Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros








Intervalo de ano
1.
Braz. j. microbiol ; Braz. j. microbiol;42(3): 980-991, July-Sept. 2011. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-607528

RESUMO

Antihistaminics are widely used for various indications during microbial infection. Hence, this paper investigates the antimicrobial activities of 10 antihistaminics belonging to both old and new generations using multiresistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates. The bacteriostatic activity of antihistaminics was investigated by determining their MIC both by broth and agar dilution techniques against 29 bacterial strains. Azelastine, cyproheptadine, mequitazine and promethazine were the most active among the tested drugs. Diphenhydramine and cetirizine possessed weaker activity whereas doxylamine, fexofenadine and loratadine were inactive even at the highest tested concentration (1 mg/ml). The MIC of meclozine could not be determined as it precipitated with the used culture media. The MBC values of antihistaminics were almost identical to the corresponding MIC values. The bactericidal activity of antihistaminics was also studied by the viable count technique in sterile saline solution. Evident killing effects were exerted by mequitazine, meclozine, azelastine and cyproheptadine. Moreover, the dynamics of bactericidal activity of azelastine were studied by the viable count technique in nutrient broth. This activity was found to be concentration-dependant. This effect was reduced on increasing the inoculum size while it was increased on raising the pH. The post-antimicrobial effect of 100 fg/ml azelastine was also determined and reached up to 3.36 h.


Assuntos
Humanos , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/análise , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/farmacologia , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Técnicas In Vitro , Meios de Cultura/análise , Meios de Cultura/farmacologia , Métodos , Métodos , Usos Terapêuticos
2.
Braz. j. microbiol ; Braz. j. microbiol;42(3): 992-1000, July-Sept. 2011. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-607529

RESUMO

Several antihistaminics possess antibacterial activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria. However, the exact mechanism of such activity was unclear. Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate their mechanism of antibacterial activity especially their effect upon the permeability of the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. The effects of azelastine, cetirizine, cyproheptadine and diphenhydramine were studied using Gram-positive and Gram-negative multiresistant clinical isolates. Leakage of 260 and 280 nm UV-absorbing materials was detected upon treatment with the tested antihistaminics; indicative of membrane alteration. Using an artificial membrane model, cholesterol-free negatively-charged unilamellar liposomes, confirmed the effect of antihistaminics upon the membrane permeability both by showing an apparent membrane damage as observed microscopically and by detection of leakage of preloaded dye from the liposomes colorimatrically. Moreover, examination of the ultrastructure of cells treated with azelastine and cetirizine under the transmission electron microscope substantiated the detected abnormalities in the cell wall and membrane. Furthermore, the effect of pretreating certain isolates for both short and long periods with selected antihistaminics was followed by the viable count technique. Increased vulnerability towards further exposure to azelastine was observed in cells pretreated with azelastine for 2 days and those pretreated with azelastine or cetrizine for 30 days.


Assuntos
Humanos , Membrana Celular , Permeabilidade da Membrana Celular , Parede Celular , Citoplasma , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1 , Lipossomas Unilamelares/análise , Lipossomas Unilamelares/farmacologia , Métodos , Métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA