Psychological and organizational factors impacting job satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A study on similar exposure groups in Indonesia

Introduction@#The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted technical workers who work more often in the field (e.g., engineering, mechanical, health safety environment (HSE), quality control, and production workers) with increasingly complex workloads and work pressures. Few studies have yet to examine the job satisfaction of such workers using a combination of psychological and organizational factors during difficult times, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. @*Objective@#This study aims to explain whether psychological and organizational factors affect employee job satisfaction as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. @*Methods@#This quantitative research uses Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling. A survey with a questionnaire was used to collect data in this study. Using the non-probability sampling technique, data from 103 respondents spread throughout four Similar Exposure Groups (SEGs) in Indonesia were collected. Data analysis in this study used SmartPLS 3.0. @*Results@#Male workers in this study constituted more than 90% of the respondents, the majority with a long working period (more than five years). Worker experience was directly proportional to worker age; most workers were between 41 and 56 years old. The results, with a majority of SEGs from engineering, found that out of five hypotheses (H1–H5), four are accepted while one is rejected. Employee job satisfaction during this pandemic is influenced by the feeling of safety (H1) and work pressure (H3). Work pressure is further influenced by the feeling of safety at work (H2). Moreover, work pressure acts as a mediator on the feeling of safety and job satisfaction (H4). However, job satisfaction is not influenced by management commitment (H5). @*Conclusion@#Management commitment to work safety during pandemic situations must be adjusted, especially regarding policies to ensure the availability of additional standards on health protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. In addition, the guarantee that the company is committed to ensuring that workers feel safe will be covered if exposed to COVID-19. Occupational safety and health standards are no longer fully focused on work equipment or facilities. The feeling of safety and work pressure during a pandemic require attention from companies in accordance with their existing limitations and capabilities.

Molecular identification of new Trypanosoma evansi type non-A/B isolates from buffaloes and cattle in Indonesia / Identificação molecular de novos isolados de Trypanosoma evansi tipo não A/B em búfalos e gado na Indonésia

Abstract Trypanosoma evansi is reportedly divided into two genotypes: types A and B. The type B is uncommon and reportedly limited to Africa: Kenya Sudan, and Ethiopia. In contrast, type A has been widely reported in Africa, South America, and Asia. However, Trypanosoma evansi type non-A/B has never been reported. Therefore, this study aims to determine the species and genotype of the Trypanozoon subgenus using a robust identification algorithm. Forty-three trypanosoma isolates from Indonesia were identified as Trypanosoma evansi using a molecular identification algorithm. Further identification showed that 39 isolates were type A and 4 isolates were possibly non-A/B types. The PML, AMN-SB1, and STENT3 isolates were likely non-A/B type Trypanosoma evansi isolated from buffalo, while the PDE isolates were isolated from cattle. Cladistic analysis revealed that Indonesian Trypanosoma evansi was divided into seven clusters based on the gRNA-kDNA minicircle gene. Clusters 6 and 7 are each divided into two sub-clusters. The areas with the highest genetic diversity are the provinces of Banten, Central Java (included Yogyakarta), and East Nusa Tenggara. The Central Java (including Yogyakarta) and East Nusa Tenggara provinces, each have four sub-clusters, while Banten has three.

Resumo Trypanosoma evansi é reportado como dividido em dois genótipos: tipos A e B. O tipo B é incomum e reportado como limitado à África: Quênia, Sudão e Etiópia. Em contraste, o tipo A tem sido amplamente relatado na África, América do Sul e Ásia. No entanto, Trypanosoma evansi tipo não-A/B nunca foi relatado. Portanto, este estudo tem como objetivo determinar a espécie e o genótipo do subgênero Trypanozoon, utilizando-se um algoritmo robusto de identificação. Quarenta e três isolados de tripanosoma da Indonésia foram identificados como Trypanosoma evansi, usando-se um algoritmo de identificação molecular. A identificação adicional mostrou que 39 isolados eram do tipo A e 4 isolados eram, possivelmente, do tipo não A/B. Os isolados PML, AMN-SB1 e STENT3 foram, provavelmente, Trypanosoma evansi do tipo não A/B isolado de búfalos, enquanto os isolados de PDE foram isolados de bovinos. A análise cladística revelou que o Trypanosoma evansi indonésio foi dividido em sete grupos baseados no gene do minicírculo gRNA-kDNA. Os clusters 6 e 7 foram divididos cada um em dois subclusters. As áreas com maior diversidade genética são as províncias de Banten, Java Central (incluindo Yogyakarta) e East Nusa Tenggara. As de Java Central (incluindo Yogyakarta) e East Nusa Tenggara têm, cada uma, quatro subgrupos, enquanto Banten tem três.