Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of magnification on root coverage surgery: a systematic review
Moro, Marcella Goetz; Souto, Maria Luisa Silveira; Rovai, Emanuel Silva; Cesar Neto, João Batista; Holzhausen, Marinella; Pannuti, Claudio Mendes.
  • Moro, Marcella Goetz; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Souto, Maria Luisa Silveira; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Rovai, Emanuel Silva; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Cesar Neto, João Batista; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Holzhausen, Marinella; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Pannuti, Claudio Mendes; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry. Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontics. São Paulo. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 19: e201669, jan.-dez. 2020. ilus
Article in English | BBO, LILACS | ID: biblio-1116314
ABSTRACT
Root coverage surgery can be performed in patients with gingival recession to cover the exposed root aiming to control hypersensitivity and promotes better aesthetic. Optical magnification has been proposed as a refinement in this surgical technique to increase root coverage. This approach may lead to enhanced soft tissue stability, less post-operative discomfort, better predictability and esthetic appearance.

Aim:

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of magnification on root coverage surgery when compared to procedures performed without magnification.

Methods:

Randomized controlled trials with a follow-up of at least 6 months that compared surgeries for root coverage performed under optic magnification versus conventional (macro) root coverage surgery were screened. The primary outcome was mean root coverage (mm) (MRC) and secondary outcomes were percentage of root coverage (PRC) and complete root coverage (CRC).

Results:

Of 569 papers relevant to this review, seven were included. Meta-analysis showed that the use of magnification may favor greater PRC (7.38%, 95% CI 3.66-11.09).

Conclusion:

Magnification can increase PRC in root coverage surgeries. More randomized trials with the use of magnification may be necessary to verify if this benefit is clinically relevant, in order to justify the use of this device
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Periodontitis / Gingival Recession / Microsurgery Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of São Paulo/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Periodontitis / Gingival Recession / Microsurgery Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Language: English Journal: Braz. j. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: University of São Paulo/BR