RÉSUMÉ
ObjectiveTo establish the clinical comprehensive evaluation index system for Chinese patent medicine（CPM） based on Evidence and Value：Impact on DEcisionMaking（EVIDEM） framework， so as to promote the scientific， systematic and standardized implementation of clinical comprehensive evaluation of CPM. MethodThe clinical comprehensive evaluation index system was determined through literature review， semi-structured interview and Delphi method， and the weights of each index were clarified by analytic hierarchy process（AHP）. ResultThe recovery rates of both rounds of expert consultation were 100%， and the authority coefficient of experts was 0.90 and 0.905， respectively. Kendall's coordination coefficients（W） of the second- and third-level indicators in the first-round consultation were 0.320 and 0.283（P<0.001）， and in the second round were 0.411 and 0.351， respectively（P<0.001）. The finally constructed clinical comprehensive evaluation index system for CPM included 6 first-level indicators， 13 second-level indicators and 28 third-level indicators. Among the first-level indicators， the weights of effectiveness， safety， economy， innovation， suitability and accessibility were 37.34%， 32.68%， 11.85%， 5.87%， 5.79% and 6.47%， respectively. ConclusionThis study has constructed a universal clinical comprehensive evaluation index system for CPM， and the domain and criteria are introduced and interpreted in detail， which can provide reference and information for carrying out the clinical comprehensive evaluation of CPM， but it needs to be refined and improved in combination with the clinical practice of CPM for specialized diseases.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To establish an evaluation index system that can be used for medical quality assessment in clini-cal departments.Methods Based on literature analysis and key informant interview,the Delphi method was used to analyze the-importance and operability of the evaluation index system of medical quality in clinical departments.Results A clinical depart-ment medical quality assessment and evaluation system was established,consisting of 3 primary indicators,14 secondary indica-tors,and 24 tertiary indicators.Conclusion By building a medical quality assessment and evaluation index system in clinical departments,a simple,standardized,and highly operational management model is established for medical institutions to carry out medical quality management.It is conducive to directing clinical departments to focus on medical quality management,improving their medical quality awareness and management level,and promoting the high-quality development of public hospitals.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To investigate the recognition of the post competency index system among rural general practice assistant physicians and its influencing factors.Methods:This study was a cross-sectional survey. A questionnaire survey on the recognition of post competency index system was conducted from October 2020 to September 2021 among rural general practice assistant physicians from 10 provinces/municipalities selected by stratified cluster sampling method. The recognition of rural general practice assistant physicians at all levels of indexs and the factors influencing recognition were analyzed.Results:A total of 1 123 questionnaires were distributed and 1 024 valid ones were collected with a recovery rate of 91.18%. Of the 1 024 respondents, 529 were male(51.7%) and 435 were aged 40-49 years(42.5%), which was the highest proportion by age group. The average overall recognition score of the index system was 4.41, and the scores of the primary indexes were 4.32-4.45. Three primary indexes had the highest recognition scores: professional competence, basic health care services, and interpersonal communication and teamwork. The recognition scores on the second level index were 4.18-4.61, and the proportion of recognition scores greater than 4 was over 80%. There were significant differences in the recognition scores of the index system among assistant physicians with different working years, educational background, professional title and work unit ( F/H=6.41, 14.83, 12.45, 7.53, P<0.01). Educational background(associate degree: B=0.091, P=0.015; bachelor degree and above: B=0.196, P<0.001) and professional title(intermediate professional title and above: B=-0.234, P<0.001) were the independent factors influencing the recognition degree of the index system for rural general practice assistant physicians. Conclusions:The post competency index system is generally recognized by rural general practice assistant physician, and academic qualifications and professional title status may influence its recognition.
RÉSUMÉ
Background Healthy lifestyle is one of the important factors affecting individual health. How to promote residents' cognition of healthy lifestyle has become an urgent practical problem for the whole society. However, there is no residents' healthy lifestyle cognitive indexes available with consideration of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Objective To construct a cognitive index system for providing effective assessment on residents' cognition of healthy lifestyle under the background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Methods Based on the health belief model, a preliminary cognitive index system of residents' healthy lifestyle under the background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality was proposed after literature study and relevant policy review. Then three rounds of indicator importance evaluation and screening by Delphi method were conducted before the index system was finally constructed. The weights of all levels of indicators were determined using analytic hierarchy process. In addition, a self-assessment questionnaire was developed based on the index system. The questionnaire was utilized to conduct a survey among 200 residents by convenience sampling in Shenyang, Liaoning Province from November to December 2021. The survey was used to examine the reliability and validity of the indicator system. Results The effective recovery rates of the three rounds of Delphi method were all 100%. The authority coefficient was 0.84. The Kendall's W consistency test showed good expert consistency (P<0.001). Finally, a cognitive index system of residents' healthy lifestyle under the background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality was initially constructed, including 4 first-level indicators, 8 second-level indicators, and 35 third-level indicators. Among them, the weights of the first-level indicators were 0.4541 for practice cognition, 0.2248 for benefit and obstacle cognition, 0.1626 for action clue cognition, and 0.1585 for risk cognition, respectively. The correlation coefficients between each indicator were from 0.586 to 0.977 (P<0.01). The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.95, indicating high reliability. Invited experts agreed that the entries were representative and the content validity of the constructed indicator system was good. The factor analysis also showed that the structure validity was good. Conclusion The proposed index system for residents' cognition of healthy lifestyle show good reliability and validity, which can be used as an effective assessment tool for residents' healthy lifestyle cognition under the background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. It can provide a scientific and theoretical basis for promoting residents' cognition and practice of healthy lifestyle.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct an evaluation index system of operation quality and effectiveness of compact urban medical groups and provide references for evaluation of compact urban medical groups.Methods:The evaluation index system was constructed by Delphi method,and the weight was determined by analytic hierarchy process.Results:The evaluation index system consisted of 5 primary indexes,12 secondary indexes and 40 tertiary indexes.Providing assessment methods for the construction of medical groups,the evaluation index system is scientific and authoritative.Conclusion:At the initial stage,policy support should be strengthened,innovative governance mechanisms should be explored,and measures such as implementing a community of responsibilities,strengthening information interconnection,and improving profit distribution mechanisms should be taken to gradually promote the construction of close urban medical groups.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct an evaluation the index system of entrustable professional activities for resident training doctors in psychiatric department,and to provide reference for formulating training strategies and assessment standards.Entrustable professional activities refers to the ability of trainees to perform and complete spe-cific clinical tasks independently after they have been trusted.Methods:Through documental analysis and semi-structured interviews,the item database of entrustable professional activities for psychiatric resident training physi-cians was established.Delphi consultation was conducted among 63 experts in the field of psychiatry from 7 national resident training bases and 3 medical colleges in China.Indicators were comprehensively screened and sorted out,and indicators at all levels and their weights were determined by the analytic hierarchy process.Results:A hierarchi-cal evaluation index system of entrustable professional activities for psychiatric resident training doctors was con-structed,including 4 first-level indicators,17 second-level indicators and 68 third-level indicators.The weights of the first-level,second-level and third-level indicators were determined.Conclusion:The evaluation index system of en-trustable professional activities is comprehensive and systematic,which is suitable for clinical work and convenient for practical application.It could provide quantitative standards for the assessment of psychiatric residents and pro-mote the improvement of training quality.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To establish the risk assessment index system of clinical surgery department and determine the weight of each index,so as to provide reference for hospital performance management department.Methods Delphi method was used to construct the risk assessment index system of clinical surgery department,and the weight of each index was calculated by analytic hierarchy process.Results The risk assessment index system of clinical surgery departments was successfully constructed,including 4 first-level indicators,12 second-level indicators and 33 third-level indicators.Conclusion Clinical surgical department risk evaluation index system can more reasonably and fairly reflect the clinical risk borne by the surgical department,but also can more truly reflect the results of clinical department performance assessment,which is conducive to the reform of the hospital's internal performance appraisal and distribution system is more rational.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To evaluate the application effect of the risk evaluation index system in clinical surgery departments.Methods A questionnaire was designed based on the risk evaluation index system of clinical surgery departments,and the risk evaluation were graded with RSR method.Results Among the risk evaluation of clinical surgery departments in the two hospitals,the results of first hospital were low,medium and high risk departments,and the results of second hospital were low and high risk departments,respectively.The differences among them were statistically significant.Conclusion In the process of clinical performance evaluation,it suggests that the hospital management department refer to the risk evaluation index system of clinical surgery departments as a risk assessment tool to promote more scientific and fairer performance distribution,which has certain social promotion value.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To explore the construction of comprehensive evaluation model of hospital mobile portal from the perspective of user maintenance.Methods The index system was constructed based on CRM-BSC(customer relationship management-the balanced score card)theory.A comprehensive evaluation model of hospital mobile portal was constructed by introducing cloud model.Finally,three hospital official Apps were selected for empirical research to verify the validity of the model.Results Although the construction status of the hospital's official App is good,it varies greatly in different evaluation dimensions.In the"user value"and"user perceived value"dimension performs well,but in the"user knowledge"and"user interaction"dimension performs poorly,need to be further optimized and improved.Conclusion The comprehensive evaluation model can provide comprehensive evaluation standards and tools for mobile portals,and the research results can provide decision support for medical institutions to improve the services of mobile portals.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective@#To construct an evaluation index system of public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level centers for disease control and prevention (CDC), so as to provide the evidence for improving the public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level CDC.@*Methods@#An index system framework was created based on review of health emergency policies, laws and regulations released in China from 2003 to 2023. The importance, sensitivity and accessibility of indicators were scored and screened through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, and the weights of indicators were calculated using precedence charts. The efficiency of Delphi expert consultations was evaluated using the active coefficient, authority coefficient and coordination coefficient. @*Results@#Eighteen experts participated in consultations, including 9 men, 15 with educational levels of master degree and higher, 12 with preventive medicine or public health as the specialty, and 12 with deputy senior professional titles and higher. The active coefficients of two rounds of consultations were 100.00% and 94.44%, and the authority coefficients were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. The coordination coefficients of secondary and tertiary indicators during the second round consultation were 0.341 and 0.241, which were both higher than those during the first round (both P<0.05). The final evaluation index system included 8 primary indicators, 21 secondary indicators and 58 tertiary indicators. Among primary indicators, health emergency organization and management (0.203 1), health emergency team building (0.203 1) and financial support for health emergency (0.203 1) had the highest weights, and of secondary indicators, completion degree of health emergency administration regulations (initial weight/global weight: 0.750 0/0.152 3), health emergency team building (0.750 0/0.152 3) and financial support for emergency (0.750 0/0.152 3) had the highest weights, while among tertiary indicators, defining the duty of health emergency administration sectors had the highest weight (0.750 0/0.114 2). @*Conclusion@#The created evaluation index system is feasible for evaluation of the public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level CDC.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES@#To construct a quantitative index system with the integrated medical and nursing care assessment for the elderly service needs, this system can assess the cost of medical and care services accurately and objectively, so as to provide scientific basis for the allocation of old-age service resources in China.@*METHODS@#Based on the survival needs of the Existence, Relation and Growth theory, an index system is constructed through literature analysis, group discussion, and expert correspondence. Analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of indicators at all levels. The 3-grades service items corresponding to each index were quantified through the measurement of working hours, and the medical and nursing care needs of 624 disabled/demented elderly people over 60 years old in Changsha were investigated to evaluate their reliability and validity.@*RESULTS@#The authoritative coefficients of the 2 rounds of expert correspondence were 88.5% and 88.6%, respectively, and the opinion coordination coefficients were 0.159 and 0.167, respectively. The final quantitative evaluation index system included 4 first-level indicators, 17 second-level indicators, and 105 third-level indicators. The service time of doctor ranged from 6.01 to 22.64 min, the service time of nurses ranged from 0.77 to 24.79 min, and the service time of caregiver ranged from 0.12 to 51.88 min. The Cronbach's αcoefficient was 0.73, the split-half reliability was 0.74, the content validity was 0.93, and the calibration validity was 0.781.@*CONCLUSIONS@#The quantitative evaluation index system of medical and nursing service need for the elderly can be used to accurately evaluate the medical and nursing service need.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Sujet âgé , Adulte d'âge moyen , Reproductibilité des résultats , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Méthode Delphi , Soins infirmiers , ChineRÉSUMÉ
ObjectiveTo construct an evaluation index system for the development of district-level disease prevention and control centers according to the requirements of the modernization of Shanghai’s disease control system and public health work practices， and to comprehensively assess the construction and development of district-level disease prevention and control institutions. MethodsAccording to the national and municipal requirements for the development of disease prevention and control institutions， an index framework was proposed through literature search and expert interviews. 39 representative experts in the field of public health at the national， provincial， and municipal （district） levels were selected to participate in the consultation and construction of the index system. The authority coefficient， the coefficient of variation， etc. were used to carry out quality control and determination of each index on the Delphi method. ResultsThe questionnaire response rate was 100%， the expert authority coefficient was 0.86，the degree of familiarity was 0.79， and the judgment basis was 0.92. The coefficients of variation of the necessary indicators in the index system were all <0.25 in the dimension of importance， and there were statistical differences in the statistical test of Kendall’s W coordination coefficients at all levels and dimensions （all P<0.001）. After multiple rounds of consultation， experts reached a consensus， forming a development evaluation index system of district-level CDCs with 6 first-level indicators， 24 second-level indicators， and 105 third-level indicators （including 63 necessary indicators and 42 recommended indicators）. ConclusionThe evaluation index system of Shanghai district-level CDCs based on the Delphi method has good authority， reliability， sensitivity and operability. This indicator system can effectively support the development of Shanghai district-level CDCs， and can be used for evaluation at multiple levels and in an all-round way in the future. The evaluation results can provide an evidence-based basis for the modernization of the disease prevention and control system and the continuous and dynamic updating of the development goals in the future.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct a scientific and feasible index system for nurses′ ability to cope with new infectious diseases based on ability-based education theory, so as to provide reference for the training of nurses′ ability to cope with new infectious diseases.Methods:After consulting domestic and foreign literaturesuch as China National Knowledge Internet, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, etc. from the establishment of the database to October 2020, based on the theory of "ability-based education", taking the action framework of the theory of "life cycle of emergency" and "sudden infectious disease events proposed" by WHO as the structural framework, the index items were preliminarily constructed, and the Delphi expert consultation method was used to conduct two rounds of expert consultation for 15 experts, so as to finally establish the index system of nurses′ ability to cope with new infectious diseases.Results:The effective recovery rate of the two rounds of expert consultation questionnaires was 100.00%, and the authority coefficient was 0.930. Kendall′s concordance coefficients of two rounds of consultation experts in the tertiary indicators were 0.363, 0.304 and 0.269, respectively, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.01), and the coefficient of variation of each index was 0.000-0.167. The index system of nurses′ ability to cope with new infectious diseases included 3 primary indicators, 12 secondary indicators and 44 tertiary indicators. Conclusions:The index system of nurses′ ability to cope with new infectious diseases based on ability-based education theory is scientific, reliable and practical, which can provide reference for the training and assessment of new infectious diseases coping ability of nurses.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To improve the clinical ability of interns by establishing the evaluation index system focusing on the training of clinical competence, and to construct the performance incentive mechanism based on the index system.Methods:The subjective evaluation method and expert consultation method were used to construct 5 first-class indexes and 15 second-class indexes. And the indexes and score setting were consulted by experts through questionnaires and in-depth interviews.Results:According to the feedback results of expert consultation, the scores of teaching ward-rounds and small lectures in the index system were need to adjust. At the same time, the minimum graduation standards were set to determine whether to participate in the final examination.Conclusion:The scores of teaching ward-rounds and small lectures have been raised, the scores of case discussion lowered, and the final examination scores are not included in the minimum standards. After the establishment of the initial index system, a series of supporting measures, including two-way selection of tutors, postgraduate reexamination, and other policies, have been carried out for performance incentives. At the same time, new teaching methods, student-oriented teaching activities, and formative evaluation have been adopted to actively improve the clinical competence of interns.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct the evaluation index system of "early clinical contact" education of undergraduate medical students, and to provide guidance for the evaluation of "early clinical contact" education in medical teaching.Methods:The evaluation index system of "early clinical contact" education of undergraduate medical students was constructed by literature research, Delphi expert consultation and analytic hierarchy process, and the weight of each index was determined. Excel 2010 and SPSS 25.0 were used to make data entry and statistical analysis.Results:The enthusiasm of experts in the two rounds of expert consultation were 100.00%(26/26) and 96.15%(25/26) respectively, the expert authority coefficients were 0.900 and 0.920, and the coordination coefficients were 0.255 and 0.175 respectively ( P < 0.05). The evaluation index system included 4 first-class indexes, 12 second-class indexes and 47 third-class indexes. Conclusion:The index system has high scientificity and reliability. After further verification, it can be used as an evaluation tool for the teaching quality of "early clinical contact" education of undergraduate medical students.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct an evaluation index system for core competence of nurses in the imaging department.Methods:The literature research and the opinions of the research team were integrated to develop indicators for core competence of imaging nurses at all levels. Delphi method was used to conduct 2 rounds of consultation with 20 experts, and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the index weights at all levels. The indicators were converted into a self-assessment scale, and 31 imaging in-service nurses in a third-level hospital were selected for questionnaire survey. SPSS 21.0 software was used to analyze the consultation results.Results:Through 2 rounds of consultation, the evaluation index system for core competence of nurses in the imaging department was formed, including 5 first-level indicators, 18 second-level indicators, and 78 third-level indicators. The effective response rates of the two rounds of expert consultation were 100%, and the authority coefficients were 0.933 and 0.923. In the second round, the expert opinion coordination coefficients of the first, second and third grade indexes were 0.46, 0.53 and 0.47, respectively ( P < 0.01). The core competence scores of the 31 respondents ranged from 3.08 to 4.45 in each dimension. Conclusion:After 2 rounds of expert consultation, the expert opinions tended to be consistent and the degree of coordination was high. The constructed indicators can be used for the core competence training and teaching evaluation of in-service nurses in the imaging department.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct medical students' employment quality evaluation index system based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP), for providing basis to scientific and objective evaluation of medical students' employment quality.Methods:Two rounds of consultation with 21 experts were conducted to construct medical students' employment quality index and evaluation standard by Delphi method, and the weight of each index and evaluation standard determined by AHP. Excel 2007 and SPSS 21.0 were used to analyze the results of expert consultation. The enumeration data were expressed as frequency and percentage. The mean and coefficient of variation were used to describe the importance scores of experts on indicators at all levels. The positive coefficient, authority coefficient and coordination degree of experts were calculated, and the Kendall coordination coefficient ( W) test was carried out. Yaahp 6.0 is used to analyze the pairwise comparison matrix in the analytic hierarchy process to calculate the weight of the indicator. Results:The authority of expert consultation was ranged from 0.77 to 0.94, and the positive coefficient of experts was 100.00%. The evaluation system of medical students' employment quality was determined, which involved 3 first-class indexes, 9 second-class indexes and 35 third-class indexes, and the weight coefficients of each index were calculated by AHP.Conclusion:The evaluation index system of medical students' employment quality is reasonable, which can be used to provide reference standard for medical students' employment quality evaluation, and has certain application value.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct a follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019), and provide a reference basis for the next revision and improvement of the standard.Methods:The evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) was preliminarily established by consulting relevant references and materials. The experts in the field of diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of brucellosis were selected, and two rounds of expert consultation were carried out in the form of questionnaires using the Delphi method. The necessity and availability of evaluation indicators were scored, and suggestions for modifying and adding indicators were put forward. Based on this, a standard follow-up evaluation index system was established. At the same time, a judgment matrix was constructed combined with the Saaty scale, and the analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weight of each index in the system.Results:After 2 rounds of expert ( n = 10) consultation, a standard follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) was constructed with 3 first-level indexes, 8 second-level indexes and 21 third-level indexes. The positive coefficients of experts in 2 rounds of questionnaires were both 100%; the coefficient of authority of experts was 0.82; the Kendall's coefficients of concordance of first-level, second-level and third-level indexes were 0.722, 0.260, and 0.181, respectively, with P < 0.05. Among the first-level indexes, the weight of standard quality evaluation was the highest (0.364), and the weight of standard implementation status was the lowest (0.278); among the second-level indexes, the combined weight of social benefits was the highest (0.186), and the combined weight of advanced nature was the lowest (0.043); among the third-level indexes, the combined weight of timely diagnosis rate was the highest (0.096), and the combined weight of consistency with technical data was the lowest (0.009). Conclusions:The constructed follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) is scientific and reliable, which evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, reduces the defects of a single evaluation, and provides a basis for subsequent revision and improvement of the standard.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct the homogenous evaluation index system for public hospital branches under the background of high-quality development, providing reference for improving the homogenization level of public hospital branches.Methods:By analyzing literature, relevant policies and the management practices of the public hospital branches, a preliminary screening index system for homogenization evaluation of public hospital branches was constructed. Two rounds of Delphi method were used to screen homogenization evaluation indicators for public hospital branches and determine the weights of the indicators. Taking the branches of a tertiary hospital as an example, the indicator system was empirically applied.Results:The homogenization evaluation index system for public hospital branches included 4 first level indicators, 8 second level indicators and 21 third level indicators. The weights of the first level indicators of medical homogeneity, management homogeneity, emergency conversion and satisfaction were 51.33%, 23.16%, 9.00% and 16.51%, respectively. Through empirical application, the homogenization coefficient of the public hospital branche was 0.833 5.Conclusions:The homogenization evaluation index system for public hospital branches was in line with the goals of the construction and development of multiple campuses of one hospital for public hospital. Indicators with low homogenization coefficients were the shortcomings of homogenization in hospital branches. This indicator system provided measurement standards and improvement directions for the homogenization of medical and management in hospital branches.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To construct a self-examination index system for hospital legal practice, and provide effective reference for the self-examination work of hospital practice in accordance with the law.Methods:From May 2021 to September 2022, a multi-dimensional and multi-level indicator system was initially constructed through literature review and expert interviews; Delphi expert consultation method was used to carry out a three-round questionnaire survey, experts were invited to assess the importance of indicators, and the weight values of indicators were processed by using analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.Results:The Cs value of consulting experts′ familiarity with the survey content was 0.84, Ca value of judgment basis was 0.78, Cr value of authoritative evaluation was 0.81, and Kendall W value was 0.630. The index system of hospital self-examination included 5 first-level indexes, 19 second-level indexes, and 30 third-level indicators. The 5 first-level indicators included institutional practice, personnel practice, disinfection and prevention of infectious disease, online diagnosis and treatment, and anti-fraud insurance, with weights of 0.235, 0.186, 0.188, 0.185, and 0.206 respectively. Among the second-level indicators, the weights of rational use of medical insurance fund, internet hospital and internet diagnosis and treatment, organization qualification and practice behavior were the highest, with values of 0.206, 0.185, 0.122 and 0.113 respectively. Among the third-level indicators, the internet hospital physician qualification, whether the hospital had obtained the license to practice, cracking down on fraudulent insurance practices, real-name medical treatment, and reasonable and standardized use of health insurance costs had the highest weight, which were 0.185, 0.122, 0.076, 0.065, and 0.065, respectively. Conclusions:The self-examination index system of medical institutions is scientific, which could help the medical institutions to practice self-examination and ensure medical quality and safety.