Evaluation of clopidogrel response variability and identification of the CYP2C19 polymorphism in Mexican patients / Evaluación de la variabilidad en la respuesta a clopidogrel e identificación del polimorfismo CYP2C19 en pacientes mexicanos

Abstract Objective Drug inhibition of platelet P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor has reduced the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary interventions. The analysis of the phosphorylation status of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein by flow cytometry has shown a predictive value for adverse events and stent thrombosis. Polymorphisms of CYP2C19 in high risk patients may also relate to adverse cardiovascular events. Methods Ninety patients were enrolled. Patients received a 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose. Blood samples were obtained at the time of the procedure and 24 h later, platelet reactivity was assessed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation measurement using flow cytometry. Low response to clopidogrel was defined as a platelet reactivity index ≥ 50%. The presence of CYP2C19*2 was identified with the restriction enzyme Smal. Results Mean platelet reactivity index: 53.45 ± 22.48% in the baseline sample and 57.14 ± 23.08% at 24 h (p = 0.183); 40% of patients behaved as good responders, the rest behaved as non-responders with 38% of patients showing platelet reactivity indexes between 50-70% and 22% showing indexes above 70%. The CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was found in 17% of patients, with a 3.9% AA homozygous genotype carriers. Conclusion Response to the clopidogrel loading dose showed a wide variability among patients with 40% responding to the drug according to previously established cut-off values. Our results showed that 3.9% of patients show the AA genotype. To our knowledge, this is the first study involving clopidogrel response by flow citometry and genotype typification in Mexican Mestizo population.

Resumen Objetivo La inhibición del receptor plaquetario P2Y12 se ha asociado con reducción en incidencia de eventos cardiovasculares mayores en pacientes sometidos a intervenciones coronarias percutáneas. El estudio de la fosfoproteína estimulada por vasodilatadores mediante citometría de flujo tiene valor predictivo para desarrollo de eventos adversos y trombosis del stent. Los polimorfismos del CYP2C19 en pacientes de alto riesgo pueden también asociarse con eventos adversos. Método 90 pacientes, dosis de carga de clopidogrel: 600 mg. Se obtuvieron muestras de sangre basales y post-24 horas. La reactividad plaquetaria se estudió mediante medición de fosfoproteína estimulada por vasodiatadores por citometría de flujo. Se consideró baja respuesta al clopidogrel un índice de reactividad plaquetaria ≥50%. La presencia del CYP2C19*2 se identificó con enzima de restricción Smal. Resultados La media del índice de reactividad plaquetaria fue: 53.45 ± 22.48% en muestras basales y 57.14 ± 23.08% a 24 h (p = 0.183); 40% de los pacientes repondieron a clopidogrel, el resto de comportó como no-respondedores, un 38%, mostró índices de reactividad plaquetaria entre 50 -70% y 22%, índices > 70%. El polimorfismo CYP2C19*2 se encontró en 17% pacientes, con un 3.9% portadores de genotipo homozigótico AA. Conclusiones La respuesta a clopidogrel mostró amplia variabilidad entre pacientes, el 40% presentó respuesta de acuerdo con puntos de corte pre establecidos. Un 3.9% de los pacientes presentó genotipo AA. Consideramos que este es el primer estudio realizado en población mestizo-mexicana utilizado citometría de flujo para evaluar la respuesta a clopidogrel así como la tipificación genética de los pacientes.

When is the Best Time for the Second Antiplatelet Agent in Non-St Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome? / Qual o Melhor Momento para o Segundo Antiplaquetário na Síndrome Coronariana Aguda sem Elevação do ST?

Abstract Dual antiplatelet therapy is a well-established treatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), with class I of recommendation (level of evidence A) in current national and international guidelines. Nonetheless, these guidelines are not precise or consensual regarding the best time to start the second antiplatelet agent. The evidences are conflicting, and after more than a decade using clopidogrel in this scenario, benefits from the routine pretreatment, i.e. without knowing the coronary anatomy, with dual antiplatelet therapy remain uncertain. The recommendation for the upfront treatment with clopidogrel in NSTE-ACS is based on the reduction of non-fatal events in studies that used the conservative strategy with eventual invasive stratification, after many days of the acute event. This approach is different from the current management of these patients, considering the established benefits from the early invasive strategy, especially in moderate to high-risk patients. The only randomized study to date that specifically tested the pretreatment in NSTE-ACS in the context of early invasive strategy, used prasugrel, and it did not show any benefit in reducing ischemic events with pretreatment. On the contrary, its administration increased the risk of bleeding events. This study has brought the pretreatment again into discussion, and led to changes in recent guidelines of the American and European cardiology societies. In this paper, the authors review the main evidence of the pretreatment with dual antiplatelet therapy in NSTE-ACS.

Resumo A indicação de dupla terapia antiplaquetária para o tratamento da síndrome coronariana aguda sem elevação do ST está bem estabelecida e é recomendação classe I (Nível de Evidência A) nas atuais diretrizes nacionais e internacionais. No entanto, essas mesmas diretrizes não são muito claras e consensuais quanto ao melhor momento para utilização do segundo antiplaquetário. As evidências sobre este tema são conflitantes e, após mais de uma década do uso do clopidogrel neste cenário, ainda há discussão se o pré-tratamento com dupla terapia antiplaquetária teria benefício de maneira rotineira, ou seja, quando aplicada sem conhecer a anatomia coronária. A recomendação de tratamentoupfront com clopidogrel na síndrome coronariana aguda sem elevação do ST se baseia em redução de eventos não fatais identificados em estudos que utilizavam estratégia conservadora, com eventual estratificação invasiva tardia, vários dias após o evento agudo. Essa abordagem é bastante diferente da que é feita atualmente, tendo em vista os benefícios já demonstrados da estratégia invasiva precoce nos pacientes de risco intermediário/alto. O único ensaio clínico randomizado que testou a hipótese do pré-tratamento na síndrome coronariana aguda sem elevação do ST sob a atual estratégia invasiva precoce utilizou o antiplaquetário prasugrel e mostrou que não houve benefício em redução de eventos isquêmicos, tendo, por outro lado, aumentado o risco de eventos hemorrágicos. Este estudo trouxe novamente o pré-tratamento à discussão e modificou recomendações nas atuais diretrizes das sociedades americana e europeia de cardiologia. Neste artigo, os autores apresentam uma revisão sobre as principais evidências do pré-tratamento com dupla terapia antiplaquetária na síndrome coronariana aguda sem elevação do ST.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Colombia / Análisis de costo-efectividad del ticagrelor en comparación con el clopidogrel para el tratamiento de pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo en Colombia

Introduction: Acute coronary syndrome is one of the most frequent medical emergencies in developing countries. Objective: To determine, from the perspective of the Colombian health system, the cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Materials and methods: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Colombian health system comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome. To estimate the expected costs and outcomes, a Markov model was constructed in which patients could remain stable without experiencing new cardiovascular events, suffer from a new event, or die. For the baseline case, a 10-year time horizon and a discount ratio of 3% for costs and benefits were adopted. The transition probabilities were extracted from the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) clinical trial. Vital statistics were drawn from the Departmento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE) and additional information from Colombian patients included in the Access registry. To identify and measure resource use, a standard case was built by consulting guidelines and protocols. Unit costs were obtained from Colombian rate lists. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted in which costs were represented by a triangular distribution, and the effectiveness through a beta distribution. Results: In the base case, the additional cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained with ticagrelor was COP$ 28,411,503. The results were sensitive to changes in the time horizon and the unit cost of clopidogrel. For a willingness-to-pay equivalent to three times the Colombian per capita gross domestic product, the probability of ticagrelor being cost-effective was 75%. Conclusions: Ticagrelor is a cost-effective strategy for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Colombia.

Introducción. El síndrome coronario agudo es una de las emergencias médicas más frecuentes en los países en desarrollo. Objetivo. Determinar, desde la perspectiva del sistema de salud colombiano, la relación de costo-efectividad del ticagrelor comparado con el clopidogrel para el tratamiento de pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un análisis de costo-efectividad desde la perspectiva del sistema de salud colombiano, comparando el ticagrelor y el clopidogrel para el tratamiento de pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo. Para estimar los costos y resultados esperados de las dos alternativas, se construyó un modelo de Markov en el cual los pacientes podían permanecer estables sin experimentar nuevos eventos cardiovasculares, sufrir de un nuevo evento coronario o morir. Para el caso de base, se adoptó un horizonte temporal de 10 años y una tasa de descuento de 3 % para los costos y beneficios. Las probabilidades de transición se extrajeron del estudio Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes , PLATO. Las estadísticas vitales se consultaron en informes del Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE) y los parámetros adicionales del modelo se basaron en la información de los pacientes colombianos incluidos en el registro en Access. Para identificar y medir el uso de recursos, se construyó un caso estándar a partir de guías y protocolos. Los costos unitarios se obtuvieron de manuales tarifarios colombianos. Se hizo un análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico en el que los costos se representaron por una distribución triangular y, las probabilidades de transición, mediante una distribución beta. Resultados. En el caso de base, el costo adicional por años de vida ajustados por calidad ganados con el ticagrelor fue de COP$ 28´411.503. Los resultados fueron sensibles a los cambios en el horizonte temporal y al costo unitario del clopidogrel. Para un umbral de costo-efectividad equivalente a tres veces el producto interno bruto per cápita de Colombia, la probabilidad de que el ticagrelor fuera costo-efectivo fue de 75 %. Conclusiones. El ticagrelor es una estrategia costo-efectiva para el tratamiento de los pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo en Colombia.

Clopidogrel versus prasugrel en síndrome coronario agudo tratado con angioplastia / Clopidogrel versus prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome treated with coronary angioplasty

Al uso del clopidogrel se han agregado nuevos antiagregantes como prasugrel y ticagrelor. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la incidencia de eventos isquémicos y hemorrágicos en pacientes que han recibido clopidogrel o prasugrel.Se incluyeron de manera consecutiva todos los pacientes con angioplastia durante la internación por síndrome coronario agudo entre diciembre 2011 y diciembre 2012.Fueron incluidos 398 pacientes. No se observaron diferencias en la mortalidad de causa cardiovascular (clopidogrel 2.5% vs. prasugrel 2.9%, p = 0.48). El grupo prasugrel presentó una reducción en la tasa de infarto (1.9% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.01) con sangrado totales (18.5% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.001) a expensas de sangrados menores (12.4% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), sin diferencia en sangrados mayores (p = 0.27) y sangrados con peligro de vida (p =.0.20). Por análisis multivariado los predictores independientes de mortalidad cardiovascular fueron edad (odds ratio 1.08, intervalo de confianza, IC, 95% 1.02-1.16, p = 0.02) insuficiencia renal (odds ratio 6.98, IC 95% 1.23-39.71, p < 0.0001). En cuanto al sangrado total se identificaron la edad (odds ratio 1.06, IC 95% 1.02-1.09, p = 0.002), elevación del segmento ST (odds ratio 1.99, IC 95% 1.05-3.79, p = 0.02), insuficiencia renal (odds ratio 3.32, IC 95% 1.62-6.78, p = 0.002) y utilización de prasugrel (odds ratio 3.97, IC 95% 1.87-8.41, p < 0.0001). La utilización de prasugrel se asocia a una menor tasa de infarto agudo de miocardio al año de seguimiento, con incremento de hemorragias menores. No se observaron diferencias significativas en la mortalidad cardiovascular entre ambos grupos.

Greater antithrombotic potency new antiplatelet agents have been added such as prasugrel (PR) and ticagrelor to the traditional use of clopidogrel (CL) in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study was aimed at comparing the incidence of long term ischemic and hemorrhagic events in patients treated with CL or PR during hospitalization. Retrospective ACS data base analysis performed by our cardiology service was completed prospectively. There were consecutively included all patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during hospitalization due to ACS from December 2011 thru December 2012. A total of 398 ACS patients who underwent PCI with stent implantation were recruited. No differences in cardiovascular related deaths were observed in both groups (PR 2.9% vs. CL 2.5%, p = 0.48). PR group showed less re-infraction (1.9% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.01) with more total bleedings (18.5% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.001) and minor bleedings (12.4% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) with no differences in major and life threatening bleedings (p = ns). Multivariate analysis showed that independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality were age (OR 1.08, CI 95% 1.02-1.16) and renal failure (OR 6.98, CI 95% 1.23-39.71). Independent predictors for total bleeding were age (OR 1.06, CI 95% 1.02-1.09),ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR 1.99, CI 95% 1.05-3.79), renal failure (OR 3.32, CI 95% 1.62-6.78) and prasugrel use (OR 3.97, CI 95% 1.87-8.41). Use of prasugrel, in the ACS that requires PCI with stent, is associated with a lower myocardial infarction a year after follow-up, and it also leads to an increase of milder hemorrhage. No significant differences were observed in the cardiovascular mortality of both groups.

Successful Management of Recurrent Colon Ulcer in Hemodialysis Patient after Conversion to Peritoneal Dialysis / 대한소화기학회지

Lower gastrointestinal complications often develop in end stage renal disease patients, and among the more problematic is recurrent colon ulcer. The exact pathogenesis of this condition is not known and there were no specific therapeutic modalities concerning this type of disease entity. We report, with a literature review, a case of recurrent colon ulcer with intermittent hematochezia in an end stage renal disease patient on long term hemodialysis that improved after conversion to peritoneal dialysis.

Effects of simvastatin/ezetimibe on microparticles, endothelial progenitor cells and platelet aggregation in subjects with coronary heart disease under antiplatelet therapy

It is not known whether the addition of ezetimibe to statins adds cardiovascular protection beyond the expected changes in lipid levels. Subjects with coronary heart disease were treated with four consecutive 1-week courses of therapy (T) and evaluations. The courses were: T1, 100 mg aspirin alone; T2, 100 mg aspirin and 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe; T3, 40 mg simvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe, and 75 mg clopidogrel (300 mg initial loading dose); T4, 75 mg clopidogrel alone. Platelet aggregation was examined in whole blood. Endothelial microparticles (CD51), platelet microparticles (CD42/CD31), and endothelial progenitor cells (CD34/CD133; CDKDR/CD133, or CD34/KDR) were quantified by flow cytometry. Endothelial function was examined by flow-mediated dilation. Comparisons between therapies revealed differences in lipids (T2 and T3<T1 and T4 for total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides; P<0.002 for all), as well as for endothelial function (T2>T1 and T4, P=0.001). Decreased platelet aggregation was observed after aspirin (arachidonic acid, T1<T3 and T4, P=0.034) and clopidogrel (adenosine, T3 and T4<T1 and T2, P<0.0001) therapy. Simvastatin/ezetimibe diphosphate did not change platelet aggregation, the amount of circulating endothelial and platelet microparticles, or endothelial progenitor cells. Cardiovascular protection following therapy with simvastatin/ezetimibe seems restricted to lipid changes and improvement of endothelial function not affecting the release of microparticles, mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells or decreased platelet aggregation.

Farmacogenómica cardiovascular / Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics

La enfermedad cardiovascular representa la primera causa de morbimortalidad a nivel mundial. Actualmente, la evidencia que sustenta la implementación de determinadas intervenciones terapéuticas se origina a partir de datos provenientes de grupos poblacionales. Sin embargo, los pacientes presentan variaciones interindividuales relacionadas tanto con la eficacia como con la toxicidad ante un mismo tratamiento farmacológico. Estas variaciones pueden ser explicadas principalmente por diferencias en la adherencia, interacciones no reconocidas y diferencias genéticas. Las alteraciones en el genoma explican entre un 20 y un 95% de la variabilidad interindividual tanto en la disponibilidad como en la respuesta a fármacos. En el tratamiento de las enfermedades cardiovasculares existen diversos ejemplos de dicha variabilidad genética interindividual y su impacto en la eficacia o toxicidad de diferentes fármacos. La variabilidad genética que determina la respuesta al clopidogrel radica fundamentalmente en el polimorfismo del citocromo (CYP) 2C19. Los polimorfismos en los genes CYP 2C9 y VKORC1 explican gran parte de la variabilidad en la respuesta a los anticoagulantes dicumarínicos. Con respecto al tratamiento hipolipidemiante, el polimorfismo del gen SLCO1B1 se ha asociado a la aparición de miopatía en pacientes tratados con simvastatina. Muchos otros polimorfismos han sido postulados pero sin un impacto clínico definido hasta la fecha. La utilización de la farmacogenómica en la práctica cotidiana ofrece la oportunidad de poder predecir toxicidad o eficacia terapéutica.

Cardiovascular disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current medical practice takes into account information based on population studies and benefits observed in large populations or cohorts. However, individual patients present great differences in both toxicity and clinical efficacy that can be explained by variations in adherence, unknown drug to drug interactions and genetic variability. The latter seems to explain from 20% up to 95% of patient to patient variability. Treating patients with cardiovascular disorders faces the clinician with the challenge to include genomic analysis into daily practice. There are several examples within cardiovascular disease of treatments that can vary in toxicity or clinical usefulness based on genetic changes. One of the main factors affecting the efficacy of Clopidogrel is the phenotype associated with polymorphisms in the gene CYP 2C9. Furthermore, regarding oral anticoagulants, changes in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 play an important role in changing the clinical response to anticoagulation. When analyzing statin treatment, one of their main toxicities (myopathy) can be predicted by the SLCO1B1 polymorphism. The potential for prediction of toxicity and clinical efficacy from the use of genetic analysis warrants further studies aiming towards its inclusion in daily clinical practice.

P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: Which and when.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are the commonest acute manifestation of coronary artery disease and a major cause of hospitalization and death. Plaque rupture and subsequent platelet activation are the key factors in its pathogenesis. Platelet inhibitors are crucial in the management of ACS. Aspirin remains the standard antiplatelet but use of dual antiplatelet drugs is beneficial in ACS. Platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors are an important group of antiplatelet compounds that can be combined with aspirin in the management of ACS. P2Y12 inhibitors may belong to the thienopyridine or nonthienopyridine group of compounds. The former (clopidogrel, prasugrel) combine irreversibly with the receptor and therefore have a prolonged duration of action. On the other hand, the non-thienopyridine compounds (ticagrelor, elinogrel) have a reversible action and hence a shorter duration of action. Several new compounds in this group have become or are likely to become available. The newer agents have a more uniform and complete antiplatelet effect and are much less likely to be affected by genetic variability of CYP2C19 enzyme activity compared with that of clopidogrel. Large phase 3 trials have shown that ticagrelor and prasugrel reduce major cardiovascular events in ACS compared to clopidogrel when given in addition to aspirin. This is accompanied by some increase in bleeding. This review discusses the properties, clinical profile and possible place of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in clinical practice.

Terapia anticoagulante no tratamento das síndromes coronárias agudas: revisão / Anticoagulant therapy for treating acute coronary syndromes: A review

As síndromes coronarianas são responsáveis por elevado número de hospitalizações, associadas a importante morbimortalidade nos dias atuais. O tratamento de suas formas de apresentação tem sido objeto de grande interesse nas últimas décadas e, conhecida a estreita relação de sua fisiopatologia com ativação das vias da cascata de coagulação ? que em última instância resulta na formação do trombo coronariano, drogas com ação anticoagulante vêm sendo amplamente testadas em associação com a terapia antiagregante plaquetária. Algumas classes de drogas trouxeram, ao longo dos anos, benefício indubitável em relação à melhora do desfecho clínico dos pacientes e outras ainda necessitam de evidências adicionais para a implementação na prática clínica. Apesar do benefício clínico na redução de eventos adversos, é certo que o preço cobrado por essas associações tem sido o aumento significativo do risco de eventos hemorrágicos. Atualmente, as classes de anticoagulantes com benefício clínico mais amplamente aceito pela literatura nas síndromes coronarianas agudas são as heparinas não fracionadas e de baixo peso molecular e, mais recentemente, a inibição específica do fator Xa com o fondaparinux, além dos inibidores diretos da trombina alguns ainda em fase inicial de investigação. O objetivo desta revisão é discorrer sobre as recomendações de utilização das terapias anticoagulantes nas síndromes coronárias agudas, à luz dos achados dos estudos mais relevantes sobre cada uma delas e dos consensos sobre a abordagem das mesmas.

Coronary syndromes account for a high number of hospital admissions and have been associated with significant rates of morbimortality. Treatment of the outward signs of the disease has been object of great interest over the last decades. Given the great association of the disease physiopathology with the activation of the coagulation cascade pathways which eventually results in the formation of coronary thrombus, anticoagulant drugs have been widely tested in association with platelet anti-aggregation therapy. Some of such drugs have undoubtedly contributed to the clinical outcome of patients and some other still need further testing before implementation in the medicalpractice. Despite the clinical benefit of reducing adverse events, the use of such drugs has significantly increased the risk of bleeding events. According to the literature on acute coronary syndromes, the classes of anticoagulants with widely accepted clinical benefits are unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins and, more recently, fondaparinux for specific inhibition of activated X factor, besides direct thrombin inhibitors some still in early stages of testing. This review aims to argue about the recommendations of adopting anticoagulant therapies to treat acute coronary syndromes in the light of the most relevant studies on each therapy and the most consensual understandings of their approach.

Antiplaquetários nas síndromes coronarianas agudas: revisão / Antiplatelet drugs for treating acute coronary syndromes: A review

As síndromes coronarianas agudas sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST são causadas, na maioria das vezes, por instabilização ou ruptura da placa de ateroma, com consequente formação de trombo não oclusivo. A escolha adequada de antiplaquetários é fundamental no tratamento, com redução dos eventos isquêmicos e da mortalidade. O objetivo deste artigo é a revisão crítica atualizada dos principais agentes antiplaquetários disponíveis para uso no Brasil, os mecanismos de ação de cada droga, bem como suas indicações e contraindicações em pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST. A aspirina, isoladamente, é capaz de reduzir eventos de forma significativa. Sua associação com derivados tienopiridínicos, principalmente com o clopidogrel, acarretou sinergismo de ação com importante redução de eventos adversos. Novas drogas surgiram, gerando redução de recorrência de infarto e aumento nas taxas de sangramento, tornando mais complexa a escolha de antiplaquetários. O prasugrel, na sala de hemodinâmica, é opção basicamente nos pacientes que não receberam clopidogrel e que se submetem à angioplastia precoce, com baixo risco de sangramento avaliado por escores. O ticagrelor é uma opção ao clopidogrel para pacientes submetidos a tratamento invasivo, com possível benefício adicional na mortalidade. A escolha de antiplaquetários deve ser individualizada, conforme as circunstâncias definidas no texto, conforme o perfil de risco hemorrágicoe também conforme o perfil de risco de morte ou infarto do paciente.

Acute coronary syndromes without ST segment elevation are usually caused by destabilization or rupture of the atheroma plaque and the subsequent formation of non-occlusive thrombus. The right choice of antiplatelet drugs is crucial for treatment and to reduce both ischemicevents and mortality. This paper provides an updated critical review of the main antiplatelet drugs available in Brazil, describing the mechanisms of action, indications and contraindications of each drug for patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation.Aspirin alone is capable of reducing events significantly. Its association with thienopyridine derivatives, especially with clopidogrel leads to synergisms and meaningful reduction of adverse events. Choosing the most adequate antiplatelet drug has become increasingly difficultas new drugs have been developed, which have reduced infarction recurrence but increased bleeding rates. Prasugrel is basically an option for patients that have not been treated with clopidogrel and undergo angioplasty in early stages, with low risks of bleeding as assessedthrough scores. Ticagrelor is an alternative to clopidogrel for patients that have undergone invasive treatment. The choice of antiplatelet drugs should be individualized for each patient, according to circumstances herein described, and according to patients? death and bleeding risk rankings.