RESUMO
Objective To compare the efficacy of femoral triangle versus adductor canal approach to saphenous nerve block for postoperative analgesia in the patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.Methods Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes,aged 53-68yr,scheduled for elective total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia,were assigned into 2 groups (n=30 each) using a random number table method:femoral triangle approach to saphenous nerve block group (group F) and adductor canal approach to saphenous nerve block group (group A).Femoral triangle and adductor canal approach to saphenous nerve block was performed by injecting 0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml in group F and group A,respectively.Patient-controlled saphenous nerve block analgesia was used in two groups,and the analgesic pump solution contained 1% ropivacaine 400 mg diluted to 160 ml in 0.9% sodium chloride injection.The analgesic pump was set up with a 5 ml bolus dose,a 30-main lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 5 ml/h,and analgesia lasted until 72 h after operation.When visual analog scale score > 4 and pain was not relived after 30-min pressing by patients,pethidine hydrochloride 100 mg was intramuscularly injected as rescue analgesic.The muscle strength of quadriceps femoris was assessed by manual muscle test at 4,8,24,48 and 72 h after operation.The patient's satisfaction score was assessed and recorded at 72 h after operation.Rescue analgesia and development of adverse reactions (local anesthetic intoxication,itching,dizziness,urinary retention,nausea and vomiting) were recorded within 72 h after operation.Results Compared with group F,the muscle strength of quadriceps femoris was significantly increased at 4,8 and 24 h after operation,the rate of postoperative rescue analgesia was decreased (P<0.05),and no significant change was found in patient's satisfaction score or incidence of adverse reactions in group A (P>0.05).Conclusion Adductor canal approach to saphenous nerve block provides better efficacy for postoperative analgesia than femoral triangle approach to saphenous nerve block in the patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.
RESUMO
Objective@#To investigate the clinical effects of free superficial femoral artery femoral triangle perforator flap in the repair of skin and soft tissue defects in extremities.@*Methods@#From January 2016 to November 2017, 14 patients (9 males and 5 females, aged 19 to 54 years) with skin and soft tissue defects in extremities accompanied with tendon and bone exposure were admitted to our unit. The size of skin and soft tissue defects after debridement ranged from 7 cm×3 cm to 10 cm×7 cm. The defects were repaired with free superficial femoral artery femoral triangle perforator flaps, with size ranging from 13.0 cm×2.0 cm to 20.0 cm×4.5 cm. The medial femoral cutaneous nerve was applied to the flap. The perforator flap was grafted onto the medial femoral cutaneous nerve in 6 patients. The donor sites were sutured directly. The survival of flaps and the follow-up of patients were observed.@*Results@#All flaps of 14 patients survived successfully. The recipient sites and donor sites were healed completely in 13 patients, and 1 patient with partial skin necrosis at the edge of flap was healed after treatment. All patients were followed up for 6 months to 1 year after the operation. The flaps were in good shape, with nearly normal color and soft texture and no cicatrix contracture deformity. The flaps recovered protective sense in 6 patients who had medial femoral cutaneous nerve grafting, and the sensory recovery of the flap was slightly worse in the remaining 8 patients. There was no significant complications on the appearance and walking of the donor thigh in 14 patients, only a linear scar was left on the inner thigh, and no numbness was felt in the donor sites of patients.@*Conclusions@#The free superficial femoral artery femoral triangle perforator flap is an ideal therapy for repairing skin and soft tissue defects in extremities.
RESUMO
Objective@#To compare the efficacy of femoral triangle versus adductor canal approach to saphenous nerve block for postoperative analgesia in the patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.@*Methods@#Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes, aged 53-68 yr, scheduled for elective total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia, were assigned into 2 groups (n=30 each) using a random number table method: femoral triangle approach to saphenous nerve block group (group F) and adductor canal approach to saphenous nerve block group (group A). Femoral triangle and adductor canal approach to saphenous nerve block was performed by injecting 0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml in group F and group A, respectively.Patient-controlled saphenous nerve block analgesia was used in two groups, and the analgesic pump solution contained 1% ropivacaine 400 mg diluted to 160 ml in 0.9% sodium chloride injection.The analgesic pump was set up with a 5 ml bolus dose, a 30-min lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 5 ml/h, and analgesia lasted until 72 h after operation.When visual analog scale score > 4 and pain was not relived after 30-min pressing by patients, pethidine hydrochloride 100 mg was intramuscularly injected as rescue analgesic.The muscle strength of quadriceps femoris was assessed by manual muscle test at 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 h after operation.The patient′s satisfaction score was assessed and recorded at 72 h after operation.Rescue analgesia and development of adverse reactions (local anesthetic intoxication, itching, dizziness, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting) were recorded within 72 h after operation.@*Results@#Compared with group F, the muscle strength of quadriceps femoris was significantly increased at 4, 8 and 24 h after operation, the rate of postoperative rescue analgesia was decreased (P<0.05), and no significant change was found in patient′s satisfaction score or incidence of adverse reactions in group A (P>0.05).@*Conclusion@#Adductor canal approach to saphenous nerve block provides better efficacy for postoperative analgesia than femoral triangle approach to saphenous nerve block in the patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.
RESUMO
Femoral artery is the major artery of the lower limb. It shows some variations in its branching pattern. One of the rare but clinically important variations is the origin of deep circumflex iliac and inferior epigastric arteries from it instead of from external iliac artery. We report here the origin of inferior epigastric and deep circumflex iliac arteries from the femoral artery bilaterally. Both the arteries passed up deep to the inguinal ligament and had a normal course and distribution after crossing the inguinal ligament. Knowledge of these variations is of importance in plastic surgery, anterior approach to the hip joint, draining psoas abscess or reducing a femoral hernia.
La arteria femoral es la principal arteria del miembro inferior. Se observan algunas variaciones en su patrón de ramificación. Una variante rara, pero clínicamente importante es el origen común de las arterias circunfleja iliaca profunda y epigástrica inferior no desde la arteria ilíaca externa. Presentamos el origen bilateral de las arterias epigástricas inferiores y circunfleja ilíaca profunda desde la arteria femoral. Ambas arterias pasaron profundas al ligamento inguinal y tuvieron un curso y distribución normal después de cruzar el ligamento inguinal. El conocimiento de estas variaciones son de importancia en la cirugía plástica, en el acceso anterior a la articulación de la cadera, el drenaje absceso del músculo psoas mayor o para reducir una hernia femoral.