RÉSUMÉ
Background: Breast reconstruction can have a significant impact on the physical, emotional and psychological well-being of patients undergoing mastectomy. The type and timing of breast reconstruction influence the satisfaction index of reconstructed patients. Methods: A retrospective examination was carried out on patient records from 2016 to 2024 at general hospital of Mexico. The analysis encompassed 210 patients who underwent breast reconstruction during this frame time. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was administered in March 2024 and at various intervals during each patient磗 post-operative care. Patients were stratified according to multiple variables such as: oncological therapy, timing of reconstruction, type of reconstruction and educational attainment. Results: The average age of the participants was 50.3 years. In terms of reconstruction timing, 25.24% underwent immediate reconstruction, while 74.76% opted for delayed reconstruction. When it came to BMI, the average was 26.99 kg/m�. Regarding the type of flap used for reconstruction, the majority (82.86%) had a latissimus dorsi flap. The overall demonstrated a mean psychosocial well-being scale score of 76�6. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction goes beyond physical restoration; it can profoundly impact a patient's emotional recovery, self-image, and quality of life. By addressing not only the physical changes but also the emotional and psychological aspects of breast cancer treatment, reconstruction plays a vital role in helping patients move forward with confidence, resilience, and a sense of empowerment. Regardless of when we first contact the patient, it is always worthwhile to provide her with information and the option of reconstruction.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi muscle transfer is one of the most frequent procedures at our hospital. The objective is to evaluate if there is any functional impairment after the surgery with a potential impact of patient磗 daily life. Methods: Functional morbidity was analyzed applying the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire and shoulder range of motion with goniometer in 42 patients whose breast reconstruction was between 2016 and 2022 at our hospital. We collected data using Microsoft excel V16.47.1 and analyzed data with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software, v23.0. Results: There was statistically significant difference for disability/symptom DASH score in cases of bilateral reconstruction and for cases undergoing a procedure on the right side versus left side. Conclusions: In patients with bilateral breast reconstruction, we found a greater DASH score in dysfunction and symptoms which associates with poor quality of life, as well as when the flap is on the contralateral extremity of the hand dominance; in those cases, there are other reconstructive procedures that provide greater safety and less disability to the patient. For evaluating extension, we need more prospective and comparative studies with strict follow up of the patients and same series of rehabilitation.
RÉSUMÉ
Breast cancer is recognized worldwide as a major health problem among women due to its high incidence and high mortality and morbidity rates. Breast reconstruction is an approach of great value for those patients who underwent mastectomy, impacting their quality of life and psychological stress. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap was described as the preferred graft for breast reconstruction with an autologous flap by surgeons because it represented a decrease in complications for the time and obtained better results. DIEP flap reconstruction requires microsurgical skills as well as continuous monitoring of the patient to identify and resolve possible associated complications.
RÉSUMÉ
At present, breast cancer ranks first in the incidence of female malignant tumors, and the age of onset tends to be younger. With the development of comprehensive treatment, most patients can survive for a long time or even be cured clinically. How to improve the quality of life to achieve multiple physical, figure and psychological rehabilitation are the focus of clinical research. Traditional surgical methods have many shortcomings, such as large trauma, slow recovery, many complications, poor physical recovery, and great mental blow to patients, it has been unable to meet the overall medical demands. With the promotion of endoscopic technology in clinical application, endoscopic surgery is increasingly widely used in the surgical treatment of breast cancer, and the technical means are more mature. Its advantages such as concealed incision, small incision, low trauma, good cosmetic effect, and fewer complications can make up for the shortcomings of traditional surgical methods, meet the clinical needs of patients, and have huge advantages in the surgical treatment of breast cancer, it is worth for breast surgeons to learn and further promote. This article reviews the application status and prospect of endoscopic technology in surgical treatment of breast cancer.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To evaluate the patient-reported outcome(PRO)of patients with breast cancer who underwent autologous breast reconstruction and implant breast reconstruction.Methods Patients who underwent breast reconstruction in Shanghai Cancer Center,Fudan University from Jan 2020 to Jun 2021 were selected,including 111 patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction and 108 patients who underwent implant breast reconstruction.Chinese version Breast-Q2.0 scale,breast cancer specificity scale QLQ-BR23 and EORTC quality of life scale QLQ-C30 were used to investigate the PRO of the two groups 18 months after operation.Results The rate of stage Ⅲ breast cancer in the self-weight construction group was higher than that in the implant reconstruction group(64.9%vs.44.4%,P<0.001).The preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and postoperative radiotherapy in the autologous reconstruction group were higher than those in the implant reconstruction group(P<0.001).Postoperative chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in the autologous reconstruction group were lower than those in the implant reconstruction group(P<0.001).The study based on Breast-Q scale showed that the breast satisfaction of autologous reconstruction group was higher than that of implant reconstruction(59.28±17.20 vs.54.94±14.48,P<0.05).The study based on QLQ-BR23 showed that the self-weight construction group was higher than the implant reconstruction group in the field of arm symptoms(20.02±20.80 vs.12.65±16.18,P<0.05).The study based on QLQ-C30 scale showed that there was no significant difference in all functional areas and symptom areas of patients.There was no significant difference in the number and time of social regression between the two groups.Conclusion Breast reconstruction can improve the PRO of breast cancer patients,and oncology factors will affect the choice of breast reconstruction.Patients with autologous breast reconstruction are more satisfied with breast appearance,but upper limb symptoms such as swelling and pain are more obvious than implant reconstruction,which is related to the higher proportion of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with autologous reconstruction.There is no significant difference in quality of life and social regression between the two groups.
RÉSUMÉ
At present,the development of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)pathways in deep inferior epigastric perforator(DIEP)flap breast reconstruction is still in the initial stage worldwide,lacking established guidelines.In the multidisciplinary ERAS pathways,the department of anesthesiology is responsible for some core elements such as optimizing anestheticprotocols,perioperative fluid management and homeostasis regulation,prevention of hypothermia,improvement of perioperative analgesia,and postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.We summarized the anesthetic management in the ERAS pathways for patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center,along with the recent progress,aiming to establish and improve the perioperative strategy based on ERAS pathways in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
RÉSUMÉ
@#Objective To explore the surgical technique and preliminary safety and aesthetics results of immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (BR) with titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLoop Bra) after skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-areola-complex-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for breast cancer patients. Methods The clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent immediate prepectoral implant-based BR with TiLoop Bra after SSM or NSM in West China Hospital from January to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, early complication were collected. The preliminary aesthetics results were assessed with the Ueda score and Harris score. Results All the patients were female with a mean age of 39.0±6.8 years. One patient had bilateral breast malignant tumors, and the others had unilateral malignant tumors. Six patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. The mean diameter of the tumors was 24.4±11.9 mm under the color ultrasound before the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean operation time was 153.9±49.4 min. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 29.2±18.3 mL. There were 3 patients with tumor stage 0, 10 patients with stage Ⅰ, 6 patients with stage Ⅱ, 3 patients with stage Ⅲ and 1 patient was found no residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All the patients were successfully followed up with a median follow-up time of 4.8 (3.0-9.2) months. There were 2 (8.3%) patients with major complications, including 1 wound dehiscence and 1 hematoma, and 4 (16.7%) minor complications, including 2 wound dehiscence and 2 infection. The patients with excellent and good Ueda score and Harris score accounted for 82.6% and 87.0%, respectively. None of the patients had animation deformity, capsular contracture, nipple-areola or skin flaps necrosis, or implant loss. During the follow-up period, no local/regional recurrence or distant metastasis was found. Conclusion For selected reliable patients, immediate prepectoral implant-based BR with TiLoop Bra after SSM or NSM for breast cancer patients is safe and has good aesthetics results in the early postoperative period. It has broad application space in patients with suitable indications, and can be promoted as a routine operation.
RÉSUMÉ
Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative pain between SF flap and serratus anterior muscle (SM) in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study that included 53 women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction from January 2020 to March 2021. Twenty-nine patients (54.7%) had SF elevation, and 24 patients (45.3%) underwent SM elevation. We evaluated patient-reported early postoperative pain on the first day after surgery. Also, it was reported that all surgical complications in the first month and patient reported outcomes (PROs) were measured with the BRECON 23 questionnaire. Results: The serratus fascia group used implants with larger volumes, 407.6 ± 98.9 cc (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the fascial and muscular groups regarding the postoperative pain score reported by the patients (2 versus 3; p = 0.30). Also, there was no difference between the groups regarding early surgical complications and PROs after breast reconstruction. Conclusion: The use of SF seems to cause less morbidity, which makes the technique an alternative to be considered in breast reconstruction. Although there was no statistical difference in postoperative pain scores between the fascia and serratus muscle groups.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Femelle , Douleur , Période postopératoire , Tumeurs du sein , Mammoplastie , Implants mammaires , MastectomieRÉSUMÉ
Resumo Por se tratar de um tumor sólido, a cirurgia do câncer de mama sempre será necessária. Em algumas ocasiões, diante do avanço local da doença, a mastectomia, ou seja, a retirada completa da mama, pode ser necessária. Para atenuar as alterações corporais causadas pela mastectomia, a reconstrução mamária é uma possibilidade de reparação local e uma alterativa de reaproximação do que socialmente se considera um corpo reestabelecido. Este artigo, em forma de ensaio, parte de uma breve pesquisa em bases de dados científicos, interligando reconstrução mamária e representações sociais. Encontramos uma possível lacuna de problematização do que seria um corpo normal e reparado e quais seriam as forças que interferem na decisão de uma mulher recorrer às cirurgias ditas reparadoras. Ao questionarmos as diferentes visões do que é ou não um corpo saudável, abordamos teóricos como Foucault, Butler e Le Breton, para uma compreensão ampliada dos conceitos de corporeidade.
Abstract Breast cancer surgery will always be necessary as it is a solid tumor. Due to the local advancement of the disease, some cases may require a mastectomy, i.e., the complete removal of the breast. To mitigate the bodily changes, breast reconstruction offers a possibility for local repair and an alternative to what is socially considered as a +reestablished body. This essay is based on a brief search in scientific databases linking breast reconstruction and social representations. We found a possible gap in the problematization of what a normal, repaired, reconstructed body would be and what the subjective forces would be that interfere in a woman's decision to resort to what are known as reparative surgeries. By questioning the different views on what constitutes a healthy body, we draw on Foucault, Butler, and Le Breton for a broader understanding of the concepts of corporeality.
RÉSUMÉ
RESUMEN Antecedentes: la reconstrucción mamaria inmediata prepectoral con implantes es la incorporación técnica más reciente al arsenal de reconstrucción mamaria. Esta técnica proporciona un aspecto más natural a la reconstrucción, elimina complicaciones, como la deformidad por animación, y disminuye el dolor posoperatorio. Objetivo: describir los resultados quirúrgicos en una serie de pacientes con reconstrucción mamaria inmediata prepectoral con implantes de silicona. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio retrospectivo descriptivo; fueron revisadas las historias clínicas y los informes de anatomía patológica de pacientes operadas con la técnica descripta entre marzo de 2018 y diciembre de 2021, por carcinoma invasor, no invasor y sarcoma de mama. Todas fueron evaluadas en el preoperatorio con mamografía digital y presentaban más de 2 cm de cobertura grasa en la mama intervenida. Resultados: se registraron 52 reconstrucciones en 40 pacientes. El promedio de edad fue de 52 años (rango 30-76). En todas se realizó mastectomía con preservación del complejo aréolapezón. Con un promedio de seguimiento de 40 meses, no se registraron complicaciones mayores. No se encontró animación, desplazamiento ni rotación del implante. Se observó contractura capsular grados III y IV después del año de seguimiento en 3 pacientes que realizaron radioterapia posoperatoria. Los resultados estéticos fueron excelentes y buenos en 40 mamas (80,0%), regulares en 8 mamas (12,0%) e insuficientes en 4 mamas (8,0%). Se necesitó revisión quirúrgica posoperatoria inmediata por hematoma en 4 mamas (7,7%). Conclusiones: la reconstrucción inmediata con implantes prepectorales posmastectomía fue una técnica segura y con alto porcentaje de satisfacción.
ABSTRACT Background: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction has recently been added to the armamentarium for breast reconstruction. This technique provides natural-looking breasts, avoids complications, such as animation deformity, and reduces postoperative pain. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the surgical outcomes in a series of patients undergoing immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction with silicone implants. Material and methods: A descriptive and retrospective study was carried out with review of the medical records and pathology reports of patients who underwent surgery using the described technique for invasive carcinoma, non-invasive carcinoma, and sarcoma of the breast from March 2018 to December 2021. All the patients were evaluated preoperatively with digital mammography and had fat coverage thickness in the operated breast > 2 cm. Results: A total of 52 reconstructions were performed on 40 patients. Mean age was 52 age (range 30- 76). The nipple sparing mastectomy was undertaken in all the cases. There were no major complications during the 40-month average follow-up. None of the patients experienced animation deformity, implant displacement, or rotation. After one year of follow-up, three patients who underwent postmastectomy radiotherapy showed grades III and IV capsular contracture. The aesthetic results were excellent and good in 40 breasts (80.0%), fair in 8 breasts (12.0%) and insufficient in 4 breasts (8.0%). Four breasts (7.7%) required surgical revision in the immediate postoperative period. Conclusions: Immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is a feasible technique with enduring results and high level of satisfaction.
RÉSUMÉ
La mastectomía total por cáncer de mama produce una deformidad importante en las pacientes, con alteraciones severas de su autoestima, imagen corporal, sexualidad, y calidad de vida en general. El gold estándar en los países desarrollados es la reconstrucción mamaria inmediata y, actualmente existen pocas contraindicaciones absolutas para realizar alguna técnica de reconstrucción. Este artículo se describen las opciones reconstructivas (colgajos e implantes), tiempos de reconstrucción, ventajas y desventajas de ambas técnicas, potenciales complicaciones, y se propone un algoritmo de tratamiento. La elección de la técnica de reconstrucción debería ser decidida entre la paciente y su cirujano/a, considerando características físicas, factores relacionados con la enfermedad y tratamiento oncológico, y preferencias de las pacientes.
Total mastectomy for breast cancer treatment can be a cause of deformity and distress for patients, with severe impairment of self-esteem, body image, sexuality, and quality of life. In developing countries, immediate breast reconstruction is the gold standard, and there are only a few absolut contraindications for some technique of breast reconstruction. This article describes reconstructive options (flaps and allo-plastic material), reconstructive timing, pros and cons of both techniques, potential complications, and an algorithm of treatment is proposed. Choice of the reconstructive technique should be decided by the patient and her surgeon, considering physical characteristics, factors related with the disease and oncologic treatments, and patients' preferences.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Breast cancer is a pathological entity that widely compromises the life and quality of life of affected women; in addition to the great affectation to the current health services. Therefore, maintaining an accurate and complete cancer registry program is one of the most important factors in implementing national cancer control programs and evaluating the results of screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Among the current limitations in the studies, there is a gap in the study of the population undergoing breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out at hospital general de México “Dr. Eduardo Licéaga” with the information from the clinical records of the period 2019-2020. Patients undergoing breast reconstruction after mastectomy with histological report were included. Through non-probabilistic sampling, a population of 138 women was formed. For data analysis, frequencies and percentages were calculated for the qualitative variables; while for the quantitative variables, mean and standard deviation were calculated. Results: 138 women who underwent breast reconstruction were included, the mean age was 49.9±10.85 years, the mean BMI was 26.80±4.62 kg/m2, the secondary educational level predominated (34.8%), radiotherapy was applied to 34.1%, reconstruction was late in 75.4%, the most frequent reconstruction technique was TRAM flap (44.2%), the histological type of invasive ductal carcinoma predominated (68.1%). Conclusions: In women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction, the histological type of invasive ductal carcinoma predominates.
RÉSUMÉ
Surgeons in the late 19th - 20th century performed radical mastectomies as the only possible treatment for breast cancers. Since then, the medical-surgical/scientific community has been constantly encouraged to develop and study different less invasive alternatives in breast reconstruction. Over time, locoregional perforator flap options have served as practical alternatives to implant-based reconstruction and abdominal flaps, especially in the setting of patients who have received radiation therapy or have a history of failed reconstruction, as they effectively fill the missing volume and respect the musculature of the donor site. Breast reconstruction using strategies with one of the different locoregional flaps can preserve the musculature and innervation of the post-mastectomy site, which manages to reduce possible adverse events. In addition to evaluating the anatomical characteristics of the defect and affected quadrant, it is essential to assess the patient's body constitution and the skills of the surgical team as well as microsurgery training when designing a reconstructive plan. Different research protocols should be developed in the study and development of new medical-surgical therapeutic alternatives; we suggest joint development with tissue engineering.
RÉSUMÉ
El Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans es un tumor cutáneo fibrohistiocítico, extremadamente raro y representa menos del 1% de los tumores mamarios. Se caracteriza por un lento crecimiento, pero con comportamiento infiltrante con altas tasas de recidiva local. Se puede sospechar clínicamente, la confirmación es histopatológica y se debe complementar con inmunohistoquímica. El tratamiento de elección es quirúrgico. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 23 años con Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans de mama derecha, sometida a tumorectomía y reconstrucción inmediata de colgajo de dorsal ancho. La paciente tuvo evolución satisfactoria, sin evidencia de enfermedad.
SUMMARY Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is a fibro histiocytic cutaneous tumor extremely rare that accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancers, and it is characterized by slow growing but locally invasiveness with high recurrence rates. Confirmation of the diagnosis is with histopathology with immunohistochemistry. Treatment of choice is surgical resection with latissimus dorsalis reconstruction. We present the case of a 23-year-old woman with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the right breast in whom a tumorectomy followed by latissimus dorsalis reconstruction was performed. The patient had a favorable clinical evolution remaining free of disease.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective: To investigate the oncologic and surgical safety of the fused fascia method for immediate breast reconstruction with implants. Methods: The clinical data of 343 patients with immediate breast reconstruction with implants in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital from 2014-2017 were retrospectively analyzed to compare the 5-year local recurrence-free survival, 5-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival of patients with breast reconstruction by fusion fascia and other methods, and to analyze the complication incidences of implant removal between different implant groups. Results: Of the 343 patients with breast reconstruction, 95 were in the fused fascia group (fascia group) and 248 were in the non-fascia group (25 in the bovine pericardial patch group and 223 in the muscle flap group). At a median follow-up of 49 months, the differences in 5-year local recurrence-free survival (90.1% and 94.9%, respectively), 5-year disease-free survival (89.2% and 87.6%, respectively), and 5-year overall survival (95.2% and 95.1%, respectively) between patients in the fascial and non-fascial groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The complication incidence of implant removal was 24.0% (6/25) in the patch group and 2.1% (2/95) and 2.2% (5/223) in the fascia and muscle flap groups, respectively. Conclusion: Immediate breast reconstruction with fused fascial combined with implant is safe and feasible, less invasive than muscle flaps, more economical and with fewer complications than patches.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Animaux , Bovins , Femelle , Mastectomie/méthodes , Études rétrospectives , Implants mammaires/effets indésirables , Études de faisabilité , Mammoplastie/méthodes , Tumeurs du sein/complications , Résultat thérapeutique , Complications postopératoires/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
Autologous tissue reconstruction accounts for a certain proportion in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction. Deep infra-epigastric perforator free flap has its significant advantages, gradually being widely promoted and applied in China. The success rate of DIEP surgery is generally over 95%. However, vessel crisis and flap necrosis are inevitable. Before surgery, personnel and equipment should be prepared and patients should be thoroughly evaluated. During the surgical process, it is necessary to follow certain programmed and standardized procedures. Meticulous manipulations through entire operation are the key to reduce the risk of vessel crisis. Standard of procedure for flap monitoring during and after surgery should be established, and strictly implemented. If vessel crisis occurs, timely and orderly organization, exploration, and rescue should be carried out. The surgical team should do their best to identify problems, and rescue the flap as much as possible. Ensuring the overall safety and reducing interference with subsequent adjuvant treatment for patients should be considered. Based on the author’s long-term and extensive clinical work experience, this paper shares and discusses the strategies and methods of monitoring and rescue of free flap in breast reconstruction.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To evaluate the clinical prognosis of stage Ⅰ breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy by using Meta-analysis.Methods:Wanfang Resource Database, Chinese Journal Full-Text Database, VIP Information Resource System, Chinese Scientific and Technological Journal Database, Cochrane Library, EMbase, PubMed were searched by computer. The retrieval time was from the establishment of each database to August 25, 2021. To collect clinical control test group (CCT) and randomized controlled trial(RCT) on breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy. The researchers independently searched the inclusion and exclusion criteria, screened and sorted them, evaluated them, extracted relevant data, and performed Meta-analysis with Rev man 5.3 software.Results:Twelve research were enrolled in this study.the Meta-analysis results showed that there were no significant differences in the local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, 3-year tumor free survival rate and complications between the patients performed stage Ⅰ breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy and the patients only performed modified radical mastectomy ( OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 - 1.68, P = 0.77; OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.42 - 1.06, P = 0.09; OR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.77 - 1.93, P = 0.40; OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.58 - 1.41, P = 0.66). The quality of life score in the patients performed stage Ⅰ breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy was higher than that in the patients only performed modified radical mastectomy ( MD = 9.79, 95% CI 8.82 - 10.76, P<0.001). Conclusions:StageⅠbreast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy can reduce the pressure of patients due to physical defects, help patients build up confidence and improve their quality of life.
RÉSUMÉ
Using the serratus anterior fascia may be a safe and effective option to recreate the lateral breast profile during subpectoral breast reconstruction, with minimal functional impact on the donor site. However, the literature is scarce when it comes to studies on this fascia flap in implant-based reconstruction. This article aimed to review the use of the serratus anterior fascia in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction, searching the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, and SciELO. The search was carried out by combining the following keywords: 'breast reconstruction' and 'serratus anterior fascia'. In the Pubmed and Embase databases, the search yielded a total of 12 and 15 articles, respectively, of which seven were selected according to the scope of this article. We found no studies on serratus anterior fascia and breast reconstruction in the Lilacs and SciELO databases. All works have results favorable for the use of the serratus anterior fascia flap and agree that this technique can be considered in the algorithm for the coverage of the inferolateral portion during subpectoral breast reconstruction
Sujet(s)
Humains , Femelle , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , 33584/méthodes , Fascia/transplantation , Muscles intermédiaires du dos/transplantation , MastectomieRÉSUMÉ
Objective:To investigate the surgical method and clinical application value of single-port inflatable endoscopic prepectoralis prosthesis implantation for breast reconstruction (external prosthesis wrapping Off-Label).Methods:From September 2021 to February 2022, 7 breast cancer patients who underwent single-port inflatable endoscopic prepectoralis prosthesis implantation breast reconstruction (Off-Label) in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis of surgical complications, postoperative movement deformities, postoperative chest wall pain, postoperative quality of life and satisfaction scores of patients were conducted.Results:All 7 patients successfully completed the operation. There were no complications such as postoperative bleeding, infection, ischemic necrosis of nipple-areola complex or skin flap, postoperative movement deformity, postoperative chest wall pain, capsular contracture, prosthesis exposure or removal. The BREAST-Q scale was used to evaluate the quality of life and satisfaction after breast reconstruction. Postoperative breast satisfaction (55-100 points), chest wall status (52-89 points), and social psychological status (62-100 points) can be compared High rating.Conclusion:The single-port inflatable endoscopic prepectoral prosthesis implantation breast reconstruction (Off-Label) can achieve better radical effect and cosmetic effect through a shorter operation time, and the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction of patients are higher.
RÉSUMÉ
Breast cancer, as the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in women, remains a worldwide public health dilemma. With the improvement of patients’ quality of life and survival rate, the increasing number of patients tend to choose immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy for breast cancer, which is conducive to improving patients' mental health and life qualities. It has also accelerated the continuous innovation of breast reconstruction technology. However, there are still many controversies globally regarding the choice of postmastectomy reconstruction for different stages of breast cancer. Different stages of breast cancer have big variability in tumor volume, treatment plans, risk of complications, patient demands and cognitive condition. Therefore, multiple aspects such as oncology safety and aesthetic requirements of patients should be taken into consideration by surgeons. Based on clinical experience of Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and domestic and foreign literature, this article aims to analyze the characteristics of immediate breast reconstruction, explores the role of IBR in different stages of breast cancer treatment, and to provide a reference for the comprehensive treatment of breast cancer.