Thoracoscopic laparoscopy-assisted Ivor-Lewis resection of esophagogastric junction cancer / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective: To investigate the outcome of patients with esophagogastric junction cancer undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopy-assisted Ivor-Lewis resection. Methods: Eighty-four patients who were diagnosed with esophagogastric junction cancer and underwent Ivor-Lewis resection assisted by thoracoscopic laparoscopy at the National Cancer Center from October 2019 to April 2022 were collected. The neoadjuvant treatment mode, surgical safety and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. Results: Siewert type Ⅱ (92.8%) and adenocarcinoma (95.2%) were predominant in the cases. A total of 2 774 lymph nodes were dissected in 84 patients. The average number was 33 per case, and the median was 31. Lymph node metastasis was found in 45 patients, and the lymph node metastasis rate was 53.6% (45/84). The total number of lymph node metastasis was 294, and the degree of lymph node metastasis was 10.6%(294/2 774). Among them, abdominal lymph nodes (100%, 45/45) were more likely to metastasize than thoracic lymph nodes (13.3%, 6/45). Sixty-eight patients received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery, and nine patients achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) (13.2%, 9/68). Eighty-three patients had negative surgical margins and underwent R0 resection (98.8%, 83/84). One patient, the intraoperative frozen pathology suggested resection margin was negative, while vascular tumor thrombus was seen on the postoperative pathological margin, R1 resection was performed (1.2%, 1/84). The average operation time of the 84 patients was 234.5 (199.3, 275.0) minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 90 (80, 100) ml. One case of intraoperative blood transfusion, one case of postoperative transfer to ICU ward, two cases of postoperative anastomotic leakage, one case of pleural effusion requiring catheter drainage, one case of small intestinal hernia with 12mm poke hole, no postoperative intestinal obstruction, chyle leakage and other complications were observed. The number of deaths within 30 days after surgery was 0. Number of lymph nodes dissection, operation duration, and intraoperative blood loss were not related to whether neoadjuvant therapy was performed (P>0.05). Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy or immunotherapy was not related to whether postoperative pathology achieved pCR (P>0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted Ivor-Lewis surgery for esophagogastric junction cancer has a low incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, high safety, wide range of lymph node dissection, and sufficient margin length, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Surgical safety and pathological outcome of perioperative PD-1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy for Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ locally advanced adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction / 临床外科杂志

Objective To explore the surgical safety and pathological outcome of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ locally advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Methods 20 patients were recruited from January 2022 to December 2022,which conformed to Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ and c'T3-4N0M0 or cT2-4N+M0,and accepted at least two cycles of neoadjuvant regimen of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy before radical operation.While,23 patients,who accepted direct radical operation.,were seted as the matched group.The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events in the neoadjuvant period were evaluated.The surgery safety,the postoperative recovery,the surgery complications rate and the pathological outcome were compared between the two groups.Results In terms of safety of preoperative therapy,17 patients(85％)undergoed adverse events,the incidence of serious adverse events was 30％.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,lymph number harvested,time to start eating,postoperative days,and post operative mortality and morbidity between the two groups are all have no statistical differences.The pT stages was statistically lower than the matched group.In the neoadjuvant treatment group,the pathological complete response rate was 40％.Conclusion PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy is a safe neoadjuvant therapy,and exhibits promising pathological response,in patients with Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ locally advanced AEG.

Surgical Safety of Elderly Hospitalized Patients Stratified by Age in General Surgery / 中国医学科学院学报

Objective To compare the surgical safety of elderly hospitalized patients in different age groups undergoing general surgery,and provide references for preoperative evaluation and treatment decision-making.Methods The inpatients ≥ 60 years old in the department of general surgery were selected from a national multi-center survey conducted from January to June in 2015 and from January to June in 2016.The patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were described,and the risk factors for adverse postoperative outcomes of patients in different age groups were explored.Results The elderly patients (≥75 years old) accounted for 17.33%.The non-elderly patient (< 75 years old) group and the elderly patient (≥75 years old) group had significant differences in the proportions of patients with three or more chronical diseases (13.18% vs.5.36%,P<0.001),emergency surgery (16.64% vs.7.62%,P<0.001),American Society of Anesthesiologists score≥3 (48.68% vs.27.28%,P<0.001),and postoperative return to the intensive care unit(33.64% vs.12.00%,P<0.001).The occurrence of postoperative infectious complications showed no significant difference between the two age groups (7.29% vs.6.40%,P=0.410),while severe complications differed between the two groups (6.51% vs.2.60%,P<0.001).Besides,emergency surgery was a common independent risk factor for the two age groups.Conclusions Advanced age is not a contraindication to surgery of elderly patients.With consideration to patient's physical conditions and available surgical resources,elderly patients can still benefit from surgery.

Surgical safety checklist: an element of work organization in the operating theater / Lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica: um elemento de organização do trabalho no bloco cirúrgico

Objectives: the surgical safety checklist (SSC) is a document that is intended to increase patient safety in the operating theater by eliminating avoidable errors. The original document has been published in English by the WHO which recommends its obligatory use. The document's name is often distorted when translated into European languages, for instance into the "surgical control list". This article aims to assess the consequences of the distortion of the originally intended meaning for the completion of SSC in the operating theater. Methods: we compared the exactness of the meaning of translation in 29 European languages based on Google translator. Particular attention was paid to the presence of essential words such as "checklist" and "safety" in the translation. Results: we found that in 15 out of the 29 languages, the translation of these two words was incorrect, particularly in Slavic languages. The most often mistranslation was the "control card" or "control list", which was a misnomer. Conclusions: the translation of the SSC name into native languages is inadequate in about one-half of the cases, which may jeopardize its proper use by team members of the operating theater, and thus the patient perioperative safety.

Objetivo: a lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica (SSC) é um documento que visa aumentar a segurança do paciente no centro cirúrgico, eliminando possíveis erros. O documento original foi publicado em inglês pela OMS que recomenda seu uso obrigatório. O nome do documento é frequentemente distorcido quando traduzido para idiomas europeus, por exemplo, na "lista de controle cirúrgico". Este artigo visa avaliar as consequências da distorção do significado originalmente pretendido para a realização do SSC na sala de cirurgia. Métodos: para isso, comparamos a exatidão do significado da tradução em 29 idiomas europeus com base no tradutor do Google. Atenção especial foi dada para a presença de palavras essenciais como "lista de verificação" e "segurança" na tradução. Resultados: descobrimos que em 15 dos 29 idiomas, a tradução dessas duas palavras estava incorreta, principalmente em idiomas eslavos. A tradução incorreta mais frequente era o "cartão de controle" ou "lista de controle", o que era um equívoco. Conclusão: a tradução do nome do SSC para as línguas nativas é inadequada em cerca de metade dos casos, o que pode comprometer seu uso adequado pelos membros da equipe de centro cirúrgico e, portanto, a segurança perioperatória do paciente.

Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding World Health Organization surgical safety checklist and the challenges in its implementation at a teaching hospital in North India

Background: The WHO in 2009 published the surgical safety checklist (SSC) for reducing the surgical complications. For its successful implementation it is imperative to identify the current knowledge, attitude and practices of the involved personnel and explore the anticipated barriers. Objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practices of the participants about the SSC and determine the possible challenges in its implementation.Methods: This study is a descriptive, cross-sectional study involving the use of a pre-tested questionnaire carried out in a teaching hospital. All personnel involved in the operation theater who gave their written consent were enrolled.Results: Awareness regarding the SSC is high and existing practices are favorable towards patient safety amongst Hospital personnel. Attempts should be made to educate all personnel to gain complete knowledge regarding the checklist. The anticipated barriers, of which lack of knowledge was found to be the most prominent, should be dealt with.Conclusions: A strategy aimed at proper education, stepwise implementation, alleviating the hindrances and regular feedbacks can result in decreasing the surgery related complications and morbidities through implementation of the surgical safety checklist.

Ensuring Surgical Safety: Initial Footstep in a Thousand Mile Journey An Initial outcome Study from a Developing Country

Background: Surgical adverse events due to negligence are increasingly recognized as an important aspect for preventing morbidity and mortality in healthcare system. WHO Safe Surgical Checklist provides an opportunity for surgical teams to minimize surgical adverse events by following just a simple checklist. The aim of this study is to assess the compliance of different members of the surgical team to this checklist and post operative outcomes before and after an orientation programme regarding the checklist. Methods: We observed 100 elective surgeries in the Department of Surgery of our institution and collected the baseline data regarding the use of WHO Safe Surgical Checklist in these surgeries. Following the collection of baseline data we organised an orientation program for the surgical team at our institution and collected the same data after orientation. Data obtained both before and after the data collection were compared. Results: This study has shown significant improvement in certain sections of the WHO Safe Surgical Checklist such as conformation, by the patient himself, of his identity (10%) , site of surgery (23%) and procedure to be performed (35%) . A significant increase has also been shown in estimation of the duration of surgery by the surgeons (11%) and specimen labelling (44%). The members of the surgical team introduced themselves more number of times (17%) after the orientation. Number of deaths (50%) and surgical site infections (80% class1 SSI, 25 % class 2 SSI, 13% class 3 SSI, 52% class 4 SSI) has also been shown to decrease following the checklist implementation. Conclusion: Implementation of this WHO Safe Surgical Checklist is beneficial both to the patient and to the surgical team and is not very difficult to comply with, considering the excellent post operative outcomes shown in this study. Compliance with all items on the checklist with active co-operation, co-ordination and participation by all team members are key factors that led to the successful implementation of the checklist

Effect of Adherence to the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist on Morbidity and Mortality in a Defined Surgical Patient Population

To improve patient safety and prevent complications, WHO introduced surgical safety checklist (WHO SSC). However, the actual effect of WHO SSC on patient morbidity, particularly surgical site infections (SSI), and mortality on post-operative patients is one of the least studied area. Our study was to measure the effects surgical safety checklists have in reducing morbidities and complications, particularly surgical site infections, post-operative length of stay and mortality resulting from the surgical procedures. Methods: A prospective observational comparative study was conducted among all patients who underwent elective general surgical procedures from 01st July 2015 to 30th June 2016 in the Main OT Complex (OT1 and OT2), Indoor Surgical Wards and higher dependency units (ITU & CCU) of IPGMER & SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, after applying proper exclusion criteria. Pre-implementation (before implementation of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist) data was collected for first 6 months, then WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was implemented over next 6 months. Pre and post-implementation cohorts were compared and analysed. Results: Total 382 patients (187 Control group and 195 implementation group) were included. Both groups matched regarding age, sex, type of surgery, type of anaesthesia, post-operative length of stay. However, incidence of SSI significantly decreased (30.48% to 16.41%, p value 0.002, <0.05, statistically significant). Overall complication rate, unplanned return to operating room (OR) also decreased though the results were statistically not significant. Conclusion: Implementation of WHO SSC decreases morbidity related to SSI significantly. Further studies are required to assess the effects on mortality and unplanned return to OR.

A survey of the ten-year implementation of WHO surgical safety checklist in China / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective@#To investigate the current status of the ten-year implementation of the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist (SSC) in China.@*Methods@#A questionnaire was designed based on the three phases described by the checklist — the period before induction of anaesthesia, the period before skin incision, and the period before patient leaves operating room, taking into account some hotspots and disputes.The questionnaire was sent to the members of the Chinese-based online New Youth Anesthesia Forum through the WeChat platform.Answers were completed by mobile phones or desktop computers.Each WeChat ID number allowed only one answer for each individual participant.@*Results@#A total of 3 943 members red the questionnaire invitation, of which 2 121 members completed the questionnaire with an overall completion rate of 53.79%.For checks completed before induction of anesthesia, the percentage of members who routinely practiced checks before induction of anesthesia was 93.35%, the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 60.16%, and the percentage of members who selected the element of the checklist the surgeon was not involved in the check was 14.05%.For checks practiced before skin incision, the percentage of members who routinely completed checks before skin incision was 78.22%, the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 51.91%, and the percentage of members who selected the element of the checklist surgeons and anesthesiologists routinely stated their own professional key information was 18.24% and 18.81%, respectively.For checks practiced before the patient leaved the operating room, the percentage of members who routinely completed checks before removing the patient from the operating room was 64.26%, and the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 44.18%.The percentage of members who was really serious about practicing the checklist was 56.20%.The percentage of members who believed that surgeons should participated in checks practiced before induction of anesthesia was 81.47%.If the member himself or a member of his family needed a surgery, the percentage of members who hoped to implement the checklist was 98.35%.The percentage of members who believed that practicing WHO SSC could reduce the complications of surgery and improve the anesthetic safety of patients was 94.34%.@*Conclusion@#The implementing rate of checks practiced before induction of anesthesia is high, while the implementing rates of checks completed before skin incision and before patient leaves operating room are sequentially reduced in China.Although there are some problems with the implementation of WHO SSC, most respondents believe that implementing SSC can improve the anesthetic safety of patients undergoing surgery.

A survey of the ten-year implementation of WHO surgical safety checklist in China / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective To investigate the current status of the ten-year implementation of the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist (SSC) in China.Methods A questionnaire was designed based on the three phases described by the checklist — the period before induction of anaesthesia,the period before skin incision,and the period before patient leaves operating room,taking into account some hotspots and disputes.The questionnaire was sent to the members of the Chinese-based online New Youth Anesthesia Forum through the WeChat platform.Answers were completed by mobile phones or desktop computers.Each WeChat ID number allowed only one answer for each individual participant.Results A total of 3 943 members red the questionnaire invitation,of which 2 121 members completed the questionnaire with an overall completion rate of 53.79％.For checks completed before induction of anesthesia,the percentage of members who routinely practiced checks before induction of anesthesia was 93.35％,the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 60.16％,and the percentage of members who selected the element of the checklist the surgeon was not involved in the check was 14.05％.For checks practiced before skin incision,the percentage of members who routinely completed checks before skin incision was 78.22％,the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 51.91％,and the percentage of members who selected the element of the checklist surgeons and anesthesiologists routinely stated their own professional key information was 18.24％ and 18.81％,respectively.For checks practiced before the patient leaved the operating room,the percentage of members who routinely completed checks before removing the patient from the operating room was 64.26％,and the percentage of members who completed each and every element of the checklist was 44.18％.The percentage of members who was really serious about practicing the checklist was 56.20％.The percentage of members who believed that surgeons should participated in checks practiced before induction of anesthesia was 81.47％.If the member himself or a member of his family needed a surgery,the percentage of members who hoped to implement the checklist was 98.35％.The percentage of members who believed that practicing WHO SSC could reduce the complications of surgery and improve the anesthetic safety of patients was 94.34％.Conclusion The implementing rate of checks practiced before induction of anesthesia is high,while the implementing rates of checks completed before skin incision and before patient leaves operating room are sequentially reduced in China.Although there are some problems with the implementation of WHO SSC,most respondents believe that implementing SSC can improve the anesthetic safety of patients undergoing surgery.

Application value of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in lymphadenectomy of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the application value of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging in lymphadenectomy of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 702 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy in the Fujian Medical University Uuion Hospital between April and December 2017 were collected.There were 517 males and 185 females,aged from 22 to 91 years,with an average age of 61 years.Of the 702 patients,39 using ICG fluorescence imaging in the surgery and 663 not using ICG fluorescence imaging were allocated into ICG group and non-ICG group,respectively.Observation indicators:(1) surgical situations and postoperative recovery;(2) postoperative complications;(3) average number of lymph node dissected and positive lymph nodes;(4) follow-up situations.The number of lymph node dissected in the first station (No.1-7 group) and second station (No.8-12 group) were analyzed respectively.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect complications of patients up to June 2018.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD,comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range),comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.Count data were represented as absolute number or percentage,comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test.Comparisons of ordinal data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test.Results (1) Surgical situations and postoperative recovery:702 patients underwent successfully laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy,without injuries of important vessels and adjacent organs,without combined multiple organs resection or conversion to open surgery.Of 39 patients in the ICG group,cases undergoing total radical gastrectomy,distal subtotal gastrectomy and proximal subtotal gastrectomy,cases with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy,Billroth Ⅰ anastomosis,Billroth Ⅱ anastomosis,Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and esophagogastric anastomosis,operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,time for out-of-bed activities,time to initial anal exsufflation,time to first fluid diet intake and duration of postoperative hospital stay were 21,16,2,21,3,13,2,0,(173±28) minutes,40 mL (range,5-200 mL),(2.1±0.6)days,(3.5±1.4)days,(4.8± 1.3)days,(8.6±3.6) days.The above indexes were 363,299,1,363,27,267,1,5,(174±41)minutes,50 mL(range,0-1 750 mL),(2.2±0.8)days,(3.4± 1.1) days,(4.6± 1.5) days,(9.4± 5.0) days in the non-ICG group.There were statistically significant differences in the surgical type and digestive reconstruction method (x2 =9.550,11.388,P＜ 0.05) and no statistically significant difference in the operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,time for out-of-bed activities,time to initial anal exsufflation,time to first fluid diet intake and duration of postoperative hospital stay (t =0.221,Z =-0.651,t =0.492,-0.826,-0.842,0.995,P＞0.05).(2) Postoperative complications:92 out of the 702 patients had postoperative complications,without death of complications.The incidence of complication was 15.38％(6/39) and 12.97％(86/663) in the ICG group and non-ICG group,with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (x2=0.188,P＞0.05).Six patients with complications (1 of Clavien-Dindo Ⅳ,2 of Clavien-Dindo Ⅲa,3 of Clavien-Dindo Ⅰ) in the ICG group and 86 (6 of Clavien-Dindo Ⅳ,16 of Clavien-Dindo Ⅲ,61 of Clavien-Dindo Ⅱ,3 of Clavien-Dindo Ⅰ) in the non-ICG group were cured after symptomatic treatment.(3) Average number of lymph node dissected and positive lymph nodes:the average number of lymph node dissected and positive lymph nodes was 37 (range,3-112) and 1 (range,0-68) of 702 patients,38 (range,24-70) and 2 (range,0-42) in the ICG group,37 (range,3-112) and 1 (range,0-68) in the non-ICG group,with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z=-1.454,-0.514,P＞0.05).Stratified analysis:the average number of No.1-7 group lymph nodes dissected and positive lymph nodes was 34 (range,16-67) and 2 (0-38) in the ICG group,33 (range,3-91) and 1 (range,0-56) in the non-ICG group.The average number of No.8-12 group lymph nodes dissected and positive lymph nodes was 11 (range,4-22) and 0 (range,0-13) in the ICG group,9 (range,0-31) and 0 (range,0-25) in the non-ICG group.There was a statistically significant difference in the average number of No.8-12 group lymph nodes dissected between the two groups (Z=-1.984,P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the average number of No.1-7 group lymph nodes dissected,positive No.1-7 group lymph nodes and the average number of positive No.8-12 group lymph nodes between the two groups (Z =-1.302,-0.463,-0.758,P＞0.05).(4) Follow-up situations:702 patients were followed up for 6-14 months,with a median time of 10 months.There was no readmission caused by postoperative complications in the two groups.Conclusion ICG fluorescence imaging in lymphadenectomy of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer is beneficial to dissection of perigastric lymph nodes and increase number of lymph nodes dissected,but cannot increase operation time and incidence of postoperative complications.

Safety of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in 70 years of age or older patients / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the safety of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in 70 years of age or older patients.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 40 patients (age ≥70 years old) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2012 and December 2016 were collected.Twenty patients undergoing LPD were allocated into the LPD group,and 20 receiving open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) who were selected by random number table during the same period were allocated into the OPD group.Observation indicators included:(1) intraoperative situations;(2) postoperative situations;(3) follow-up situation.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect the patients' survival after discharge and tumor recurrence and metastasis up to March 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution was represented as x±s,and comparison between groups were evaluated with the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as median (range) and comparison between groups was analyzed using the nonparametric test.Comparison of count data was analyzed using the chi-square test.Comparison of ranked data was analyzed by non parametric test.Results (1) Intraoperative situations:1 patient in the LPD group was converted to open surgery,with a conversive rate of 5.0％ (1/20).Operative time and volume of intraoperative blood loss were (463 ± 10) minutes,210.5 mL (152.5-300.0 mL) in the LPD group and (332± 25) minutes,420.0 mL (350.1-493.8 mL) in the OPD group,showing statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t =5.48,Z =-3.98,P＜0.05).Cases with intraoperative blood transfusion and pylorus preservation were respectively 4,14 in the LPD group and 6,10 in the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=0.53,1.67,P＞0.05).The results of intraoperative rapid frozen pathological examination showed negative margin of the 40 patients.(2) Postoperative situations:cases in ICU,cases with postoperative analgesia,time for out-of-bed activity,time to anal exsufflation and time for intake were 17,7,(2.2±0.7)days,(4.2± 0.9)days,(4.8±0.7)days in the LPD group and 6,15,(3.6±0.8)days,(5.7±0.9)days,(7.1 ± 2.7)days in the OPD group,showing statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (x2 =12.34,6.47,t=-6.18,-6.55,-3.65,P＜0.05).Pancreatic fistula,delayed gastric emptying (Grade B),postoperative bleeding (Grade B),biliary fistula,pulmonary infection,intestinal obstruction,wound infection,reoperation and major complication were respectively detected in 2,3,1,1,3,1,0,2,3 patients of the LPD group and 2,4,1,1,4,1,2,3,4 in patients of the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.00,0.17,0.00,0.00,0.17,0.00,2.11,0.23,0.17,P＞0.05).Results of postoperative pathological examination showed that duodenal adenocarcinoma,ampullary carcinoma,lower bile duct carcinoma,pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic cystic tumor were respectively detected in 8,2,5,3,2 patients of the LPD group and 10,2,4,2,2 patients of the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.53,P＞0.05).Duration of postoperative hospital stay in the LPD and OPD groups were (19± 13) days and (15±7) days,respectively,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =1.28,P＞ 0.05).Results of postoperative oncology showed that tumor diameter,number of lymph node dissected,number of positive lymph nodes,cases with negative margin,cases in T1N0M0,T2N0M0,T3N0M0,T3N1M0,T4N0M0,T4N1M0 of TNM staging were respectively (2.4±0.7)cm,15.4±2.3,2,20,2,7,8,2,1,0 in the LPD group and (2.8±0.9)cm,14.4±2.5,3,20,1,8,5,2,3,1 in the OPD group,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =-1.64,1.32,x2 =0.23,0.00,Z =-0.69,P＞ 0.05).(3) Follow-up situation:1 patient died respectively in both groups within the postoperative 30 days.Thirty-eight patients were followed up for 1-26 months,with a median time of 14 months.During follow-up,2 patients had tumor recurrence and 1 died of myocardial infarction in the LPD group;3 had tumor recurrence and 1 died of tumor recurrence in the OPD group.Conclusion LPD in 70 years of age or older patients is not only safe and feasible,but also significantly reduce volume of intraoperative blood loss and demand of analgesia,as well as quickly resume normal diet and activities.

Safety of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in 70 years of age or older patients / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the safety of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in 70 years of age or older patients.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 40 patients (age ≥70 years old) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2012 and December 2016 were collected.Twenty patients undergoing LPD were allocated into the LPD group,and 20 receiving open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) who were selected by random number table during the same period were allocated into the OPD group.Observation indicators included:(1) intraoperative situations;(2) postoperative situations;(3) follow-up situation.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect the patients' survival after discharge and tumor recurrence and metastasis up to March 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution was represented as x±s,and comparison between groups were evaluated with the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as median (range) and comparison between groups was analyzed using the nonparametric test.Comparison of count data was analyzed using the chi-square test.Comparison of ranked data was analyzed by non parametric test.Results (1) Intraoperative situations:1 patient in the LPD group was converted to open surgery,with a conversive rate of 5.0％ (1/20).Operative time and volume of intraoperative blood loss were (463 ± 10) minutes,210.5 mL (152.5-300.0 mL) in the LPD group and (332± 25) minutes,420.0 mL (350.1-493.8 mL) in the OPD group,showing statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (t =5.48,Z =-3.98,P＜0.05).Cases with intraoperative blood transfusion and pylorus preservation were respectively 4,14 in the LPD group and 6,10 in the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=0.53,1.67,P＞0.05).The results of intraoperative rapid frozen pathological examination showed negative margin of the 40 patients.(2) Postoperative situations:cases in ICU,cases with postoperative analgesia,time for out-of-bed activity,time to anal exsufflation and time for intake were 17,7,(2.2±0.7)days,(4.2± 0.9)days,(4.8±0.7)days in the LPD group and 6,15,(3.6±0.8)days,(5.7±0.9)days,(7.1 ± 2.7)days in the OPD group,showing statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (x2 =12.34,6.47,t=-6.18,-6.55,-3.65,P＜0.05).Pancreatic fistula,delayed gastric emptying (Grade B),postoperative bleeding (Grade B),biliary fistula,pulmonary infection,intestinal obstruction,wound infection,reoperation and major complication were respectively detected in 2,3,1,1,3,1,0,2,3 patients of the LPD group and 2,4,1,1,4,1,2,3,4 in patients of the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.00,0.17,0.00,0.00,0.17,0.00,2.11,0.23,0.17,P＞0.05).Results of postoperative pathological examination showed that duodenal adenocarcinoma,ampullary carcinoma,lower bile duct carcinoma,pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic cystic tumor were respectively detected in 8,2,5,3,2 patients of the LPD group and 10,2,4,2,2 patients of the OPD group,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.53,P＞0.05).Duration of postoperative hospital stay in the LPD and OPD groups were (19± 13) days and (15±7) days,respectively,showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =1.28,P＞ 0.05).Results of postoperative oncology showed that tumor diameter,number of lymph node dissected,number of positive lymph nodes,cases with negative margin,cases in T1N0M0,T2N0M0,T3N0M0,T3N1M0,T4N0M0,T4N1M0 of TNM staging were respectively (2.4±0.7)cm,15.4±2.3,2,20,2,7,8,2,1,0 in the LPD group and (2.8±0.9)cm,14.4±2.5,3,20,1,8,5,2,3,1 in the OPD group,with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (t =-1.64,1.32,x2 =0.23,0.00,Z =-0.69,P＞ 0.05).(3) Follow-up situation:1 patient died respectively in both groups within the postoperative 30 days.Thirty-eight patients were followed up for 1-26 months,with a median time of 14 months.During follow-up,2 patients had tumor recurrence and 1 died of myocardial infarction in the LPD group;3 had tumor recurrence and 1 died of tumor recurrence in the OPD group.Conclusion LPD in 70 years of age or older patients is not only safe and feasible,but also significantly reduce volume of intraoperative blood loss and demand of analgesia,as well as quickly resume normal diet and activities.

Oblitoma en la cirugía ginecoobstétrica: un problema creciente. Reporte de un caso / Oblitoma in obstetric and gynecologic surgery: a growing problem

Resumen ANTECEDENTES: Los oblitomas, u objetos extraños retenidos en el abdomen posterior a una cirugía, son consecuencia de una iatrogenia que causa morbilidad, dificultad diagnóstica, problemas médico-legales, y complicaciones para las pacientes, el médico y la institución hospitalaria. CASO CLINICO: Paciente de 27 años de edad, con un cuerpo extraño retenido en la cavidad abdominal (bulbo de la cánula de Yankauer), olvidado durante una cesárea de urgencia. El diagnóstico y tratamiento fueron expeditos, con reintervención quirúrgica para extraer el cuerpo extraño, sin complicaciones y con evolución satisfactoria de la paciente. CONCLUSIONES: El estudio actual de los oblitomas u objetos extraños retenidos es un problema creciente, con estadísticas en contra, sobre todo asociadas con elevada frecuencia de cesáreas y alta prevalencia de obesidad materna durante el embarazo, esto debe alertar a los ginecoobstetras a conducirse con más cuidado para evitar este tipo de accidentes.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Oblitomas or retained surgical items (RSI) in the abdominal cavity after surgery are cause of iatrogenic medical problems, that origin high morbidity, difficult diagnosis and medical malpractice claims to may lead complications to patients, physicians included to hospital. CLINICAL CASE: We report an exceptional case, in a 27-year-old women, with a bulb of Yankahuer cannula retained in abdominal cavity, Forgotten during an emergency cesarean section. The diagnosis and management was realized with opportunity, avoiding complications. CONCLUSION: Actually, the study of oblitoma or foreign objects retained that's considered a growing problem, with statistics against it, mainly associated with high frequency of cesarean sections and high prevalence of maternal obesity during pregnancy. In fact, that situation place the gynecologists and obstetricians at a latent risk for this event. It is important to know the predisposing factors for its prevention and to implement institutional programs to reduce complications.

Lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica: evidências para a implementação em serviços de saúde / Surgical safety checklist: evidence for implementation in health services

A segurança do paciente cirúrgico é problemática complexa e desafiadora em âmbito global. A presente pesquisa teve como objetivos (a) analisar as evidências disponíveis na literatura sobre o processo de implementação da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica da Organização Mundial da Saúde na prática dos serviços de saúde, e (b) analisar o processo de implementação e o uso diário da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica, segundo o relato de enfermeiros que atuavam em unidades de centro cirúrgico de hospitais de duas cidades localizadas no estado do Paraná. A pesquisa foi conduzida em duas fases: revisão integrativa e estudo descritivo. A busca dos estudos primários foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, CINAHL e LILACS. A amostra da revisão integrativa foi composta de 27 pesquisas agrupadas em três categorias, a saber: processo de implementação: estratégias para introdução da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica nos serviços de saúde (n=15); processo de implementação: estratégias para otimização do uso da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica nos serviços de saúde (n=9) e facilitadores e barreiras para implementação da lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica nos serviços de saúde (n=3). A condução da revisão integrativa possibilitou compreender o processo de implementação da lista, as diferentes estratégias utilizadas para sua implantação, aspectos da implementação considerados bem-sucedidos ou pouco exitosos no alcance dos resultados esperados, facilitadores e barreiras deste processo. O estudo descritivo foi realizado em 25 hospitais de duas cidades que compõem a mesorregião do Norte Central Paranaense (Londrina e Maringá). Os participantes foram 91 enfermeiros que atuavam em centro cirúrgico dos hospitais selecionados. Para a coleta de dados elaborou-se dois instrumentos, os quais foram submetidos à validação aparente e de conteúdo. Os resultados evidenciaram que, na maioria dos hospitais investigados, a lista de verificação de segurança cirúrgica foi implementada, sendo que, para a maioria dos participantes, as estratégias adotadas na introdução da lista foram o planejamento prévio conduzido pelos enfermeiros, a adaptação com predominância do uso no formato impresso e programa educacional. Com relação ao uso diário da lista, a maioria dos enfermeiros apontou a utilização inadequada desta prática nos seguintes aspectos: adesão parcial ao uso pela equipe cirúrgica, diferença de adesão entre as etapas de checagem e entre as categorias profissionais e condutas inadequadas da equipe cirúrgica na checagem da lista em sala cirúrgica (equipe incompleta, desatenta e sem participação ativa de seus membros). Para a maioria dos participantes, o uso da lista trouxe benefícios ou tem potencial para produzir efeitos benéficos para o paciente, equipe cirúrgica e serviço de saúde. As evidências geradas trazem subsídios para os enfermeiros e demais profissionais de saúde na elaboração de protocolos relativos ao processo de implementação ou uso diário da lista mais adequados e compatíveis com as especificidades estruturais e organizacionais dos serviços de saúde nacionais, com o propósito de viabilizar a integração desta ferramenta no processo de trabalho, melhorar a adesão da equipe e alcançar os melhores resultados em prol da segurança do paciente

Surgical patient safety is a complex and challenging problem at the global level. This study aimed to analyze (a) the available evidence in the literature on the process of implementation of the surgical safety checklist of the World Health Organization in the practice of health services, and (b) the implementation process and the daily use of the surgical safety checklist, according to the report of nurses working in surgical center units of hospitals of two cities located in the state of Paraná. The research was conducted in two phases: integrative review and descriptive study. The search for primary studies was carried out in PubMed, CINAHL and LILACS databases. The sample of the integrative review consisted of 27 studies grouped into three categories, namely: implementation process: strategies for the introduction of the surgical safety checklist in the health services (n = 15); implementation process: strategies to optimize the use of the surgical safety checklist in health services (n = 9) and facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the surgical safety checklist (n = 3). Conducting the integrative review made it possible to understand the process of implementing the list, the different strategies used for its implementation, aspects of implementation considered successful or not very successful in achieving the expected results, facilitators and barriers of this process. The descriptive study was carried out in 25 hospitals of two cities that make up the mesoregion of Northern Central of Paraná state (Londrina and Maringá). Participants were 91 nurses who worked in the surgical center of the selected hospitals. For the data collection, two instruments were elaborated, which were submitted to the apparent validation and content. The results showed that, in most of the hospitals investigated, the surgical safety checklist was implemented, and, for most of the participants, the strategies adopted in the introduction of the list were the previous planning conducted by the nurses, the adaptation with predominance of the use in the printed format and educational program. Regarding the daily use of the list, most of the nurses pointed out the inadequate use of this practice in the following aspects: surgical team's partial adherence to the use of it, difference in adherence between the check-up stages, and between the professional categories and inadequate behavior of the surgical team in checking the list in the surgical room (incomplete, inattentive team, and members not taking part actively). For most participants, using the list has brought benefits or can potentially produce beneficial effects for the patient, surgical team, and health service. The evidence generated provides subsidies for nurses and other health professionals in elaborating protocols related to the implementation process or daily use of the list more adequate and compatible with the structural and organizational specificities of the national health services, in order to make feasible the integration of this tool into the work process, to improve team adherence and to achieve the best results for patient safety

Safety Management for MR-Guided Interventions

PURPOSE: Operating room management is the serious and complex task for hospital managers and the common approach is to develop relevant standard operational procedures. From patient and staff safety perspective, operating room management should be well-studied and hospital should identify and address any potential risks. Simultaneous usage of different imaging and less-invasive treatment technologies demands strong management control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have formed the multidisciplinary expert panel (surgeons, anesthesiologists, radiologists, healthcare managers etc.) for hybrid theater management standard operational procedure development. On the first stage the general concept of hybrid room design and patient routing was developed. The second stage included the technical details discussion. For patient safety improvement we modified the Surgical Safety Check-list in accordance with potential MRI-related safety challenges and concerns. RESULTS: WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is a simple and easy-to use tool which includes three blocks of question (grouped by the surgery process). We have developed two additional blocks of questions for the intraoperative magnetic resonance investigation. It is very important to have a special detailed routing with a strong control of ferromagnetic devices and anesthesiology care. CONCLUSION: High-energy MRI (1.5-3.0T) is characterized by potential influence on patient and staff safety in case of hybrid surgery. It is obvious to have a strong managerial control of ferromagnetic devices and anesthesiology care. Surgical Safety Checklist is the validated tool for improving patient safety. Modification and customization of this check-list potentially provides the opportunity for surgery processes improving.

Application of Different Blocking Ways at the First Hepatic Portal in Precise Hepatectomy / 昆明医科大学学报

Objective To investigate the differences in the safety of the operation of different hepatic vascular exclusion for liver surgery. Methods Sixty patients with liver resection were grouped by different hepatic blood flow blocking methods, and given pre-operative assessment prior to surgery. Results On the first day after surgery, the average levels of ALT and AST were (395.0 ± 220.2) U/L and (415.3±311.0) U/L in patients who received Pringle’s method (110.2±53.0) U/L and (125.6±78.5) U/L in patients who received regional hepatic vascular exclusion, (98.9±32.2) U/L and (96.2 ±66.5) U/L in patients who didn't receive hepatic vascular exclusion, respectively. Postoperative liver function damage was more serious in patients who received Pringle's method than patients who received regional hepatic vascular exclusion or patients who didn't receive hepatic vascular exclusion, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) .Conclusion Regional hepatic vascular exclusion or not can not only reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, but also expand the indications for liver resection.

Investigation of the surgical safety checklist implementation in a tertiary hospital / 中华医院管理杂志

Objective To investigate the implementation of the surgical safety checklist in the hospital.Methods The investigation covered the participants of 560 surgical operations of a tertiary hospital,including the surgeons,surgical assistants,scrub nurses and anesthetists,to learn their compliance and awareness of the content of the surgical safety checklist.Results Poor compliance and unawareness of some items of surgical safety checklist in surgical team members were found,plus insufficient understanding of some the items on the checklist.This checklist can improve the quality and safety awareness of the team.Conclusion The implementation of the surgical safety checklist is feasible and effective for avoidance of risks in selective operations,and conducive to promoting communication among the surgical team and preventing surgical errors.

Implementación de la Lista de verificación de seguridad quirúrgica postoperatoria en la sala general / Post-operative surgical safety checklist implementation in the surgery ward

Introducción: La iniciativa de la OMS ha demostrado que el conocimiento adecuado de los riesgos que pueden llegar a poner en peligro el bienestar y la vida del paciente pueden ser disminuidos a través de la implementación de listas de verificación durante el acto quirúrgico. Objetivos: Identificar las acciones destinadas a brindar mayor seguridad al paciente desde la implementación de listas de verificación en el período postoperatorio. Lugar de Aplicación: Hospital Aeronáutico Central. Diseño: prospectivo, observacional. Población: 200 actos quirúrgicos. Método: Se analizaron las fallas identificadas utilizando Listas de Verificación en 200 actos quirúrgicos entre Abril y Octubre de 2011. Resultados: Se identificaron 20 (57%) partes quirúrgicos incompletos o mal confeccionados, 4 (11%) pacientes con analgesia inadecuada o insuficiente, 4 (11%) con indicación postquirúrgica de oxígeno sin colocar o colocado a flujo inadecuado y 3 (8,6%) pacientes con indicación de faja corporal sin colocar o colocada de forma incorrecta. Conclusiones: La utilización de Listas de Verificación permiten reducir los riesgos y a evitar eventos adversos prevenibles. En este aspecto, es fundamental la educación continua en todas las áreas de trabajo con el fin de lograr una real política de seguridad para el paciente quirúrgico.

Introduction: WHO initiative has shown that adequate knowledge of the risks that may endanger patients’ lives and well-being is essential and they can be diminished by implementing surgical safety checklists during surgery. Objectives: Identify actions aimed at providing better patient safety through the implementation of safety checklists in the postoperative period. Place of implementation: Hospital Aeronáutico Central. Design: prospective, observational. Population: 200 surgeries. Method: Analysis of errors identified using Surgical Safety Checklists in 200 surgeries, between April and October 2011. Results: The following was identified: 20 (57%) incomplete or defective surgery reports, 4 (11%) patients with inadequate or insufficient analgesia, 4 (11%) patients with postoperative indication of oxygen therapy not administered or placed with inadequate flow, and 3 (8.6%) patients with indication to wear abdominal binder were without them or they were wrongly placed. Conclusions: The use of Safety Checklists reduces risks and prevents avoidable adverse events. In this regard, continuing education in all work areas is vital in order to achieve a real safety policy for the surgical patient.

Análisis de las quejas derivadas de las prácticas quirúrgicas / Complaint analysis derived from surgical practice

Se analizan los asuntos presentados ante la Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico desde junio de 1996 hasta diciembre de 2007, para difundir su magnitud e identificar los problemas de seguridad en la atención médica. De 182 407 asuntos, 87 % lo resolvió el Área de Orientación y Gestión. Las restantes 18 443 quejas fueron derivadas a la Dirección de Conciliación; de ellas, en 48 % se logró la conciliación entre promoventes y médicos y en 31 % esto no fue factible; 3 % se trató de quejas irresolubles. La mayor frecuencia de quejas se registró en el Distrito Federal y Estado de México, principalmente correspondientes a instituciones de seguridad social y hospitales privados. Entre las nueve especialidades involucradas con mayor frecuencia, existieron seis quirúrgicas. Se identificó mala práctica en 25 % de los casos. Las principales pretensiones de los promoventes de las quejas fueron reintegro de los gastos erogados por atención médica en 51 % de los casos e indemnización en 40 %; en estos últimos el monto promedio de lo pagado por caso fue 4.6 veces mayor. El conocimiento de las quejas médicas permite investigar sus causas y generar acciones preventivas y correctivas, para su abatimiento. Se propone que la Academia Mexicana de Cirugía, por su liderazgo académico y docente, asuma la vanguardia en la difusión y promoción del plan “Las prácticas quirúrgicas seguras salvan vidas”, de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, y la implantación en nuestro país de la “Lista de verificación de la seguridad quirúrgica”.

This study reports on the analysis of medical complaints presented to the National Commission on Medical Arbitration (Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico, CONAMED) between June 1996 and December 2007 to determine its magnitude and to identify the causes of safety problems in medical care. Out of 182,407 complaints presented to CONAMED, 87% were resolved by the Office of Orientation and Management. The remaining 18,443 complaints were presented to the Council Directorate. Of those cases, 48% were resolved by an agreement between the complainants and the physicians, 31% were not resolved by this method, and 3% were irresolute complaints. The highest frequency of complaints was registered in the Federal District (Distrito Federal) and the State of México (Estado de México), mainly corresponding to social security institutions and private hospitals. Among the nine most frequently involved specialties, six were surgical specialties. Malpractice was identified in 25% of all cases. The principal demands of those making complaints were the refunding of expenses in patient medical care (51%) and indemnification (40%) and, in those, the average amount of payments was 4.6 times greater. Due to the incidence of medical complaints, it was reasonable to investigate the causes and to take preventive and corrective actions required for its decrease. It was proposed to the Mexican Academy of Surgery that this organization should use their educational leadership and assume the vanguard in the dissemination and promotion of the WHO plan "Safe Surgery Saves Lives" and the implementation in Mexico of the "Surgical Safety Checklist."