RESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción : El síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico en pediatría (SIM-C) es una infrecuente entidad asociada a COVID-19 con un amplio espectro de presentación: desde un cuadro similar a la enfermedad de Kawasaki a una afectación multisistémica con shock. Se han descripto asociaciones entre valores de laboratorio y mala evolución, pero no existen puntos de corte que predigan la misma. Objetivo : El objetivo de este estudio fue describir y analizar las características de los pacientes con SIM-C y las relaciones de estas con los hallazgos de laboratorio. Material y métodos : Se realizó un estudio analítico y retrospectivo de niños internados con diagnóstico de SIM-C entre mayo 2020 y junio 2021 en el HNRG. Se estudiaron 32 pacientes, 17 femeninas (53,13%) y 15 masculinos (46,87%), edad promedio de 7,67 años (rango 0,5-14,91). Diez de los pacientes (31,25%) presentaron shock. Se obtuvieron datos clínicos, ecocardiográficos y valores de troponina I ultrasensible, NT-proBNP, plaquetas y linfocitos al momento del diagnóstico; y se analizaron comparativamente entre quienes presentaron shock durante la evolución (Grupo 1) y quienes no (Grupo 2). Resultados : La diferencia en un valor inicial de NT-proBNP elevado fue estadísticamente significativa entre ambos grupos (p=0,008), en tanto que la troponina y el recuento de linfocitos y plaquetas, no. De los 13 pacientes que requirieron inotrópicos, el 58% presentó linfopenia inicialmente (p=0,006 vs aquellos que no los necesitaron). Conclusiones : Si bien la mortalidad debido al SIM-C es baja, la afectación cardiovascular y el compromiso hemodinámico en los paci entes que presentaron este síndrome puede ser frecuente. Poder contar con una herramienta de laboratorio ampliamente difundida para la categorización de pacientes podría ayudar a mitigar riesgos y obtener una derivación temprana a centros especializados.
ABSTRACT Background : Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is an uncommon condition associated with COVID-19 with a wide spectrum of presentations, ranging from Kawasaki-like disease to multisystem involvement with shock. The as sociation between the laboratory characteristics and unfavorable outcome has been described, but the cut-off points associated with higher risk have not yet been defined. Objective : The aim of this study was to describe and analyze the characteristics of patients with MIS-C and their associations with the laboratory findings. Methods : We conducted an analytical and retrospective study of pediatric patients hospitalized between May 2020 and June 2021 with diagnosis of MIS-C in Hospital General de Niños Dr. Ricardo Gutiérrez (HNRG). The cohort was made up of 23 patients, 17 female (53.13%) and 15 male (46.87%); mean age was 7.67 years (range 0.5-14.91). Ten patients (31.25%) presented shock. Clinical and echocardiographic data and values of high-sensitive troponin I, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), platelets and lymphocytes at the time of diagnosis were obtained and compared between those with shock during evolution (group 1) and those without shock (group 2). Results : There was a significant difference in baseline elevated NT-proBNP values between both groups (p = 0.008), but not in troponin levels and lymphocyte and platelet counts. Of the 13 patients who required inotropic agents, 58% had baseline lymphopenia (p = 0.006 vs those who did not require inotropic drugs). Conclusions : Although mortality due to MIS-C is low, cardiac involvement and hemodynamic impairment may be common. The availability of a commonly used laboratory tool for patient categorization could help to mitigate risks and obtain early referral to specialized centers.
RESUMO
Abstract Background In view of the absence of effective therapy for COVID-19, many studies have been conducted seeking to identify determining factors for the development of severe forms, aiming to direct efforts to avoid the worst outcomes in patients susceptible to severe conditions. One of the main comorbidities associated with complicated forms of the disease is systemic arterial hypertension (SAH). Objective To assess aspects of the clinical, demographic, laboratory, and radiological characteristics of hypertensive patients with COVID-19 to contribute to the knowledge of the relationship between the presence of this comorbidity and the severity of the disease. Methods A total of 380 patients with a diagnosis of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized between June and August 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of a previous diagnosis of hypertension. For comparison between groups, a significant difference was established if p < 0.05. Results Of the total of 380 patients, 202 (53.16%) had a clinical diagnosis of SAH. Hypertensive patients were significantly older (p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (p < 0.01) than the non-hypertensive group. In laboratory tests, hypertensive patients had higher levels of blood glucose (p = 0.014), creatinine (p = 0.002), and urea (p = 0.003), while values for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (p < 0.01), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (p = 0.006), and sodium (p = 0.024) were lower. There was no difference between groups in radiographic parameters. Conclusions This study showed that, although the hypertensive group had some laboratory alterations that elicited severe disease, these patients did not have worse outcomes.
RESUMO
Resumo Fundamento: Sabe-se que a inflamação desempenha um papel crucial em muitas doenças, incluindo a COVID-19. Objetivo: Utilizando a dilatação fluxo-mediada (DFM), objetivou-se avaliar os efeitos da inflamação na função endotelial de pacientes com COVID-19. Métodos: Este estudo foi realizado com um total de 161 indivíduos, dos quais 80 foram diagnosticados com COVID-19 nos últimos seis meses (48 mulheres e 32 homens com idade média de 32,10±5,87 anos) e 81 eram controles saudáveis (45 mulheres e 36 homens com idade média de 30,51±7,33 anos). Os achados do ecocardiograma transtorácico e da DFM foram analisados em todos os indivíduos. Resultados com p<0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significantes. Resultados: O ecocardiograma e a DFM do grupo COVID-19 foram realizados 35 dias (intervalo: 25-178) após o diagnóstico. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa nos parâmetros ecocardiográficos. Em contraste, a DFM (%) foi significativamente maior no grupo controle (9,52±5,98 versus 12,01±6,18; p=0,01). Na análise multivariada com o modelo stepwise progressivo, a DFM foi significativamente diferente no grupo controle em relação ao grupo COVID-19 (1,086 (1,026-1,149), p=0,04). O teste de correlação de Spearman indicou que a DFM (r=0,27; p=0,006) apresentou correlação positiva fraca com a presença de COVID-19. Conclusão: Os achados deste estudo apontam para disfunção endotelial induzida por COVID-19, avaliada por DFM, na fase inicial de recuperação.
Abstract Background: Inflammation is known to play a crucial role in many diseases, including COVID-19. Objective: Using flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), we aimed to assess the effects of inflammation on endothelial function in COVID-19 patients. Methods: This study was conducted with a total of 161 subjects, of whom 80 were diagnosed with COVID-19 within the last six months (comprising 48 women and 32 men with a mean age of 32.10 ± 5.87 years) and 81 were healthy controls (comprising 45 women and 36 men with a mean age of 30.51 ± 7.33 years). We analyzed the findings of transthoracic echocardiography and FMD in all subjects. All results were considered statistically significant at the level of p < 0.05. Results: The echocardiography and FMD of the COVID-19 group were performed 35 days (range: 25-178) after diagnosis. There was no statistically significant difference in echocardiographic parameters. Differently, FMD (%) was significantly higher in the control group (9.52 ± 5.98 vs. 12.01 ± 6.18, p=0.01). In multivariate analysis with the forward stepwise model, FMD was significantly different in the control group compared to the COVID-19 group (1.086 (1.026 - 1.149), p=0.04). A Spearman's correlation test indicated that FMD (r=0.27, p=0.006) had a weak positive correlation with the presence of COVID-19. Conclusion: Our findings point to COVID-19-induced endothelial dysfunction, as assessed by FMD, in the early recovery phase.
RESUMO
Abstract Ischemic strokes secondary to occlusion of large vessels have been described in patients with COVID-19. Also, venous thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism have been related to the disease. Vascular occlusion may be associated with a prothrombotic state due to COVID-19-related coagulopathy and endotheliopathy. Intracranial hemorrhagic lesions can additionally be seen in these patients. The causative mechanism of hemorrhage could be associated with anticoagulant therapy or factors such as coagulopathy and endotheliopathy. We report on cases of ischemic, thrombotic, and hemorrhagic complications in six patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed typical SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia findings in all the cases, which were all confirmed by either serology or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Tromboembolia/complicações , COVID-19/complicações , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , AVC Isquêmico , HemorragiaRESUMO
ABSTRACT Many patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were unable to return to work or their return was delayed due to their health condition. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the impact of moderate-to-severe and critical COVID-19 infection on persistence of symptoms and return to work after hospital discharge. In this study, two thirds of hospitalized patients with pulmonary involvement reported persistence of symptoms six months after COVID-19 infection, such as memory loss (45.5%), myalgia (43.9%), fatigue (39.4%), and dyspnea (25.8%), and 50% slowly returned to work, with repercussions due to fatigue and/or loss of energy.
RESUMO Muitos pacientes hospitalizados com COVID-19 não puderam retornar ao trabalho ou seu retorno foi atrasado devido ao seu estado de saúde. O objetivo deste estudo observacional foi avaliar o impacto da infecção moderada a grave ou crítica por COVID-19 na persistência dos sintomas e no retorno ao trabalho após a alta hospitalar. Neste estudo, dois terços dos pacientes hospitalizados com acometimento pulmonar relataram persistência dos sintomas seis meses após a infecção por COVID-19, como perda de memória (45,5%), mialgia (43,9%), fadiga (39,4%) e dispneia (25,8%), e 50% retornaram lentamente ao trabalho, com repercussões devido à fadiga e/ou perda de energia.
RESUMO
Introducción: Es reiterativo observar publicaciones sobre el comportamiento de la COVID-19 que entremezclan aspectos sanitarios con una crisis política y social en Venezuela; lo cual descontextualiza la realidad e impiden al lector la adquisición de información veraz sobre el complejo proceso salud-enfermedad en ese país. Objetivo: Analizar las publicaciones científicas que asocian al contexto político al comportamiento de la COVID-19 en Venezuela. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en PubMed sobre información publicada que relacionara las condiciones sanitarias con la situación política y económica actual de Venezuela, entre los años 2019 a 2021. Se realizó una clasificación según tipo de artículo, autores, institución y país de afiliación, revistas, fuentes de financiamiento y número de citas o descargas. Resultados: Se hallaron un total de 20 artículos, de los cuales siete eran artículos de investigación, cinco revisiones, cuatro correspondencias y cuatro artículos de información. El autor con mayor número de publicaciones fue Paniz et al., seguido por Ramírez et al. El país de afiliación del 45 % (9) de los autores principales es EE.UU.; cuatro autores trabajan en instituciones venezolanas y tres en Colombia. The Lancet es la revista donde se publicaron la mayoría de los artículos (6), seguida de revistas del grupo Public Library of Science (PLoS) (3) y Emerging Infectious Diseases (2). Conclusiones: El descontextualizar la crisis política en Venezuela no contribuye a aportar soluciones a los problemas de salud pública que enfrentan los venezolanos en la actualidad.
Introduction: It is repetitive to observe publications on the behavior of COVID 19 in Venezuela that mix health aspects with a political and social crisis in Venezuela; which takes reality out of context and prevents the reader from acquiring truthful information about the complex health-disease process in Venezuela. Objective: To analyze the scientific publications that associate the political context with the behavior of COVID 19 in Venezuela. Methods: A PubMed search was carried out on published information that related health conditions with the current political and economic situation in Venezuela, between the years 2019 and 2021. A classification was made according to type of article, authors, institution and country of affiliation, journals, funding sources, and number of citations or downloads. Results: A total of 20 articles were found, of which 7 were research articles, 5 reviews, 4 correspondence and 4 information articles. The author with the highest number of publications was Paniz et al., followed by Ramírez et al. The country of affiliation of 45% (9) of the main authors is the USA; 4 authors work in Venezuelan institutions and 3 in Colombia. The Lancet is the journal where most articles were published (6), followed by journals from the Public Library of Science (PLoS) group (3) and Emerging Infectious Diseases (2). Conclusions: Decontextualizing the political crisis in Venezuela does not contribute to providing solutions to the public health problems that Venezuelans face today.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Estimate the future number of hospitalizations from Covid-19 based on the number of diagnosed positive cases. METHOD Using the covid-19 Panel data recorded in Spain at the Red Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica, Renave (Epidemiological Surveillance Network), a regression model with multiplicative structure is adjusted to explain and predict the number of hospitalizations from the lagged series of positive cases diagnosed from May 11, 2020 to September 20, 2021. The effect of the time elapsed since the vaccination program starting on the number of hospitalizations is reviewed. RESULTS Nine days is the number of lags in the positive cases series with greatest explanatory power on the number of hospitalizations. The variability of the number of hospitalizations explained by the model is high (adjusted R2: 96.6%). Before the vaccination program starting, the expected number of hospitalizations on day t was 20.2% of the positive cases on day t-9 raised to 0.906. After the vaccination program started, this percentage was reduced by 0.3% a day. Using the same model, we find that in the first pandemic wave the number of positive cases was more than six times that reported on official records. CONCLUSIONS Starting from the covid-19 cases detected up to a given date, the proposed model allows estimating the number of hospitalizations nine days in advance. Thus, it is a useful tool for forecasting the hospital pressure that health systems shall bear as a consequence of the disease.
RESUMEN OBJETIVO Predecir el número futuro de hospitalizaciones por covid-19 a partir del número de casos positivos diagnosticados. MÉTODO Usando datos del Panel covid-19 registrados en España en la Red Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica (Renave), se ajusta un modelo de regresión con estructura multiplicativa para explicar y predecir el número de hospitalizaciones a partir de la serie retardada de casos positivos diagnosticados durante el periodo entre el 11 de mayo de 2020 y el 20 de septiembre de 2021. Se analiza el efecto sobre el número de hospitalizaciones del tiempo transcurrido desde el inicio del programa de vacunación. RESULTADOS El número de retardos de la serie de casos positivos que mayor capacidad explicativa tiene sobre el número de hospitalizaciones es de nueve días. La variabilidad del número de hospitalizaciones explicada por el modelo es elevada (R2 ajustado: 96,6%). Antes del inicio del programa de vacunación, el número esperado de ingresos hospitalarios en el día t era igual al 20,2% de los casos positivos del día t-9 elevado a 0,906. Iniciado el programa de vacunación, este porcentaje se redujo un 0,3% diario. Con el mismo modelo se obtiene que en la primera ola de la pandemia el número de casos positivos fue más de seis veces el que figura en los registros oficiales. CONCLUSIONES Partiendo de los casos de covid-19 detectados hasta una fecha, el modelo propuesto permite estimar el número de hospitalizaciones con nueve días de antelación. Ello lo convierte en una herramienta útil para prever con cierta anticipación la presión hospitalaria que el sistema sanitario tendrá que soportar como consecuencia de la enfermedad.
Assuntos
Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos , Brasil/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Planejamento em Saúde , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the spatial correlation between confirmed cases of covid-19 and the intensive care unit beds exclusive to the disease in municipalities of Paraná. METHODS This is an epidemiological study of ecological type which used data from the Epidemiological Report provided by the Department of Health of Paraná on the confirmed cases of covid-19 from March 12, 2020, to January 18, 2021. The number of intensive care beds exclusive to covid-19 in each municipality of Paraná was obtained by the Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde (CNES - National Registry of Health Establishments), provided online by the Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde (Datasus - Informatics Department of the Brazilian Unified Health System). The Bivariate Moran's Index (local and global) was used to analyze the intensive care bed variable and spatial correlation, with a 5% significance level. LISA Map was used to identify critical and transition areas. RESULTS In the analyzed period, we found 499,777 confirmed cases of covid-19 and 1,029 intensive care beds exclusive to the disease in Paraná. We identified a positive spatial autocorrelation between the confirmed cases of covid-19 (0.404-p ≤ 0.001) and intensive care beds exclusive to the disease (0.085-p ≤ 0.001) and disparities between the regions of Paraná. CONCLUSION Spatial analysis indicated that confirmed cases of covid-19 are related to the distribution of intensive care beds exclusive to the disease in Paraná, allowing us to find priority areas of care in the state regarding the dissemination and control of the disease.
RESUMO OBJETIVO Analisar a correlação espacial entre os casos confirmados de covid-19 com os leitos de unidades de terapia intensiva exclusivos para a doença nos municípios do Paraná. MÉTODO Trata-se de um estudo epidemiológico, do tipo ecológico que utilizou dados do Informe Epidemiológico fornecido pela Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Paraná sobre os casos confirmados de covid-19, no período de 12 de março de 2020 a 18 de janeiro de 2021. A quantidade de leitos de terapia intensiva exclusivos para covid-19 de cada município paranaense foi obtida pelo Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde disponibilizado online pelo Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde. A variável leito de terapia intensiva foi analisada pelo Índice Bivariado de Moran (local e global). Para a identificação de áreas críticas e de transição utilizou-se o LISA Map. Para avaliar a correlação espacial foi utilizado o Índice Bivariado de Moran, considerando o nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS No período analisado foram confirmados 499.777 casos de covid-19 no Paraná e identificados 1.029 leitos de terapia intensiva exclusivos para a doença entre os municípios do estado. Foi identificado autocorrelação espacial positiva entre os casos confirmados de covid-19 (0,404-p ≤ 0,001) com os leitos de terapia intensiva exclusivos para a doença (0,085-p ≤ 0,001) e disparidades entre as regiões do Paraná. CONCLUSÃO A análise espacial permitiu confirmar a relação entre os casos confirmados de covid-19 e a distribuição de leitos de terapia intensiva exclusivos para a doença no Paraná e possibilitou identificar áreas prioritárias de atenção no estado, relacionadas à disseminação e controle da doença.
Assuntos
Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Análise Espacial , Programas Governamentais , Unidades de Terapia IntensivaRESUMO
Resumo Fundamento A doença Coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19), causada pela síndrome respiratória aguda grave Coronavírus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), espalhou-se pelo mundo. Objetivo Investigar a associação entre a hipertensão e a gravidade/mortalidade de pacientes hospitalizados com COVID-19 em Wuhan, China. Métodos Um total de 337 pacientes diagnosticados com COVID-19 no Sétimo Hospital da cidade de Wuhan, de 20 de janeiro a 25 de fevereiro de 2020, foram inseridos e analisados em um estudo de caso unicêntrico e retrospectivo. O nível de significância adotado para a análise estatística foi 0,05. Resultados Dos 337 pacientes com diagnóstico confirmado de COVID-19, 297 (87.8%) tiveram alta do hospital e 40 pacientes (22,9%) morreram. A idade média foi de 58 anos (variando de 18 a 91 anos). Havia 112 (33,2%) pacientes diagnosticados com hipertensão no momento da internação (idade média, 65,0 anos [variação, 38-91 anos]; sendo 67 homens [59,8%, IC95%: 50,6%-69,0%], p=0,0209). Pacientes com hipertensão apresentaram uma porção significativamente maior de casos graves (69 [61,6%, IC95%: 52,5%-70,8%] vs. 117 [52,0%, IC95%: 45,4%-58,6%] em pacientes graves e 23 [19,3%, IC95%: 12,9%-28,1%] vs. 27 [12,0%, IC95%: 7,7%-16,3%] em pacientes críticos, p=0,0014) e maiores taxas de mortalidade (20 [17,9%, IC95%: 10,7%-25,1%] vs. 20 [8,9%, IC95%: 5,1%-12,6%, p=0,0202). Além disso, pacientes hipertensos apresentaram níveis anormais de vários indicadores, como linfopenia e inflamação, e nas funções cardíacas, hepáticas, renais e pulmonares no momento da internação. O grupo de pacientes com hipertensão também demonstrou níveis maiores de TNT e creatinina próximo da alta. Conclusão A hipertensão está altamente associada à gravidade ou mortalidade da COVID-19. Um tratamento agressivo deve ser considerado para pacientes hipertensos com COVID-19, principalmente com relação a lesões cardíacas e dos rins.
Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread worldwide. Objective To investigate the association between hypertension and severity/mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Methods A total of 337 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at the Seventh Hospital of Wuhan City, from January 20 to February 25, 2020, were enrolled and analyzed in a retrospective, single-center case study. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 0.05. Results Of the 337 patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, 297 (87.8%) were discharged from the hospital and 40 patients (22.9%) died. The median age was 58 years (range, 18-91 years). There were 112 (33.2%) patients diagnosed with hypertension at admission (median age, 65.0 years [range, 38-91 years]; 67 [59.8%, 95%CI: 50.6%-69.0%] men, p=0.0209). Patients with hypertension presented a significantly higher portion of severe cases (69 [61.6%, 95%CI:52.5%-70.8%] vs. 117 [52.0%, 95%CI: 45.4%-58.6%] in severe patients and 23 [19.3%, 95%CI:12.9%-28.1%] vs. 27 [12.0%, 95%CI: 7.7%-16.3%] in critical patients, p=0.0014) and higher mortality rates (20 [17.9%, 95%CI: 10.7%-25.1%] vs. 20 [8.9%, 95%CI: 5.1%-12.6%, p=0.0202). Moreover, hypertensive patients presented abnormal levels of multiple indicators, such as lymphopenia, inflammation, heart, liver, kidney, and lung function at admission. The hypertension group still displayed higher levels of TnT and creatinine at approaching discharge. Conclusion Hypertension is strongly associated with severity or mortality of COVID-19. Aggressive treatment may be considered for COVID-19 patients with hypertension, especially regarding cardiac and kidney injury.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción: El registro ARGEN-IC permitió conocer las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de la insuficiencia cardíaca aguda (ICA) en nuestro país; sin embargo, no contamos con datos nacionales de las consecuencias sobre la ICA de la implementación del distanciamiento social, preventivo y obligatorio a causa de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Objetivo: Evaluar las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los pacientes ingresados al registro ARGEN-IC durante el confinamiento y distanciamiento social debido a la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Materiales y métodos: Se compararon pacientes (p) incorporados al registro ARGEN-IC durante marzo-junio de 2019 (grupo A: Era No COVID) con los ingresados en igual período de 2020 (grupo B: Era COVID). Se registraron los datos de filiación, las características clínicas, bioquímicas, imagenológicas y terapéuticas durante la hospitalización y las respectivas complicaciones (mortalidad cardiovascular y no cardiovascular). Resultados: Se incluyeron 361 p, 222 en el grupo A y 139 en el grupo B. Se observaron diferencias significativas entre ambas poblaciones en cuanto a edad, grupo A 70,9 ± 14,8 años vs. grupo B 75 ± 13,3 (p = 0,008); antecedente de hipertensión arterial, grupo A 70,2% vs. grupo B 87,7% (p <0,001); antecedente de accidente cerebrovascular isquémico, grupo A 4,5% vs. grupo B 10,07% (p = 0,039); e hipertrofia ventricular izquierda, grupo A 4,9% vs. grupo B 1,5% (p = 0,021). En relación con otras variables como etiología, factores desencadenantes y forma de presentación clínica, no se hallaron diferencias significativas entre ambas poblaciones, aunque hubo una tendencia a mayor antecedente de depresión en el grupo B. No hubo diferencia en la duración de la estadía hospitalaria ni en la mortalidad. Conclusiones: Durante el distanciamiento social y obligatorio en nuestro país, observamos una disminución de las internaciones por ICA en 2020 respecto de las registradas en el mismo período de 2019. Entre aquellos que requirieron internación, hallamos un perfil de paciente más añoso, con más comorbilidades. No se observaron diferencias en la mortalidad total y cardiovascular, ni en la estadía hospitalaria.
ABSTRACT Introduction: The ARGEN-IC registry allowed knowing the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of acute heart failure (AHF) in our country; however, there are no available national data of the consequences on AHF of social, preventive and mandatory distancing due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients admitted to the ARGEN-IC registry during confinement and social distancing due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: Patients included in the ARGEN-IC registry during March-June 2019 (group A: Non-COVID era) were compared with those admitted in the same period of 2020 (group B: COVID era). Affiliation data, clinical, biochemical, imaging and therapeutic characteristics during hospitalization and the associated complications (cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality) were recorded. Results: A total of 361 patients were included in the study: 222 in group A and 139 in group B. Significant differences were observed between both populations in terms of age (group A: 70.9 ± 14.8 years vs. group B: 75 ± 13.3, p = 0.008), history of hypertension (group A: 70.2 % vs. group B: 87.7%, p <0.001), history of ischemic stroke (group A: 4.5% vs. group B: 10.07%, p = 0.039), and left ventricular hypertrophy (group A: 4.9 % vs. group B: 1.5 %, p = 0.021). No significant differences were found between the two populations regarding other variables such as etiology, triggering factors, and forms of clinical presentation, although there was a trend towards greater history of depression in group B. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay or mortality. Conclusions: During compulsory social distancing in our country, we observed a decrease in hospitalizations for AHF in 2020 compared with those registered in the same period of 2019, but the population requiring hospitalization was older and with more comorbidities. No differences were observed in overall and cardiovascular mortality, or in the length of hospital stay.
RESUMO
RESUMEN Introducción: La infección por COVID-19 se asocia a compromiso cardiovascular en su etapa aguda. La información sobre el compromiso cardíaco en la etapa de convalecencia de la enfermedad tanto en pacientes con y sin síntomas persistentes es limitada. Objetivos: 1. Analizar el compromiso cardíaco mediante ecocardiograma en la etapa de convalecencia de la enfermedad por COVID-19; 2. Explorar su asociación con: a) gravedad del cuadro agudo y b) persistencia de síntomas. Métodos: Estudio analítico, observacional, prospectivo y unicéntrico. Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos que consultaron al centro para realizar evaluación post-COVID. Se realizó ecocardiograma Doppler color transtorácico en busca de hallazgos patológicos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 600 pacientes desde el 01/09/2020 al 01/05/2021. Veintinueve (4,8%) presentaron hallazgos patológicos en el ecocardiograma. Los pacientes con cuadros iniciales moderados o graves presentaron mayor prevalencia de trastornos de motilidad parietal (4,3% versus 0,5%, p = 0,02) y derrame pericárdico (4,3% versus 0,24%, p = 0,01) en comparación con aquellos con cuadros asintomáticos o leves. En el ajuste multivariado esta asociación no alcanzó significación estadística. El 28,6% de los pacientes referían síntomas persistentes, no observándose una asociación entre la presencia de los mismos y los hallazgos ecocardiográficos patológicos. Conclusión: La prevalencia de compromiso cardíaco evaluado mediante ecocardiograma en la etapa de convalecencia de la enfermedad por COVID-19 fue de 4,8%. Los pacientes con cuadros iniciales más graves presentaron más hallazgos patológicos. La significancia no se sostuvo en el análisis multivariado. Los síntomas persistentes no se asociaron a mayor compromiso cardíaco.
ABSTRACT Background: The acute phase of COVID-19 infection is associated with cardiovascular involvement, but there is limited information regarding this relationship in the recovery phase from this disease both in patients with or without persistent symptoms. Objectives: The aims of this study were: 1. To analyze cardiovascular involvement by echocardiography in the recovery phase from COVID-19 disease, and 2. To explore its association with: a) the severity of the acute phase and b) the presence of persistent symptoms. Methods: An analytical, observational, prospective and single-center study was carried out, including consecutive patients attending the center for post-COVID-19 evaluation who underwent a transthoracic color Doppler echocardiogram looking for pathological outcomes. Results: A total of 600 patients were included from September 1, 2020 to May 1, 2021, and 29 of these patients (4.8%) presented pathological findings in the echocardiogram. Patients with moderate or severe acute phase COVID-19 infection had a higher prevalence of wall motion disorders (4.3% vs. 0.5%, p=0.02) and pericardial effusion (4.3% vs. 0.24%, p=0.01) compared with those with asymptomatic or mild symptoms; however, after multivariate adjustment, this association did not reach statistical significance. In 28.6% of cases, patients reported persistent symptoms, with no evident association between their presence and pathological echocardiographic results. Conclusion: The prevalence of cardiovascular involvement evaluated by echocardiography was 4.8% in the recovery phase from COVID-19 disease. Patients with more severe initial clinical presentation exhibited more pathological findings, but the significance was not sustained in the multivariate analysis. Persistent symptoms were not associated with greater cardiovascular involvement.