Fatores prognósticos em pacientes graves com meningite bacteriana adquirida na comunidade e lesão renal aguda / Prognostic factors among critically ill patients with community-acquired acute bacterial meningitis and acute kidney injury

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar os fatores prognósticos em pacientes graves com meningite bacteriana adquirida na comunidade e lesão renal aguda. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo com inclusão de pacientes em um hospital terciário dedicado a doenças infecciosas localizado em Fortaleza (CE), com diagnóstico de meningite bacteriana adquirida na comunidade complicada por lesão renal aguda. Investigaram-se os fatores associados a óbito, ventilação mecânica e uso de vasopressores. Resultados: Incluíram-se 41 pacientes, com média de idade de 41,6 ± 15,5 anos, 56% dos quais do sexo masculino. O tempo médio entre a admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva e o diagnóstico de lesão renal aguda foi de 5,8 ± 10,6 dias. A mortalidade global foi de 53,7%. Segundo os critérios KDIGO, 10 pacientes foram classificados como estágio 1 (24,4%), 18 como estágio 2 (43,9%) e 13 como estágio 3 (31,7%). A classificação em estágio KDIGO 3 aumentou de forma significante a mortalidade (OR = 6,67; IC95% = 1,23 - 36,23; p = 0,028). A presença de trombocitopenia não se associou com aumento da mortalidade, porém foi um fator de risco para a ocorrência da classificação KDIGO 3 (OR = 5,67; IC95% = 1,25 - 25,61; p = 0,024) e para necessidade de utilizar ventilação mecânica (OR = 6,25; IC95% = 1,33 - 29,37; p = 0,02). Os pacientes que necessitaram de ventilação mecânica 48 horas após o diagnóstico de lesão renal aguda tiveram níveis mais elevados de ureia (44,6 versus 74mg/dL; p = 0,039) e sódio (138,6 versus 144,1mEq/L; p = 0,036). Conclusão: A mortalidade de pacientes graves com meningite bacteriana adquirida na comunidade e lesão renal aguda é alta. A severidade da lesão renal aguda se associou com mortalidade ainda mais elevada. A presença de trombocitopenia se associou com lesão renal aguda mais grave. Níveis mais elevados de ureia podem prever mais precocemente a ocorrência de lesão renal aguda de maior gravidade.

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate prognostic factors among critically ill patients with community-acquired bacterial meningitis and acute kidney injury. Methods: A retrospective study including patients admitted to a tertiary infectious disease hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil diagnosed with community-acquired bacterial meningitis complicated with acute kidney injury. Factors associated with death, mechanical ventilation and use of vasopressors were investigated. Results: Forty-one patients were included, with a mean age of 41.6 ± 15.5 years; 56% were males. Mean time between intensive care unit admission and acute kidney injury diagnosis was 5.8 ± 10.6 days. Overall mortality was 53.7%. According to KDIGO criteria, 10 patients were classified as stage 1 (24.4%), 18 as stage 2 (43.9%) and 13 as stage 3 (31.7%). KDIGO 3 significantly increased mortality (OR = 6.67; 95%CI = 1.23 - 36.23; p = 0.028). Thrombocytopenia was not associated with higher mortality, but it was a risk factor for KDIGO 3 (OR = 5.67; 95%CI = 1.25 - 25.61; p = 0.024) and for mechanical ventilation (OR = 6.25; 95%CI = 1.33 - 29.37; p = 0.02). Patients who needed mechanical ventilation by 48 hours from acute kidney injury diagnosis had higher urea (44.6 versus 74mg/dL, p = 0.039) and sodium (138.6 versus 144.1mEq/L; p = 0.036). Conclusion: Mortality among critically ill patients with community-acquired bacterial meningitis and acute kidney injury is high. Acute kidney injury severity was associated with even higher mortality. Thrombocytopenia was associated with severer acute kidney injury. Higher urea was an earlier predictor of severer acute kidney injury than was creatinine.

Valor prognóstico da procalcitonina em pacientes com infecções do trato respiratório inferior no ambiente hospitalar / Prognostic value of procalcitonin in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infections

RESUMO Infecções do trato respiratório inferior são condições frequentes e potencialmente letais, consistindo nas principais causas de prescrição inadequada de antibióticos. A caracterização de sua gravidade e a predição prognóstica dos pacientes acometidos auxiliam na condução, permitindo maior acerto nas decisões sobre a necessidade e o local de internação, assim como a duração do tratamento. A incorporação de biomarcadores às estratégias classicamente utilizadas representa estratégia promissora, com destaque para a procalcitonina. O objetivo deste artigo foi apresentar uma revisão narrativa sobre a potencial utilidade e as limitações do uso da procalcitonina como um marcador prognóstico em pacientes hospitalizados portadores de infecções do trato respiratório inferior. Os estudos publicados sobre o tema são heterogêneos, no que tange à variedade de técnicas de mensuração da procalcitonina, seus valores de corte, os contextos clínicos e a gravidade dos pacientes incluídos. Os dados obtidos indicam valor moderado da procalcitonina para predizer o prognóstico de pacientes com infecções do trato respiratório inferior, não superior a metodologias classicamente utilizadas, e com utilidade que se faz notar apenas quando interpretados junto a outros dados clínicos e laboratoriais. De modo geral, o comportamento da procalcitonina, ao longo dos primeiros dias de tratamento, fornece mais informações prognósticas do que sua mensuração em um momento isolado, mas faltam informações sobre a custo-efetividade dessa medida em pacientes em terapia intensiva. Estudos que avaliaram o papel prognóstico da procalcitonina inicial em pacientes com pneumonia adquirida na comunidade apresentam resultados mais consistentes e com maior potencial de aplicabilidade prática, mas com utilidade limitada a valores negativos para a seleção de pacientes com baixo risco de evolução desfavorável.

ABSTRACT Lower respiratory tract infections are common and potentially lethal conditions and are a major cause of inadequate antibiotic prescriptions. Characterization of disease severity and prognostic prediction in affected patients can aid disease management and can increase accuracy in determining the need for and place of hospitalization. The inclusion of biomarkers, particularly procalcitonin, in the decision taken process is a promising strategy. This study aims to present a narrative review of the potential applications and limitations of procalcitonin as a prognostic marker in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infections. The studies on this topic are heterogeneous with respect to procalcitonin measurement techniques, cutoff values, clinical settings, and disease severity. The results show that procalcitonin delivers moderate performance for prognostic prediction in patients with lower respiratory tract infections; its predictive performance was not higher than that of classical methods, and knowledge of procalcitonin levels is most useful when interpreted together with other clinical and laboratory results. Overall, repeated measurement of the procalcitonin levels during the first days of treatment provides more prognostic information than a single measurement; however, information on the cost-effectiveness of this procedure in intensive care patients is lacking. The results of studies that evaluated the prognostic value of initial procalcitonin levels in patients with community-acquired pneumonia are more consistent and have greater potential for practical application; in this case, low procalcitonin levels identify those patients with a low risk of adverse outcomes.

Tratamento da pneumonia grave adquirida na comunidade no Brasil: análise secundária de um inquérito internacional / Management of severe community-acquired pneumonia in Brazil: a secondary analysis of an international survey

Objetivo: Avaliar a percepção dos médicos brasileiros quanto ao diagnóstico, à avaliação de gravidade, ao tratamento e à estratificação de risco em pacientes com pneumonia grave adquirida na comunidade, e compará-la com as diretrizes atuais. Métodos: Estudo transversal realizado por meio da aplicação de um questionário anônimo a uma amostra de médicos brasileiros especialistas em cuidados intensivos, medicina de emergência, medicina interna e pneumologia. Entre outubro e dezembro de 2008, foram avaliadas as atitudes dos médicos no diagnóstico, a avaliação de risco e as intervenções terapêuticas para pacientes com pneumonia grave adquirida na comunidade. Resultados: Responderam ao questionário 253 médicos, sendo 66% da Região Sudeste do Brasil. A maioria (60%) dos médicos que responderam tinha mais de 10 anos de experiência. Verificou-se que a avaliação de risco de pneumonia grave adquirida na comunidade foi muito heterogênea, sendo a avaliação clínica a forma de avaliação de risco mais frequente. As hemoculturas foram habitualmente realizadas por 75% dos médicos, entretanto, foi reconhecido seu fraco desempenho diagnóstico. Por outro lado, a pesquisa de antígenos urinários de Pneumococo e Legionella foi solicitada por menos de um terço dos médicos. A maioria (95%) prescreveu antibióticos de acordo com as diretrizes. A combinação de uma cefalosporina de terceira ou quarta geração com um macrolídeo foi a escolha mais comum. Conclusão: Este inquérito brasileiro demonstrou diferenças entre as diretrizes publicadas e a prática clínica. Isso leva à necessidade de se desenvolverem programas educacionais e de adoção de protocolos para implementar estratégias baseadas em evidências no manejo da pneumonia grave adquirida na comunidade. .

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate Brazilian physicians’ perceptions regarding the diagnosis, severity assessment, treatment and risk stratification of severe community-acquired pneumonia patients and to compare those perceptions to current guidelines. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional international anonymous survey among a convenience sample of critical care, pulmonary, emergency and internal medicine physicians from Brazil between October and December 2008. The electronic survey evaluated physicians’ attitudes towards the diagnosis, risk assessment and therapeutic interventions for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Results: A total of 253 physicians responded to the survey, with 66% from Southeast Brazil. The majority (60%) of the responding physicians had > 10 years of medical experience. The risk assessment of severe community-acquired pneumonia was very heterogeneous, with clinical evaluation as the most frequent approach. Although blood cultures were recognized as exhibiting a poor diagnostic performance, these cultures were performed by 75% of respondents. In contrast, the presence of urinary pneumococcal and Legionella antigens was evaluated by less than 1/3 of physicians. The vast majority of physicians (95%) prescribe antibiotics according to a guideline, with the combination of a 3rd/4th generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide as the most frequent choice. Conclusion: This Brazilian survey identified an important gap between guidelines and clinical practice and recommends the institution of educational programs that implement evidence-based strategies for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia. .

Patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia present reduced functional performance

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea, treatment with oral corticosteroids, high circulating levels of cytokines, and oxidant/antioxidant imbalance in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) could affect the patients' exercise tolerance and peripheral muscle strength (PMS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional capacity (FC) of patients hospitalized for CAP and to correlate the FC with length of hospital stay. METHOD: We prospectively evaluated 45 patients (49±16 years; CAP group) and 20 healthy subjects (53±17 years; control group). They were randomized to perform, on separate days, a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), a test of PMS, and the Glittre test (GT). Additionally, the SF-36 questionnaire and the MRC scale were completed and evaluated. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the groups (CAP and controls) for the 6MWT (381.3±108 vs. 587.1±86.8 m) and GT (272.8±104.3 vs. 174±39 sec). The CAP group also presented worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, reduced strength (quadriceps and biceps), and higher scores of dyspnea. The time required to perform the GT correlated with the length of hospital stay (r=0.35, P=0.02) and dyspnea (r=0.36, P=0.02). Significant correlations were observed between GT and 6MWT (r=-0.66, P=0.0001) and between GT with the physical functioning domain of SF-36 (r=-0.51, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for CAP presented with reduced FC, PMS, and HRQoL during hospitalization. In addition, GT performance was related to the length of hospital stay. .

Pneumonia grave por vírus influenza A H1N1 e pneumonia comunitária grave: diferenças na evolução / Severe virus influenza A H1N1 related pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia: differences in the evolution

OBJETIVO: Analisar dados clínicos, laboratoriais e de evolução de pacientes com pneumonia grave por vírus influenza A H1N1 em comparação à pneumonia bacteriana grave adquirida na comunidade. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte, retrospectivo. Todos os pacientes admitidos na unidade de terapia intensiva, entre maio de 2009 e dezembro de 2010, com diagnóstico de pneumonia grave por influenza A H1N1 foram incluídos. Trinta pacientes com pneumonia adquirida na comunidade grave admitidos no mesmo período foram usados como grupo controle. Pneumonia adquirida na comunidade grave foi definida como presença de ao menos um critério maior de gravidade (uso de ventilador ou vasopressor) ou de dois critérios menores. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados os dados de 45 pacientes. Dentre eles, 15 pacientes com H1N1. Em comparação ao grupo com pneumonia adquirida na comunidade, pacientes do grupo H1N1 tiveram contagens de leucócitos significativamente menores na admissão (6.728±4.070 versus 16.038±7.863; p<0,05) e níveis de proteína C-reativa mais baixos (dia 2: 15,1±8,1 vs. 22,1±10,9 mg/dL, p<0,05). Os valores da relação PaO2/FiO2 foram menores na primeira semana em pacientes com H1N1. Não sobreviventes de pneumonia grave por H1N1 tiveram níveis significativamente mais elevados de proteína C-reativa do que os sobreviventes, além de níveis séricos mais altos de creatinina. A taxa de mortalidade foi significativamente mais elevada no grupo H1N1 do que no grupo controle (53% versus 20%, p=0,056, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: Diferenças nos perfis de contagem de leucócitos, proteína C-reativa e de oxigenação podem auxiliar no diagnóstico e na avaliação do prognóstico de pacientes com pneumonia grave por vírus influenza A H1N1 e por pneumonia adquirida na comunidade.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical, laboratory and evolution data of patients with severe influenza A H1N1 pneumonia and compare the data with that of patients with severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. METHODS: Cohort and retrospective study. All patients admitted to the intensive care unit between May 2009 and December 2010 with a diagnosis of severe pneumonia caused by the influenza A H1N1 virus were included in the study. Thirty patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia admitted within the same period were used as a control group. Severe community-acquired pneumonia was defined as the presence of at least one major severity criteria (ventilator or vasopressor use) or two minor criteria. RESULTS: The data of 45 patients were evaluated. Of these patients, 15 were infected with H1N1. When compared to the group with community-acquired pneumonia, patients from the H1N1 group had significantly lower leukocyte counts on admission (6,728±4,070 versus 16,038±7,863; p<0.05) and lower C-reactive protein levels (Day 2: 15.1±8.1 versus 22.1±10.9 mg/dL; p<0.05). The PaO2/FiO2 ratio values were lower in the first week in patients with H1N1. Patients who did not survive the H1N1 severe pneumonia had significantly higher levels of C-reactive protein and higher serum creatinine levels compared with patients who survived. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the H1N1 group than in the control group (53% versus 20%; p=0.056, respectivelly). CONCLUSION: Differences in the leukocyte count, C-reactive protein concentrations and oxygenation profiles may contribute to the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with severe influenza A H1N1 virus-related pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia.

Neumonía adquirida en la comunidad en el anciano hospitalizado: aspectos clínicos y nutricionales / Community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: clinical and nutritional aspects

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the elderly has unique features and there is little information about the effects of nutrition status on its outcome. Aim: To assess the clinical manifestations and prognostic factors of CAP in immunocompetent elderly patients requiring hospitalization. Patients and methods: Prospective study of all patients with CAP, admitted to Puerto Montt Hospital, Chile over one year. Epidemiológica! and clinical information and laboratory results were recorded. A nutritional assessment was also performed. Outcomes of elderly (>65 years) and young patients were compared. Results: Two hundred patients aged 63± 19 years were studied. Of these, 109 were older than 65 years (78.4±8 years) and 91 were younger than 65years (45.5±11 years). Multiple associated diseases, altered mental status, absence of fever, malnutrition and mortality were more common in the older group. Suspected aspiration pneumonia was more common in younger patients, probably related to alcoholism. Malnutrition was associated with longer hospital stay and mortality at any age. An univariate analysis showed that a low serum albumin (<3.4 g/dl) and a mid arm muscle circumference below the 25th percentile were associated with higher mortality. Conclusions: CAP in the elderly has specific features and malnutrition is associated with a worse prognosis in young and elderly patients.

Estudo comparativo entre pacientes idosos internados com diagnóstico clínico de pneumonia comunitária, com ou sem confirmação radiológica / Comparative study of elderly inpatients clinically diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, with or without radiological confirmation

OBJETIVOS: Comparar aspectos clínicos, radiológicos e evolutivos de idosos internados com diagnóstico clínico de pneumonia comunitária, com ou sem confirmação radiológica. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados, retrospectivamente, 141 pacientes com idade acima de 60 anos. RESULTADOS: Em 45 pacientes, os achados radiológicos corroboraram o diagnóstico clínico e, em 96 pacientes, a radiologia não foi compatível com a suspeita clínica. Os sinais, os sintomas, a terapêutica e os desfechos destes dois grupos foram comparados. Os achados do estudo sugerem que não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos segundo os critérios analisados. A prevalência de radiografias de tórax compatíveis com pneumonia entre pacientes com suspeita clínica da doença foi de pouco mais de 30 por cento. CONCLUSÃO: O diagnóstico clínico de pneumonia comunitária tem baixa especificidade em idosos e deve ser usado com cautela. Devido ao pequeno número de pacientes estudados, mais estudos sobre o tema são necessários para confirmar os achados.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and radiological aspects, as well as aspects regarding the course of the disease, of elderly inpatients clinically diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, with or without radiological confirmation. METHODS: A total of 141 patients over the age of 60 were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: Radiological findings corroborated the clinical diagnosis in 45 patients, whereas, in 96 patients, radiology did not correlate with the clinical suspicion. The signs, symptoms, treatment, and outcomes of these two groups were compared. The findings of the study suggest that there were no significant differences between the groups according to the criteria analyzed. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of chest X-rays compatible with pneumonia in patients suspected of the disease was slightly higher than 30 percent. Having low specificity in the elderly, the clinical diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia should be used with caution. In view of the small number of patients studied, further studies on this topic are needed in order to confirm the findings.

Evaluación de la gravedad en la neumonía del adulto adquirida en la comunidad / Evluating severiity of community-acquired pneumonia inaddults

Clinical evolution in patients affected by community acquired pneumonia varies from a mild and low risk infectious disease to an extremely severe, life threatening disease. Commonly, immunocompetent adults without co-morbidities or severe risk factors cared for at out patient clinic have low risk of complications and death (mortality below 1-2%); it increases to 5-15% in patients with co-morbidities and/or with specific risk factors that are admitted into the hospital and reaches 20-50% in those patients admitted into ICUs. Evaluation of severity in patients with pneumonia allows the prediction of disease evolution, establishing the proper setting of care, the type- of microbiological tests needed, and to choose the best empiric antibiotic treatment. It is suggested that patients be in three risk categories: low risk (mortality under 1-2%) susceptible to ambulatory treatment; high risk patients (mortality 20-30%) that need specialized wards; and intermediate risk patients, with co-morbidities and/or risk factors for complicated clinical evolution and death, but cannot be classified in a specific category. In the ambulatory setting, without availability of complete laboratory exams, it is recommended to evaluating the severity of pneumonia considering the following clinical variables: age over 65 years, presence of co-morbidities, sensorial compromise, vital signs alteration, degree of radiological involvement: multilobar, bilateral findings, cavitations), pleural effusion and arterial oximetry < 90%. However, clinical judgement and the physician´s experience must predominate over predictive models, which are not infallible.

La evolución del paciente con neumonía adquirida en la comunidad puede variar entre un cuadro infeccioso banal de bajo riesgo de complicaciones hasta uno de extrema gravedad con riesgo vital. En general, el adulto inmunocompetente sin co-morbilidad ni criterios de gravedad manejado en el medio ambulatorio tiene bajo riesgo de complicaciones y muerte (letalidad menor de 1-2%), elevándose a 5-15% en los pacientes con co-morbilidad y/o factores de riesgo específicos que son admitidos al hospital y a 20-50% en aquellos admitidos a la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. La evaluación de la gravedad en el paciente con neumonía permite predecir la evolución de la enfermedad, orientar el lugar de manejo, la extensión del estudio microbiológico, y el tratamiento antimicrobiano empírico. Se sugiere clasificar a los enfermos en tres categorías de riesgo: pacientes con bajo riesgo (mortalidad inferior a 1-2%) susceptibles de tratamiento ambulatorio; pacientes con alto riesgo (mortalidad entre 20-30%) que deben ser manejados en unidades especializadas del hospital; y pacientes con riesgo intermedio, con co-morbilidad y/o factores de riesgo de evolución complicada y muerte, pero que no es posible clasificar en una categoría precisa. En el medio ambulatorio, donde no se dispone de exámenes complementarios, se recomienda evaluar la gravedad de los pacientes con neumonía considerando las siguientes variables clínicas: edad sobre 65 años, presencia de co-morbilidad, compromiso de conciencia, alteración de los signos vitales, compromiso radiográfico multilobar o bilateral, presencia de cavitación o efusión pleural, y SaO2 < 90%. Sin embargo, el juicio clínico y la experiencia del médico deben predominar sobre los modelos predictores, los cuales no son infalibles.