摘要
Foods can be contaminated with foodborne pathogens through a variety of pathways, including water, air and soil. Food safety events caused by foodborne pathogens show a serious impact on human health. However, due to the diversity of foodborne pathogens and the complexity of food matrices, the rapid detection of foodborne pathogens was difficult. The conventional microbial culture and physiological and biochemical identification can hardly meet the need of rapid detection of foodborne pathogens in the field. It is necessary to develop rapid detection technologies for foodborne pathogens. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and associated protein (Cas) are an adaptive immune systems of prokaryotes with specific recognition and cleavage of nucleic acid sequences, which shows good potential for development of nucleic acid detection and biosensing in the field. According to different forms of application, paper-based analytical devices can be categorized into test paper, lateral flow assay and microfluidic paper-based chips, etc. As a good simplicity and low-cost analytical testing tools, they show good prospects in the field of rapid testing. Therefore, the rapid and sensitive detection of foodborne pathogens can be realized by combining the efficient recognition ability of CRISPR/Cas system and the simplicity of paper-based analytical devices. In this paper, we briefly introduce an overview of the CRISPR/Cas system for nucleic acid detection, and this section focuses on an overview of the features and principles of the class 2 system, including types II, V and VI, which uses a single effector. The application of CRISPR/Cas system based test paper analysis, lateral flow assay and microfluidic paper-based chips for the detection of foodborne pathogens are highlighted in the paper, and finally the advantages, current challenges and future prospects of CRISPR/Cas system in combination with paper-based analytical devices to establish detection methods are discussed.
摘要
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of dapagliflozin combined with tirofiban in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with coronary heart disease.Methods:A total of 120 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease treated in Fuyang People′s Hospital from January to August 2022 were prospectively selected as subjects. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into control group and experimental group. The control group was treated with tirofiban, and the experimental group was treated with dapagliflozin combined with tirofiban. The efficacy and safety of treatments between the two groups were compared.Results:After 3 months of treatment, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 h postprandional blood glucose (2 h PG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), D-dimer (D-D) and fibrinogen (FIB) levels in 2 groups were decreased compared with before treatment:experimental group: (7.33 ± 1.77) mmol/L vs. (9.45 ± 2.05) mmol/L, (10.33 ± 2.07) mmol/L vs. (13.57 ± 2.88) mmol/L, (7.22 ± 1.28) % vs. (9.25 ± 1.78) %, (1.98 ± 0.29) mmol/L vs. (6.05 ± 1.24) mmol/L, (2.95 ± 0.37) mmol/L vs. (4.35 ± 0.76) mmol/L, (0.78 ± 0.23) mg/L vs. (1.85 ± 0.79) mg/L, (2.57 ± 0.37) g/L vs. (7.15 ± 1.36) g/L, control group: (8.21 ± 1.85) mmol/L vs. (9.68 ± 2.17) mmol/L, (11.78 ± 2.26) mmol/L vs. (13.89 ± 3.02) mmol/L, (8.25 ± 1.36) % vs. (9.37 ± 1.86) %, (2.77 ± 0.42) mmol/L vs. (6.08 ± 1.22) mmol/L, (3.84 ± 0.44) mmol/L vs. (4.27 ± 0.72) mmol/L, (1.34 ± 0.52) mg/L vs. (1.81 ± 0.72) mg/L, (5.25 ± 0.84 ) g/L vs. (7.11 ± 1.28) g/L, the differences were statistically significant ( P< 0.05). The levels of FPG, 2 h PG, HbA 1c, TC, LDL-C, D-D and FIB between the two groups were statistically significant ( P<0.05). High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac blood transfusion volume (CO), stroke output (SV), thrombin time (TT) and partially activated prothrombin time (APTT) were all increased: experimental group: (1.76 ± 0.30) mmol/L vs. (1.07 ± 0.28) mmol/L, (68.64 ± 12.91) % vs. (45.05 ± 12.24) %, (4.88 ± 0.91) L/min vs. (3.95 ± 1.12) L/min, (53.66 ± 5.43) ml/min vs. (43.27 ± 4.88) ml/min, (31.83 ± 4.39) s vs. (23.25 ± 3.44) s, (13.85 ± 2.17) s vs. (10.75 ± 1.56) s, control group: (1.43 ± 0.26) mmol/L vs. (1.06 ± 0.24) mmol/L, (60.37 ± 11.86) % vs. (45.42 ± 12.41) %, (4.37 ± 0.84) L/min vs. (4.17 ± 1.16) L/min, (47.86 ± 5.27) ml/min vs. (43.36 ± 4.94) ml/min, (27.24 ± 3.91) s vs. (23.78 ± 3.62) s, (12.74 ± 1.94) s vs. (10.89 ± 1.78) s, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). There were significant differences in HDL-C, LVEF, CO, SV, TT and APTT between the two groups ( P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in experimental group was lower than that in control group during treatment: 5.00% (3/60) vs. 16.67% (10/60), and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Dapagliflozin combined with tirofiban in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with coronary heart disease has obvious curative effect, and can improve blood glucose and blood lipid levels, coagulation function and cardiac function, with high safety.
摘要
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the basic principles and important rules of forensic identification of adverse drug events and to accumulate basic data and to provide references for forensic identification of similar cases.@*METHODS@#Thirty-three cases of adverse drug events in our forensic identification files were retrospectively reviewed, analyzed, and summarized.@*RESULTS@#There were 27 live and 6 dead victims included in this study. Our study showed a gradually increasing numbers of adverse drug cases in forensic identification year by year with a slight female predominance (20/33 cases, 60.6%). Of the 33 victims, nearly two-thirds (21/33, 63.6%) were due to hospital errors including only one case of drug overdose (1/21, 4.8%), whereas the rest were not related to the hospital errors. Eight cases (8/33, 24.2%) were caused by illegal medical practitioners due to improper use of medication.@*CONCLUSION@#Investigators need to pay more attention to the characteristics and complexities of adverse drug events on a case by case basis encountered in increasing numbers of more and more such forensic identification.