摘要
Objective:To construct a scientific and technological evaluation system based on the needs of the pilot program for building a national high-quality hospital and establishing a national medical center.Methods:Xiangya Hospital of Central South University gradually improved its academic evaluation system by following the guidelines outlined in national authorities′ documents regarding "abolishing the five only" and "setting new standards", adhering to the guiding principles of "quality, contribution, efficiency, and impact" and employing the principles of "high-standard evaluation, quantitative evaluation, representative work evaluation, and third-party evaluation" .Results:The hospital established a comprehensive, scientific, and quantifiable indicator pool. These indicators were applied to various aspects of medical innovation evaluation, including awarding incentives, discipline assessment, professional promotion, personnel assessment, mentor selection for graduates, and excellence evaluation. Simultaneously, the hospital developed an intelligent platform for medical innovation evaluation and assessment in university-affiliated hospitals based on performance management theory.Conclusions:Through the construction and practice of the Xiangya technology evaluation system, the hospital further improved and optimized its academic evaluation work, guiding researchers to high-quality innovation and efficient translational research, ultimately promoting the high-quality development of the hospital.
摘要
Objective:By analyzing the current status of hospital scientific research contract management, identifying common problems in contract review and proposing suggestions to improve the efficiency of hospital scientific research contract management.Methods:Taking a large comprehensive tertiary hospital as an example, through interviews with professional lawyers, and analysis of problems identified in the preliminary review of a total number of 419 scientific research contracts from 2018 to 2020, further solutions are proposed.Results:Identified problems include no breach protocol of the contract, more attention should be paid to intellectual property protection clauses, supplementary signing of contracts, not include the ethics consideration and protection of genetics resources, low efficiency, time costing, and lack of information sharing among multiple departments.Conclusions:By improving the level of scientific research services, strengthening the Principle Investigator’s awareness of the significance of contract management, enhancing the legal and regulatory training, pay more attention to the protection of intellectual property rights, develop contract templates and establishing an information system to improve the management level of scientific research contracts.