摘要
Background and Objectives@#The seasonality and climatic relevance of epiglottitis have not yet been fully investigated in a population-based cohort. This study aimed to examine the seasonality of epiglottitis and explore associated climatic factors.Materials and Method In a retrospective cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance claims database from January 2010 to December 2019, we identified patients with epiglottitis who claimed the following diagnostic codes as a principal or first additional diagnosis: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes J0510, J0510.001 (acute epiglottitis without obstruction, epiglottitis not otherwise specified), and J0511 (acute epiglottitis with obstruction). We calculated the seasonal ratio as the ratio of the highest to the lowest number of patients per month to compare the degree of seasonality. In addition, the climate data points corresponding to each month were obtained. Thus, we analyzed the correlations between the monthly patient numbers for each disease and various climatic factors. @*Results@#There were seasonal variations in the number of patients with epiglottitis, which were highest from winter to spring and lowest in summer. The prevalence of epiglottitis was strongly correlated with the average temperature, ground temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, daily temperature range, and sunlight rate. Additionally, epiglottitis was most prevalent in the <9 age group before 2013, but after 2013, it was most prevalent in the 30–39 age group. @*Conclusion@#This large population-based study demonstrated clear seasonality and climatic association in patients with epiglottitis. Further studies exploring the detailed demographic factors affecting epiglottitis are required to address similar diseases more effectively.
摘要
Background/Aims@#Little is known about the national colonoscopy volume in Asian countries. This study aimed to assess the national colonoscopy volume in Korea over a 12-year period on the basis of a nationwide population-based database. @*Methods@#We conducted a population-based study for colonoscopy claims (14,511,158 colonoscopies performed on 13,219,781 patients) on the basis of the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from 2002 to 2013. The 12-year national colonoscopy burden was analyzed according to patient age, patient sex, and healthcare facility type. @*Results@#The overall volume of colonoscopy increased 8-fold over the 12-year period. The annual colonoscopic polypectomy rate significantly increased in all patient sex and age groups over the 12-years period (all p<0.001). The yearly colonoscopic polypectomy rate for men was significantly increased compared with that for women (2.3% vs 1.7%, p<0.001) and for the screening-age group compared with that for the young-age group (2.0% vs 1.6%, p<0.001). The yearly colonoscopic polypectomy rate relative to the total colonoscopy volume significantly increased in primary, secondary, and tertiary facilities by 2.4%, 1.9%, and 1.4% during the 12-year period (all p<0.001). In addition, the annual colonoscopy volume covered by high-volume facilities significantly increased by 1.8% in primary healthcare facilities over the 12-year period (p<0.001). @*Conclusions@#Healthcare resources should be prioritized to allow adequate colonoscopic capacity, especially for men, individuals in the screening-age group, and at primary healthcare facilities. Cost-effective strategies to improve the quality of colonoscopy may focus on primary healthcare facilities and high-volume facilities in Korea.
摘要
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to study the attitude of Korean lawyers toward withdrawal of life sustaining treatment, and compare and analyze different types of their attitudes. METHODS: Research design of this project was Q methodology approach. The study population was 24 lawyers, aged from 32 to 69 years. Q sample to investigate the attitude of the lawyers toward withdrawal of life sustaining treatment included 34 statements obtained from literatures, TV debate, and depth interviews of 5 lawyers among the lawyers included. After listening to the purpose and method of the study, the 24 lawyers agreed to fill out a survey asking sociodemographic information, and the information was distributed in 9 scale Q-sample. RESULTS: The collected data were processed through QUANL PC program and sorted into 5 types as follows: The first type was 'Choosing to withdraw life sustaining treatment', the second 'Withholding life sustaining treatment' regardless of the cost, the third is neutral type that claims that humans have the right to decide the death and life, and demands the proper legalization to protect such rights, the fourth type agrees to withdrawal of life sustaining treatment, nevertheless, admits that one has a rigt to withhold one's own life treatment, categorized as self contradiction type. The fifth type believed that 'Life and death are providential' with the faith, therefore, such authority to decide life and death belongs to God, but not human beings. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the lawyer's attitudes toward withdrawal of life sustaining treatment were grouped into five different types as follows: 'Choosing to withdraw life sustaining treatment', 'Withholding life sustaining treatment', 'Demanding legalization', 'Self contradiction type', and 'Life and death are providential'.