RESUMO
BACKGROUND. Government employment in India is known for its lack of flexibility. We studied whether this also involved professional freedom among health personnel working for the National Leprosy Eradication Programme. METHODS. The sample population consisted of National Leprosy Eradication Programme employees from Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh and 8 health professional groups. A questionnaire was developed for each of them to elicit information on 5 aspects of their autonomy. They were studied individually and as homogeneous groups so that comparisons were possible both within and between groups in different regions who were conducting similar health programmes. RESULTS. National Leprosy Eradication Programme personnel enjoy a high degree of autonomy within the organization. This autonomy was evident in both states investigated, despite different administrations and it was not connected with the professional positions they held. Professional freedom correlated with the training activities, promotional prospects and commitment to the organization. CONCLUSIONS. The National Leprosy Eradication Programme job is not rigid because the organization is small and the intellectual needs of the professionals are met within it.
Assuntos
Adulto , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Órgãos Governamentais , Humanos , Índia , Satisfação no Emprego , Hanseníase/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipe de Assistência ao PacienteRESUMO
This study examines the "service" factors of the health professionals working in the National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) resulting from the introduction of multidrug therapy (MDT) technology, and their impact on their job satisfaction. The findings show that both among physicians and paramedicals, the significant chemotherapeutic dissatisfaction observed before the introduction of multidrug therapy has been replaced by a moderately positive satisfaction. This was much higher than the other incentives like pay, promotional prospect and job significance within NLEP and the community. It was also consistent over five years which was not the case with hydnocarpus and monotherapy technologies. Intercorrelation matrix test revealed three positive intercorrelations. First, personnel associated technology with personal progress which provided a sense of accomplishment while also satisfying their economic needs; second, they saw it as a mode of developing relationships with their clients; and third, it improved their self-image in the community. However, this satisfaction may not be static when there is a reduction of work load, or, the leprosy programme is integrated into general health services. Therefore, while planning these changes, care must be taken that the present level of technological satisfaction is maintained or further improved.