Diagnostic value of urinary luteinizing hormone levels in the monitoring of precocious puberty treatment

ABSTRACT Objective To determine whether first-voided urinary LH (FV-ULH) - level measurement can adequately assess pubertal suppression as much as standard tests can. Subjects and methods The study group included patients with central precocious puberty and rapidly progressing early puberty who received up to 3 - 4 doses of GnRHa therapy monthly and did not have adequate hormonal suppression after GnRH stimulation (90-minute LH level > 4 IU/L). Design: All of the participants underwent an LHRH test just after admission to the study. According to the stimulated peak LH levels, the patients were divided into 2 groups and followed until the end of the first year of treatment. The concordance between FV-ULH and stimulated LH levels was assessed. Results The FV-ULH levels in patients with inadequate hormonal suppression were significantly high compared to patients with adequate hormonal suppression. FV-ULH levels were very strongly correlated with stimulated LH levels (r = 0.91). Its correlation with basal LH levels was significant (r = 0.65). However, this positive correlation was modestly weakened after the first year of treatment. The cutoff value for FV-ULH of 1.01 mIU/mL had the highest sensitivity (92.3%) and specificity (100%). Conclusion FV-ULH levels, using more reliable and sensitive assay methods, can be used to monitor the adequacy of GnRHa therapy.

Development of a subcutaneous endometriosis rat model

PURPOSE: To present a rat model of subcutaneous endometriosis for the study of pathophysiology and the effects of drugs. METHODS: Fifty three-month-old female Wistar rats (Rattus norvergicus) were distributed into one control group and four treatment groups: estradiol (2.5; 5; 10mg/kg sc), medroxyprogesterone acetate (0.5; 2; 5mg/kg sc), triptorelin pamoate (0.18; 0.56mg/kg sc) and acetylsalicylic acid (3mg/kg per os). The animals were autoimplanted subcutaneously with 4x4-mm uterine fragments to induce endometriosis. The endometriomas were measured on days 1, 7, 14 and 21. The relative dry and wet weights of the endometrioma were used to evaluate response to the drug. Endometrial -like tissue was confirmed by histology. The greatest weight gain was observed on day 14 (relative wet weight: 29.1 ± 6.7mg%, relative dry weight: 5.3 ± 0.9mg %). Treatments were administered between day 5 and day 14. RESULTS: The relative wet weight of the hemiuterus in the 10mg/kg estradiol group differed significantly from control and the other two estradiol groups (p=0.0001). In the medroxyprogesterone acetate group the weight decreased significantly but this decrease was not dose-dependent. Weight reduction was also significant in the triptorelin pamoate and the acetylsalicylic acid groups. CONCLUSION: The model of subcutaneous endometriosis is reproducible, low-cost and easy to perform, and suitable for the study of pathophysiology and the effects of drugs. .

Ovarian Hyper-Response to Administration of an GnRH-Agonist Without Gonadotropins

Several case reports have indicated that a small subgroup of patients may develop ovarian hyperstimulation following the administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) without gonadotropins. However, since only few such cases have been published, it is unclear what course to follow in subsequent cycles after ovarian hyperstimulation in the first cycle using only GnRHa. A 33-yr-old woman was referred to in vitro fertilization for oocyte donation. A depot preparation (3.75 mg) of tryptorelin without gonadotropins induced ovarian multifollicular enlargement with high estradiol level, and was followed by human chorionic gonadotropin administration and oocyte retrieval. In a subsequent cycle of the same patient, a low dose of tryptorelin (0.05 mg) did not induce ovarian hyperstimulation, and resulted in clinical pregnancy. This report shows potential management of ovarian hyperstimulation following the administration of GnRHa without gonadotropins.

Protocolo largo con análogos de GnRH versus protocolo corto con antagonistas: ¿existen diferencias en cuanto a los resultados de los ciclos de FIV-ICSI? / Protocol with GnRH analogues vs antagonists of GnRH: exist differences in the results of the IVF-ICSI cycles?

Objetivo: Valorar si existen diferencias en los resultados de los ciclos de FIV-ICSI en función del protocolo de estimulación empleado. Método: Estudio retrospectivo descriptivo de pacientes infértiles que fueron sometidas a ciclos de FIV-ICSI en el Hospital Universitario La Paz, entre los meses de enero y septiembre de 2010, comparando un protocolo largo de estimulación con análogos de GnRH vs un protocolo corto con antagonistas de GnRH. Las variables analizadas fueron: tasa de gestación, necesidad de cancelación del ciclo, dosis total de gonadotropinas requerida durante la estimulación, niveles de estradiol sérico el día de la administración de la hCG, número de folículos puncionados, complejos obtenidos, número de ovocitos maduros y de embriones conseguidos. Resultados: No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en los resultados de los ciclos en función del protocolo de estimulación empleado, en ninguna de las variables analizadas. Conclusiones: Este estudio no encontró diferencias en los resultados de los ciclos de FIV-ICSI con relación al uso de análogos o antagonistas de GnRH. Es necesarios más estudios con mayores tamaños muestrales para definir qué tipo de pacientes serían subsidiarias de recibir cada tratamiento para conseguir resultados óptimos.

Aims: To assess if there exist any differences in the results of the IVF-ICSI cycles depending on the stimulation protocol employed. Methods: Retrospective descriptive study of infertile patients who underwent IVF-ICSI cycles at La Paz University Hospital, between January and September 2010, comparing sitmulation protocol with GnRH agonists vs antagonists of GnRH. The variables analyzed were pregnancy rate, cancellation rate, total dose of gonadotropin required for stimulation, serum estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration, number of follicles punctured, complexes obtained, number of mature oocytes and of embryos obtained. Results: No statistically significant differences where found in the results of cycles depending on the protocol of stimulation used in any of the variables analyzed. Conclusions: This study didn't find any difference in the outcome of IVF-ICSI cycles in relation to the use of GnRH agonists or antagonists. We need more studies with larger sample sizes to determine which is the best treatment to each patient in order to achieve optimal results.

Long-acting GnRH analogue triptorelin therapy in central isosexual precocious puberty.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of long acting GnRH analogue in improving the auxological outcome of patients with central isosexual precocious puberty (CIPP) and to determine the factors influencing the response. METHODS: Thirty-five patients (30 girls, 5 boys) with CIPP were treated with a long acting GnRH analogue, triptorelin. Final height outcomes and factors affecting treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment was started at the chronological age (CA) of 6.5 1.8 years in girls and 4.4 1.5 years in boys and continued for a period of 3.7 1.8 years in girls and 6 1.8 years in boys. Follow-up period after discontinuation of treatment was 2.2 0.5 years in girls and 2.6 0.3 years in boys. Treatment led to regression of precocious puberty and reversal of secondary sexual characteristics. There was decline in growth rate reflected by a fall in heightSD of 0.8 0.8 in girls and 2.3 0.9 in boys (p = 0.014), an even greater retardation in bone age (BA) advancement with a decrease in BA-CA of 1.7 1 years in girls and 2.7 1 years in boys and a fall in heightSDBA of 1.5 1.1 in girls and 2.1 1.6 in boys. Final height (149.8 6.9 cm in girls and 161.9 3.9 cm in boys) exceeded projected height at the onset of treatment (143.4 8.3 cm in girls and 154.3 2.7 cm in boys) by 6.4 2.4 cm in girls and 7.6 1.5 cm in boys ( p < 0.001 in both the groups). Factors influencing height gain included age at start of therapy (r = 0.715), BA-CA at the time of initiation of treatment (r = 0.734), heightSDBA at the onset of treatment ( r = 0.566) and the duration of treatment (r = 0.711). Girls treated at an age of less than 6 years (n = 9) had a greater height gain (8.7 1.6 cm versus 5.3 1.9 cm, p < 0.001) and achieved similar final height (148.7 8 cm versus 150.2 6.6 cm) in those treated after this age (n = 21). No side effects of GnRH therapy were observed in the study. CONCLUSION: Long acting GnRH therapy is effective in improving the auxological outcome of patients with CIPP. Maximum benefit is observed in girls with greater bone age advancement treated at a younger age and for a longer duration of treatment. These girls had lower bone age advance at discontinuation of treatment.