Disparities in the protagonism of oral health teams in the work process of Primary Healthcare / Disparidades do protagonismo das equipes de saúde bucal no processo de trabalho na APS

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Evaluate and compare the protagonism of Oral Health teams (OHt) in the teamwork process in Primary Healthcare (PHC) over five years and estimate the magnitude of disparities between Brazilian macro-regions. METHODS Ecological study that used secondary data extracted from the Sistema de Informação em Saúde para a Atenção Básica (SISAB - Health Information System for Primary Healthcare) from 2018 to 2022. Indicators were selected from a previously validated evaluative matrix, calculated from records in the Collective Activity Form on the degree of OHt's protagonism in team meetings and its degree of organization concerning the meeting agendas. A descriptive and amplitude analysis of the indicators' variation over time was carried out, and the disparity index was also calculated to estimate and compare the magnitude of differences between macro-regions in 2022. RESULTS In Brazil, between 3.06% and 4.04% of team meetings were led by OHt professionals. The Northeast and South regions had the highest (3.71% to 4.88%) and lowest proportions (1.21% to 2.48%), respectively. From 2018 to 2022, there was a reduction in the indicator of the "degree of protagonism of the OHt" in Brazil and macro-regions. The most frequent topics in meetings under OHt's responsibility were the work process (54.71% to 70.64%) and diagnosis and monitoring of the territory (33.49% to 54.48%). The most significant disparities between regions were observed for the indicator "degree of organization of the OHt concerning case discussion and singular therapeutic projects". CONCLUSIONS The protagonism of the OHt in the teamwork process in PHC is incipient and presents regional disparities, which challenges managers and OHt to break isolation and lack of integration, aiming to offer comprehensive and quality healthcare to the user of the Unified Health System (SUS).

RESUMO OBJETIVO Avaliar e comparar o protagonismo das equipes de Saúde Bucal (eSB) no processo de trabalho em equipe na Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS) ao longo de cinco anos, e estimar a magnitude das disparidades entre as macrorregiões brasileiras. MÉTODOS Estudo ecológico que utilizou dados secundários extraídos do Sistema de Informação em Saúde para a Atenção Básica (SISAB), de 2018 a 2022. Foram selecionados indicadores de matriz avaliativa previamente validada, calculados a partir dos registros na Ficha de Atividade Coletiva do grau de protagonismo das eSB nas reuniões de equipe, bem como do seu grau de organização em relação às pautas dos encontros. Foi realizada análise descritiva e da amplitude da variação dos indicadores ao longo do tempo, e também foi calculado o índice de disparidade para estimar e comparar a magnitude das diferenças entre as macrorregiões no ano de 2022. RESULTADOS No Brasil, entre 3,06% e 4,04% das reuniões de equipe foram lideradas por profissionais da eSB. No período, o Nordeste e o Sul foram as regiões que apresentaram maiores (3,71% a 4,88%) e menores proporções (1,21% a 2,48%), respectivamente. No período de 2018 a 2022, houve uma redução do indicador "grau de protagonismo das eSB" no Brasil e nas macrorregiões. Os temas mais frequentes em reuniões sob responsabilidade das eSB foram processo de trabalho (54,71% a 70,64%) e diagnóstico e monitoramento do território (33,49% a 54,48%). As maiores disparidades entre as regiões foram observadas para o indicador "grau de organização das eSB, em relação à discussão de caso e de projeto terapêutico singular". CONCLUSÕES O protagonismo das eSB no processo de trabalho em equipe na APS é incipiente e apresenta disparidades regionais, o que desafia gestores e eSB para o rompimento do isolamento e da falta de integração, visando a oferta de atenção à saúde integral e de qualidade ao usuário do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS).

Content analysis of NOC outcomes related to mechanical ventilation in people with COVID-19 / Análisis de contenido de los resultados NOC relacionados con la ventilación mecánica en personas con COVID-19 / Análise de conteúdo de resultados NOC relacionados à ventilação mecânica em pessoas com COVID-19

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the evidence of content validity of the Nursing Outcomes "Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult" and "Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult", for patients with severe COVID-19. Method: Methodological study developed in two stages: literature review to construct the definitions of the indicators and analysis of the evidence of content validity of the nursing outcomes by a focus group. Results: All the conceptual and operational definitions developed for the 56 indicators were considered clear and precise. However, 17 indicators were excluded because they were deemed not to be relevant. The definitions of the magnitudes for 17 indicators of the Nursing Outcome "Mechanical Ventilation Response: Adult" and 22 indicators "Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult" were thus constructed. Conclusion: The development of definitions and validation by experts makes the use of these outcomes and their indicators more understandable and precise, favoring their use in clinical practice and providing greater detail in assessment and recording.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar la evidencia de validez de contenido de los resultados de enfermería "Respuesta a la ventilación mecánica: Adulto" y "Respuesta al destete de la ventilación mecánica: Adulto", para pacientes adultos con COVID-19 grave. Método: Estudio metodológico desarrollado en dos etapas: revisión bibliográfica para construir las definiciones de los indicadores y análisis de la evidencia de validez de contenido de los resultados de enfermería mediante un grupo focal. Resultados: Todas las definiciones conceptuales y operativas elaboradas para los 56 indicadores se consideraron claras y precisas. Sin embargo, se excluyeron 17 indicadores porque se consideró que no eran pertinentes. Se construyeron así las definiciones de las magnitudes para 17 indicadores del resultado de enfermería "Respuesta a la ventilación mecánica: adulto" y 22 indicadores "Respuesta al destete de la ventilación mecánica: adulto". Conclusiones: La elaboración de definiciones y validación por expertos hace más comprensible y preciso el uso de estos resultados y sus indicadores, favoreciendo su uso en la práctica clínica y aportando mayor detalle en la valoración y registro.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar as evidências de validade de conteúdo dos Resultados de Enfermagem "Resposta à ventilação mecânica: adulto" e "Resposta ao Desmame da Ventilação Mecânica: adulto", para pacientes adultos com COVID-19 grave. Método: Estudo metodológico desenvolvido em duas etapas: revisão da literatura para construção das definições dos indicadores e análise das evidências de validade de conteúdo dos resultados de enfermagem por um grupo focal. Resultados: Todas as definições conceituais e operacionais elaboradas para os 56 indicadores foram consideradas claras e precisas. Entretanto, 17 indicadores foram excluídos por serem julgados pouco relevantes. Desse modo foram construídas as definições das magnitudes para 17 indicadores do Resultados de Enfermagem "Resposta a ventilação mecânica: adulto" e de 22 indicadores "Resposta ao desmame da ventilação mecânica: adulto". Conclusão: A elaboração das definições e a validação por especialistas tornam o uso desses Resultados e seus indicadores mais compreensível e preciso, favorecendo o uso na prática clínica, proporcionando maior detalhamento da avaliação e dos registros.

Questionários direcionados ao diabetes mellitus validados para o português do Brasil / Diabetes mellitus questionnaires validated in brazilian Portuguese

Modelo do estudo: Revisão de escopo recomendada pelo Instituto Joanna Briggs e PRISMA-ScR. Objetivo: Analisar e sintetizar as evidências científicas sobre questionários relacionados ao diabetes mellitus validados para língua portuguesa do Brasil. Método: Foram incluídos estudos com resumo disponível e que descreveram um questionário relacionado ao diabetes mellitus publicados em inglês, espanhol ou português em periódicos indexados no PubMed, Scopus, BVS e Web of Science e nos catálogos de dissertações/teses do Portal da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior entre 2011 e 2022. Os descritores utilizados foram: diabetes mellitus; diabetes; sur-veys and questionnaires; reproducibility of results; psychometrics; validation studies; validation studies as topic; Brazil; Brazilian. O protocolo do estudo foi registrado na plataforma Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/asb-jz/). Resultados: Integraram esta revisão 39 publicações cujos questionários selecionados abordaram os temas: autocuidado/autogestão/autogerenciamento/autoeficácia; qualidade de vida; cuidado com a pele, úlceras e lesões; plano alimentar; adesão medicamentosa; estresse emocional/psicológico; conhecimento sobre diabetes; risco para desenvolvimento do diabetes; satisfação da qualidade dos cuidados em diabetes; manejo do diabetes em escolas; atitudes de profissionais da saúde frente ao diabetes. Conclusão: A utilização de questionários validados pode contribuir para a medida das barreiras e dificuldades encontradas por pessoas com diabetes mellitus e direcionar para a construção de estratégias de intervenções que sejam mais assertiva (AU).

Study design: Scoping review following the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR. Objective: To analyze and synthesize scientific evidence on questionnaires related to diabetes mellitus validated in Brazilian Portuguese. Method: Studies with available abstracts and that described a questionnaire related to diabetes mellitus published in English, Spanish or Portuguese, in journals indexed in PubMed, Scopus, VHL and Web of Science and in the catalog of dissertations/theses of the Portal of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, between 2011 and 2022 were included. The descriptors used were: diabetes mellitus; diabetes; surveys and questionnaires; reproducibility of results; psychometrics; validation studies; validation studies as topic; Brazil; and Brazilian. The study protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework platform (https://osf.io/asbjz/). Results: This review included 39 publications in which selected questionnaires addressed the themes: self-care/self-management/self-efficacy; quality of life; skin, ulcer and wound care; food plan; medication adherence; emotional/psychological stress; knowledge about diabetes; risk for developing diabetes; satisfaction with the quality of diabetes care; diabetes management in schools; and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards diabetes. Conclusion: The use of validated questionnaires can contribute to the measurement of barriers and difficulties encountered by people with diabetes mellitus and direct the construction of more assertive intervention strategies (AU).

Assessment of the Risk Factors Related to the Length of Hospital Stay and Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty / Avaliação dos fatores de risco relacionados ao tempo de internação e às complicações pós-operatórias em pacientes submetidos a artroplastia total primária do joelho

Abstract Objective To assess the risk factors involving longer hospital stays and early postoperative complications (first 30 days after surgery) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods Across-sectional study was conducted with collection of data of patients who underwent TKA in a private hospital between 2015 and 2019. The following data were collected: age, gender, body mass index, and clinical comorbid-ities. We also collected intraoperative data such as the grade on the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), the duration of the surgery, the length of stay, the postoperative complications, and readmission within 30 days. Statistical models were used to investigate the possible risk factors associated with longer hospital stays and postoperative complications. Results There was evidence of an increase in the length of hospital stay in older patients, with higher grades on the ASA classification or who suffered postoperative complications. For each increase in 1 year of age, we expect the length of stay to be multiplied by 1.008 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.004 to 1.012; p < 0,001). In patients who were ASA grade III, the time is expected to be multiplied by 1.297 (95%CI: 1.083 to 1.554; p = 0,005) when compared with grade-I patients. In patients who suffered postoperative complications, the time is expected to be multiplied by 1.505 (95%CI: 1.332 to 1.700; p < 0.001) compared with patients without complications. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that, in patients who underwent primary TKA, preoperative characteristics such as older age and ASA grade > III, as well as the development of postoperative complications, independently predict the increase in the length of hospital stay.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar os fatores de risco relacionados a um tempo de internação mais longo e às complicações pós-operatórias precoces (primeiros 30 dias após a cirurgia) em pacientes submetidos a artroplastia total do joelho (ATJ). Materiais e Métodos Este é um estudo transversal com coleta de dados de pacientes submetidos a ATJ em um hospital privado entre 2015 e 2019. Os seguintes dados foram coletados: idade, gênero, índice de massa corporal, e comorbidades clínicas. Também coletamos dados intraoperatórios, como o grau na classificação da American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) e a duração da cirurgia, além do tempo de internação, as complicações pós-operatórias, e a readmissão em 30 dias. Os possíveis fatores de risco associados a um tempo de internação mais longo e às taxas de complicações pós-operatórias foram investigados por meio de modelos estatísticos. Resultados Os pacientes mais velhos, com graus mais elevados na classificação da ASA ou que sofreram complicações pós-operatórias, ficaram internados por mais tempo. Para cada aumento em um ano de idade, esperamos que o tempo de internação seja multiplicado por 1,008 (intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%]: 1,004 a 1,012; p < 0,001). Em pacientes de grau III na classificação da ASA, espera-se que o tempo seja multiplicado por 1,297 (IC95%: 1,083 a 1,554; p = 0,005) em comparação com pacientes de grau I. Em pacientes com complicações pós-operatórias, espera-se que o tempo seja multiplicado por 1,505 (IC95%: 1,332 a 1,700; p < 0,001) em comparação com pacientes sem complicações. Conclusão Este estudo demonstrou que, em pacientes submetidos a ATJ primária, características pré-operatórias, como idade avançada e grau ≥ III na classificação da ASA, e o desenvolvimento de complicações pós-operatórias predizem o aumento do tempo de internação hospitalar de forma independente.

GRINCIRCAR: una iniciativa para promover la cirugía académica e investigación quirúrgica en el caribe colombiano / GRINCIRCAR: an initiative to promote academic surgery and surgical research in the Colombian Caribbean

Introducción. La investigación quirúrgica es uno de los pilares de la cirugía académica, que integra el microambiente para lograr una adecuada práctica basada en la evidencia, realizar planteamientos y conseguir eventuales soluciones a necesidades quirúrgicas de una población. En el caribe colombiano existen brechas significativas en cuanto al aporte en investigación quirúrgica, comparado con otras regiones del país. Por ende, es necesaria una iniciativa que haga frente a estos retos. Métodos. El Grupo Colaborativo de Investigación en Cirugía General y Subespecialidades del Caribe Colombiano (GRINCIRCAR), es una iniciativa fundada por una colectividad de estudiantes de medicina, médicos residentes de cirugía y cirujanos académicos de universidades del caribe colombiano, que buscan impulsar la investigación quirúrgica y aportar a la resolución de problemas de salud en cirugía de la región. Discusión. De acuerdo al programa de investigación con políticas y prioridades en salud establecidos por el Instituto Nacional de Salud, existen por lo menos dos dimensiones donde se involucra directamente la cirugía. A pesar de esto, no existen datos sobre la distribución de recursos para la investigación quirúrgica en la región del Caribe colombiano, pese a que el acceso al cuidado quirúrgico básico y las enfermedades quirúrgicas, hace parte de las prioridades en salud y cirugía global. Conclusiones. Se necesita promover la cirugía académica y la investigación quirúrgica en la región del caribe colombiano. La investigación colaborativa podría ser una solución al integrar la participación de múltiples centros y participantes

Introduction. Surgical research is one of the cornerstones of academic surgery, which integrates the microenvironment to achieve an adequate evidence-based practice, asking the right questions to achieve eventual solutions to the surgical needs of a population. In the Colombian Caribbean, there are significant gaps in the contribution in surgical research, compared to other regions of the country. Therefore, an initiative is needed to address these challenges. Methods. The Collaborative Group for Research in General Surgery and Subspecialties of the Colombian Caribbean (GRINCIRCAR) is an initiative founded by a group of medical students, surgical residents and academic surgeons from Colombian Caribbean universities, who seek to promote surgical research and contribute to solutions of health problems in surgery in the region. Discussion. According to the research program, health policies and priorities established by the National Institute of Health, there are at least two dimensions where surgery is directly involved. Despite this, there are no data on the distribution of resources for surgical research in the Colombian Caribbean region, despite the fact that access to basic surgical care and surgical diseases are part of the priorities in global health and surgery. Conclusions. There is a need to promote academic surgery and surgical research in the Colombian Caribbean region. Collaborative research in the region could be a solution by integrating the participation of multiple centers and participants

Mortalidad perioperatoria en Tolima, perspectivas del cuarto indicador de The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery: Un análisis preliminar de la cohorte prospectiva del estudio Colombian Surgical Outcomes Study (ColSOS) / Perioperative mortality in Tolima and perspectives of the fourth indicator of The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery: A preliminary analysis of the prospective cohort of the Colombian Surgical Outcomes Study (ColSOS)

Introducción. La mortalidad perioperatoria en el mundo representa 4,2 millones de muertes anuales. El cuarto indicador de The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery permite estandarizar la mortalidad perioperatoria. En Colombia, existen aproximaciones por datos secundarios, limitando el análisis y las intervenciones aplicables a nuestra población. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la mortalidad perioperatoria a través de datos primarios que permitan sustentar políticas públicas. Métodos. Se hizo el análisis preliminar de un estudio observacional, de cohorte prospectiva, multicéntrico en 6 instituciones del departamento de Tolima. Se incluyeron los pacientes llevados a procedimientos quirúrgicos por una semana, con posterior seguimiento hasta el egreso, fallecimiento o 30 días de hospitalización. La mortalidad perioperatoria fue el desenlace primario. Resultados. Fueron incluidos 378 pacientes, con mediana de 49 años (RIC 32-66), buen estado funcional (ASA I-II 80 %) y baja complejidad quirúrgica (42 %). Las cirugías más comunes fueron por Ortopedia (25,4 %) y Cirugía plástica (23,3 %). El 29,7 % presentaron complicaciones postoperatorias, las más comunes fueron síndrome de dificultad respiratoria agudo e íleo postoperatorio. La mortalidad perioperatoria fue de 1,3 %. Discusión. La mortalidad perioperatoria discrepó de la reportada en otros estudios nacionales, aun cuando los pacientes tenían un bajo perfil de riesgo y baja complejidad de los procedimientos. Sin embargo, coincide con la reportada internacionalmente y nos acerca a la realidad del país. Conclusión. La determinación del cuarto indicador es de vital importancia para mejorar la atención quirúrgica en Colombia. Este es el primer acercamiento con datos primarios que nos permite tener información aplicable a nuestra población

Introduction. Perioperative mortality accounts for 4.2 million deaths annually. The fourth indicator of The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery allows standardizing perioperative mortality. In Colombia, there are approximations based on secondary data, limiting the analysis and interventions applicable to our population. The objective of this study is to describe perioperative mortality through primary data that allow supporting public policies. Methods. A preliminary analysis of an observational, prospective cohort, multicenter study was carried out at six institutions in the District of Tolima. Patients undergoing surgical procedures were included for one week, for subsequent follow-up until discharge, death, or 30 days of hospitalization. Perioperative mortality was the primary outcome and was presented as a proportion. Results. A total of 378 patients were included, with a median age of 49 years (RIC 32-66), low-risk profile (ASA I-II 80%), and low surgical complexity (42%). The most common surgeries were Orthopedic (25.4%) and Plastic Surgery (23.3%). Postoperative complications occurred in 29.7%, the most common were ARDS and postoperative ileus. Perioperative mortality was 1.3%. Discussion. Perioperative mortality differed from that reported in national studies, even when the patients had a low-risk profile and low complexity of the procedures. However, it coincides with that reported internationally and brings us closer to the reality of the country. Conclusion. The determination of the fourth indicator is of vital importance to improving surgical care in Colombia. This is the first approach with primary data that allows us to have applicable information for our population

Estudio exploratorio prospectivo de los factores asociados a eventos adversos en salud en personas mayores que viven con VIH / An exploratory prospective study of the factors associated with adverse health outcomes in older adults living with HIV

INTRODUCCIÓN: Gracias al tratamiento antirretroviral en Occidente, la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) se ha convertido en una enfermedad crónica. Hoy, el 50% de las personas que viven con VIH son mayores de 50 años y en torno al 20% de los nuevos casos de esta infección se dan en ese mismo grupo etario. Este trabajo tiene por objeto el analizar los factores clínicos y sociodemográficos asociados a eventos adversos en salud (caídas, visitas a urgencias, ingresos hospitalarios y muerte) en una cohorte de personas mayores de 55 años con infección por VIH. MÉTODOS: Estudio exploratorio prospectivo con cuatro años de seguimiento. Se incluyeron personas con infección por VIH seguidas en las consultas de enfermedades infecciosas de dos hospitales de Madrid. Se recogieron datos sociodemográficos y variables clínicas. Se evaluó la situación funcional, mental y social de los participantes. Se revisaron en las historias clínicas de los pacientes número de caídas, visitas a los servicios de urgencias, ingresos hospitalarios y muertes producidas durante el periodo estudiado. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 117 pacientes con una edad media de 61,4 (desviación estándar 6,6) años y una mediana de seguimiento de 47 meses (35 a 50). De estos sujetos, el 25% tenía síntomas depresivos y el 10% tenía algún grado de deterioro cognitivo en la visita inicial. Las frecuencias de eventos adversos en salud registradas fueron: caídas del 7,7%, visitas a urgencias del 53%, ingresos hospitalarios del 33,3% y muertes del 2,6%. Los síntomas de depresión se asociaron con caídas y visitas a urgencias en el análisis bivariado. Los factores asociados a ingreso hospitalario fueron haber adquirido la infección por consumo de drogas por vía parenteral, ser frágil y ser menor de 65 años. Se realizó análisis multivariado para el resultado de ingresos hospitalarios con las variables que mostraron p < 0,05 en el análisis bivariado y ninguna de ellas alcanzó significación estadística. CONCLUSIONES: Los síntomas de depresión y el deterioro cognitivo se presentan con una alta frecuencia en estos pacientes, por lo que debería realizarse tamizaje de ambos de forma sistemática en este grupo poblacional. Son necesarios estudios con más pacientes y mayor tiempo de seguimiento que permitan identificar los factores de riesgo asociados a eventos adversos en las personas mayores que viven con VIH.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with adverse health outcomes (falls, emergency room visits, hospital admissions and death) in a cohort of patients older than 55 years with HIV infection. METHODS: It is an exploratory prospective study with four years follow-up. People with HIV infection followed in the infectious diseases consultation unit of two hospitals in Madrid were included. Sociodemographic data and clinical variables were collected. The functional, mental, and social situations of the participants were assessed. Patient clinical histories were reviewed to gather data on the number of falls, visits to emergency departments and hospital admissions during the period studied. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients with a mean age of 61,4 (SD 6,6) years and a median follow-up of 47 months(35 to 50) were included. Of these subjects, 25% had depressive symptoms, and 10% had some degree of cognitive impairment at the baseline visit. The recorded frequencies were: falls 7,7%, visits to the emergency room 53%, hospital admission 33,3% and deaths 2,6%. Depressive symptoms were associated with falls and emergency room visits in the univariate analysis. The factors associated with hospital admission were having acquired the infection through intravenous drug use, frailty and being under 65 years of age. Multivariate analysis was conducted for the hospital admissions outcome, with the variables showing p < 0,07 in the univariate analysis, none of which reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Depression screening and cognitive evaluation should be done systematically in this population group. More studies with more patients and longer follow-up times are necessary.

Estudio de los desenlaces perioperatorios de la apendicitis aguda durante la pandemia por COVID-19: un estudio observacional analítico de cohorte / Study of perioperative outcomes of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analytical observational cohort study

Introducción. La condición de pandemia por COVID-19 impactó a la sociedad y los sistemas de salud a nivel mundial. Las adaptaciones institucionales procuraron mantener la calidad de la atención a pesar de un contexto organizacional desfavorable. La apendicitis aguda requirió ser manejada en un nuevo escenario institucional. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento quirúrgico de la apendicitis durante la pandemia. Métodos. Estudio observacional analítico, retrospectivo, en el que se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a apendicectomía, antes y durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Se evaluaron las complicaciones, infección del sitio operatorio, reingresos y estancia hospitalaria. Adicionalmente, se analizaron los desenlaces en los 3 picos epidemiológicos de la pandemia. Se efectuaron estadísticas descriptivas y analíticas entre los grupos a comparar. Resultados. Se incluyeron 1521 pacientes con apendicitis, 48,3 % operados antes y 51,7 % durante la pandemia. No hubo diferencias entre los grupos en complicaciones (p=0,352), infección del sitio operatorio (p=0,191), reingreso en los primeros 30 días (p=0,605) y estancia hospitalaria (p=0,514). El manejo de la apendicitis durante el tercer pico fue similar a las prácticas habituales. El tiempo de evolución fue mayor durante la pandemia (p=0,04) y los pacientes fueron llevados a cirugía más pronto que previo a la pandemia (p<0,001). Conclusiones. No se evidenció un incremento de complicaciones quirúrgicas, reingresos, estancia hospitalaria ni infección del sitio operatorio en los pacientes operados durante la pandemia. Hubo un efecto favorable para los pacientes como consecuencia de la adaptación institucional en la pandemia por COVID-19

Introduction. COVID-19 pandemic impacted society and health systems worldwide. The institutional adaptations sought to maintain the quality of care in an unfavorable organizational context. Acute appendicitis was required to be managed in a new institutional setting. The effectiveness of surgical treatment of appendicitis during the pandemic was evaluated. Methods. Retrospective analytical observational study, in patients with appendectomy, before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Complications, surgical site infections, readmissions, and hospital stay were evaluated. Additionally, the outcomes in the 3 epidemiological peaks of the pandemic were analyzed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed between the groups to be compared. Results. A total of 1521 patients with appendicitis were included, 48.3% before and 51.7% during the pandemic. There were no differences in complications (p=0.352), operative site infection (p=0.191), readmission at 30 days (p=0.605), and hospital stay (p=0.514) between the groups. Management of appendicitis during the 3rd peak was like usual practices. There was a long evolution time during the pandemic (p=0.04) and the patients were taken to surgery sooner than before the pandemic (p<0.001). Conclusions. There was no evidence of an increase in surgical complications, readmissions, hospital stay, and surgical site infections during patients who underwent surgery. There was a favorable effect for patients because of institutional adaptation in the COVID-19 pandemic

Outcome measures for adults with down syndrome based on the international classification of functioning, disability, and health model: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Adults with Down syndrome (DS) have functional disabilities due to the extra presence of chromosome 21. OBJECTIVE: To identify the functionality and disability assessment instruments used in research involving adults with DS and associate them with the components of the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). METHODS: Two independent researchers analyzed articles from PubMed, Lilacs, SciELO, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases, including cross sectional and clinical studies whose results involved functionality and disability for individuals with DS (≥18 years), with no publication date limit for the studies. The methodological quality of the studies was analyzed by the Downs & Black Checklist; descriptive analysis was used for the results. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021234012). RESULTS: 15 articles were analyzed in which 48 instruments were identified for the assessment of adults with DS (36.42±10.62 years); the quality of the articles was considered "good". Of these 48 instruments, 41 were associated with bodily function, 5 instruments were associated with the activity component, one instrument was associated with social participation and one instrument was associated with the environment. CONCLUSION: Of the 48 instruments identified to assess adults with DS, most were for the Body Function and Structure component; only the 6MWT and CAMDEX-SD have been validated for this population. LIFE-H and MQE were used to assess Social Participation and the Environment, but they cannot be considered dependable, as they have not been confirmed for individuals with DS.

Experiencia en la generación de estrategias de monitorización y evaluación en la implantación de Guías de Práctica Clínica en España / Experience Generating Evaluation and Monitoring Strategies in the Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Spain / Experiência na geração de estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação na implementação de manuais de prática clínica na Espanha

Introducción. La monitorización de la utilización del conocimiento y la evaluación de resultados permiten conocer la aplicación de la evidencia, cambios en los conocimientos y actitudes, el impacto en resultados de salud y la integración y el mantenimiento de las prácticas adoptadas. Existen debilidades relacionadas con la falta de sistematización, limitaciones de los registros y calidad del proceso. El objetivo de este artículo es describir la experiencia en la generación de estrategias de monitorización y evaluación de resultados de implantación de Guías de Buenas Prácticas en España. División de temas tratados. En primer lugar, se revisan los procesos de medición de resultados en la implantación de Guías, en el marco del Programa Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®, cuya herramienta para liderar el cambio incluye la monitorización y evaluación como una de las seis fases del ciclo de acción. En segundo lugar, se analizan las estrategias de monitorización y evaluación propuestas en la literatura, destacando la Asociación Profesional de Enfermeras de Ontario. Finalmente, se analizan las estrategias de monitorización y evaluación generadas por dos instituciones españolas participantes en el programa, centradas en adecuación de registros, explotación y análisis de indicadores, desarrollo de herramientas, procedimientos de evaluación y mecanismos de difusión y retroalimentación. Conclusiones. La definición de estrategias de monitorización y evaluación planificada de forma temprana contribuye a la viabilidad de la evaluación de la implantación y su sostenibilidad. Es necesario adaptarlas al contexto, con estrategias transversales que alcancen a toda la institución, facilitadas por la institución. Palabras clave: Ciencia de la Implementación; Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia; Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud; Mecanismos de Evaluación de la Atención de Salud; Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud

Introduction. Monitoring the usage of knowledge and evaluating results permits one to know the application of the evidence, knowledge, and attitude changes, the impact on health results, integration, and maintenance of the adopted practices. There exist weaknesses related to lack of systematization, limitation of the records, and quality of the process. This article's objective is to describe the experience generating monitoring strategies and evaluation of the results regarding the implementation of good practice guides in Spain. Topics for Reflection. In the first place, the measurement process of the results regarding the implementation of guides are reviewed, in the Best Practice Spotlight Organizations® program frame, whose tool to lead the change includes monitoring and evaluation as one of the sixth phases of the action cycle. In the second place, monitoring and evaluation strategies proposed in the literature are analyzed, highlighting the Professional Nurses Association of Ontario. Finally, the monitoring and evaluation strategies are analyzed by two Spanish institutions participating in the program, focused on the adequation of records, exploitation and indicator analysis, tools development, evaluation procedures, dissemination, and feedback mechanisms. Conclusions: The definition of monitoring and evaluation strategies planned in advance contributes to the viability of the evaluation regarding the implementation and its sustainability. Is necessary to adapt them to the context, with transversal strategies that reach the whole institution, facilitated by the institution. Keywords: Implementation Science; Evidence-Based Practice; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms; Quality Indicators, Health Care

Introdução. Monitorizar a utilização do conhecimento e avaliar os resultados permite-nos conhecer a aplicação das evidências, as mudanças nos conhecimentos e atitudes, o impacto nos resultados de saúde e a integração e manutenção das práticas adotadas. Existem fragilidades relacionadas à falta de sistematização, limitações de registros e qualidade do processo. O objetivo deste artigo é descrever a experiência na geração de estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação dos resultados da implementação de Manuais de Boas Práticas na Espanha. Divisão dos temas abordados. Em primeiro lugar, são revistos os processos de medição de resultados na implementação dos Manuais, no âmbito do Programa Best Practice Spotlight Organizations®, cuja ferramenta para liderar a mudança inclui a monitorização e avaliação como uma das seis fases do ciclo de ação. Em segundo lugar, são analisadas as estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação propostas na literatura, com destaque para a Associação Profissional de Enfermeiros de Ontário. Por fim, são analisadas as estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação geradas por duas instituições espanholas participantes do programa, focadas na adaptação de registros, exploração e análise de indicadores, desenvolvimento de ferramentas, procedimentos de avaliação e mecanismos de divulgação e feedback. Conclusões. A definição de estratégias de monitoramento e avaliação planeadas antecipadamente contribui para a viabilidade da avaliação da implementação e para a sua sustentabilidade. É necessário adaptá-los ao contexto, com estratégias transversais que alcancem toda a instituição, facilitadas pela instituição. Palavras-chave: Ciência da Implementação; Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências; Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde; Mecanismos de Avaliação da Assistência à Saúde; Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde

Efecto de un curso sobre medicina basada en la evidencia: análisis exploratorio / Effect of a Course on Evidence-Based Medicine: Exploratory Análisis / Efeito de um curso sobre medicina baseada em evidências: análise exploratoria

Introducción. Tomar decisiones clínicas basadas en la mejor evidencia disponible es una buena práctica que favorece los resultados en salud. Su uso ha sido promovido por diferentes organismos; sin embargo, aún existen algunas barreras entre profesionales de la salud para su apropiación. El objetivo fue el análisis exploratorio del efecto de un curso sobre los conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes frente a la Medicina Basada en la Evidencia (MBE) en profesionales de la salud que ejercen en Bogotá, Colombia. Metodología. Estudio exploratorio que incluyó un componente cuantitativo y uno cualitativo de carácter descriptivo. El estudio se desarrolló entre agosto de 2022 y abril de 2023. Para el componente cuantitativo se construyó un cuestionario tipo test, compuesto por 38 preguntas, aplicado antes y después del curso. Respecto de lo cualitativo, se realizaron en total 6 entrevistas semiestructuradas a docentes, estudiantes y uno de los gestores del proyecto. Resultados. Los resultados cuantitativos permitieron identificar cambios relacionados con la toma de decisiones clínicas, una mejora en el conocimiento y aplicación de herramientas para la evaluación de la calidad de estudios para resolver preguntas clínicas. El componente cualitativo permitió identificar dos temáticas centrales: pedagogía de la toma de decisiones y los aspectos que posibilitan o no la implementación de estas herramientas para tomar decisiones clínicas. Discusión. Los resultados sobre los efectos del curso son similares a los reportados por otros estudios en contextos diferentes al colombiano. Se requiere investigación que a mediano y largo plazo mida el impacto de la formación en el cambio de práctica. Conclusión. El curso sugiere tener efectos en los conocimientos y habilidades para mejorar la búsqueda y evaluación de la evidencia, así como para la formulación de preguntas clínicas, la comprensión de la certeza de la evidencia y mejorar la actitud hacia el uso de la evidencia para fundamentar la toma de decisiones en la clínica. Palabras clave: Medicina Basada en la Evidencia; Capacitación Profesional; Toma de Decisiones Clínicas; Desarrollo de Personal; Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud.

Introduction. Making clinical decisions based on the best available evidence is a good practice that favors health outcomes. Different organizations have promoted its use; however, there are still some barriers to its appropriation among health professionals. The objective was the exploratory analysis of the effect of a course on knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) in health professionals practicing in Bogotá, Colombia. Methodology. Exploratory study that included quantitative and qualitative components with a descriptive approach. The study was conducted between August 2022 and April 2023. For the quantitative component, a questionnaire was developed with 38 questions, applied before and after the course. In the qualitative component, 6 semi-structured interviews were conducted with teachers, students, and a Project manager. Results. The quantitative results showed changes in clinical decision-making and the improvement in the knowledge and application of study quality assessment tools to resolve clinical issues. The qualitative component identified two main themes: pedagogy in decision-making and the aspects that either allow or do not allow the implementation of these tools for clinical decision-making. Discussion. The results on the effects of the course are similar to those reported by other studies in contexts other than Colombia. Research is needed in the medium and long term to measure the impact of the training on practice change. Conclusion. The course suggests effects on knowledge and skills related to searching for and evaluating evidence, formulating clinical questions, understanding the certainty of evidence, and improving attitudes toward the use of evidence to inform clinical decision-making. Keywords: Evidence-Based Medicine; Professional Training; Clinical Decision-Making; Staff Development; Outcome Assessment Health Care

Introdução. Tomar decisões clínicas baseadas nas melhores evidências disponíveis é uma boa prática que favorece os resultados em saúde. A sua utilização tem sido promovida por diferentes instâncias, contudo, ainda existem algumas barreiras entre os profissionais de saúde para a sua apropriação. O objetivo foi a análise exploratória do efeito de um curso sobre conhecimentos, habilidades e atitudes em relação à Medicina Baseada em Evidências (MBE) em profissionais de saúde que atuam em Bogotá, Colômbia. Metodologia. Estudo exploratório que incluiu uma componente quantitativa e uma componente qualitativa descritiva. O estudo foi realizado entre agosto de 2022 e abril de 2023. Para a componente quantitativa foi criado um questionário do tipo teste, composto por 38 questões, aplicado antes e após o curso. Quanto aos aspectos qualitativos, foram realizadas um total de 6 entrevistas semiestruturadas com professores, alunos e um dos gestores do projeto. Resultados. Os resultados quantitativos permitiram identificar mudanças relacionadas à tomada de decisão clínica, melhoria no conhecimento e aplicação de ferramentas de avaliação da qualidade dos estudos para resolução de questões clínicas. A componente qualitativa permitiu identificar dois temas centrais: a pedagogía da tomada de decisão e os aspectos que possibilitam ou não a implementação destas ferramentas para a tomada de decisões clínicas. Discussão. Os resultados sobre os efeitos do curso são semelhantes aos relatados por otros estudos noutros contextos que não a Colômbia. É necessária investigação a médio e longo prazo para medir o impacto da formação na mudança de práticas. Conclusão. O curso sugere ter efeitos sobre conhecimentos e competências para melhorar a procura e avaliação de evidências, bem como para formular questões clínicas, compreender a certeza das evidências e melhorar a atitude em relação ao uso de evidências para fundamentar a tomada de decisões na clínica. Palavras-chave: Medicina Baseada em Evidências; Capacitação Profissional; Tomada de Decisão Clínica; Desenvolvimento de Pessoal; Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde

Resultados de la implementación de una guía de recomendaciones en el cuidado de las personas con ostomías digestivas / Results in the Application of a Recommendation Guide for the Care of People with Digestive Ostomy / Resultados da implementação de diretrizes de recomendações no cuidado de pessoas com ostomias digestivas

Introducción. La instauración de una ostomía digestiva tiene una importante repercusión física y emocional en las personas. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la adherencia de las enfermeras a las buenas prácticas en el manejo de las ostomías, la disminución de complicaciones y la adquisición de destrezas de los pacientes en su propio autocuidado tras la implementación de la Guía de Buenas Prácticas de la asociación de enfermeras de Ontario. Metodología. Estudio cuasiexperimental prospectivo en una unidad de cirugía digestiva desde 2017 hasta 2022. La intervención ha consistido en la implementación de las recomendaciones de cuidados de una Guía de Buenas Prácticas, analizando variables de proceso y de resultados en la salud a lo largo del proceso. Resultados. Se han encontrado diferencias significativas (p<0.05) en las variables de adherencia: educación sanitaria preoperatoria, marcaje del estoma, evaluación integral posoperatoria y educación sanitaria posoperatoria. No se han encontrado diferencias significativas en las variables de complicaciones del estoma (del 37.5% al 27.8%), ni en las complicaciones de la piel periestomal (del 12.5% al 10.2%). Sí se han encontrado diferencias en la variable de adquisición de destrezas del paciente en su autocuidado (del 44.44% al 98%). Discusión. Implantar recomendaciones de buenas prácticas mejora la calidad de los cuidados y disminuye las complicaciones. Conclusiones. La implementación de la guía ha aumentado la adherencia de las enfermeras a las buenas prácticas basadas en la evidencia y ha mejorado la adquisición de destrezas de los pacientes en su autocuidado, disminuyendo las complicaciones (aunque sin significación). Palabras clave: Estomía; Autocuidado; Guía de Práctica Clínica; Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia; Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud

Introduction. The establishment of a digestive ostomy has an essential physical and emotional repercussion. This study aims to analyze nurses' adherence to the good practice of management in ostomy, the decrease of complications, and the acquisition of patients' ability in self-care after implementing the Ontario Nurses' Good Practices guide. Methodology. A quasi-experimental prospective study in a digestive surgery unit from 2017 to 2022. The intervention consists of implementing the recommendations made in the Good Practices Guide and analyzing variables of process and health throughout the process. Results. Significative differences have been found (p<0.05) in the adherence variables: preoperatory sanitary education, marking of stoma, post-operatory integral evaluation, and sanitary post-operatory education. The investigators did not find significant differences in the variable of stoma complications (from 37.5% to 27.8%) or the peristoma skin complications (from 12.5% to 10.2%). A difference in the acquisition of abilities of the patient self-care was found (from 44.4% to 98%). Discussion. To make good practice recommendations improves the quality of the care and reduces complications. Conclusions. Implementing the guide has increased the nurses' adherence to the good practices based on the evidence and the acquisition of abilities in the patient's self-care, decreasing the complications (even though it didn't show significance). Keywords: Ostomy; Self Care; Practice Guideline; Evidence-Based Nursing; Outcome Assessment, Health Care

Introdução. A realização de uma ostomia digestiva tem um importante impacto físico e emocional nas pessoas. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a adesão das enfermeiras às boas práticas no manejo de ostomias, a redução de complicações e a aquisição de habilidades dos pacientes no seu próprio autocuidado após a implementação das diretrizes de boas práticas dos Associação de Enfermeiras de Ontário. Metodologia. Estudo prospectivo quase-experimental numa unidade de cirurgia digestiva de 2017 a 2022. A intervenção consistiu na implementação das recomendações de cuidados das Diretrizes de Boas Práticas, analisando variáveis de processo e resultados de saúde ao longo do processo. Resultados. Foram encontradas diferenças significativas (p<0.05) nas variáveis de adesão: educação em saúde préoperatória, marcação do estoma, avaliação pós-operatória abrangente e educação em saúde pós-operatória. Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas nas variáveis de complicações do estoma (de 37.5% para 27.8%), nem nas complicações da pele periestomal (de 12.5% para 10.2%). Foram encontradas diferenças na variável aquisição de habilidades de autocuidado pelo paciente (de 44.44% para 98%). Discussão. A implementação de recomendações de boas práticas melhora a qualidade dos cuidados e reduz complicações. Conclusões. A implementação das diretrizes aumentou a adesão das enfermeiras às boas práticas baseadas em evidências e melhorou a aquisição de habilidades de autocuidado pelos pacientes, diminuindo complicações (embora não significativamente). Palavras-chave: Estomia; Autocuidado; Guia de Prática Clínica; Enfermagem Baseada em Evidências; Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde

Quality assessment indictors and benchmarks for pancreatic surgery / 中华外科杂志

Pancreatic surgery is the most complex type of abdominal surgery,with high technical requirements and long learning curve,and the quality of surgery is directly related to the prognosis of the patients. In recent years,more and more indicators have been used to evaluate the quality of pancreatic surgery,such as operation time,intraoperative blood loss,morbidity,mortality, prognosis and so on,and different evaluation systems have been established,including benchmarking,auditing,outcome evaluation based on risk factor adjustment and textbook outcomes. Among them,the benchmark is the most widely used to evaluate surgical quality and is expected to become the standard for comparison among peers. This article reviews existing quality evaluation indicators and benchmarks for pancreatic surgery and anticipates its future application prospects.

Childhood seizures: assessment of the knowledge, attitude and home interventions among patients attending a paediatric outpatient clinic in Nigeria

Most seizures in children occur outside the hospital and effective first aid would protect individuals from harm. Study assessed the knowledge, attitude and home-based interventions for childhood seizures.Methodology: This was a descriptive cross-sectional survey conducted from 1stJune to 31stDecember, 2021 among caregivers of patients in a Paediatric outpatient clinic. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to assess knowledge, attitude, and home intervention of childhood seizures. Data were analyzed using SPSS 24 and results presented as frequency tables, percentages and charts. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.Results: Out of 218 respondents, the commonest source of information on childhood seizures was from friends and relatives 126(73.2%). Fever was the commonest known cause. Only 15(6.9%) recognized seizure as a neurological disorder. Jerking of the body and clenchingof the teeth were the commonest recognizable symptoms. The majority said seizures were contagious (176(80.7%) and children with seizures should not go to school 187(85.8%). The overall knowledge score was poor. Negative attitudes included avoidance 19(8.7%), isolation from playing with peers (15(6.9%) and from the public 17(7.8%). Common interventions during seizures were putting palm kernel oil in the mouth while only 25(29.4%) took the child to the hospital or laid him down away from harmful objects 25(29.4%). The practice of home intervention for seizures was good in only 11(5.0%) of respondents

Pattern and determinants of outcomes of neurological emergencies admitted into children emergency ward in a tertiary hospital in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Neurological emergencies are life-threatening central nervous system disorders, significantly contributing to childhood morbidity and mortality. The sequelae may be irreversible and may impact negatively on the quality of life of affected children and their families. This study identified the morbidity pattern and determinants of the outcomes of children with neurological emergencies in the Children Emergency Room (CHER) of the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH). Method: A 4-year retrospective study was carried out in the CHER. Data on demography, diagnosis and outcomes of children with neurological disorders were extracted from the records. Data analysed with SPSS 24 were expressed in percentages and frequency tables. Results: Of the 3040 children admitted in the CHER, 364(12%) aged 0-15 years had neurological emergencies, commoner among males (59.3%) and children aged less than five years (70.9%). Meningitis (40.2%) and febrile convulsion (28.2%) were the topmost diagnoses made. Raised intracranial pressure (17.4%) and head injuries (25.5%) were significantly more prevalent among children aged five years and above. The mortality rate was 61(16.8%) and more among adolescents (30.6%). All the mortalities took place within the first 48hours of admission especially among those with head injuries (46.5%) and perinatal asphyxia (95%), (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Meningitis and febrile convulsion were the commonest neurologic emergencies seen in this study. Mortality rate was high, especially in the first 48 hours of admission and mainly from perinatal asphyxia and head injuries. Education on the prevention and management of neurologic emergencies should be strengthened

Decision-to-delivery interval and obstetric outcomes of emergency caesarean sections in a Nigerian teaching hospital

Prolonged Decision-to-Delivery interval (DDI) is associated with adverse maternal-foetal outcomes following emergency Caesarean section (EmCS). Objectives: To determine the DDI, predictive factors, and the foeto-maternal outcomes of patients that had EmCS in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Methods: A descriptive study of all EmCS performed at the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex (OAUTHC), Ile-Ife, Nigeria, from 1st June 2020 to 31st May 2021, was conducted. Relevant data were extracted from the documentations of doctors, nurses and anaesthetists using a designed proforma. The data obtained were analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25. Results: The median (IQR) DDI was 297 (175-434) minutes. Only one patient was delivered within the recommended DDI of 30 minutes. The most common cause of prolonged DDI was delay in procuring materials for CS by patients' relatives(s)/caregiver(s) (264, 85.2%). Repeat CS (AOR = 4.923, 95% CI 1.09-22.36; p = 0.039), prolonged decision-to-operating room time (AOR = 8.22, 95% CI 1.87-8.66; p<0.001), and junior cadre of surgeon (AOR = 25.183, 95% CI 2.698-35.053; p = 0.005) were significant predictors of prolonged DDI. Prolonged DDI > 150 minutes was significantly associated with maternal morbidity (p = 0.001), stillbirth (p = 0.008) and early neonatal death (p = 0.049). Conclusion: The recommended DDI of 30 minutes for CS is challenging in the setting studied. To improve foetomaternal outcomes, efforts to reduce the DDI should be pursued vigorously, using the recommended 30 minutesas a benchmark.

Association between vaccination status and COVID-19-related health outcomes among community-dwelling COVID-19 patients in Nara, Japan

BACKGROUND@#Many previous studies have reported COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, but there are few studies in Japan. This community-based, retrospective observational study investigated the association between vaccination status and COVID-19-related health outcomes in COVID-19 patients by SARS-CoV-2 variant type.@*METHODS@#The study participants were 24,314 COVID-19 patients aged 12 or older whose diagnoses were reported to the Nara Prefecture Chuwa Public Health Center from April 2021 to March 2022, during periods when the alpha, delta, and omicron variants of COVID-19 were predominant. The outcome variables were severe health consequences (SHC) (i.e., ICU admission and COVID-19-related death), hospitalization, and extension of recovery period. The explanatory variable was vaccination status at least 14 days prior to infection. Covariates included gender, age, population size, the number of risk factors for aggravation, and the number of symptoms at diagnosis. The generalized estimating equations of the multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate the adjusted incidence proportion (AIP) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each health outcome. We performed stratified analyses by SARS-CoV-2 variant type, but the association between vaccination status and COVID-19-related health outcomes was stratified only for the delta and omicron variants due to the small number of vaccinated patients during the alpha variant.@*RESULTS@#Of the 24,314 participants, 255 (1.0%) had SHC; of the 24,059 participants without SHC, 2,102 (8.7%) were hospitalized; and of the 19,603 participants without SHC, hospitalization, and missing data on recovery period, 2,960 (15.1%) had extension of recovery period. Multivariable Poisson regression models showed that regardless of SARS-CoV-2 variant type or health outcome, those who received two or more vaccine doses had significantly lower risk of health outcomes than those who did not receive the vaccine, and there was a dose-response relationship in which the AIP for health outcomes decreased with an increased number of vaccinations.@*CONCLUSION@#A higher number of vaccinations were associated with lower risk of COVID-19-related health outcomes, not only in the delta variant but also in the omicron variant. Our findings suggest that increasing the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses can prevent severe disease and lead to early recovery of patients not requiring hospitalization.

Blinding assessment in clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine: Exploratory principles and protocol / 中西医结合学报

As one of the key components of clinical trials, blinding, if successfully implemented, can help to mitigate the risks of implementation bias and measurement bias, consequently improving the validity and reliability of the trial results. However, successful blinding in clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is hard to achieve, and the evaluation of blinding success through blinding assessment lacks established guidelines. Taking into account the challenges associated with blinding in the TCM field, here we present a framework for assessing blinding. Further, this study proposes a blinding assessment protocol for TCM clinical trials, building upon the framework and the existing methods. An assessment report checklist and an approach for evaluating the assessment results are presented based on the proposed protocol. It is anticipated that these improvements to blinding assessment will generate greater awareness among researchers, facilitate the standardization of blinding, and augment the blinding effectiveness. The use of this blinding assessment may further advance the quality and precision of TCM clinical trials and improve the accuracy of the trial results. The blinding assessment protocol will undergo continued optimization and refinement, drawing upon expert consensus and experience derived from clinical trials. Please cite this article as: Wang XC, Liu XY, Shi KL, Meng QG, Yu YF, Wang SY, Wang J, Qu C, Lei C, Yu XP. Blinding assessment in clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine: Exploratory principles and protocol. J Integr Med. 2023; 21(6): 528-536.

Exploration and consideration on establishing a core outcome set of Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical trials in distal radius fracture / 中国骨伤

There are inconsistencies in treatment outcomes, measurement instruments, and criteria for assessing clinical effectiveness in studies related to distal radius fractures (DRF), resulting in potential biases and failing to provide high-quality clinical evidence. To address these challenges, international researchers have reached a consensus on developing the core outcome indicator set for distal radius fractures(COS-DRF). However, it's important to note that the existing COS-DRF framework could not reflect the unique characteristics of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) treatment. Currently, there are no established standards for treatment outcomes and measurement instruments specific to TCM clinical research, nor has a COS-DRF been established for TCM clinical studies in China. In light of these gaps, our research team aims to construct a core set of treatment outcomes for TCM clinical research on distal radius fractures. This involves compiling a comprehensive list of treatment outcomes and measurement instruments, initially derived from a thorough literature review and expert consensus, which will then undergo further refinement and updates based on real-world clinical experiences, incorporating feedback from 2 to 3 rounds of expert consensus or Delphi questionnaire surveys. Our goal is to establish a COS-DRF or CMS-DRF that aligns with the principles and practices of TCM, and provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice.

Construction of a core outcome set in clinical research of acupuncture and moxibustion for treatment of adhesive capsulitis / 中国针灸

This study aims to construct the core outcome set for the clinical trials of adhesive capsulitis treated with acupuncture and moxibustion. Using systematic review, semi-structured interview, Delphi questionnaire survey, analytic hierarchy process and expert consensus meeting, the primary outcomes are obtained, i.e. local tenderness, pain degree during movement, range of motion, changes in range of motion, function score, and score of local symptoms of shoulder joint. The secondary outcomes are myofascial thickness, thickness of the inferior wall of the joint capsule, health status, activity of daily living, incidence of adverse events, laboratory indexes, vital signs, cost-effectiveness, total effective rate, and patient satisfaction. It is expected to provide a reference for the outcome selection in clinical trials and the generation of medical evidences in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis with acupuncture and moxibustion.