Реферат
Abstract Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections in children under 12 years old. Data sources: This is a systematic review in which five randomized clinical trials about the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin, involving a total of 429 children with nosocomial infections, were evaluated. They were searched in scientific databases: PubMed, Bvs, and SciELO. Summary of findings: The main nosocomial infections that affected children were bacteremia, skin, and soft tissue infections followed by nosocomial pneumonia. Most infections were caused by Gram-positive bacteria, which all studies showed infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci strains being isolated. Both linezolid and vancomycin showed high therapeutic efficacy against different types of nosocomial infections, ranging from 84.4% to 94% for linezolid and 76.9% to 90% for vancomycin. Patients receiving linezolid had lower rates of rash and red man syndrome compared to those receiving vancomycin. However, despite the adverse reactions, antimicrobials can be safely administered to children to treat nosocomial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria. Conclusion: Both linezolid and vancomycin showed good efficacy in the treatment of bacterial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria in hospitalized children. However, linezolid stands out regarding its pharmacological safety. Importantly, to strengthen this conclusion, further clinical trials are needed to provide additional evidence.
Реферат
Background: Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses persistent threat, affecting both healthcare environment and communities, with substantial impact on infection rates, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Vancomycin, a longstanding cornerstone in MRSA treatment, but with the emergence of vancomycin resistant MRSA (VRSA), necessitating alternative antimicrobial solutions. Linezolid, stands out as a promising candidate. It has unique advantages such as an absence of renal toxicity and improved lung parenchymal diffusion compared to vancomycin, making it an appealing choice, especially for healthcare-acquired pneumonia by MRSA. Methods: This cross-sectional study investigated linezolid susceptibility in 158 MRSA isolates using both disk diffusion and agar dilution method. Results: Results indicated that the majority of isolates exhibited linezolid susceptibility, with 53.16% showing a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ?2 礸/ml. However, two MRSA isolates, constituting 1.27% of the sample, displayed a MIC of 8 礸/ml, named them as a linezolid-resistant MRSA (LRSA). These findings align with previous research, mirroring resistance rates observed in different regions. Notably, vigilance against linezolid resistance is crucial, particularly due to its status as a last-resort MRSA treatment. Conclusions: Remarkably, a 100% concordance was found between the disk diffusion and MIC methods for detecting linezolid resistance in MRSA, suggesting that the disk diffusion method may be practical choice for laboratories with heavy workloads. However, adherence to CLSI guidelines is essential, and cases of resistance by disk diffusion should be confirmed using MIC methods. Emergence of linezolid-resistant MRSA is a worrisome development, necessitating ongoing surveillance and vigilance.
Реферат
The primary objective of this study was to prepare and evaluate a linezolid inhaler. Dry powder inhaler liposomes were formulated to investigate the efficacy of pulmonary delivery of Linezolid for tuberculosis. The liposomes were prepared using soya lecithin and cholesterol in different weight ratios, drug in a constant amount, and two different methods: physical dispersion and ethanol injection. The F9 formulation was characterized for physical and chemical properties such as vesicle size, shape, and zeta potential. The results of physical characterization, in vitro testing, and stability studies indicate that liposomes containing Linezolid can be used for the treatment of tuberculosis. The evaluated batch exhibited favorable physicochemical properties, with spherical liposomes having a mean size below 100?nm and high entrapment efficiency (98.8%). The prepared liposomal dry powder inhalers (DPIs) sustained drug release for up to 8 hours. Liposome stability was assessed 90 days after storage at room temperature, revealing its stability. The liposomal formulation had steady zeta potential, good entrapment efficiency, improved stability, and an extended drug release time. In conclusion, linezolid-loaded liposomal inhalers were successfully formulated.
Реферат
RESUMEN Presentación: En el presente artículo exponemos nuestra valoración crítica de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado publicado en la revista New England Journal of Medicine el año 2022. Conclusiones del estudio: El estudio compara cuatro regímenes de linezolid (en adición a bedaquilina y pretomanid) para el manejo de tuberculosis farmacorresistente. Finalmente, se demuestra que el régimen de 600 mg de linezolid durante 26 semanas tuvo menos frecuencia de falla terapéutica y eventos adversos (en comparación con darlo por menos semanas o a más dosis). Comentario crítico: El artículo es relevante porque aún no es clara la dosis adecuada de linezolid y la duración del tratamiento con este agente para minimizar los efectos adversos y mantener la eficacia contra la tuberculosis altamente resistente. A pesar de algunas limitaciones como el bajo número de participantes, la alta pérdida al seguimiento, y el no realizar comparaciones estadísticas entre grupos; los resultados son relativamente confiables para la toma de decisiones.
ABSTRACT Presentation: In this article we present our critical appraisal of a randomized clinical trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2022. Study conclusions: The study compares four linezolid regimens (in addition to bedaquiline and pretomanid) for the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Finally, it shows that the regimen of 600 mg of linezolid for 26 weeks had less frequency of therapeutic failure and adverse events (compared to giving it for fewer weeks or at higher doses). Critical comment: The article is relevant because the appropriate dose of linezolid and duration of treatment with this agent to minimize adverse effects and maintain efficacy against highly resistant tuberculosis is still unclear. Despite some limitations such as low number of participants, high loss to follow-up, and no statistical comparisons between groups, the results are relatively reliable for decision making.
Реферат
Linezolid is an antibacterial agent for the treatment of multi-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections， which is widely used in clinical practice. However， there are large individual differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug in patients， and it is difficult to obtain the optimal therapeutic effect when the drug is administered according to the conventional dose in the instructions. Therefore， it is necessary to carry out therapeutic drug monitoring （TDM） for linezolid， and guide and optimize its antibacterial treatment plan by using population pharmacokinetics （PPK） and pharmacodynamics principles. This paper summarizes the PPK changes and the research progress of individualized administration of linezolid in various populations， and recommends that the patient’s steady-state blood concentration is kept at 2-8 mg/mL through TDM when using linezolid clinically. It is recommended to appropriately reduce the dosage for patients with liver and kidney dysfunction， appropriately increase the dosage for obese， burned and children patients， and provide pharmaceutical monitoring during the medication process to promote rational drug use.
Реферат
Objective To provide the evidence for clinical medication safety by the investigation of the risk factors of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia in cancer patients in the department of hepatobiliary surgery. Methods Patients who received linezolid for anti-infective treatment from January 2017 to December 2021 were selected. The patients were divided into thrombocytopenia group and non-thrombocytopenia group according to whether thrombocytopenia occurred or not after administration of linezolid. The general data and laboratory indicators of the two groups were compared, and the risk factors of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia were screened by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 104 patients were included in the study, including 84 patients who underwent surgery and 20 patients who did not. The incidence of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia was 24.0%. There were significant differences in gender, age, duration of linezolid use, platelet count, white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), total bilirubin, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate between the two groups (P<0.05); logistic regression analysis suggested that age ≥60 years (OR=7.093; P=0.017), duration of linezolid use ≥12 days (OR=4.399; P=0.035), baseline platelet count ≤200×109/L (OR=8.470; P=0.004), baseline AST≥50 U/L (OR=15.465; P<0.001), and baseline white blood cell count ≥11×109/L (OR=11.436; P=0.001) were the risk factors for linezolid-related thrombocytopenia in cancer patients. Conclusion During the treatment of linezolid in cancer patients, attention should be paid to the adverse reactions of thrombocytopenia in the patients, especially those with old age, long-term treatment, low baseline platelets, poor baseline liver function, and high baseline white blood cell counts.
Реферат
Objective:To evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of ceftobiprole, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin against Staphylococcus aureus (SAU) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) bloodstream infections, which can provide a reference for clinical medication. Methods:A total of 1 777 strains of staphylococci were isolated from blood culture of 51 hospitals within the Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS) from January to December in 2021. The dilution method was used to assess the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ceftobiprole, vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin on staphylococci. Additionally, the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of these medications in varied dosage regimens were predicted using Monte Carlo simulation.Results:Ceftobiprole demonstrated significant antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA), the MIC 50 and MIC 90 were 0.500 and 1.000 mg/L, respectively, and the MIC range was ≤0.060 to 4.000 mg/L.Meanwhile, the ceftobiprole-resistance rate of SAU was 0.1%(1/1 073), but the resistance rate of CNS was 7.7%(54/704). There was no evidence of staphylococcal resistance to daptomycin or vancomycin. Against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), no resistance to the four drugs was observed. Monte Carlo simulation showed that standard drug regimens of ceftobiprole (500 mg once every eight hours) and daptomycin (6 mg·kg -1·d -1) achieved high PTA and CFR against staphylococcus.The current vancomycin and linezolid standard treatment for staphylococcal bloodstream infections had a low CFR. When vancomycin 1 000 mg once every eight hours was used, the CFRs of MRSA and MSSA were both≥90.0%, while the CFR of CNS was still less than 80.0%. CFR of linezolid against staphylococcus was ≥90.0% under the dosages of 600 mg once every eight hours. Conclusions:Ceftobiprole, vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin all show strong antibacterial activity against staphylococcus.Ceftobiprole and daptomycin standard treatment represent adequate antibacterial efficacy against staphylococcal bloodstream infections. Furthermore, appropriate increase of the dosages of vancomycin and linezolid based on the MIC value and species of bacteria is necessary.
Реферат
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of omacycline with meropenem plus linezolid in the treatment of patients with pulmonary infection.Methods:The clinical data of 58 patients with pulmonary infection admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital and Jiande First People’s Hospital from December 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the omacycline group ( n=29) and the meropenem combined with linezolid group (combined group, n=29). The omacycline group was given intravenous omacycline 200 mg or 100 mg, q. d, and the combined group was given intravenous meropenem (1 000 mg, t.i.d) and linezolid (600 mg, b. i.d). The clinical efficacy and drug-related adverse events of two groups were observed. SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Results:In the omacycline group, 8 cases (27.6%, 8/29) were cured, 19 cases (65.5%, 19/29) were improved, and 2 cases (6.9%, 2/29) were worsened. In the combined group, 1 case (3.4%, 1/29) was cured, 26 cases (89.7%, 26/29) were improved, and 2 cases (6.9%, 2/29) died. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups ( χ2=6.533, P=0.038). The respiratory failure occurred in 3 cases (10.3%, 3/29) of the omacycline group and 5 cases (17.2%, 5/29) of the combined group ( χ2=0.580, P=0.446). In those patients who were cured or improved, the median time from treatment initiation to disease remission was 3.0 (2.0, 5.5) d in the omacycline group and 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) d in the combined group ( Z=-2.122, P=0.034). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups [6.9% (2/29) vs. 13.8% (4/29), χ2=0.744, P=0.389]. Conclusion:Omacycline exhibits a good efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with pulmonary infection, which may be prioritized for the treatment of pulmonary infections.
Реферат
Objective:To establish a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the determination of voliconazole (VRC), posaconazole (PCZ), and linazolam (LNZ) in human serum.Methods:This study is a methodological validation by LC-MS/MS. The blood concentration results of VRC, PCZ, and LNZ in our hospital′s anti-infection patients were collected. Voriconazole, Posaconazole, and Linezolid were accurately weighed and prepared. Linezolid-[2H3] was used as the internal standard. After gradient elution on the ACE PFP column, the residuals were analyzed by LC-MS/MS in the positive electrospray ionization mode and multiple reaction monitor (MRM) mode. The method′s linearity, precision, lower limit of detection, and recovery rate were validated according to standard guidelines.Results:The linear correlation coefficient ( r) of the standard curve was above 0.99 ( r>0.99). The linear range of VRC and PCZ were 0.10 mg/L~10.00 mg/L, and the lower limit of detection were 0.01 mg/L. The linear range of LNZ was 0.50 mg/L~50.00 mg/L, and the lower limit of detection was 0.05 mg/L. The recoveries of VRC, PCZ and LNZ were 90.96%-103.18%, 91.84%-99.17%, and 97.04%-100.41%, respectively. Intra-and inter-batch precision (% CV) for VRC were less than 8.30%. Intra-and inter-batch precision (% CV) for PCZ was less than 9.78%. Intra-and inter-batch precision (% CV) for LNZ was less than 7.14%. Drug concentrations in 155 cases of VRC, 44 cases of PCZ, and 59 cases of LNZ were detected. Conclusion:We have established an LC-MS/MS method for the rapid, accurate, highly specific determination of VRC, PCZ, and LNZ concentrations in human serum. This method is suitable for analyzing large clinical sample sets.
Реферат
@#Abstract: Objective To collect extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated from Xi'an City between 2019 and 2020, and analyze the drug resistance patterns of XDR-TB strains to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs and the occurrence of new defined extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Xi'an, in order to provide evidence for guiding clinical drug use of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients. Methods A total of 3 088 strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that underwent phenotypic drug susceptibility testing at Xi'an Chest Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively selected to analyze the resistance of anti-tuberculosis drug. Among the stored MDR-TB strains, 114 strains of preserved multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis were randomly selected for bedaquiline and linezolid susceptibility testing. Combined with the results of previous second-line drug susceptibility testing, the incidence of newly defined extensive drug resistance was analyzed. Results Among the 3 088 Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains analyzed, 411 strains (14.3%) showed resistance to isoniazid, 347 strains (11.2%) showed resistance to rifampicin, 142 strains (4.6%) showed resistance to ethambutol, 550 strains (17.8%) showed resistance to streptomycin, and 237 strains (7.6%) exhibited multidrug resistance. Of 237 MDR-TB strains, the resistance rates of ethambutol, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, sodium para-aminosalicylate, prothioconazole, capreomycin, amikacin, and clofazimine were 44.3%, 26.6%, 33.3%, 24.1%, 5.1%, 4.2%, 3.0%, and 2.5%, respectively. Among the randomly selected 114 MDR-TB strains, none showed resistance to bedaquiline, three showed resistance to linezolid, and one strain met the new definition for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Conclusion In Xi'an City, high rates of resistance among MDR-TB strains are observed for ethambutol, quinolone and sodium para-aminosalicylate, and the drug susceptibility tests should be obtained as much as possible when using these drugs. The incidence of new definition extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis is low, and bedaquiline and linezolid remain effective drugs for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis even without drug susceptibility testing results.
Реферат
En esta presentación se realiza un recorrido a través de los diferentes esquemas terapéuticos de la tuberculosis drogo-resistente. Se muestra como los investigadores utilizan los nuevos fármacos disponibles y desarrollan diferentes esquemas cada vez más acortados y de administración por vía oral exclusiva, con la intención de lograr una mayor eficacia de curación de la tuberculosis resistente, con menos efectos colaterales y menor letalidad. La búsqueda de esquemas con una duración similar a las terapias de casos sensibles de tuberculosis (esquemas primarios de 6 meses) es el objetivo principal. Las pruebas moleculares como el Xpert ayudan enormemente a seleccionar los esquemas de terapia, según el perfil de susceptibilidad de los casos (resistencia a isoniazida, rifampicina, fluorquinolonas y combinaciones). Las terapias actuales de la tuberculosis drogo-resistente se basan en nuevos fármacos como fluorquinolonas, bedaquilina y linezolid, pero otros fármacos como pretomanid y delamanid también están siendo recomendados.
This presentation takes a tour through the different therapeutic schemes of drug-resistant tuberculosis. It shows how researchers use the new drugs available and develop different increasingly shortened schedules and exclusive oral administration, with the intention of achieving greater efficacy in curing resistant tuberculosis, with fewer side effects and lower lethality. The search for regimens with a duration similar to therapies of sensitive cases of tuberculosis (primary regimens of 6 months) is the main objective. Molecular tests, such as Xpert, greatly help in selecting therapy regimens, according to the susceptibility profile of the cases (resistance to isoniazid, rifampicin, fluorquinolones and combinations). Current drug-resistant tuberculosis therapies are based on new drugs such as fluorquinolones, bedaquiline and linezolid, but other drugs such as pretomanid and delamanid are also being recommended.
Тема - темы
Humans , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Antitubercular Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Chile , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic useРеферат
Objetivo: Comparar custos da terapia endovenosa exclusiva com linezolida com os custos da terapia iniciada por via endovenosa com transição para via oral após 72 horas, como estratégia de intervenção em programas de gestão de antimicrobianos. Métodos: Avaliação econômica de custo-minimização comparando custos diretos da terapia endovenosa exclusiva com linezolida com a terapia endovenosa seguida de transição para via oral em cenário simulado, sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), com árvore de decisão como modelo para tomada de decisão. Resultados: A alternativa englobando a transição de via mostrou-se a mais econômica em todos os cenários analisados. Para 28 dias de tratamento com linezolida, houve redução de 22% nos custos, considerando o paciente internado. Ao considerar alta após o sexto dia de tratamento, a redução de custos variou de 26%, com financiamento pelo SUS do restante do tratamento, a 84%, com financiamento do tratamento pós-alta pelo paciente. Conclusão: Conclui-se que a transição de via de linezolida é uma importante estratégia nos programas de gerenciamento de antimicrobianos, capaz de gerar economia significativa para a instituição. As avaliações econômicas de custo-minimização, nesse contexto, são uma importante ferramenta para demonstrar o aspecto econômico com potencial para sensibilizar gestores e tomadores de decisão.
Objective: To compare the direct costs of linezolid intravenous therapy with the costs of intravenous therapy switching to oral therapy after 72 hours as an intervention strategy in antimicrobial stewardship programs. Methods: Economic evaluation cost-minimization comparing direct costs of exclusive linezolid intravenous therapy with intravenous therapy for 72 hours and after switching to oral therapy in a simulated scenario, from the perspective of the National Health Service, with a decision tree as a decision modeling. Results: The alternative encompassing the therapy transition proved to be the most economical in all analyzed scenarios. For 28 days of treatment with linezolid, there was a 22% reduction in costs, considering the hospitalized patient. When considering discharge after the sixth day of treatment, the cost reduction ranged from 26%, with funding from the National Health Service for the rest of the treatment, to 84%, with funding for the post-discharge treatment by the patient. Conclusion: It was concluded that the linezolid therapy transition is an important strategy in antimicrobial management programs, capable of generating significant savings for the institution. In this context, economic cost-minimization assessments are an important tool to demonstrate the economic aspect with the potential to raise awareness among managers and decision-makers.
Тема - темы
Drug Administration Routes , Economics, Pharmaceutical , Costs and Cost Analysis , Linezolid , Antimicrobial StewardshipРеферат
Objective: This study aimed to compare the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric patients who used vancomycin (VAN) or linezolid (LNZ) to treat Gram-positive coccus (GPC) infections and to assess which treatment (VAN or LNZ) is the most cost-effective considering a pediatric hospital perspective. Methods: A retrospective cohort was performed to evaluate the occurrence of nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients without previous AKI, with GPC infections that used LNZ, or VAN monitored by serum VAN levels. Initially, descriptive analysis and Fisher and chisquare test were performed for this comparison. Then, a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted through a decision tree model. The outcomes of interest were the rate of AKI related to the drug and the rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and cure. Results: In patients without previous acute kidney injury (AKI), 20% developed nephrotoxicity associated with VAN versus 9.6% in the LNZ group (p = 0.241). As there was no difference in nephrotoxicity between VAN andlinezolid (LNZ), vancomycin (VAN) monitored by serum VAN levels can optimize and rationalize the treatment. The nephrotoxicity risk criterion should not guide the prescription for LNZ. Furthermore, the average global cost of treatment with VAN was approximately R$ 43,000, while for LNZ, it was R$ 71,000. Conclusion: VAN was considered dominant (lower cost and greater effectiveness) over LNZ for treating patients with GPC infection.
Objetivo: Este estudo objetivou comparar a ocorrência de lesão renal aguda (LRA) em pacientes pediátricos que usaram vancomicina (VAN) ou linezolida (LNZ) para tratar infecções por cocos Gram-positivos (CGP) e avaliar qual tratamento (VAN ou LNZ) é o mais custo-efetivo considerando a perspectiva de um hospital pediátrico. Métodos: Foi realizada uma coorte retrospectiva para avaliar a ocorrência de nefrotoxicidade em pacientes pediátricos sem LRA prévia, com infecções por CGP que utilizaram LNZ ou VAN, combinada com vancocinemia. Para essa comparação, inicialmente foram realizados análise descritiva e testes de Fisher e qui-quadrado. Em seguida, foi realizada uma análise de custo-efetividade por meio de um modelo de árvore de decisão. Os desfechos de interesse foram a taxa de LRA relacionada ao medicamento e a taxa de internação em unidade de terapia intensiva e cura. Resultados: Nos pacientes sem LRA prévia, 20% deles desenvolveram nefrotoxicidade associada à VAN versus 9,6% no grupo LNZ (p = 0,241). Como não houve diferença na nefrotoxicidade entre VAN e LNZ, a VAN combinada com a vancocinemia pode otimizar e racionalizar o tratamento, e a prescrição de LNZ não deve ser guiada pelo critério de risco de nefrotoxicidade. Além disso, o custo médio global do tratamento com VAN foi de aproximadamente R$ 43.000, enquanto para LNZ foi de R$ 71.000. Conclusão: Assim, a VAN foi considerada dominante (menor custo e maior eficácia) sobre a LNZ para o tratamento de pacientes com infecção por CGP.
Тема - темы
Pediatrics , Vancomycin , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Renal Insufficiency , LinezolidРеферат
Background & objectives: Infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococci are difficult to treat given the limited therapeutic alternatives. Different gene clusters are known to confer vancomycin resistance. vanA and vanB genes are transferable and are clinically relevant. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the vancomycin-resistant genotypes in the strains causing urinary tract infection and also to test the in vitro efficacy of linezolid and pristinamycin against the vancomycin-resistant isolates. Methods: Antimicrobial resistance profile of 118 enterococcal isolates was evaluated. Minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin, teicoplanin and high-level gentamicin (HLG) was determined by micro broth dilution. The vancomycin-resistant isolates were tested against linezolid and pristinamycin by micro-broth dilution and E strip method. The presence of vancomycin-resistant genes was detected by multiplex polymerase chain reaction and was sequenced and analyzed. Results: Most commonly isolated species were Enterococcus faecalis (76.9%) and Enterococcus faecium (16.9%). It was found that 43 per cent of the isolates were resistant to HLG and 16.9 per cent to vancomycin. Higher resistance was seen against fluoroquinolones, erythromycin, tetracycline and ?-lactam drugs. However, 5.08 per cent strains were resistant to tigecycline. All vancomycin-resistant strains were sensitive to pristinamycin and one was resistant to linezolid. vanA and vanB gene were found in 15 and five isolates, respectively. The gene sequences were submitted to NCBI gene bank and accession numbers were obtained. Interpretation & conclusions: The present study showed prevalence of vanA and vanB genes carrying Enterococcus in a tertiary care centre in north India. The emergence of resistance against drugs such as tigecycline and linezolid is a topic of concern as it will be a therapeutic challenge for physicians.
Реферат
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of linezolid in the treatment of gram-positive coccal infections after chemotherapy in older adult patients with leukemia.Methods:Ninety-two older adult patients with leukemia complicated by gram-positive coccal infections, who received treatment in Yiwu Central Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019, were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to receive routine anti-infection treatment (control group, n = 46) or linezolid treatment (observation group, n = 46). Clinical efficacy, the time required for body temperature restoring to normal, and medication time were compared between the two groups. Results:Total response rate was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group [95.65% (44 /46) vs. 78.26% (36/46), χ2 = 6.13, P = 0.013]. The time required for body temperature restoring to normal and medication time in the observation group were (7.98 ± 1.04) days and (8.58 ± 1.31) days, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(8.85 ± 1.47) days, (9.46 ± 2.52) days, t = 3.27, 2.10, P = 0.001, 0.019). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group [4.35% (2/46) vs. 19.57% (9/46), χ2 = 5.05, P < 0.05]. Conclusion:Linezolid is highly effective on gram-positive coccal infections after chemotherapy in older adult patients with leukemia. Linezolid treatment requires comparatively shorter time required for body temperature restoring to normal and shorter medication time and is safer than routine anti-infection treatment.
Реферат
Objective:To predict and evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of linezolid, teicoplanin and daptomycin against Staphylococci bloodstream infections with Monte Carlo simulation, and to optimize the clinical administration program. Methods:A total of 1 847 Staphylococci strains isolated from blood samples between January 2018 to December 2019 were collected with the help of the Blood Bacterial Resistant Investigation Collaborative System (BRICS). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of linezolid and daptomycin were detected by broth dilution method, while MIC of teicoplanin were detected by agar dilution method. The dosage regimens of linezolid were 800 mg once daily, 500 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours and 600 mg once every eight hours. The dosage regimens of teicoplanin were 400 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours, 800 mg once every 12 hours, and 1 000 mg once every 12 hours. The dosage regimens of daptomycin were 4 mg·kg -1·d -1, 6 mg·kg -1·d -1, 8 mg·kg -1·d -1, 10 mg·kg -1·d -1and 12 mg·kg -1·d -1. The probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of three different dosage regimens were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. A dosage regimen with CFR≥90.0% was a reasonable choice for empirical antimicrobial therapy. Results:PTA of linezolid against Staphylococci when MIC≤0.500 mg/L at four dosage regimens (800 mg once daily, 500 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours and 600 mg once every eight hours) were all over 90.0%. When MIC was 1.000 mg/L, the PTA of linezolid against Staphylococci under the dosages of 500 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours and 600 mg once every eight hours were 92.2%, 96.6% and 97.6%, respectively. The CFR of the four dosage regimens of linezolid were 73.9%, 83.7%, 90.8% and 95.3%, respectively. When MIC≤1.000 mg/L, PTA of teicoplanin against Staphylococci were all 100.0% at four dosage regimens (400 mg once every 12 hours, 600 mg once every 12 hours, 800 mg once every 12 hours and 1 000 mg once every 12 hours). When MIC was 2.000 mg/L, the PTA of teicoplanin (800 mg once every 12 hours and 1 000 mg once every 12 hours) against Staphylococci were both 100.0%. The CFR of the four dosage regimens of teicoplanin were 90.8%, 92.8%, 93.5% and 94.6%, respectively. When MIC≤0.500 mg/L, PTA of daptomycin against Staphylococci under the five dosages of 4 mg·kg -1·d -1, 6 mg·kg -1·d -1, 8 mg·kg -1·d -1, 10 mg·kg -1·d -1 and 12 mg·kg -1·d -1 were all over 90.0%. When MIC was 1.000 mg/L, the PTA of daptomycin against Staphylococci under the three dosages of 8 mg·kg -1·d -1, 10 mg·kg -1·d -1 and 12 mg·kg -1·d -1were 96.9%, 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively. The CFR of the five dosage regimens of daptomycin against Staphylococci were 97.4%, 99.2%, 99.9%, 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively. Conclusions:Linezolid (600 mg once every 12 hours), teicoplanin (400 mg once every 12 hours) and daptomycin (4 mg·kg -1·d -1) can achieve satisfactory antibacterial activity for Staphylococci bloodstream infections.
Реферат
Objective:To analyze the adverse reactions of patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis treated with linezolid, and to provide reference for clinical rational use of drugs.Methods:A total of 189 patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis who were admitted to Hunan Chest Hospital between June 2019 and June 2020 were retrospectively included, and were divided into the linezolid group and the control group. The control group was given a standardized anti-tuberculosis treatment without linezolid, and the linezolid group was given linezolid in addition to standardized regimens. The occurrences of hematological toxicity, peripheral neuritis, optic neuritis and other adverse reactions in the two groups after anti-tuberculosis treatment were recorded. The risk factors for adverse reactions of linezolid were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using independent samples t test and chi-square test, and logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for adverse reactions of linezolid. Results:A total of 189 patients with MDR-TB were included in this study, including 108 in the linezolid group and 81 in the control group. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the linezolid and control groups. The frequencies of leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuritis and optic neuritis in the linezolid group were 20.4%(22/108), 47.2%(51/108), 21.3%(23/108), 20.4%(22/108) and 13.9%(15/108), respectively, which were all significantly higher than those in the control group (8.6%(7/81), 27.2%(22/81), 9.9%(8/81), 1.2%(1/81) and 4.9%(4/81), respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant ( χ2=4.90, 7.86, 4.40, 15.86 and 4.10, respectively, all P<0.050). Patients older than 45 years of age was independent risk factor for leukopenia (odds ratio ( OR)=3.08, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 1.03 to 9.25, P<0.050) and thrombocytopenia ( OR=2.41, 95% CI 1.09 to 5.35, P<0.050) after linezolid administration. The higher value of white blood cell at baseline ( OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.76, P=0.002) was an independent protective factor for leukopenia associated with linezolid. Conclusions:Pancytopenia, peripheral neuritis and optic neuritis are prone to appear when linezolid is used to treat patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. In clinical practice, closely monitoring the adverse reactions during the use of linezolid for anti-tuberculosis treatment is needed.
Реферат
@#A UPLC-MS/MS method was established for the determination of the genotoxic impurity (R)-5-(azidomethyl)-3-[3-fluoro-4-(4-morpholinyl)phenyl]-2-oxazolidinone in linezolid API and its glucose injection. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) with 0.1% formic acid water-0.1% formic acid acetonitrile (60∶40) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The UPLC-MS/MS was equipped with electrospray ionization in positive ionization mode and multiple reaction monitoring mode. The results showed that the calibration curve was linear in the range of 4-12 ng/mL and the limit of quantification was 0.073 ng/mL.The average recoveries of the low, medium and high concentration (80%,100%,120% limit concentration) loading solutions were 101.14%, 100.59% and 101.47%, respectively (RSDs:0.73%, 1.10% and 0.91%, respectively).The sample solution was stable for 6 d.No genotoxic impurity of (R)-5-(Azidomethyl)-3-[3-fluoro-4-(4-morpholinyl)phenyl]-2-oxazolidinonewas not detected in the samples of linezolid API and its glucose injection.
Реферат
Linezolid is a n anti-infective drug commonly used in clinic. Considering the large difference of individual condition ， severe basic disease ，poor organ function and large variety and quantity of drugs ，standard dose of linezolid may not be suitable for all critically ill patients. This paper reviews the relevant researches on the application of linezolid in adult critically ill patients in recent years ，analyzes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of critically ill patients ，and summarizes the influence of common physiological and pathological changes in critically ill patients on drugs. When using linezolid ，the clinical comprehensive evaluation of this special group should be strengthened. In addition to appropriately reducing the drug dosage of patients with liver/ kidney function injury ，it is also necessary to consider appropriately increasing the drug dosage in other cases. After medication ，in order to avoid excessive or insufficient drug exposure ，clinical medication monitoring should be strengthened ，especially the important mean as therapeutic drug monitoring should be used well.
Реферат
@#Vancomycin is used to manage methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other bacterial infections that are Gram-positive in nature. Linezolid belongs to the oxazolidinone class of antibiotics, which is primarily used to treat vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), MRSA, diabetic foot, soft tissue, and skin infections. Here, we discuss vancomycin and linezolid dosing in obese patients, their mechanism of actions, pharmacokinetics, problems with dosing and evaluation of several dosing protocols in the obese patient population. There is no generally accepted dosing protocol for linezolid and vancomycin. Evidence suggests that using trough concentrations alone is insufficient for estimating vancomycin and linezolid exposure accurately as many researchers have revised protocol guidelines, developed more rigorous dosing and monitoring guidelines, or developed novel dosage strategies to meet the needs of overweight patients. Peaks and troughs measurement should be considered because it improves precision and reduces the area under the curve (AUC) estimate bias. To provide better dosing guidelines in this vulnerable group, obese patients must be included in all phases of drug design.