RESUMO
Objective To investigate the impacts of Nalbuphine combined with Sufentanil on postoperative analgesia and stress response in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.Methods 86 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery from August 2020 to April 2022 were collected and grouped into an experimental group and a control group according to the analgesic plan,with 43 patients in each group.The control group was given Sufentanil after surgery,and the experimental group was given Nalbuphine + Sufentanil.The analgesic and sedative effects at different time points after surgery(1,6,12,24 and 48 h),and the changes in serum pain mediator and stress response indicators were observed and compared.The time of getting out of bed after surgery,the number of patient-controlled analgesia,the number of cases of remedial analgesia,the recovery of gastrointestinal function,and the occurrence of adverse reactions within 48 hours after surgery were recorded in both groups.Results Compared with the control group,the experimental group had a shorter time to get out of bed for the first time after surgery(t = 3.29,P = 0.001),and had fewer instances of patient-controlled analgesia(Z = 4.53,P = 0.000)and cases of remedial analgesia(χ2 = 4.48,P = 0.034);Postoperative 12,24 and 48 h after surgery,the visual analogue scale(VAS)in the experimental group was obviously lower than that in the control group(t = 2.86,t = 2.55,t = 0.10,P<0.05);Postoperative 1 and 6 h,the Ramsay sedation score in the experimental group patients was lower than that in the control group(t = 2.10,t = 2.07,P<0.05);Postoperative 6,12 and 24 h,the serum substance P(SP)(t = 3.63,t = 5.51,t = 3.46,P<0.05)and prostaglandin E2(PGE2)(t = 2.34,t = 3.56,t = 0.33,P<0.05)levels in the experimental group were obviously lower than those in the control group;Postoperative 6,12 and 24 h,the serum cortisol(Cor)level in the experimental group was obviously lower than that in the control group(t = 4.65,t = 6.50,t = 6.52,P<0.05);Postoperative 6,12,24 and 48 h,the serum norepinephrine(NE)(t = 5.49,t = 7.85,t = 7.70,t = 2.18,P<0.05),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)(t = 5.43,t = 7.83,t = 5.27,t = 2.32,P<0.05),and hypersensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP)(t = 3.39,t = 9.241,t = 4.87,t = 2.37,P<0.05)levels in the experimental group were obviously lower than those in the control group.There was no statistically obvious difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative exhaust time,defecation time,bowel sounds occurrence time,and incidence of adverse reactions(P>0.05).Conclusion Nalbuphine combined with Sufentanil is effective in postoperative analgesia of laparoscopic colorectal cancer patients,and can effectively regulate the post-traumatic stress response of the body after surgery.
RESUMO
Objective To observe the occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation with dexmedetomidine sedation,and to evaluate its safety in intensive care unit (ICU).Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted.Adult critical patients undergoing mechanical ventilation over 48 hours admitted to ICU of Zigong First People's Hospital in Sichuan Province were enrolled.The patients were divided into dexmedetomidine group (Dex group) and midazolam group (Mid group) according to the randomise number generated by computer.The patients in both groups were given slow intravenous infusion of 0.05 mg/kg midazolam and 1-2 μg/kg fentanyl to induce anesthesia before tracheal intubation,followed by 0.06 mg· kg-1· h-1 midazolam and 20-50 μg· kg-1 · h-1 fentanyl or 0.1-0.2 μg· kg-1 · h-1 sufentanil for continuous intravenous pumping to maintain analgesia and sedation;on the next day,the patients in Dex group was given dexmedetomidine (with the initial dose of 0.4 μg· kg-1 · h-1,and maintenance dose of 0.1-0.7 μg· kg-1 · h-1),and midazolam was stopped half an hour later;the original sedation and analgesia plan remained unchanged in Mid group.The goal of sedation was to maintain a Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) score of-2 to 1 or a Ramsay sedation score of 3 to 4;patients were given midazolam if obvious agitation occurred,in combination with propofol for sedation if necessary;wakeup test was performed every day.Observation endpoints included patients discharged from ICU,death or mechanical ventilation over 28 days.Occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events during sedation such as hypertension,hypotension,bradycardia,tachycardia and arrhythmia,dose of sedatives and analgesics,duration of mechanical ventilation,length of ICU stay and 28-day mortality were observed in two groups.Results A total of 383 patients were enrolled,with 190 patients in Dex group and 193 in Mid group.There was no statistically significant difference in general data such as gender,age,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score and predicted mortality between two groups.Doses of midazolam,propofol and fentanyl in Dex group were reduced as compared with those of Mid group,while the dose of sufentanil was similar in two groups.The Ramsay score and RASS score of Dex group were significantly reduced as compared with those of Mid group (3.34± 0.63 vs.3.95 ± 0.86,-1.33 ±0.87 vs.-1.98 ± 1.27,both P ＜ 0.01).Bradycardia was prominent in Dex group,which was observed in more than half of patients at the beginning of the treatment (1-2 hours),but the patients requiring isoprenaline treatment for heart rate lower than 50 bpm were less than that of Mid group (3.7％ vs.5.2％,x 2 =0.506,P =0.477).The incidences of hypotension (45.3％ vs.68.4％),tachycardia (16.3％ vs.33.7％) and arrhythmia (14.7％ vs.31.1％) in Dex group were significantly lower than those of Mid group (all P ＜ 0.01),and no other cardiovascular adverse events such as cardiac arrest,sinus arrest,hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia were observed in two groups.There was no statistically significant difference in duration of mechanical ventilation between Dex group and Mid group [days:5 (2,28) vs.4 (2,56),Z =-1.917,P =0.055],but compared with Mid group,the length of ICU stay in Dex group was significantly prolonged [days:9 (2,67) vs.6 (2,57),Z =-4.302,P =0.000],and the 28-day mortality in Dex group was significantly reduced (22.6％ vs.44.6％,x2 =20.610,P =0.000).Conclusion Long time dexmedetomidine sedation is safe in critical patients undergoing mechanical ventilation,which can significantly reduce cardiovascular adverse events except bradycardia,and lower the 28-day mortality.
RESUMO
Objective To measure the nursing workload in ICU,and provide the basis for the scientific distribution of human resources and reasonable scheduling in ICU.Methods ICU patients of the First and Third People's Hospital of Zigong from July to September,2011 were selected.The TISS-28 and NAS were applied to measure the nursing workload in the ICU.The number of staff nurses on each day and on each shift was recorded.Results The total nursing workload and the per capita nursing workload for each day in a week showed no significant difference,and the per capita nursing workload of different shifts and the needs of nurse-patient ratio of different patients in ICU were significantly different.Conclusions The allocation of nursing staff should be balance for each day in a week and different shifts for each day.The configuration of the nursing human resources should be based on actual nursing workload,no only considering the species of the diseases,the disease condition,self-care ability and cooperation of the patients,but also the proficiency of nurse skills.