Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
節目: 20 | 50 | 100
结果 1 - 8 de 8
过滤器
1.
文章 在 中文 | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1029266

摘要

The first working meeting of the 8th Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Nephrology was held in Guangzhou, China on November 30, 2023. At the meeting, the list of the 8th Editorial Committee was announced, the work of the journal in the past 5 years was summarized, and the future work of the Editorial Committee was planned and discussed. Jiang Yongmao, former deputy secretary-general of the Chinese Medical Association, Jin Dong, deputy general manager of the Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House Co., Ltd, Lu Quan, editor of the Journal Management Department of Chinese Medical Association, Yu Xueqing, editor-in-chief of the 8th Editorial Committee, Cai Guangyan, Chen Jianghua, Zhao Minghui and Mao Haiping, deputy editor-in-chief of the 8th Editorial Committee, and 69 members of the 8th Editorial Committee, attended the meeting. The meeting came to a successful conclusion, and provided guidance for how to break through the difficulties, publish high-quality content and achieve high-quality development under the new situation.

2.
Rev. Fac. Odontol. Porto Alegre ; 64(1): e132699, dez 2023.
文章 在 葡萄牙语 | LILACS | ID: biblio-1572501

摘要

Objetivo:Realizar uma análise bibliométrica dos trabalhos apresentados nas Reuniões da Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) sobre a temática de Odontologia para Pacientes com Necessidades Especiais (OPNE). Materiais e Métodos:Os anais publicados no período de 2013a 2022foram acessados e para a coleta de dados foram usados os seguintes termosde busca "com deficiência", "necessidades especiais", "síndrome", "paciente especial", "pacientes especiais" e "portadores de deficiência" em todos os anais. Os dados foram submetidos à análise descritiva, sendo exposta a frequência absoluta e relativa das variáveis analisadas. Resultados:Foram encontrados 558resumos, excluídos 230por não se enquadrarem na temática de OPNE, finalizando com 328resumos.A maioria dos trabalhos foido tipo observacional(n=287; 87,5%),2019 foi o ano com maior número de publicações (n=51; 15,5%). O Sudeste foi a região com maior número de resumos publicados (n=204; 62,2%) seguido do Nordeste (n=54; 16,5%), as instituições públicas tiveram uma participação expressiva com mais de dois terços (n=236; 72%).Discussão:O número de trabalhos na área de OPNE vinha crescendo com o passar dos anos, houve uma queda da produção na pandemia, mas esse número está voltando a crescer. Conclusão:Apesar de todas as políticas públicas de inclusão do atendimento às pessoas com deficiênciano atendimento odontológico e de vinte anos após a especialidade se tornar oficial no Brasil, ainda não temos essa categoria como área na SBPqO que se faz tão necessária para o desenvolvimento de conhecimento científico na área.


Aim:To carry out a bibliometric analysis of the papers presented at the Meetings of the Brazilian Society for Dental Research (SBPqO) about Dentistry for Patients with Special Needs (DPSN). Materials and Methods:The annals published from 2013 to 2022 were accessed and the following search terms were used for data collection: "disabled", "special needs", "syndrome", "special patient", "special patients" and "people with disabilities" in all annals. The data were submitted to descriptive analysis, with the absolute and relative frequency of the analyzed variables being exposed. Results:558 abstracts were found, 230 were excluded because they did not fit the DPSNtheme, ending with 328 abstracts. Most studies were observational (n=287; 87.5%), 2019 was the year with the highest number of publications (n=51; 15.5%). The Southeast was the region with the highest number of published abstracts (n=204; 62.2%) followed by the Northeast (n=54; 16.5%), public institutions had a significant participation with more than two thirds (n= 236; 72%). Discussion:The number of jobs in the DPSNarea had been growing over the years, there was a drop in production during the pandemic, but thisnumber is growing again. Conclusion:Despite all the public policies to include care for disabled peoplein dental care and twenty years after the specialty became official in Brazil, we still do not have this category as an area in the SBPqO that is so necessary for the development of scientific knowledge in the area.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic , Curriculum , Dentistry
3.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.);69(4): e20220888, 2023. tab, graf
文章 在 英语 | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1431219

摘要

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of study methodology and evaluation type on the selection of studies during the presentation of scientific events. METHODS: A prospective, observational, transversal approach was applied to a cohort of studies that were submitted for presentation at the 2021 Brazilian Breast Cancer Symposium. Three forms of criteria (CR) were presented. CR1 was based on six criteria (method, ethics, design, originality, promotion, and social contribution); CR2 graded the studies from 0 to 10 for each study, and CR3 was based on five criteria (presentation, method, originality, scientific knowledge, and social contribution). To evaluate the item correlation, Cronbach's alpha and factorial analysis were performed. For the evaluation of differences between the tests, we used the Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc Dunn tests. To determine the differences in the study classifications, we used the Friedman test and Namenyi's all-pairs comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 122 studies were evaluated. There was also a good correlation with the items concerning criterion 1 (α=0.730) and 3 (α=0.937). Evaluating CR1 methodology, study design and social contribution (p=0.741) represents the main factor and CR3 methodology, and the scientific contribution (p=0.994) represents the main factor. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed differences in the results (p<0.001) for all the criteria that were used [CR1-CR2 (p<0.001), CR1-CR3 (p<0.001), and CR2-CR3 (p=0.004)]. The Friedman test showed differences in the ranking of the studies (p<0.001) for all studies (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Methodologies that use multiple criteria show good correlation and should be taken into account when ranking the best studies.

4.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 74(5): 487-493, oct. 2022. graf
文章 在 西班牙语 | LILACS | ID: biblio-1423767

摘要

Introducción: Los trabajos científicos permiten divulgar, compartir y contrastar resultados a terceros. Una de las formas de ver la actividad investigativa de cada especialidad es a través de las presentaciones que realizan en reuniones científicas. Objetivo: Describir el número de presentaciones de las distintas especialidades o áreas quirúrgicas en Chile en el principal congreso realizado a nivel nacional y evaluar si el comportamiento fue distinto durante los años de pandemia por coronavirus. Material y Método: Estudio bibliométrico del Congreso Chileno de Cirugía entre los años 2010 y 2021 evaluando el número total de presentaciones por área quirúrgica, año de presentación y período categorizado en 2010 a 2019 y 2020 a 2021. Se realiza estadística descriptiva y análisis de asociación de medias de publicaciones por área y período. Resultados: Se identificaron 4.462 presentaciones, incluyendo resúmenes orales, póster, videos y jornada de residentes. La media total fue 371,8 trabajos anuales. Coloproctología y Cirugía Gastroesofágica aportaron un total de 616 (13,8%) y 598 (13,4%) respectivamente. La media de presentaciones anuales previo a la pandemia por coronavirus fue de 414, en contraste a los 160 trabajos anuales durante ella, existiendo una disminución significativa de medias de presentaciones por área de 27,6 (± 18,8) a 10,7 (± 8,69) (p < 0,001), sin diferencias sus porcentajes de participación respecto del total (p = 0,776). Conclusión: Coloproctología y Cirugía Gastroesofágica son las áreas quirúrgicas más representadas. Si bien en el período contemporáneo a la pandemia por coronavirus significó una disminución en las presentaciones, no se observó una modificación en el porcentaje de participación de algún área en particular.


Introduction: Scientific studies allow the disclosure, sharing and comparison of results with third parties. One of the ways to see the investigative activity of each medical specialty is through the presentations they make at scientific meetings. Aim: To describe the number of presentations of the different surgical specialties or areas in Chile in the main congress held at a national level and to assess whether the behavior was different during the years of the coronavirus pandemic. Material and Method: Bibliometric study of the Chilean Congress of Surgery between 2010 and 2021, evaluating the total number of presentations by surgical area, year of presentation and two categorized periods (2010 to 2019 and 2020 to 2021). Descriptive statistics and association analysis of publication means by area and period are performed. Results: 4,462 presentations were identified, including oral summaries, posters, videos, and residents' sessions, with a mean of 371.8 per year. Coloproctology and Gastroesophageal Surgery contributed a total of 616 (13.8%) and 598 (13.4%) respectively. The mean number of annual presentations prior to the coronavirus pandemic was 414, in contrast to the 160 annual works during it, with a significant decrease in the mean number of presentations per area from 27.6 (± 18.8) to 10.7 (± 8.69) (p < 0.001), without differences in their percentages of participation with respect to the total (p = 0.776). Conclusion: Coloproctology and Gastroesophageal Surgery are the most represented surgical areas. Although the contemporary period of the coronavirus pandemic meant a decrease in presentations, no change was observed in the percentage of participation in any particular area.


Subject(s)
General Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Congresses as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Bibliometrics , Chile
5.
文章 在 葡萄牙语 | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1516349

摘要

Objetivo: as Desordens Orais Potencialmente Malignas (DOPMs) consistem em lesões e condições epiteliais que apresentam risco aumentado de malignidade. Nessa pesquisa, buscou-se identificar o perfil da produção cien-tífica brasileira sobre as DOPMs, a partir de uma análise bibliométrica dos trabalhos apresentados nas Reuniões da Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO). Materiais e Métodos: foi realizado um estudo bibliométrico, em que foram analisados os anais das reuniões anuais da SBPqO realizadas entre 2015 a 2019. Incluiu-se resumos sobre DOPMs apresentados em qualquer categoria e as seguintes informações foram extraídas: ano, desenho do estudo, tipo de DOPM, unidade federativa, localização e instituição de ensino superior de origem. Os dados foram analisados por meio de estatística descritiva. Resultados:foram identificados 91 resumos. A maior parte foi publicada em 2015 (24,2%) e por autores do estado de São Paulo (22%). A leucoplasia foi a desordem mais frequente (36,2%), seguida pela queilite actínica (35,2%). A maioria dos estudos foi de autoria de pesquisadores das regiões Sudeste (29%) e Sul (28%). Em relação à instituição de ensino, grande parte (68,1%) foi proveniente de universidades públicas. O tipo de estudo mais frequente foi pesquisa labo-ratorial básica (57,1%). Discussão: os achados do estudo indicam que o número de pesquisas sobre as DOPMs apresentadas nas Reuniões da SBPqO ainda é reduzido, concentrados na região sudeste e nas universidades públicas. Conclusão: realizar novas pesquisas a respeito desse tema é muito importante, pois permite a descoberta de informações relevantes para a saúde dos indivíduos frente a essa neoplasia.


Objective: Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs) are lesions and epithelial conditions that present an increased risk of malignancy. In this research, the aim was to identify the profile of Brazilian scientific produc-tion on DOPMs, based on a bibliometric analysis of the works presented at the Meetings of the Brazilian Dental Research Society (SBPqO). Materials and Methods: a bibliometric study was carried out, in which the annals of the annual SBPqO meetings held between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. Abstracts about DOPMs presented in any category were included and the following information was extracted: year, study design, type of DOPM, federative unit, location and educational institution of origin. The data were analyzed using descriptive sta-tistics. Results: 91 abstracts were identified. Most were published in 2015 (24.2%) and by authors from the state of São Paulo (22%). Leukoplakia was the most frequent disorder (36.2%), followed by actinic cheilitis (35.2%). Most of the studies were authored by researchers from the Southeast (29%) and South (28%) regions. Regarding the educational institution, a large part (68.1%) came from public universities. The most frequent type of study was basic laboratory research (57.1%). Discussion: the study findings indicate that the number of researches on DOPMs presented at the SBPqO Meetings is still small, concentrated in the Southeast region and in public universities. Conclusion: conducting new research on this topic is very important, as it allows the discovery of information relevant to the health of individuals in the face of this neoplasm.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Congresses as Topic , Erythroplasia , Leukoplakia , Lichen Planus
6.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; Arq. bras. oftalmol;84(2): 121-127, Mar,-Apr. 2021. tab, graf
文章 在 英语 | LILACS | ID: biblio-1153114

摘要

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study was conducted to analyze the profile and publication rate of abstracts in indexed journals presented in the cornea section at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting and to further identify potential predictive factors for better outcomes. Methods: Abstracts accepted for presentation at the 2013 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting in the cornea section were sought via PubMed and Scopus to identify whether they had been published as full-text manuscripts. First author's name, time of publication, journal's name, and impact factor were recorded. A multivariate regression was performed to explore the association between variables and both the likelihood of publication and the journal's impact factor. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the time course of publication of abstracts. Results: Of the 939 analyzed abstracts, 360 (38.3%) were published in journals with a median impact factor of 3.4. The median time interval between abstract submission and article publication was 22 months. The multivariate analysis revealed that abstracts were more likely to be published if they were funded (OR=1.482, p=0.005), had a control group (OR=1.511, p=0.016), and had a basic science research scope (OR=1.388, p=0.020). The journal's impact factor was higher in funded studies (β=0.163, p=0.002) but lower in multicenter studies (β=-0.170, p=0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed significant differences in the publication time distribution for basic science vs clinical abstracts (χ2=7.636), controlled vs uncontrolled studies (χ2=6.921), and funded vs unfunded research (χ2=13.892) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Almost 40% of Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology abstracts were published within 5 years from submission. Funding support, basic research scope, and controlled design were the determinants of better outcomes of publication.(AU)


RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar o perfil e a taxa de publicação em periódicos indexados de resumos apresentados na seção de córnea da reunião anual da Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology - ARVO, para identificar potenciais fatores preditivos com objetivo de obter melhores resultados. Métodos: Artigos que foram aceitos para apresentação no encontro anual da Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology - ARVO 2013 na seção de córnea foram pesquisados via PubMed e Scopus para identificar se haviam sido publicados como manuscritos com texto integral. Nome do primeiro autor, data de publicação, nome da revista e fator de impacto foram registrados. Foi feita uma regressão multivariada para estabelecer uma associação entre as variáveis e a chance de publicação e o fator de impacto da revista. Foi utilizado o método Kaplan-Meier para analisar o tempo da apresentação até a publicação dos artigos. Resultados: Dos 939 artigos analisados, 360 (38.3%) foram publicados em revistas com um fator de impacto médio de 3.4. O intervalo de tempo entre a submissão do resumo e a publicação do artigo teve como mediana 22 meses. Na análise multivariada, resumos tinham mais chance de publicação se tinham algum tipo de financiamento (OR=1.482, p=0.005), tinham grupo controle (OR=1.511, p=0.016) e estavam no âmbito da pesquisa científica básica (OR+1.388, p=0.020). O fator de impacto da revista era maior em estudos financiados (β=0.163, p=0.002) e mais baixo naqueles multicêntricos (β=-0.170, p=0.001). A análise Kaplan-Meier mostrou diferenças significativas na distribuição de tempo até a publicação de resumos de ciência básica vs clínicos (χ2=7.636), com grupo controle vs sem grupo controle (χ2=6.921) e financiados vs não financiados (χ2=13.892) (p<0.05). Conclusão: Aproximadamente 40% dos resumos apresentados no encontro da Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology - ARVO foram publicados dentro de 5 anos da submissão. Financiamento, pesquisa no âmbito da ciência básica e presença de grupo controle foram fatores determinantes para melhores resultados em relação à chance de publicação.(AU)


Subject(s)
Publications/statistics & numerical data , Bibliometrics , Cornea , Abstracting and Indexing , Meeting Abstract
7.
Arq. odontol ; 56: 1-9, jan.-dez. 2020. tab
文章 在 葡萄牙语 | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1103260

摘要

Objetivo:Investigar o perfil das publicações brasileiras em laser/LED de 2015 a 2019. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo observacional, por meio de documentação indireta, através da análise dos trabalhos apresentados nas reuniões do SBPqO de 2015 a 2019. Os estudos foram classificados quanto à instituição de ensino dos pesquisadores, estado de origem da pesquisa, especialidade odontológica e tipo de estudo. Resultados: Foram identificados 563 resumos. A maior parte foi concentrada em 2019 (21,7%), sendo os lasers operando em baixa potência os mais utilizados (54,1%). O Estado de São Paulo concentrou a maioria dos resumos (67,3%), com a região Sudeste contendo o maior número de trabalhos (76,9%). Em relação à instituição de ensino, as universidades estaduais produziram a maioria dos estudos (47.8%). A especialidade de Dentística foi a que mais realizou pesquisas em laser/LED (21,7%). A maioria dos resumos (73,7%) era do tipo de pesquisa laboratorial básica. A maioria dos trabalhos selecionados não recebeu apoio financeiro (54,7%). Dentre as agências financiadoras mencionadas, as Fundações de Amparo à Pesquisa foram as mais prevalentes (26,6%). Grande parte dos trabalhos não citou o Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa (97,5%). Houve associação estatisticamente significativa entre as instituições públicas e o recebimento de fomento (p < 0,005). Conclusão: A maior parte dos resumos foi concentrada em 2019, com maior número de pesquisas no Estado de São Paulo, realizadas em instituições Públicas e na especialidade de Dentística. Foi observado um número maior de estudos do tipo laboratorial. Além disso, a maioria dos estudos não recebeu fomento para pesquisa.


Aim: To determine the profile of Brazilian publications in laser/ LED from 2015 to 2019. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, using indirect documentation to analyze the papers presented at SBPqO meetings from 2015 to 2019. Results: 563 abstracts involving the use of laser/LED were evaluated and subsequently classified according to higher education research institution, state where the research was conducted, dental specialty, and type of study. Most of the abstracts involving the laser/LED were concentrated in 2019 (21.7%), with low-power lasers being the most frequently used (54.1%). Most of the abstracts were concentrated in the State of São Paulo (67.3%), with the Southeast region containing the largest number of works (76.9%). Regarding the higher education institution, the state universities produced a larger number of the studies (47.8%). Restorative dentistry was the specialty that most developed studies in the laser/LED area (21.7%). Most abstracts (73.7%) were classified as basic laboratory research. Most of the selected studies received no financial support (54.7%). Among the funding agencies mentioned, the Research Support Foundations were the most prevalent (26.6%). Most studies did not mention the Research Ethics Committee (97.5%). There was a statistically significant association between public institutions and the receipt of funding (p < 0.005). Conclusion: Most of the abstracts were identified in 2019, with a greater number of studies conducted in the State of São Paulo, in state institutions across the country, and in the specialty area of restorative dentistry. Laboratory-type studies were the most prevalent. Moreover, most studies received no funding for research.


Subject(s)
Dental Research , Meeting Abstract , Dentistry , Scientific and Technical Publications , Curing Lights, Dental , Lasers , Scientific and Technical Activities
8.
J. health inform ; 3(3): 118-122, jul.-set. 2011. tab, ilus
文章 在 葡萄牙语 | LILACS | ID: lil-621842

摘要

O presente trabalho descreve e apresenta a avaliação do funcionamento do sistema online de submissão de resumos, bem como a avaliação, acompanhamento do processo e divulgação de informações criado especialmente para o 7º Congresso Paulista de Educação Médica, realizado em São Paulo no período de 21 a 23 de Maio de 2010. O sistema foi elaborado na linguagem de programação ASP e utilizou um banco de dados Access Microsoft®. A avaliação deste sistema mostrou um alto grau de satisfação entre usuários principalmente nos itens: facilidade de utilização e ambiente amigável. Além disso, facilitou no gerenciamento e recuperação das informações arquivadas.


This paper describes and presents the evaluation of the functioning of the online abstract submission and evaluation, monitoring the process and dissemination of information created especially for the 7th Paulista Congress of Medical Education, held in São Paulo in the period from 21 to May 23, 2010. The system was developed in ASP programming language and used a Microsoft Access database ®. The system evaluation showed a high degree of users? satisfaction mainly in the items: ease of use and friendly environment. It also facilitated the management and retrieval of archived data.


El presente trabajo describe y presenta la evaluación del funcionamiento del sistema ?on-line? de gerenciamiento de resúmenes, asi como: la evaluación, el seguimiento del proceso y la difusión de información, diseñado especialmente para el 7º Congreso Paulista de Educación Médica, realizado en São Paulo en el período comprendido entre el 21 al 23 de Mayo de 2010. El sistema fue desarrollado en lenguaje de programación ASP y utiliza una base de datos Microsoft Access ®. La evaluación de este sistema mostro un alto grado de satisfacción de los usuarios, especialmente en los puntos: facilidad de uso y ambiente agradable. Además, facilita la gestión y recuperación de la información archivada.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic , Information Management , Medical Informatics , Abstracting and Indexing , Computer Systems , Online Systems
搜索明细