level showed no significant change.The expression levels of uPA,MMP-3,MMP-9, MMP-13,MMP-14 were positively associated with VAS before arthroscopic debridement (r=0.361,r=0.417, r=0.136,r=0.514,r=0.156,P<0.05 );uPA and MMP-3 were positively correlated with VAS after arthroscopic debridement(r=0.981,r=0.831,P<0.01),as well as the expression level of MMP-13 and VAS, but there were no significant differences between the expression levels of MMP-9, MMP-14 and VAS. Conclusion The decreased levels of uPA,MMP-3 and MMP-13 in synovial fluid may contribute to the pain-relief effects of arthroscopic debridement.

Therapeutic Effect of Arthroscopic Debridement Plus Oral Use of Chinese Medicine for Knee Osteoarthritis in Early and Middle Stage / 广州中医药大学学报

Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of arthroscopic debridement combined with oral use of Chinese medicine Guanjietong Tablets ( GT) for knee osteoarthritis in the early and middle stage. Methods Ninety knee osteoarthritis patients in the early and middle stage were evenly randomized into three groups, namely GT group, glucosamine sulfate group and blank control group. All of the three groups received arthroscopic debridement, and additionally, GT group and glucosamine sulfate group were given the corresponding medicine orally. We observed Lysholm knee scores of the three groups before operation, and 2 weeks, 3 months and one year after operation, and compared the knee joint space before operation and one year after operation showed by digital X-ray photograpy. Results ( 1) Lysholm knee scores in the three groups were increased 2 weeks, 3 months and one year after operation when compared with those before operation, the difference being significant (P 0.05) , but the difference between the two groups and the blank control group was significant (P0.05) , while was significant in the blank control group ( P<0.05). Conclusion Arthroscopic debridement alone has certain short-term curative effect in treating knee osteoarthritis in the early and middle stage, but the effect will decline with the extension of time. Arthroscopic debridement combined with Guanjietong Tablets could delay the narrowing of joint space and maintain the clinical curative effect, which will delay the time for artificial joint replacement.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Delayed Patella Infera / 대한정형외과학회잡지

Patella infera (baja) is a rare condition that can result from several etiologies including trauma around the knee. Risk factors include scar tissue formation in the retropatella fat pad, extensor mechanism dysfunction, immobilization in extension position of the knee joint, etc. Unawareness and delayed recognition are known to be associated with long-term disability. In this condition, arthroscopic treatment is generally recommended only for early cases. In this report, we present a case with reasonable outcome of delayed patella infera treated by arthroscopic treatment. Prudent arthroscopic debridement of the responsible scar tissue and accelerated rehabilitation therapy is necessary for achievement of a successful outcome.

Sodium hyaluronate injection immediately versus 2 weeks after arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:Sodium hyaluronate injection after arthroscopic debridement of knee osteoarthritis can reduce postoperative pain and improve joint function, but there is a controversy on the time for the hyaluronate injection after arthroscopic debridement of knee osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE:To observe the time of hyaluronate injection after arthroscopic debridement of knee osteoarthritis, and to compare recent rehabilitation effect of knee sodium hyaluronate injection for knee function after arthroscopic debridement of knee osteoarthritis between injection just after knee arthroscopy and injection 2 weeks after knee arthroscopy. METHODS:The clinical data of 100 knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing sodium hyaluronate injection immediately and 2 weeks after arthroscopic debridement were analyzed with prospective randomized control ed trial method, and the preoperative visual analog scale score, Lysholm score, 6 weeks postoperative visual analog scale score, 3 months postoperative visual analog scale score, and 3 months postoperative Lysholm score were recorded. The effects of recently rehabilitation of knee joint after surgery in two groups were compared. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:There was no significant difference in postoperative visual analog scale score between immediate injection group (6.52±2.38) and 2 weeks postoperative injection group (6.54±2.37). The preoperative Lysholm score in the immediate injection group (43.44±16.18) was lower than that in the 2 weeks postoperative injection group (51.12±16.3). The 6 weeks postoperative visual analog scale score in the immediate injection group (3.2±2.46) was significantly higher than that in the 2 weeks postoperative injection group (5.1±2.68). The 3 months postoperative visual analog scale score/Lysholm score in the immediate injection group (2.72±2.70)/(80.58±15.63) were significantly higher than those in the 2 weeks postoperative injection group (4.72±3.07)/(64.96±21.68). The results indicate that sodium hyaluronate injection immediately after arthroscopic debridement of knee osteoarthritis is more favorable for recent rehabilitation.

Arthroscopic Treatment for Osteoarthritic Knee

Arthroscopic treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee has been widely performed as one of the surgical options, in spite of persisting concerns regarding its efficacy. Arthroscopic debridement is a general term that is used to cover many procedures, including lavage, partial meniscectomy, removal of loose body, synovectomy, chondroplasty, removal of offending osteophytes, and/or microfracture. Recently, the role of arthroscopy in managing the osteoarthritic knee has been challenged by elusive consensus on its usefulness. Therefore, we review the available literatures for the arthroscopic intervention in knee osteoarthritis and summarized evidences for proper patient selection, which is a paramount factor to achieve the surgical goal of the arthroscopic treatment in osteoarthritic knee.

A Comparison of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy Alone Versus Combined Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Debridement and Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

BACKGROUND: This study compared the results of patients treated for ulnar impaction syndrome using an ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) alone with those treated with combined arthroscopic debridement and USO. METHODS: The results of 27 wrists were reviewed retrospectively. They were divided into three groups: group A (USO alone, 10 cases), group B (combined arthroscopic debridement and USO, 9 cases), and group C (arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex [TFCC] debridement alone, 8 cases). The wrist function was evaluated using the modified Mayo wrist score, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and Chun and Palmer grading system. RESULTS: The modified Mayo wrist score in groups A, B, and C was 74.5 +/- 8.9, 73.9 +/- 11.6, and 61.3 +/- 10.2, respectively (p 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both USO alone and combined arthroscopic TFCC debridement with USO improved the wrist function and reduced the level of pain in the patients treated for ulnar impaction syndrome. USO alone may be the preferred method of treatment in patients if the torn flap of TFCC is not unstable.

Results of Arthroscopic Debridement of the Elbow Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE: Primary osteoarthritis on the elbow is the result of the growth of osteophytes and contracture of the capsule. It often causes disability on joint motion and pain while exercising. As arthroscopy has developed, the arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment of the elbow have recently become more generalized as well. Therefore, we like to report on arthroscopy for treating elbow arthritis and its results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study includes 23 cases of elbow arthritis that were seen between 2005 June to 2007 June and these patients didn't response to conservative treatment. From this we excluded 18 cases that underwent arthroscopic surgery and among these 18 cases, 6 cases underwent ulnar nerve transfer. The average observation time was 21.3 months and the average age was 48.4 years (range: 22-66 years). The pre and post operative pain was evaluated with using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and functional evaluation was done with using the Mayo elbow Performance Score (MEPS) with the range of joint motion. RESULTS: The VAS score at the last follow up was significantly decreased from 3.4 to 1.9 compare to the preoperative score. The range of joint motion was improved by 25 (0-40) to 8.5 (0-20) in extension and 101.7 (80-140) to 125.2 (85-140) in flexion (p<0.05). The MEPS always showed significant improvement by showing an increase from 65.4 (40-85) to 87.9 (55-100). However, 3 cases showed a decreased range of motion after the operation. One case showed ulnar nerve symptoms after surgery. CONCLUSION: An arthroscopic procedure can treat the pathologic processes associated with arthritis of the elbow and it was safe and effective in this series.

Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for the Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement in the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty seven cases, who underwent the ulnar shortening osteotomy with or without arthroscopic debridement for treatment of the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance, were included. The mean age was 40.3 years (range, 21 to 63 years) and the mean follow-up period was 20.6 months (range, 12 to 60 months). The ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement were performed in 14 and 13 cases respectively. Pre- and postoperative functional results of the wrist were evaluated by the modified Mayo wrist score. RESULTS: The ulnar variance was corrected from 4.61 mm (range, 1.8~10 mm) to -0.06 mm (range, -3.3~3.1 mm) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone group and from 3.01 mm (range, 1.2~7.6 mm) to -0.74 mm (range, -1.8~0 mm) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. The final results of the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone were excellent in 4 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 5 cases. Those of the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group were excellent in 6 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 2 cases. The modified Mayo wrist score at the last follow-up were 83.57(range, 75~100) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone group and 83.35(range, 40~100) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debirdement group. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between two groups (p=0.43). CONCLUSION: The ulnar shortening osteotomy is valuable treatment for the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance. The combined arthroscopic debridment does not appear to have positive influence to the final results.

Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome using Arthroscopy and Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the follow-up results of patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, who were treated with arthroscopic debridement, thermal shrinkage and a simultaneous ulnar shortening osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven wrists from ten patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, which were diagnosed by the clinical history, physical examination, radiological evaluation and arthroscopic findings, and were treated by arthroscopic debridement, thermal shrinkage and ulnar shortening osteotomy were enrolled in this study. The minimum duration of the follow-up was one year. The ulnar variance was measured using Kreder's method, and the follow-up results were analyzed radiographically as well as clinically using the Chun and Palmer wrist score. RESULTS: According to the wrist scoring system, seven wrists were fair and four poor preoperatively. However, after surgery, eight wrists were excellent and three good. The average wrist score increased from 62 preoperatively to 93 at the last follow-up. The mean ulnar variance decreased from +3.3 mm (+0.4-+6.4 mm) preoperatively to +0.1 mm (-0.8-+1.3 mm) at the last follow-up. Radiological union of the osteotomy site was achieved after an average of 12 weeks. There were no cases of nonunion or malunion. CONCLUSION: When ulnar impaction syndrome is diagnosed by the clinical, radiological and arthroscopic findings, arthroscopic debridement, thermal shrinkage and simultaneous ulnar shortening osteotomy are useful treatments for relieving the patients symptoms.

Results of Treatment for Acute Deep Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of open or arthroscopic debridememt with a retention of the components for acute deep infected total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1991 to December 2005, among 1282 patients, 1457 TKAs, 8 cases of acute deep infected total knee arthroplasty was retrospectively reviewd. A radiologic and clinical assessment were performed to analyze the treatment results. The mean age was 63.9 (57-77) years. One patient was male, and 7 were female. RESULTS: The acute infection rate was 0.55% and the mean follow-up period was 41 months ( range, 30 months to 62 months). Using the Segawa classification, 3 cases were Type 2, and five cases were Type 3. Six cases were treated with arthroscopic debridement and antibiotic therapy. Two cases were treated with open debridement and antibiotic therapy. Intravenous antibiotic therapy was administered over a 3 week period. There were 2 cases of recurred infection. In synovial fluid culture, 4 cases were positive to S. aureus, 2 cases were positive to S. epidermidis and no bacteria was found in 2 cases. At the last follow-up, the mean Knee Society Score was 86.4 points. There were no chronic infection, loosening or osteolytic changes in the implants. CONCLUSION: If an early diagnosis is made, open or arthroscopic debridememt with a retention of the components is a useful method for acute deep infected total knee arthroplasty.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Acutely Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: This study is to evaluate the results of arthroscopic treatment for an acutely infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to determine the protocol for a successful arthroscopic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 16 cases of acutely infected TKA treated at this institution, 7 cases treated with arthroscopic debridement were retrospectively reviewed. The indication for arthroscopic debridement was patients with a radiographically stable prosthesis and within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms. The necessity and method of the secondary procedures were determined using a follow up of the C-reactve protein (CRP) test and physical examination after the primary arthroscopic debridment. Successful treatment was defined as no recurrence or no re-operation by the final follow-up. RESULTS: All 7 cases were treated with a retention of the prosthesis. 3 cases were treated successfully with primary arthroscopic debridement only. Three cases were treated with open debridement after primary arthroscopic debridement. One case was treated with repeated arthroscopic debridement after primary arthroscopic debridement. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic debridement is an effective treatment option for an acutely infected TKA within 72 hours of the onset of symptoms. A careful CRP follow up is suggested as the critical index to determine the secondary procedure for successful treatment of an acutely infected TKA by arthroscopic debridement.

Arthroscopic Debridement for the Osteoarthritic Ankle: Clinical Results and Prognostic Factors / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic debridement in osteoarthritic ankle and prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Feb. 2001 and Mar. 2004, twenty-seven patients who had an osteoarthritic ankle disease were managed by arthroscopic debridement. The mean age of the patients was 50.0 years (20-71) and the mean follow-up after operation was 16.2 months (12-36). There were 18 men (66.7%) and 9 women (33.3%). The preoperative radiographic findings were divided into 4 groups according to the classification system by Takakura et al. Preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale and subjective satisfaction were checked at the last follow-up visit, and the results were compared. RESULTS: In radiological evaluation, stage I was 6 cases (22.2%), stage II was 14 cases (51.9%), stage III was 4 cases (14.8%), and stage IV was 3 cases (11.1%). The mean preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale was 59.1+/-16.7 and improved to 66.5+/-24.3 at last follow-up. Especially, in stage I, preoperative AOFAS score was 69.3+/-18.7 and improved to 74.3+/-29.7, and in stage II, preoperative AOFAS socre was 63.0+/-9.6 and improved to 77.1+/-12.9. But in the stage III and IV, preoperative scores were not improved. The preoperative radiographic findings correlated with the outcome at the last follow-up time (p<0.05). The group with loose body and the group without anterior osteophyte showed better AOFAS score compared to the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two-groups. In subjective satisfaction, excellent or good results were achieved in 14 cases (51%). CONCLUSION: We suggest that arthroscopic debridement is an effective treatment in which preservation of alignment and reasonable articular cartilage can be achieved.

Arthroscopy of the Wrist and Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for the Treatment of the Ulnar Impaction Syndrome / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, who were diagnosed by wrist arthroscopy and treated by simultaneous ulnar shortening osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, in whom there was an arthroscopic diagnostic confirmation of the disease had an arthroscopic debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy. Conservative treatment over a period of more than six months had failed in each patient. The minimum duration of the follow up was one year. The ulnar variance was measured using Kreder's method, and the results were clinically analysed using Chun and Palmer's wrist score as well as radiographically. RESULTS: The Palmer's stages of TFCC injury were 2A (one), 2B (four), 2C (one) on arthroscpic finding. The results were excellent in 4 and good in 2 (preoperative: 3 were fair, and 3 were poor). The wrist score increased from 63 to 94. The ulnar variance changed from +3 mm to -1 mm. CONCLUSION: When an ulnar impaction syndrome is suspected on clinical grounds and by radiographic findings, the pathoanantomy should be assessed arthroscopically. If the arthroscopy reveals Palmer's stages 2A, 2B, 2C, arthroscopic debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy is a useful method for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome.

Arthroscopic Debridement in Osteoarthritis of the Knee

A retrospective review was performed in 33 knees of 30 patients who had undergone arthroscopic debridement for degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee. The mean age of the patients at operation was 55 years and the mean follow-up after operation was 15 months. We divided the knec:s into 2 groups; meniscectomy group (23 knees) and non-meniscectomy group (10 knees). The preoperative radiographic findings were divided into 3 groups according to the classification systern by Lotke et al. The postoperative results were evaluated using the nine-point scale by Baumgaertner et al. Our study was conducted to: 1) assess the overall efficacy of arthroscopic debridement, 2) compare the results between the. Meniscectomy group and nonmeniscectomy group, and 3) identify the relationship between the preoperative radiographic findings and out- come at the final follow-up time. Overall excellent or good results were ac.hieved in 22 knees (67%) and the preoperative radiographic findings correlated with the outcome at the final follow-up time. But the results in the meniscectomy and non-meniscectomy poups showed no significant differences statistically. We believe that arthroscopic debridement is an effective option of treatments for mild I:o moderate degenerative arthritis of the knee after failure of conservative measures.

Ganglion Cyst on the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Case Report

Ganglion cysts on the anterior cruciate ligament should he suspected in any patient having pain and clicking sensation during terminal knee extension. Previous investigators have reported incidental findings of ganglion cysts on the anterior cruciate ligament. We report a symptomatic case of a ganglion cyst on the anterior cruciate ligment that was treated successfully with arthroscopic debridement.