Clinical correlates of pp65 antigenemia monitoring in the first months of post kidney transplant in patients undergoing universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy

Abstract Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus is a major cause of morbidity in kidney transplant patients. Objectives: We aimed to study viral replication and serological response in the first months post kidney transplant in patients undergoing universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy and correlate the findings with the clinical course of Human cytomegalovirus infection. Patients and methods: Independent from the clinical strategy adopted for managing Human cytomegalovirus infection, prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy, the pp65 antigenemia assay and serological response were assessed on the day of transplantation, and then weekly during the first three months of post-transplant. Results: From the 32 transplant recipients, 16 were positive for pp65 antigenemia, with a similar incidence rate in each group. There were no positive results in the first three weeks of monitoring; the positivity rate peaked at week eight. There was a trend for a higher and earlier frequency of positivity in the universal prophylaxis group in which the course of the Human cytomegalovirus infection was also more severe. Despite the differences in clinical picture and in the initial immunosuppressant schedule, the serological response was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Routine monitoring during the first three post-transplant months has a positive impact on the early detection of Human cytomegalovirus viral replication allowing for timely treatment in order to reduce morbidity of the disease. The strategy of universal therapy employing intravenous ganciclovir was associated to a worse clinical course of the Human cytomegalovirus infection suggesting that the use of >10 cells/2 × 105 leukocytes as a cut-off in this setting may be inappropriate.

The CD4 slope can be a predictor of immunologic recovery in advanced HIV patients: a case-control study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, despite sustained viral suppression by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), is a risk factor for poor immunologic recovery. However, some patients with advanced infection do show immunologic recovery. In this study, predictive factors of immunologic recovery were analyzed in advanced HIV patients showing sustained viral suppression. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted in HIV-infected adult patients with HIV-1 RNA or = 500/mm3 at 4 years with HAART). To analyze the CD4 T cell kinetics, the CD4 slope (monthly changes in the CD4 T cell count) was estimated for each patient using a linear regression between the CD4 T cell count and the time since HAART initiation. RESULTS: Of 102 eligible patients, 73 had advanced HIV, and 33 (45.2%) showed immunologic recovery. The median CD4 slopes (cells/mm3 per month) during 0 to 6 and 0 to 12 months of HAART in the 73 advanced patients were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (0 to 6 months, 38.6 vs. 22.8; 0 to 12 months, 24.5 vs. 13.5). Multivariate analyses showed opportunistic infections at the start of HAART (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.28) and a CD4 slope > or = 20 during 0 to 12 months of HAART (adjusted OR, 10.10) were independently associated with immunologic recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The CD4 slope can be an early predictor of long-term immunologic recovery in advanced HIV patients.

Low-cost assays for monitoring HIV infected individuals in resource-limited settings.

Use of a combination of CD4 counts and HIV viral load testing in the management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) provides higher prognostic estimation of the risk of disease progression than does the use of either test alone. The standard methods to monitor HIV infection are flow cytometry based for CD4+ T cell count and molecular assays to quantify plasma viral load of HIV. Commercial assays have been routinely used in developed countries to monitor ART. However, these assays require expensive equipment and reagents, well trained operators, and established laboratory infrastructure. These requirements restrict their use in resource-limited settings where people are most afflicted with the HIV-1 epidemic. With the advent of low-cost and/or low-tech alternatives, the possibility of implementing CD4 count and viral load testing in the management of ART in resource-limited settings is increasing. However, an appropriate validation should have been done before putting them to use for patient testing.

Animal bites: the current management guidelines.

Rabies is a major public health problem in India. It is mainly transmitted by stray dogs, which form an overwhelming population in the country. Dogs are responsible for upto 95% of animal bites requiring antirabies treatment. In view of the exceptionally high fatality rate of human rabies, the prevention of infection after exposure is of utmost importance. With the availability of safe and effective tissue culture vaccines prevention of this dreaded disease is virtually assured by immediate and appropriate post exposure treatment. This is a three pronged approach including proper wound management, judicious use of antirabies serum and modern tissue culture vaccines. In India, Neural Tissue Vaccine is still used for post exposure treatment in public sector, though effective, this vaccine has serious side effects. The production and use of tissue culture vaccine should be encouraged with the aim to phase out neural tissue vaccine. WHO recommends use of intradermal route of inoculation of Tissue Culture Vaccine which makes the treatment very economical. However, this route as yet, is not approved by Drug Controller, Government of India (DCGI). There are no uniform guidelines for management of animal bite cases in India. In this article an attempt is made to discuss various aspects of animal bite management.