Research progress of pubic symphysis diastasis / 中国修复重建外科杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To review the research progress of pubic symphysis diastasis and provide effective reference for orthopedic surgeons in the diagnosis and treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis.@*METHODS@#The anatomy, injury mechanism, treatment, and other aspects of pubic symphysis diastasis were summarized and analyzed by reviewing the relevant research literature at domestically and internationally in recent years.@*RESULTS@#The incidence of pubic symphysis diastasis is high in pelvic fractures, which is caused by the injury of the ligaments and fibrocartilage disc around the pubic symphysis by external force. The treatment plan should be individualized according to the pelvic stability and the needs of patients, aiming to restore the stability and integrity of the pelvis and improve the quality of life of patients after surgery.@*CONCLUSION@#At present, the research on pubic symphysis diastasis still needs to be improved. In the future, high-quality, multi-center, and large-sample studies are of great significance for the selection of treatment methods and the evaluation of effectiveness for patients with pubic symphysis diastasis.

Differentiation of anteroposterior pelvic compression type Ⅰ and Ⅱ injuries and severity evaluation / 中华创伤杂志

Objective To investigate the reliability of using the pubic symphysis diastasis of 25 mm and anterior separation distance of sacroiliac joint to differentiate anteroposterior compression (APC) type Ⅰ and Ⅱ injuries as well as assess the injury severity.Methods A total of 11 (seven males and four females) fresh cadaver specimens with 22 hemipelvis were collected.The pelvic APC injury test models including fixed hemipelvis (restricted group) and unfixed hemipelvis (non-restricted group) were established,with 11 hemipelvis in each group according to the random number table method.Meanwhile the specimens were divided into male group (14 hemipelvis) and female group (eight hemipelvis),simulating APC type injury external rotation hemipelvis.The public symophysis interval and anterior interval of sacroiliac joint of the original pelvis,the pubic symphysis diastasis and anterior diastasis of sacroiliac joint after anterior tibiofibular ligament failure,as well as the affected pelvis ligament and sacral ligament injury were recorded and compared between the restricted and non-restricted groups,male and female groups.Results There were no significant differences in the public symphysis interval of the original pelvis and anterior interval of sacroiliac joint between the restricted group and the non-restricted group (P ＞ 0.05).The pubic symphysis interval of the original pelvis was [(5.13 ± 0.61) mm] in male group and (4.03 ± 0.84)mm] in female group (P ＜ 0.05).When the anterior tibiofibular ligament ruptured,the pubic symphysis diastasis distance was (23.36 ± 7.27) mm,ranging from 12 to 41 mm,and the diastasis distance of anterior sacroiliac joint was (9.82 ± 3.25)mm,ranging from 5 to 18 mm.In terms of the public symphysis interval,there were no significant differences between male and female groups,restricted and the non-restricted groups (P ＞ 0.05).In terms of anterior interval of sacroiliac joint,there was significant difference between male and female groups (P ＜ 0.05) but no significant difference between the restricted and non-restricted groups (P ＞ 0.05).In the restricted group,sacrotuberous ligament injuries were found in four patients,and sacrospinous ligament injuries in five,whhile there were no obvious sacrospinous ligament and sacrotuberous ligament injuries in non-restricted group.There were 10 specimens with the pubic symphysis diastasis ≥23.36 mm and 10 specimens with the diastasis distance of anterior sacroiliac joint ≥9.82 mm (46％),and there were 15 specimens with at least the pubic symphysis interval ≥ 23.36 mm or the anterior interval of sacroiliac joint ≥ 9.82 mm (68％).Conclusions The public symphysis interval ≥ 23.36 mm or anterior interval of sacroiliac joint ≥ 9.82 mm can distinguish anteroposterior compression Ⅰ from Ⅱ injuries,and the combination of the two criteria can be beneficial to assessment of pelvic injury severity.

Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation / 中华创伤骨科杂志

Cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation is also known as cervical spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality. This disorder is a both common and special type of spinal cord injury. Its patients usually have a prior history of cervical spine disorder, and their symptoms deteriorate after trauma. Radiographic examination may reveal nothing serious but their symptoms appear severe. Lack of knowledge of this disorder may lead to incorrect diagnosis and treatment based only on radiological manifestations, causing adverse outcomes to the patients. Currently, controversy exists over its injury mechanisms and treatment strategies. It helps functional recovery of the nerves if surgeons can determine the injury mechanism, radiological examinations are taken, a fine classification system is applied, and early effective surgery is conducted. This review deals with the research progress in injury mechanisms, radiological features, injury classification and treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation.

Advantage of ABCD classification in guiding diagnosis and treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation / 中华创伤骨科杂志

Objective To explore whether the ABCD classification has any advantage over the subaxial cervical spine injury classification (SLIC) in the treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation.Methods Included in this study were 118 patients who had been treated for cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation from January 2012 to December 2016.They were 98 men and 20 women,aged from 18 to 78 years (average,50.1 years).Of them,those admitted from January 2012 to June 2014 were diagnosed and treated according to the SLIC while those admitted from July 2014 to December 2016 were diagnosed and treated by the ABCD classification.After a retrospective re-evaluation of the 118 cases was conducted using the classification other than their original one,30 cases were identified who showed discrepancy in the guidance indicated by the classification.Conservative treatment had been suggested for them by the SLIC but surgical treatment was suggested by the ABCD classification.Actually,16 of them had been treated conservatively and 14 surgically.The 2 groups of the 30 cases were compared in terms of preand post-operative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores.Results The 30 patients were followed up for 12 to 48 months (average,20 months).Ten of them obtained one grade ASIA improvement (4 in the conservative group and 6 in the surgical group) one year after operation.The JOA improvement rate for the conservative group (40.58％ ± 23.02％) was significantly lower than that for the surgical group (61.44％ ± 27.06％) (Z =-2.085,P =0.037).Their gender,age,or operative procedure was not significantly correlated with their treatment results (P ＞ 0.05),but their conservative or surgical treatment was significantly correlated with their treatment results (x2 =5.000,P =0.025).Conclusion The ABCD classification may have an advantage over the SLIC in the treatment of cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation,because it may lead to better neural functional recovery due to the more appropriate treatment protocol it may provide than the SLIC.

Research process of combat injury coding of U.S. Army / 第二军医大学学报

The research and establishment of combat injury coding are important in accurate judgment of war wound, medical documents recording, health resource allocation, medical decision supporting and health service informatization. Mass casualties with complicated injuries, numerous mechanisms and severe wound infection in combat field are not found in civilian trauma, so civilian injury coding is not applicable to combat injury data. In this paper, we reviewed the development of foreign civilian injury coding systems and American military combat coding system, and explored its reference role for Chinese military combat coding research.

Applicability of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score to Criteria of Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Treatment Decision of Thoracolumbar Injury

OBJECTIVE: For improving the drawbacks of previous thoracolumbar spine trauma classification, the Spine Trauma Study Group was developed new classification, Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS). The simplicity of this scoring system makes it useful clinical application. However, considering criteria of Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), the usefulness of TLICS system is still controversial in the treatment decision of thoracolumbar spine injury. METHODS: Total 100 patients, who admitted to our hospital due to acute traumatic thoracolumbar injury, were enrolled. In 45, surgical treatment was performed and surgical treatment was decided following the criteria of HIRA in all patients. With assessing of TLICS score and Denis's classification, the treatment guidelines of TLICS and Denis's classification were applied to the criteria of Korean HIRA. RESULTS: According to the Denis's three-column spine system, numbers of patients with 2 or 3 column injuries were 94. Only 45 of 94 patients (47.9%) with middle column injury fulfilled the criteria of HIRA. According to TLICS system, operation required fractures (score>4) were 31 and all patients except one fulfilled the criteria of HIRA. Conservative treatment required fractures (score<4) were 52 and borderline fracture (score=4) were 17. CONCLUSION: The TLICS system is very useful system for decision of surgical indication in acute traumatic thoracolumbar injury. However, the decision of treatment in TLICS score 4 should be carefully considered. Furthermore, definite criteria of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury may be necessary because the differentiation of PLC injury between TLICS score 2 and 3 is very difficult.

Clinical study of acute gastrointestinal injury classification in early enteral nutrition in patients under intensive care / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective To study the feasibility of the acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) classification standard for evaluation of gastrointestinal function in intensive care unit (ICU) patients,and to discuss its value in administration of early enteral nutrition (EN).Methods A perspective study was conducted.85 patients with AGI admitted to ICU of Tianjin First Center Hospital from January 2013 to June 2013 were enrolled.EN was conducted after ICU admission or within 12-24 hours after high catabolic state.The patients were divided into four groups according to the AGI classification,i.e.grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ,and they were treated according to the treatment procedure for AGI.The primary end points were 7-day rate of intake of standard EN,the degree of disease and nutrition,and their correlation with AGI classification.Secondary endpoint was rate of giving EN within 48 hours.Results Gastrointestinal dysfunction patients accounted for 49.42％ (85/172) of the ICU patients,and number of patients in grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ were 29,28,19,9 respectively.On the first day of ICU stay,there were no statistical differences in age,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score,serum albumin (ALB) and prealbumin (PA) among four groups,and it was demonstrated that the baseline data were comparable.APACHE Ⅱ score on the seventh day of ICU stay was significantly lower than that on the first day in grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ patients (grade Ⅰ:20.48 ± 2.45 vs.22.59 ± 2.06,t=-3.120,P=0.031 ; grade Ⅱ:19.34 ± 1.80 vs.21.65 ± 2.22,t=-4.316,P=0.012; grade Ⅲ:20.63 ± 1.34 vs.23.31 ± 1.70,t=-5.640,P=0.000),and serum PA (g/L) was significantly increased (grade Ⅰ:24.37 ± 6.54 vs.10.62 ± 7.24,t=-4.866,P=0.000; grade Ⅱ:19.79± 12.48 vs.11.57±8.94,t=-2.116,P=0.031; grade Ⅲ:19.15±8.43 vs.13.78 ± 6.59,t=-3.601,P=0.000).On the seventh day ofICU stay,the APACHE Ⅱ score was higher in grade Ⅳ than that in grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ patients (22.87 ± 3.31 vs.20.48 ± 2.45,19.34 ± 1.80,20.63 ± 1.34,P＜0.05 or P＜0.01),and PA was obviously lower in grade Ⅳ than that in grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ patients (g/L:14.02 ± 8.70 vs.24.37 ± 6.54,19.79 ±12.48,19.15 ± 8.43,P＜0.05 or P＜0.01).There was no statistically significant difference among four groups in respect of serum ALB (F=0.454,P=0.722).The rate of giving EN in 24 hours in grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ patients was 95.4％,72.1％,52.0％ and 0,respectively (x2=8.310,P=0.016),and in 48 hours it was 100.0％,83.0％,76.0％,and 0 (x2=5.470,P=0.025).7-day standard EN intake rate was 100.0％,88.7％,84.0％ and 34.0％ respectively in grade Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ patients (x2 =0.720,P=0.017).Correlation analysis showed that there was a negative correlation between AGI classification and rate of giving EN in 1 day (r=-0.62,P=0.04) and 7-day standard EN intake rate (r=-0.76,P=0.02).Conclusions AGI classification can be used to estimate the gastrointestinal function of patients with critical illness,and it has a significant correlation with early EN support.An early goal achieving intervention based on the AGI classification can improve the nutritional status and the general state of the patients.

Repeatability of TLICS scoring system used in the thoracolumbar spine injury / 中国基层医药

Objective To evaluate the thoracolumbar injury severity score [ thoracolumbar injury classifica-tion and severity score(TLICS)]and repeatability,and analyze its clinical significance in the treatment of injury of thoracolumbar.Methods The clinical and imaging data of our hospital (thoracolumbar X ray,CT examination,MRI examination) of intact thoracolumbar fractures in 90 patients were retrospectively analyzed ,respectively,TLICS score were made for their site of spinal injury morphology ,neural function and the posterior ligament complex three .Three months after reviewed ,TLICS was analyzed by using Cohen weighted kappa coefficient score .Its repeatability was ana-lyzed.Results According to the TLICS system ,spinal injury body ,nerve function and the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex were evaluated , respectively, the repeatability coefficient of Kappa , the calculated total to 0.47 non operation group,operation group,the total score was 0.46,with a moderate consistency.The neural function evaluation of the highest high consistency ,consistency .No significant differences between the two groups of repetitive Kappa coefficient(statistical values =0.674 5,P>0.05).According to the TLICS system of statistical accuracy ,the diagnostic sensitivity,specificity ratios was 95.8%,86.4%,97.6%,respectively.Conclusion The reliability of TLICS system for thoracolumbar treatment and recovery is higher ,relative comprehensive evaluation ,which can effec-tively guide the clinical treatment .

Accuracy and Safety in Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spines : Comparison Study between Conventional C-Arm Fluoroscopy and Navigation Coupled with O-Arm(R) Guided Methods

OBJECTIVE: The authors performed a retrospective study to assess the accuracy and clinical benefits of a navigation coupled with O-arm(R) system guided method in the thoracic and lumbar spines by comparing with a C-arm fluoroscopy-guided method. METHODS: Under the navigation guidance, 106 pedicle screws inserted from T7 to S1 in 24 patients, and using the fluoroscopy guidance, 204 pedicle screws from T5 to S1 in 45 patients. The position of screws within the pedicle was classified into four groups, from grade 0 (no violation cortex) to 3 (more than 4 mm violation). The location of violated pedicle cortex was also assessed. Intra-operative parameters including time required for preparation of screwing procedure, times for screwing and the number of X-ray shot were assessed in each group. RESULTS: Grade 0 was observed in 186 (91.2%) screws of the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 99 (93.4%) of the navigation-guided group. Mean time required for inserting a screw was 3.8 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 4.5 minutes in the navigation-guided group. Mean time required for preparation of screw placement was 4 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group, and 19 minutes in the navigation-guided group. The fluoroscopy-guided group required mean 8.9 times of X-ray shot for each screw placement. CONCLUSION: The screw placement under the navigation-guidance coupled with O-arm(R) system appears to be more accurate and safer than that under the fluoroscopy guidance, although the preparation and screwing time for the navigation-guided surgery is longer than that for the fluoroscopy-guided surgery.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Sub-Axial Injury Classification and Severity Scale between Radiologist, Resident and Spine Surgeon

OBJECTIVE: The sub-axial injury classification (SLIC) and severity scale was developed to decide whether to operate the cervical injured patient or not, but the reliability of SLIC and severity scale among the different physicians was not well known. Therefore, we evaluated the reliability of SLIC among a spine surgeon, a resident of neurosurgery and a neuro-radiologist. METHODS: In retrograde review in single hospital from 2002 to 2009 years, 75 cases of sub-axial spine injured patients underwent operation. Each case was blindly reviewed for the SLIC and severity scale by 3 different observers by two times with 4 weeks interval with randomly allocated. The compared axis was the injury morphology score, the disco-ligamentous complex score, the neurological status score and total SLIC score; the neurological status score was derived from the review of medical record. The kappa value was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement of SLIC and severity scale was substantial agreement in the score of injury morphology [intraclass correlation (ICC)=0.603] and total SLIC and severity sacle (ICC value=0.775), but was fair agreement in the disco-ligamentous complex score (ICC value=0.304). Intraobserver agreements were almost perfect agreement in whole scales with ICC of 0.974 in a spine surgeon, 0.948 in a resident of neurosurgery, and 0.963 in a neuro-radiologist. CONCLUSION: The SLIC and severity scale is comprehensive and easily applicable tool in spine injured patient. Moreover, it is very useful tool to communicate among spine surgeons, residents of neurosurgery and neuro-radiologists with sufficient reproducibility.

CT classification of lacerating lung injury and its clinical significance / 中华创伤杂志

Objective To explore the CT classification of lacerating lung injury in blunt thoracic trauma and its clinical significance. Methods A total of 63 patients with lung lacerating injury were classified using CT features as simple type injury (complete visceral pleura, with no pneumothorax or he-mopneumothorax) and complex type injury (accompanied by visceral pleura rupture, pneumothorax or he-mopneumothorax). A retrospective analysis was done on CT manifestations and clinical data. Results Of 63 patients, 35 patients (56%) had simple type of lacerating lung injury with complete visceral pleu-ra, most of which were focal pulmonary pseudocyst lesions present in the edge of lungs and could be dis-persed quickly after conservative therapy without complications. Mean hospital stay was 16 days. Of pa-tients with complex type of lacerating lung injury, 28 patients (44.4%) were accompanied by visceral pleura rupture with larger extent of pulmonary injury, 20 (71%) by lung eontnsion, 15 (54%) by ate-lectasis or pulmonary atelectasis and three (11%) by local pulmonary infection. Thoracic puncture or closed drainage was performed in 19 patients (69%) and thoracotomy in one (4%), with mean hospital stay of 58 days. Conclusions According to CT manifestations on whether there exists visceral pleura rupture or not, the lacerating lung injury is classified as simple type injury and complex type injury. CT classification of lacerating lung injury may be helpful in selecting clinical treatment protocols and predic-ting early prognosis.