Effects of SuperPATH approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip replacement on inflammatory response, hip function, and quality of life in patients with hip diseases / 中国基层医药

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effects of SuperPATH approach versus conventional posterolateral approach in total hip replacement on inflammatory response, hip function, and quality of life in patients with hip diseases. Methods:The clinical data of 140 patients with hip diseases who underwent total hip replacement in Shanxian Central Hospital from March 2017 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into SuperPATH approach ( n = 70) and posterolateral approach ( n = 70) groups. Operation-related indexes, inflammatory response indexes, hip function, quality of life, and pain were compared between the two groups. Results:Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group [(105.40 ± 15.11) mL vs. (196.89 ± 24.26) mL, t = 26.74, P < 0.001]. Incision length, postoperative time to getting out of bed, length of hospital stay in the SuperPATH approach group were (6.85 ± 1.42) cm, (2.92 ± 0.28) days, and (6.67 ± 1.36) days, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the posterolateral approach group [(13.07 ± 1.89) cm, (8.36 ± 1.45) days, (10.91 ± 1.34) days, t = 19.36, 30.82, 18.58, P < 0.001]. Operative time was significantly longer in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group [(69.38 ± 8.62) minutes vs. (60.45 ± 7.79) minutes, t = 6.43, P < 0.001). The scores of social role functioning, general health perceptions, vitality, mental health, bodily pain, emotional role functioning, physical functioning, and physical functioning measured 6 months after surgery were significantly higher in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group ( t = 9.12, 11.80, 11.64, 11.69, 6.45, 11.79, 6.04, 10.74, all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate measured 3 and 14 days after surgery between the two groups (both P > 0.05). Harris score used for evaluation of hip function 1 month after surgery was significantly higher in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group [(76.42 ± 4.17) points vs. (69.37 ± 5.11) points, t = 8.94, P < 0.001]. The Visual Analog Scale score 3 days after surgery was significantly lower in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group [(3.18 ± 0.21) points vs. (4.26 ± 0.29) points, t = 25.23, P < 0.001]. Conclusion:Compared with the conventional posterolateral approach, the SuperPATH approach for total hip arthroplasty takes longer operative time, but it can better reduce early postoperative pain, promote hip function recovery, and improve quality of life.