Validation of NUTRIFICO Mnemonic as a Nutritional Approach and Breaking Dismal News in Palliative Care / Validação do Mnemônico NUTRIFICO como Abordagem Nutricional e Comunicação de Notícias Difíceis em Cuidados Paliativos / Validación del Mneumónico NUTRIFICO como Enfoque Nutricional y Comunicación de Noticias Difíciles en Cuidados Paliativos

A assistência nutricional em cuidados paliativos possui papel preventivo e visa assegurar as necessidades nutricionais do paciente na tentativa de auxiliar o controle dos sintomas, manter a hidratação satisfatória, ressignificar a alimentação, reduzir a ansiedade, retardar o desenvolvimento da caquexia, preservar o peso e a composição nutricional. Objetivo: Desenvolver e validar o mnemônico NUTRIFICO como abordagem de assistência nutricional e comunicação de notícias difíceis em cuidados paliativos. Método: Pesquisa de desenvolvimento e validação de conteúdo que utilizou a técnica Delphi com a aplicação do delineamento misto com abordagens qualitativas e quantitativas para a coleta e análise dos dados. Os participantes, nutricionistas com atuação em cuidados paliativos e/ou formação na área, foram recrutados por amostragem do tipo bola de neve. O percentual de concordância mínimo definido para validação foi de 80% pela escala Likert de cinco pontos. Resultados: Quarenta participantes, incluindo oito "sementes", foram convidados a participar do estudo. Destes, 16 assinaram o Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido (TCLE). A análise de conteúdo seguiu duas rodadas Delphi e foi obtida uma taxa de concordância superior a 80% entre os participantes para todos os componentes. A versão final do mnemônico NUTRIFICO resultou em dois princípios-chave, oito componentes e 12 recomendações. Conclusão: O mnemônico NUTRIFICO foi considerado válido quanto ao conteúdo e, portanto, pertinente à aplicação na abordagem nutricional e comunicação de notícias difíceis em cuidados paliativos.

Nutritional assistance in palliative care has a preventive role and seeks to ensure the patient's nutritional needs in an attempt to help to control the symptoms, maintain satisfactory hydration, reframe food, reduce anxiety, delay the development of cachexia, preserve weight and nutritional composition. Objective: To develop and validate the NUTRIFICO mnemonic as an approach to nutritional assistance and communication of dismal news in palliative care. Method: Research development and validation of content utilizing the Delphi technique with the application of a mixed design with qualitative and quantitative approaches for data collection and analysis. The participants, nutritionists with experience in palliative care and/or training in the area, were recruited by sampling using the snowball method. The minimum agreement percentage defined for validation was 80% on the five-point Likert scale. Results: Forty participants were invited to participate in the study, including eight "seeds" and 16 signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF). The content analysis followed two Delphi rounds, an agreement rate greater than 80% was obtained among participants for all the components. The final version of the NUTRIFICO mnemonic presented two key principles, eight components and twelve recommendations. Conclusion: The mnemonic NUTRIFICO was validated in terms of content and relevant for the application in the nutritional approach and communication of dismal news in palliative care

Resource utilization and costs related to the management of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy under the Brazilian supplementary healthcare system´s perspective: results from a modified Delphi panel / Utilização de recursos e custos relacionados ao manejo da cardiomiopatia hipertrófica obstrutiva sob a perspectiva do sistema de saúde suplementar brasileiro: resultados de um painel Delphi modificado

Objective: To generate data on the costs associated with the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive ypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from the perspective of the private health system in Brazil. Methods: A modified Delphi panel including seven different specialists (three clinical cardiologists with experience in obstructive HCM, two hemodynamicists with experience in septal ablation and two cardiac surgeons with expertise in myectomy), from two Brazilian states (São Paulo and Pernambuco), was conducted between August and November 2022. Two rounds of questions about the use of healthcare resources according to the functional class (NYHA I-IV) and a panel in a virtual platform were conducted to obtain the final consensus. Micro-costing defined costs and unit values were determined based on official price lists. Results: The total diagnosis cost per patient was estimated at BRL 11,486.81. The obstructive HCM management costs analysis showed average annual costs per patient of BRL 17,026.74, BRL 19,401.46, BRL 73,310.07, and BRL 94,885.75 for the functional classes NYHA I, NYHA II, NYHA III, and NYHA IV, respectively. The average costs per patient related to procedures in a year were BRL 12,698.53, BRL 13,462.30, BRL 58,841.67, and BRL 75,595.90 for the functional classes NYHA I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Conclusions: The annual costs of HCM management increased according to the functional class, highlighting the need for safe and effective strategies to improve patient's NYHA functional class while promoting a decrease in the need for invasive therapies.

Objetivo: Gerar dados acerca dos custos associados ao diagnóstico e tratamento da cardiomiopatia hipertrófica (CMH) obstrutiva, sob a perspectiva do sistema de saúde privado no Brasil. Métodos: Um painel Delphi modificado incluindo sete especialistas (três cardiologistas clínicos com experiência em CMH obstrutiva, dois hemodinamicistas com experiência em ablação de septo e dois cirurgiões cardíacos com experiência em miectomia) de dois estados brasileiros (São Paulo e Pernambuco) foi conduzido entre agosto e novembro de 2022. Foram realizadas duas rodadas de perguntas acerca da utilização de recursos de acordo com a classe funcional (NYHA I-IV) e uma reunião virtual para obtenção do consenso final. Os custos foram definidos por meio de microcusteio, e os valores unitários foram definidos com base em listas de preço oficiais. Resultados: O custo total do diagnóstico por paciente foi estimado em R$ 11.486,81. A análise de custos de manejo da CMH obstrutiva mostrou custos médios anuais por paciente de R$ 17.026,74, R$ 19.401,46, R$ 73.310,07 e R$ 94.885,75 para as classes funcionais NYHA I, NYHA II, NYHA III e NYHA IV, respectivamente. Os custos médios por paciente relacionados a procedimentos em um ano foram de R$ 12.698,53, R$ 13.462,30, R$ 58.841,67 e R$ 75.595,90 para as classes NYHA I, II, III e IV, respectivamente. Conclusões: Os custos anuais com o manejo da CMH aumentam de acordo com a classe funcional, destacando a necessidade de estratégias seguras e eficazes capazes de melhorar a classe funcional NYHA do paciente, ao mesmo tempo que promove diminuição da necessidade de terapias invasivas.

Construção e validação de indicadores para avaliação da implantação do método canguru utilizando técnica Delphi / Construction and validation of indicators to evaluate the implementation of the kangaroo method using the Delphi technique

Objetivo: Apresentar o processo de validação de uma matriz de indicadores para avaliação da implantação da segunda e terceira etapas do Método Canguru (MC) em duas maternidades de referência e na atenção básica em Recife. Métodos: O processo de construção e validação seguiu quatro passos: (1) elaboração do modelo lógico da segunda e terceira etapas do MC; (2) composição da matriz de indicadores preliminar; (3) seleção de especialistas, envio de indicadores a esse grupo para análise utilizando a Técnica Delphi; (4) consolidação dos resultados e envio aos especialistas para segunda consulta e análise final. Adotou-se um Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC) igual ou superior a 80% para estabelecer a concordância. Resultados: O modelo lógico foi composto de componentes para segunda e terceira etapas do MC, com os subcomponentes Educação e Assistencial, e um componente para a interface das duas etapas, com o subcomponente Gestão. Dos 110 itens apresentados, dois não apresentaram consenso na primeira rodada e três sugestões de alteração foram feitas. Cinco novos indicadores foram incluídos, totalizando ao final 113 indicadores. Conclusão: O uso da técnica Delphi possibilitou ampliar o consenso e validar a matriz de indicadores do MC na perspectiva de especialistas envolvidos com a estratégia. Descritores: Método Canguru; Avaliação de Programas e Instrumentos de Pesquisa; Técnica Delfos; Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde; Estudo de Validação.

Objective: To present the validation process of a matrix of indicators to evaluate the implementation of the second and third stages of the Kangaroo Method (KM) in two reference maternity hospitals and in primary care in Recife.Methods: The construction and validation process followed four stages: (1) elaboration of the logical model of the 2nd and 3rd stage of the KM; (2) composition of the preliminary indicator matrix; (3) selection of experts, sending indicators to this group for analysis using the Delphi Technique; (4) consolidation of results and sending to experts for second consultation and final analysis. A Content Validity Index (CVI) equal to or greater than 80% was adopted to establish agreement. Results: The logical model was composed of components for the 2nd and 3rd stages of the KM, with the Education and Care subcomponents, and a component for the interface of the two stages, with the Management subcomponent. Of the 110 items presented, two did not present consensus in the first round and three suggestions for changeswere made. Five new indicators were included, totaling 113 indicators at the end. Conclusion: The use of the Delhi technique made it possible to expand the consensus and validate the KM indicator matrix from the perspective of experts involved with the strategy. Descriptors: Kangaroo Method; Evaluation of Research Programs and Instruments; Delphi Technique; Research on Health Services. Validation Study.

Establishment of early warning indicators of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Tianjin / 中华预防医学杂志

In this study, Delphi method was used to conduct a questionnaire survey on 12 experts to determine the indicators system and the corresponding weight for early warning features of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in Tianjin.The positive indexes of experts in three rounds of consultations were both 100%. The experts' authority coefficient was 0.79. The Kendall's W coordination coefficients were 0.375, 0.356 and 0.385 respectively (all P<0.05). The indicators system for early warning features of 2019-nCoV Omicron variant had 5 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators and 52 third-level indicators. The weight of each indicator was also determined.

A Health Education Program for Home Emergency Management of Acute Complications of Diabetes in the Elderly / 中国医学科学院学报

Objective To establish a health education program for home emergency management of acute complications of diabetes in the elderly.Methods The program was drafted by literature review and panel discussion.The final draft was formed after two rounds of correspondence from 13 experts.Results The recovery rate of the two rounds of expert correspondence was 100%,and the expert authority coefficient was 0.98.The Kendall's harmony coefficients of the two rounds of correspondence were 0.263 and 0.212 respectively(both P<0.001).The established health education program included indicators of three categories:early stage of acute complications of diabetes at home(understanding the inducing factors),emergency warning(quick and early identification in case of emergency),and emergency treatment at home.Conclusion The contents of the health education program are systematic and reliable and meet the needs of health education for home emergency management of the elderly with diabetes.

Development of comprehensive vitality scale for the elderly based on classical test theory and analytic hierarchy process / 生理学报

The present study aims to construct an elderly vitality index evaluation system and develop a comprehensive vitality evaluation scale for the elderly to reasonably evaluate the vitality level of the elderly in China, so as to provide a reference for promoting the realization of "active aging" and "healthy aging". Literature research and in-depth interview were used to collect the senile vitality sensitive indexes. The indexes were screened and corrected by Delphi expert consultation method, item analysis method based on classical test theory, factor analysis method, and reliability and validity analysis method. The analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weight of each level of indexes. An elderly vitality evaluation system including 4 first-level indexes and 24 second-level indexes was constructed. The consistency test results of all levels of indicators showed that the consistency index (CI) and consistent ratio (CR) were both less than 0.1, which met the requirements and showed satisfactory consistency. The weights of exercise vitality, nutritional vitality, psychological vitality and social vitality were 0.263, 0.141, 0.455 and 0.141, respectively. In conclusion, the comprehensive vitality scale constructed for the Chinese elderly is reliable and scientific, and can be used to evaluate the vitality of the elderly.

Exploring the application value of the modified Delphi method in the development process of acupuncture and moxibustion guideline recommendations based on the WFAS Clinical Practice Guideline for Female Urinary Incontinence / 中国针灸

Taking the recommendations development of the World Federation of Acupuncture-Moxibustion Societies (WFAS) standard Clinical Practice Guideline for Female Urinary Incontinence as an example, this study analyzed the consensus expert composition, specific consensus process, and results in the development of the guideline's recommendations. It systematically examined the advantages of using the modified Delphi method in the formation of recommendations for acupuncture and moxibustion clinical practice guideline, with the aim of providing reference for the development of acupuncture and moxibustion guidelines in the same field.

Construction and verification of a quantitative index system to evaluate the medical and nursing care for the elderly service needs / 中南大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVES@#To construct a quantitative index system with the integrated medical and nursing care assessment for the elderly service needs, this system can assess the cost of medical and care services accurately and objectively, so as to provide scientific basis for the allocation of old-age service resources in China.@*METHODS@#Based on the survival needs of the Existence, Relation and Growth theory, an index system is constructed through literature analysis, group discussion, and expert correspondence. Analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of indicators at all levels. The 3-grades service items corresponding to each index were quantified through the measurement of working hours, and the medical and nursing care needs of 624 disabled/demented elderly people over 60 years old in Changsha were investigated to evaluate their reliability and validity.@*RESULTS@#The authoritative coefficients of the 2 rounds of expert correspondence were 88.5% and 88.6%, respectively, and the opinion coordination coefficients were 0.159 and 0.167, respectively. The final quantitative evaluation index system included 4 first-level indicators, 17 second-level indicators, and 105 third-level indicators. The service time of doctor ranged from 6.01 to 22.64 min, the service time of nurses ranged from 0.77 to 24.79 min, and the service time of caregiver ranged from 0.12 to 51.88 min. The Cronbach's αcoefficient was 0.73, the split-half reliability was 0.74, the content validity was 0.93, and the calibration validity was 0.781.@*CONCLUSIONS@#The quantitative evaluation index system of medical and nursing service need for the elderly can be used to accurately evaluate the medical and nursing service need.

Valoración de una metodología para integrar software educativo en la asignatura Rehabilitación estomatológica / Assessment of a methodology to integrate educational software in Stomatological Rehabilitation Subject

Introducción: Al elaborar una metodología resulta importante obtener los criterios de expertos antes de su aplicación. En un periodo precedente a esta investigación se elaboró una metodología con etapas y procedimientos para el desarrollo de software educativo. Objetivo: Valorar la pertinencia de la metodología para la integración de software educativo en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje de las asignaturas Rehabilitación I y II de Estomatología. Método: Se realizó una investigación pedagógica en la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Holguín. Para valorar la pertinencia de la metodología se aplicó el método Delphi, a partir del cual, mediante una encuesta aplicada a 17 expertos seleccionados por su alto coeficiente de competencia en la temática, se pudo llegar a un consenso sobre el tema explorado. Resultados: La aplicación del cuestionario reveló que la mayoría de los expertos consideró cada indicador de la dimensión validez como muy adecuado, solo uno evaluó el indicador etapas de la metodología como adecuado y los procedimientos de la etapa dos como bastante adecuados. Para la dimensión viabilidad casi la totalidad consideró muy adecuados los indicadores factibilidad de aplicación y posibilidad de generalización; esta última fue evaluada por un experto como adecuada. Al comparar los resultados de los siete indicadores con los puntos de corte se aprecia que los expertos en su conjunto los definen como muy adecuados. Conclusiones: La pertinencia de la metodología se constató con el criterio consensuado de los expertos, quienes consideraron muy adecuados los aspectos valorados, y realizaron aportes que permitieron perfeccionarla antes de su implementación. Sobre estas bases no fue necesaria una segunda etapa de aplicación del método(AU)

Introduction: When developing a methodology, it is important to obtain the criteria of experts before its application. In a period preceding this research, a methodology with stages and procedures was defined for the development of educational software. Objective: To assess the relevance of the methodology for the integration of educational software in the teaching-learning process of the subjects Rehabilitation I and II of Stomatology. Method: A pedagogical research was carried out at the University Of Medical Sciences Of Holguín. To assess the relevance of the methodology, the Delphi method was applied, from which, through a survey applied to 17 experts selected for their high coefficient of competence in the subject, a consensus could be reached on the explored topic. Results: The application of the questionnaire revealed that most of the experts considered each indicator of the validity dimension as very adequate; only one evaluated the indicator stages of the methodology as adequate and the procedures of stage two as quite adequate. For the feasibility dimension, almost all considered the feasibility of application and possibility of generalization indicators to be very adequate; the latter was evaluated by an expert as adequate. When comparing the results of the seven indicators with the cut-off points, it can be seen that the experts as a whole define them as very adequate. Conclusions: The relevance of the methodology was verified with the agreed criteria of the experts, who considered the aspects evaluated to be very adequate, and made contributions that allowed it to be perfected before its implementation. On these bases, a second stage of application of the method was not necessary(AU)

Construção e validação de instrumento para avaliação das medidas de biossegurança em bioterrorismo pelos bombeiros / Construction and validation of and assessment tool for biosafety measures in bioterrorism for firefighters / Construcción y validación de un instrumento para evaluar las medidas de bioseguridad en el bioterrorismo de los bomberos

Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo desenvolver e validar um instrumento de avaliação das medidas de Biossegurança adotadas pelos bombeiros militares, para a contenção dos agentes biológicos frente a um evento de bioterrorismo. Métodos: Tratou-se de um estudo descritivo de abordagem quantitativa, de desenvolvimento metodológico e do tipo de validação de conteúdo de um instrumento de avaliação. O estudo foi dividido nas fases de desenvolvimento e validação do instrumento. Para o desenvolvimento do instrumento foram feitas revisões da literatura e para a validação do instrumento foi utilizado o método Delphi. Para o estudo foram incluídos 6 juízes que avaliaram o instrumento através da escala numérica tipo Likert. Resultados: Os juízes avaliaram que o instrumento proposto está bem estruturado, possuindo boa clareza e coesão de escrita, com aplicabilidade no campo de estudo e de grande relevância, principalmente em vista a ausência desse tipo de instrumento para a população de bombeiros militares. Para avaliar a concordância entre os juízes foi utilizado o índice de Validade de Conteúdo, que alcançou 98% de concordância e o Índice de Fidedignidade Interavaliadores, que alcançou os conceitos bom e muito bom, mostrando baixa variância das respostas dos juízes, sendo estatisticamente válido. Conclusão: O estudo descreveu o processo de construção e validação do instrumento, provando ser apropriado e confiável para ser utilizado.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to assess the Biosafety measures adopted by firefighters, for the containment of biological agents in the face of a bioterrorism event. Methods: This is a descriptive study with a quantitative approach, methodological development, and the type of content validation of an assessment instrument. The study was divided into instrument development and validation phases. For the development of the instrument, literature reviews were conducted and for the instrument validation, the Delphi method was used. For the study, 6 judges were included who evaluated the instrument using the Likert-type numerical scale. Results: The judges evaluated that the proposed instrument is well structured, with good clarity and cohesion of writing, with applicability in the field of study and of great relevance, especially considering the absence of this type of instrument for the military firefighter population. To evaluate the agreement between the judges, we used the Content Validity Index which reached 98% of agreement and the Interrate agreement, which reached the concepts good and very good, showing low variance of the judges' answers, being statistically valid. Conclusion: The study described the process of construction and validation of the instrument, proving to be appropriate and reliable to be used.

Objetivo: Este estudio tenía como objetivo desarrollar y validar un instrumento para evaluar las medidas de bioseguridad adoptadas por los bomberos militares para contener los agentes biológicos durante un evento de bioterrorismo. Métodos: Se trata de un estudio descriptivo de abordaje cuantitativo, de desarrollo metodológico y del tipo de validación de contenido de un instrumento de evaluación. El estudio se dividió en las fases de desarrollo y validación del instrumento. Para la elaboración del instrumento se realizaron revisiones bibliográficas y para la validación del mismo se utilizó el método Delphi. Para el estudio se incluyeron 6 jueces que evaluaron el instrumento mediante una escala numérica tipo Likert. Resultados: Los jueces evaluaron que el instrumento propuesto está bien estructurado, poseyendo buena claridad y cohesión de redacción, con aplicabilidad en el campo de estudio y de gran relevancia, especialmente en vista de la ausencia de este tipo de instrumento para la población de bomberos militares. Se utilizó el Índice de Validez de Contenido para evaluar la concordancia entre los jueces, alcanzando un 98% de acuerdo y el Índice de Fiabilidad Inter-registrador, que alcanzó conceptos buenos y muy buenos, mostrando una baja varianza en las respuestas de los jueces, siendo estadísticamente válido. Conclusión: El estudio describió el proceso de construcción y validación del instrumento, demostrando ser apropiado y confiable para ser utilizado.

Construção e validação de simulação clínica sobre testagem e aconselhamento para o hiv em gestantes / Construction and validation of a clinical simulation on hiv testing and counseling in pregnant women / Construcción y validación de un simulacro clínico sobre pruebas y asesoramiento del vih en mujeres embarazadas

RESUMO Objetivo: construir e validar um cenário de simulação clínica sobre a testagem rápida e aconselhamento para o HIV em gestantes. Método: estudo metodológico, de validação de aparência e conteúdo, desenvolvido no período de junho a outubro de 2020 por meio da técnica Delphi. Para a validação, foram incluídos os juízes que obtiveram cinco ou mais pontos segundo os critérios de Fehring adaptados. Os dados foram analisados mediante o cálculo do Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC). Resultados: depois da primeira rodada Delphi, dois itens (5,7%) não atingiram o I-CVI necessário para validação em todos os critérios avaliados, que foram: comportamental, objetividade, simplicidade, clareza, relevância, precisão, variedade, modalidade, tipicidade e credibilidade. Ao final da segunda rodada Delphi, todos os itens (100%) atingiram o I-CVI necessário para validação. Conclusão: o roteiro se mostrou válido, contribuindo para subsidiar o ensino da testagem e do aconselhamento de gestante sobre o HIV.

ABSTRACT Objective: to construct and validate a clinical simulation scenario on rapid HIV testing and counseling in pregnant women. Method: methodological study, of appearance and content validation, developed between June and October 2020 through the Delphi technique. For validation, the judges who obtained five or more points according to the adapted Fehring criteria were included. The data were analyzed by calculating the Content Validity Index (CVI). Results: After the first Delphi round, two items (5.7%) did not reach the I-CVI required for validation in all the criteria evaluated, which were: behavioral, objectivity, simplicity, clarity, relevance, accuracy, variety, modality, typicality, and credibility. At the end of the second Delphi round, all items (100%) reached the I-CVI required for validation. Conclusion: the script proved to be valid, contributing to subsidize the teaching of HIV testing and counseling of pregnant women.

RESUMEN Objetivo: construir y validar un escenario de simulación clínica sobre pruebas rápidas y asesoramiento para el VIH en mujeres embarazadas. Método: estudio metodológico, de valoración de la apariencia y el contenido, desarrollado en el período de junio a octubre de 2020 mediante la técnica Delphi. Para la validación, se incluyeron los jueces que obtuvieron cinco o más puntos según los criterios adaptados de Fehring. Los datos se analizaron calculando el Índice de Validez del Contenido (IVC). Resultados: Tras la primera ronda Delphi, dos ítems (5,7%) no alcanzaron el I-CVI requerido para la validación en todos los criterios evaluados, que fueron: comportamiento, objetividad, simplicidad, claridad, relevancia, precisión, variedad, modalidad, tipicidad y credibilidad. Al final de la segunda ronda Delphi, todos los ítems (100%) alcanzaron el I-CVI requerido para la validación. Conclusión: el rodillo se mostró válido, contribuyendo a subvencionar la enseñanza de la prueba y el asesoramiento de gestores sobre el VIH.

Validation of a brochure to guide health professionals in the dressing and undressing of personal protective equipment during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Objective: To develop and validate a brochure to guide health professionals in properly dressing and undressing the personal protective equipment (PPE) used in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: To develop the brochure, an integrative literature review was conducted after searching the following databases: SciELO, LILACS, and MEDLINE. The brochure was evaluated by 38 health professionals (nurses, physical therapists, and doctors) employing the Delphi technique. The results were analyzed using the Content Validity Index. Results: In the first evaluation cycle, the items in the brochure were considered by the panel of experts as ranging from "unsuitable" to "totally adequate". After the appropriate corrections suggested by the experts, the brochure once again was sent to the second evaluation cycle, in which all items were rated as "adequate" or "totally adequate." The result is a Content Validity Index of 1.0. Conclusion: The present study allowed the development of a brochure and its validation by consensus among the evaluation group. The developed and validated brochure presents the reliability of the technique of dressing and undressing the PPE used by health professionals during the pandemic of COVID-19. This information contributes to the management of assistance with quality and safety for the frontline workers and patients. (AU)

Desenvolvimento e validação de indicadores de desempenho da gestão do Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar / Development and validation of performance indicators of the National School Food Program management

Resumo A avaliação do Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar (PNAE) é ação estratégica para garantir a qualidade da gestão. O objetivo deste estudo é desenvolver e validar um instrumento de indicadores de desempenho para avaliação da gestão do PNAE no contexto nacional. Trata-se de um estudo psicométrico de construção e validação de indicadores de desempenho. Foram estabelecidos 12 indicadores, posteriormente, avaliados em painel de especialistas em relação a sete atributos. Para obter consenso foi utilizada a técnica Delphi e a validade de conteúdo foi analisada com a Razão de Validade de Conteúdo. Para a validade de constructo e confiabilidade, nutricionistas que trabalham na execução do PNAE avaliaram a relevância dos indicadores respondendo um questionário online. A taxa de resposta dos especialistas na primeira rodada da técnica Delphi foi de 43,3% (13/30) e de 69,2% (9/13) na segunda rodada. Um novo indicador foi desenvolvido após a avaliação do painel de especialistas. Um total de 281 nutricionistas participaram do estudo da relevância dos indicadores. No geral, a validade de conteúdo e constructo foi alcançada para 13 indicadores. Todos os 13 indicadores se apresentaram relevantes, com potencial para promover a avaliação da gestão operacional do PNAE.

Abstract The evaluation of the National School Food Program (PNAE) is a strategic action to ensure the quality of management. This study aims to develop and validate an instrument of performance indicators to assess the management of the PNAE in the national context. A psychometric study was carried out for the development and validation of performance indicators. Twelve indicators were subsequently established and evaluated by an expert panel concerning seven attributes. The Delphi technique was used for the consensus of the expert panel, and the content validity of the indicators was analyzed with the Content Validity Ratio. Nutritionists working on the implementation of the PNAE assessed the relevance of the indicators by answering an online questionnaire to construct validity and reliability. Thirteen (43.3%, 13/30) experts participated in the Delphi round 1 and nine (69.2%, 9/13) completed the Delphi round 2. A new indicator was developed after the experts' suggestions. Furthermore, 281 nutritionists participated in this study assessing the relevance of the indicators. Overall, content and construct validity were achieved for 13 indicators. All were considered relevant and had the potential to promote the assessment of PNAE operational management.

Perfil de competencia del cirujano general en Venezuela. Estudio delphi / Competency profile of the surgeon. general in Venezuela. Delphi Study

Construir el Perfil del Cirujano General en Venezuela. Método: Estudio cuantitativo, constructivista, con aplicación del método Delphi para la construcción del consenso. Fases: revisión de la literatura, redacción de propuestas, rondas itinerantes de consulta a expertos, adecuación del modelo según la interacción con participantes.Resultados : Población: 30 expertos miembros del Consejo Nacional de la Sociedad Venezolana de Cirugía y profesores de Postgrado de Cirugía General. Aprobación de 100% de las competencias de segundo nivel en la segunda ronda itinerante. En relación a las habilidades prácticas se obtuvo aprobación en 98,2% de las propuestas. El número de años de formación de postgrado y el número de intervenciones al momento del egreso, propuesta por los participantes, no obtuvo consenso. La fiabilidad del instrumento mediante el Alpha Cronbach fue de 0,98.Conclusiones : El Perfil de Competencia Profesional del Cirujano General en Venezuela fue creado por consenso describiendo la necesidad de un Cirujano General quien de respuestas éticas, inclusivas, con sentido de responsabilidad humana y social, capacidad de autoevaluación y cumplimiento de normativas internacionales adaptadas a la realidad local y ajustadas al medio de trabajo. De igual manera, se identificaron las habilidades prácticas que deben ser dominadas por el egresado para dar respuesta a la asistencia médica institucional. Consideramos que este perfil de competencia debe servir de referente para el diseño de los nuevos currículos por competencia profesional de nuestros postgrados a nivel nacional que permitan la formación del especialista que atienda y responda a la necesidades de nuestra población(AU)

Build the Profile of the General Surgeon in Venezuela. Method: Quantitative, constructivist study, with application of the Delphi method for prospective consensus. Phases: review of the literature, writing of proposals, itinerant consultation rounds with experts, adaptation of the model according to the interaction with participants. Results: Population: 30 expert members of the National Council of the Venezuelan Society of Surgery and Postgraduate professors of General Surgery. 100% of the level II competitions were approved in the first and second rounds. In relation to practical skills, approval was obtained in 98.2% of the proposals. In relation to the number of years of postgraduate training and the number of interventions at the time of graduation, proposed by the participants, no consensus was obtained. The reliability of the instrument using the Alpha Cronbach was 0.98.Conclusions : The Professional Competence Profile of the General Surgeon in Venezuela was created by consensus describing the need for a Surgeon General who, with ethical, inclusive responses, with a sense of human and social responsibility, self-assessment capacity and compliance with international regulations adapted to the local reality, and adjusted to the work environment. Similarly, the practical skills that must be mastered by the graduate to respond to institutional medical care were identified. We believe that this profile of competence should serve as a reference for the design of the new curricula for professional competence of our postgraduate courses at the national level that allow the training of the specialist who attends and responds to the needs of our population(AU)

Constructions of the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars by using Delphi method / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the relevant indicators affecting difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars and score difficulty of different operation and risk indicators, so as to build an intuitive and accurate scale to help operators make more accurate analysis and prediction of difficulty before the operation.@*METHODS@#Based on literature and the clinical review, the difficulty indicators of tooth extraction were summarized. Firstly, 10 doctors from Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology who had been engaged in alveolar surgery for a long time established an expert nominal group, and then rated whether the summarized indicators needed to be retained in the form of face-to-face questionnaires. A level 1 and 2 item frame for evaluating difficulty in the tooth extraction was formed after discussion; Then Delphi method was used to send a questionnaire to 30 experts by e-mail. After two rounds of scoring and modification, the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars was formed.@*RESULTS@#The recycling rate of two rounds of questionnaires was 100.0%, which showed that the experts were very enthusiastic about the study; The authority coefficients (Cr) of the two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were both 0.92, which showed that the results were representative and authoritative. After two rounds of grading and revision, the variable coefficient (CV) decreased and the Kendall's concordance coefficient (W) increased, which were statistically significant: In the first round, the CV was 0.24 and W was 0.56 (P < 0.001), and in the second, the CV was 0.19 and W was 0.72 (P < 0.001), which indicated that there was a good convergence among the expert opinions. Finally, a scale of difficulty in the tooth extraction containing 12 items at level A and 37 items at level B was formed, including operation difficulty indicators, risk difficulty indicators and common difficulty indicators.@*CONCLUSION@#Based on comprehensive literature retrieval, the study has put forward the concept that difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is composed of operation difficulty and risk difficulty. Using Delphi method, the long-term clinical experience and professional knowledge of experts are transformed into quantitative indicators as a scoring scale. The scale has certain representativeness and authority.

Criterios de Beers para identificar el consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada: adaptación para su aplicación en Argentina / Beers criteria to identify the consumption of potentially inappropriate medication: adaptation for its application inArgentina

Introducción. Los Criterios de Beers son los más utilizados para evaluar el uso de medicación potencialmente inapropiada en grandes poblaciones, pero no contemplan algunos medicamentos de uso frecuente fuera de los EE.UU. Objetivo. Realizar una adaptación al contexto de Argentina de los Criterios de Beers publicados en 2019. Métodos. Fue elaborada una lista preliminar de medicación potencialmente inapropiada adaptada a la comercialización local, que luego fue consensuada por un panel de expertos (método Delphi). Resultados. De los 112 medicamentos originales listados en la tabla dos de los Criterios de Beers (en forma individual o como grupo), fueron excluidos 36 por no estar disponibles el país y fueron sumados 23 que no se comercializan en los EE.UU. pero sí en Argentina. Luego de dos rondas y de consensuar la suma a esta lista de dos grupos farmacológicos(antimigrañosos y vasodilatadores periféricos), fue acordado el agregado de picosulfato, bisacodilo, senósidos y cáscara sagrada como medicación potencialmente inapropiada en el grupo de agentes contra el estreñimiento, la fluoxetina entre los inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina y el Ginkgo biloba como droga contra la demencia. También hubo consenso en advertir el riesgo de hipotensión ortostática asociado a la tamsulosina, en aconsejar la consideración de la carga anticolinérgica total del esquema terapéutico administrado y en recomendar al paracetamol como primera línea de tratamiento del dolor, asociado o no a opioides. Conclusiones. Contar con una versión de los Criterios de Beers 2019 adaptada al contexto de Argentina contribuirá al desarrollo y monitoreo de intervenciones para prevenir y reducir el consumo de medicación potencialmente inapropiada. (AU)

Introduction.The Beers Criteria is the most widely used criteria to assess the use of potentially inappropriate medication in large populations, but they do not include some medications that are frequently used outside the United States. Objective.To make an adaptation of the Beers Criteria published in 2019 to the context of Argentina. Methods. A preliminary list of potentially inappropriate medication adapted to local market and practice was designed, which was then agreed upon by a panel of experts (Delphi method). Results. Of the 112 original drugs in the table 2 of the Beers Criteria (individually or as a group), 36 were excluded because they were not available in Argentina and 23 locally marketed drugs but not in the US were included. After two rounds and agreeing to add two additional pharmacological groups to this list (antimigraine and peripheral vasodilators), it was decided to add picosulfate, bisacodyl, sennosides and cascara sagrada as potentially inappropriate medication in the group of anti-constipation agents, fluoxetine among. the selective serotonin reup take inhibitors and Ginkgo biloba as an anti-dementia drug. There was also consensus in warning about the risk of orthostatic hypotension associated with tamsulosin,in advising consideration of the total anticholinergic load of the therapeutic regimen administered, and in recommending paracetamol as the first line of pain treatment, associated or not with opioids. Conclusions. Having a version of the Beers Criteria 2019 adapted to the Argentine context will contribute to the development and monitoring of interventions to prevent and reduce the consumption of potentially inappropriate medication. (AU)

Healthy Canteen Certification Seal: a proposal for the promotion of appropriate and healthy diets in school canteens / Selo de Certificação Cantina Saudável: uma proposta para a promoção da alimentação adequada e saudável em cantinas escolares

ABSTRACT Objective Although school is considered a suitable space for health promotion, there have been difficulties adopting healthy eating practices due to many ultra-processed foods offered in school canteens and irregularities in Food and Nutrition Education actions. This study aimed to propose a certification seal to encourage school canteens' managers in Brazil to adopt actions for the Promotion of Appropriate and Healthy Diets. Methods It is a methodological study in which the "Healthy Canteen Certification Seal" was developed, containing ten guidelines based on the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. The instrument was built based on national and international documents and later was consensually agreed upon by experts using the Delphi method. Results Ten guidelines for the Seal were developed around the following topics: the creation of a Council, availability of written and accessible standards; stimulation of water intake; offer of natural foods, limitation of processed and ultra-processed foods, promotion of educational actions, prohibition of abusive food advertisements, structural changes, and staff training. The overall evaluation of the proposal by the experts was positive concerning its relevance, and more than 70% of positive results were attained for all guidelines. The participants agreed that the Seal would contribute to expanding and enhancing healthy eating practices in schools. Conclusion We believe that this proposal will encourage educational institutions to adopt and implement actions for the Promotion of Appropriate and Healthy Diets, thus contributing to ensuring Food and Nutrition Safety for students.

RESUMO Objetivo Embora a escola seja considerada um espaço adequado para a promoção da saúde, dificuldades na adoção de práticas alimentares saudáveis têm sido observadas devido à oferta de uma grande quantidade de alimentos ultraprocessados em cantinas escolares e irregularidades nas ações de Educação Alimentar e Nutricional. Este estudo teve por objetivo propor um selo de certificação para estimular cantinas escolares do Brasil a adotarem ações de Promoção da Alimentação Adequada e Saudável. Métodos Trata-se de um estudo de natureza metodológica no qual se desenvolveu o instrumento "Selo de Certificação Cantina Saudável", contendo dez orientações coerentes com as diretrizes do Guia Alimentar da População Brasileira. O instrumento foi elaborado com base em documentos nacionais e internacionais e posteriormente pactuado via consenso com especialistas por meio da metodologia Delphi. Resultados As dez orientações foram elaboradas em torno das seguintes questões: criação de um Conselho, presença de normas escritas e acessíveis, incentivo à ingestão de água, oferta de alimentos in natura e limitação de processados e ultraprocessados, estímulo a ações educativas, proibição de propagandas abusivas sobre alimentos, mudanças estruturais e treinamento de funcionários. A avaliação global da proposta pelos especialistas foi positiva quanto à sua relevância, sendo obtidos resultados superiores a 70% para todas as orientações. Os participantes concordaram que o Selo contribuirá para ampliar e aprimorar a alimentação saudável nas escolas. Conclusão Acredita-se que essa proposta incentivará as instituições educativas a aderirem e implementarem ações de Promoção da Alimentação Adequada e Saudável, devendo contribuir para a garantia da segurança alimentar e nutricional dos escolares.

El método de experto en tesis doctorales cubanas del ámbito educacional: un estudio bibliométrico y de contenido / The expert method in Cuban doctoral dissertation in the educational field: a bibliometric and content study

La presente investigación tiene como objetivo caracterizar la evolución y empleo del método de experto en investigaciones pedagógicas y educacionales cubanas. Para cumplir este propósito se desarrolló un estudio bibliométrico y de contenido, con una muestra conformada por 1000 tesis doctorales defendidas durante el período 1995-2019, lo cual representa el 31,96 por ciento de la producción nacional en estas ramas de la ciencia. Se identificaron 29 métodos de uso más frecuente, así como una red de términos que demarcan cinco conglomerados de campos de aplicación. Los métodos se clasifican, generalmente, como empíricos o teóricos, con un grado de normalización relativamente bajo. En particular, el método de experto ha sido aplicado de manera creciente y sistemática durante las dos últimas décadas, con énfasis marcado en el caso particular del método Delphi. Las terminologías más comunes son experto y especialista, sin que se aprecien diferencias conceptuales notables entre ellas. La búsqueda de validez ha sido sustituida paulatinamente por otras nociones cualitativas como viabilidad y el binomio pertinencia-factibilidad. La búsqueda de consenso ha perdido terreno frente a otros objetivos más flexibles, como la evaluación de la calidad de un resultado científico, principalmente metodologías, concepciones y modelos. También se estableció un modelo matemático basado en la regresión logística binaria, que resulta útil para estimar la probabilidad de que el método de experto se implemente durante una investigación doctoral. En este modelo intervienen siete variables, entre las cuales la encuesta y los métodos estadísticos resultan más influyentes e interrelacionados(AU)

The objective of this research is to characterize the evolution and use of the expert method in Cuban pedagogical and educational research. To fulfil this purpose, a bibliometric and content study was developed. A sample was made up of 1000 doctoral dissertations from 1995-2019, which represents 31.96percent of the national production in these branches of science. Twenty-nine most frequently used methods were identified, as well as a network of terms that define five conglomerates of application fields. Methods are generally classified as empirical or theoretical, with a relatively low degree of standardization. In particular, the expert method has been applied increasingly and systematically during the last two decades, with marked emphasis on the particular case of Delphi method. The most common terminologies are expert and specialist, with no notable conceptual differences between them. The search for validity has gradually been replaced by other qualitative notions, such as feasibility and pertinence-feasibility binomial. The search for consensus has lost ground compared to other more flexible objectives, such as the evaluation of the quality of a scientific result, mainly methodologies, conceptions and models. A mathematical model based on binary logistic regression was also established, which is useful to estimate the probability that the Expert Method is implemented during a doctoral research. Seven variables are involved in this model, among which the survey and statistical methods are more influential and interrelated(AU)

Consenso Ibero-americano sobre Habilidades Comunicacionais para Estudantes de Graduação em Enfermagem / Ibero-American Consensus on Communication Skills for Nursing Degree students / Consenso Iberoamericano sobre Habilidades de Comunicación para Estudiantes de Grado de Enfermería

Resumo Objetivo: como profissão orientada à atenção da saúde, focada no cuidado às pessoas, a Enfermagem precisa desenvolver habilidades de comunicação sólidas. Com base em um consenso internacional de especialistas, apresenta-se uma proposta sobre os resultados de aprendizagem na comunicação clínica para planos de estudos em cursos de Enfermagem em países hispanofalantes. Método: um comitê orientador, composto por 5 enfermeiros e especialistas em comunicação em ciências de atenção à saúde, elaborou a primeira lista de habilidades comunicacionais específicas para o curso de Enfermagem. Outro comitê de 7 assessores científicos internacionais revisou e melhorou a referida proposta. Foram selecionados 70 especialistas de 14 países pelo procedimento de amostragem "bola de neve", sendo convidados para participar em um processo de consenso Delphi modificado a distância em duas rodadas de pesquisa. Foi realizada a análise estatística para estabelecer o nível de consenso final correspondente a cada item. Resultados: foi apresentado um questionário com 68 resultados de aprendizagem em comunicações clínicas para serem avaliados pelo painel. Na primeira rodada Delphi, o painel chegou a um consenso estatístico em todos os itens avaliados. Não foi necessária uma segunda rodada para conciliar posições. Conclusão: apresenta-se uma proposta acadêmica aprovada com um elevado nível de consenso internacional a fim de orientar e unificar os resultados de aprendizagem nos planos de estudo sobre comunicação clínica para cursos de Enfermagem em países hispanofalantes.

Abstract Objective: as a health care profession focused on caring for people, Nursing requires sound communication skills. Based on an international expert consensus, a proposal on learning outcomes in clinical communication for undergraduate Nursing education curricula in Spanish speaking countries is presented. Method: a steering committee, consisting of 5 nurses and experts in communication in health care sciences, drew up the first list of communication skills specific to the Nursing degree. Their proposal was reviewed and improved by a committee of 7 international scientific advisers. 70 experts from 14 countries were selected using a snowball sampling procedure and invited to participate in a distance modified Delphi consensus process in two survey rounds. Statistical analysis was carried out to establish the final consensus level for each item. Results: a questionnaire with 68 learning outcomes in clinical communications was submitted for panel assessment. In the first Delphi round, the panel reached a statistical consensus on all the items assessed. There was no need for a second round to reconcile positions. Conclusion: an academic proposal, approved by a high level of international consensus, is presented to guide and unify the learning outcomes on the clinical communication curriculum for undergraduate Nursing studies in Spanish speaking countries.

Resumen Objetivo: en su carácter de profesión de atención de la salud enfocada en cuidar a las personas, la Enfermería requiere habilidades de comunicación sólidas. Sobre la base de un consenso internacional de expertos, se presenta una propuesta sobre resultados de aprendizaje en la comunicación clínica para planes de estudio de las carreras de grado de Enfermería en países de habla hispana. Método: un comité orientador, compuesto por 5 enfermeros y expertos en comunicación en ciencias de atención de la salud, elaboró la primera lista de habilidades de comunicación específicas para la carrera de Enfermería. Un comité de 7 asesores científicos internacionales revisó y mejoró dicha propuesta. Se seleccionó a 70 expertos de 14 países a través del procedimiento de muestreo "bola de nieve", y se los invitó a participar en un proceso de consenso Delphi modificado a distancia en dos rondas de encuesta. Se realizó un análisis estadístico para establecer el nivel de consenso final correspondiente a cada ítem. Resultados: se presentó un cuestionario con 68 resultados de aprendizaje en comunicaciones clínicas para que lo evaluara el panel. En la primera ronda Delphi, el panel llegó a un consenso estadístico en todos los ítems evaluados. No fue necesaria una segunda ronda para conciliar posiciones. Conclusión: se presenta una propuesta académica, aprobada con un elevado nivel de consenso internacional, a fin de orientar y unificar los resultados de aprendizaje en los planes de estudio sobre comunicación clínica para carreras de grado de Enfermería en países de habla hispana.

Qualidade do cuidado em instituições de longa permanência para idosos: criação e validação de instrumento de autoavaliação / Quality of care in Long-term Care Institutions for the Elderly: creation and validation of a self-assessment instrument

O acelerado envelhecimento populacional aumenta a necessidade de cuidado de longo prazo, que deve ser avaliado para garantir melhor saúde e satisfação dos idosos, gerar comparação e influenciar a escolha das instituições de longa permanência para idosos (ILPI). Trata-se de um estudo metodológico dividido em três fases. Seus objetivos são conhecer as teorias, elaborar e validar instrumento de autoavaliação da qualidade do cuidado em ILPI. A primeira fase foi uma revisão de escopo com a pergunta: Quais os modelos teóricos têm sido utilizados para definir e avaliar a qualidade do cuidado ofertado às pessoas idosas em ILPI? Foram encontrados 1.209 artigos, 80 separados para leitura completa e 21 incluídos para análise final. A maioria dos autores, 47%, usou o modelo multidimensional, que define várias dimensões para a avalição, desenvolvido para pessoas idosas institucionalizadas. O modelo estrutura, processo e resultados, muito usado na indústria, foi bastante encontrado. A teoria centrada na pessoa, em que a qualidade percebida pelo idoso reflete a qualidade recebida, e a centrada no ambiente de trabalho, a qual relaciona o processo de trabalho com a qualidade, foram vistas em menor número. Existem poucos modelos teóricos para embasar a construção de indicadores e modelos de avaliação, que deveriam preferencialmente ser usados para melhor aprofundamento e direcionamento da avaliação do cuidado. Na segunda fase do estudo foi elaborado e validado um instrumento para autoavaliação da qualidade do cuidado em ILPI, realizado entre março e dezembro de 2021, em três etapas. Na primeira, foi realizada a construção do instrumento baseado no modelo multidimensional de qualidade, por ser o mais abrangente, na legislação brasileira e na pesquisa bibliográfica. As dimensões utilizadas foram: ambiente, lar, cuidado, envolvimento familiar e da comunidade, equipe de trabalho e gestão. Para cada uma foram criados indicadores de avaliação. Na segunda, realizou-se a validação pela Técnica Delphi modificada, por meio eletrônico, com 10 experts, escolhidos por experiência e afinidade com o tema. Para que o indicador fosse mantido foi necessário consenso mínimo de 75%. Cada indicador foi analisado quanto à pertinência para avaliação tanto da qualidade da ILPI como da dimensão correspondente, à adequação dos objetivos, à redação e à escala de avaliação. Os experts puderam dar sugestões de redação e fazer comentários. Na terceira, foi realizada a avaliação do instrumento por 10 gestores, para validação final. Permaneceram 29 dos 35 indicadores divididos em seis dimensões. A terceira fase do estudo consistiu no desenvolvimento de um produto técnico, um guia para utilização do instrumento pelos coordenadores de ILPI. Pode-se concluir que a qualidade do cuidado em ILPI revelou-se multidimensional, envolvendo vários sujeitos, variando de acordo com o tempo e cultura. O instrumento pode ser utilizado para monitoramento e acompanhamento de ações das ILPI, para constante melhoria do cuidado, contínuo aperfeiçoamento e qualificação da atenção e comparação entre as ILPI.

The future aging of the population will increase the need for better long-term care, which must be evaluated to generate the health and longevity of the elderly and influence the choice of long-term care institutions for the elderly (LTC). This is a methodological study divided into three phases. The objectives are to know the theories, elaborate and validate an instrument of self-assessment of quality of care in LTC. The first phase was a scoping review with the question: What theoretical models have been used to define and evaluate the quality of care offered to elderly people in LTC? A total of 1,209 articles were found, 80 separated for full reading and 21 included for final analysis. Most authors, 47%, used the multidimensional model, which defines several dimensions for the assessment, developed for institutionalized elderly people. The structure, process, and results model, used in the industry, was widely found. The person-centered theory, in which the quality perceived by the elderly reflects the quality received, and the work environment-centered theory, which relates the work process to quality, were seen in smaller numbers. There are few theoretical models to support the construction of indicators and evaluation models, which should preferably be used to better deepen and direct the evaluation of care. In the second phase of the study, an instrument for self-assessment of the quality of care in LTC was developed and validated, carried out between March and December 2021, in three stages. In the first, the construction of the instrument was carried out based on a multidimensional model of quality, as it is the most comprehensive, Brazilian legislation and bibliographic research. The dimensions used were environment, home, care, family and community involvement, work team and management. For each one, evaluation indicators were created. In the second, validation by the modified Delphi Technique was performed, by electronic means, with 10 experts, chosen by experience and affinity with the theme. For the indicator to be maintained, a minimum consensus of 75% was required. Each indicator was analyzed in terms of relevance for evaluating both the quality of the LTC and the corresponding dimension, the adequacy of objectives, the wording, and the evaluation scale. The experts were able to give writing suggestions and make comments. In the third, the instrument was evaluated by 10 managers for final validation. 29 of the 35 indicators divided into six dimensions remained. The third phase of the study consisted in the development of a technical product, a guide for the use of the instrument by the LTC coordinators. It can be concluded that the quality of care in LTC proved to be multidimensional, involving several subjects, varying according to time and culture. The instrument can be used to monitor and follow-up LTC actions, for constant progress in care, continuous improvement and qualification of health care and comparison between LTC.