Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of pathological factors on survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Sharma, Gopal; Yadav, Anuj Kumar; Pareek, Tarun; Kaundal, Pawan; Tyagi, Shantanu; Devana, Sudheer Kumar; Singh, Shrawan Kumar.
  • Sharma, Gopal; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. Department of Urology. Chandigarh. IN
  • Yadav, Anuj Kumar; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. Department of Urology. Chandigarh. IN
  • Pareek, Tarun; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. Department of Urology. Chandigarh. IN
  • Kaundal, Pawan; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. Department of Urology. Chandigarh. IN
  • Tyagi, Shantanu; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. Department of Urology. Chandigarh. IN
  • Devana, Sudheer Kumar; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. Department of Urology. Chandigarh. IN
  • Singh, Shrawan Kumar; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. Department of Urology. Chandigarh. IN
Int. braz. j. urol ; 48(3): 406-455, May-June 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1385126
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

There is an ongoing need to identify various pathological factors that can predict various survival parameters in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). With this review, we aim to scrutinize the impact of several pathological factors on recurrence free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with UTUC. Materials and

Methods:

Systematic electronic literature search of various databases was conducted for this review. Studies providing multivariate hazard ratios (HR) for various pathological factors such as tumor margin, necrosis, stage, grade, location, architecture, lymph node status, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), carcinoma in situ (CIS), multifocality and variant histology as predictor of survival parameters were included and pooled analysis of HR was performed.

Results:

In this review, 63 studies with 35.714 patients were included. For RFS, all except tumor location (HR 0.94, p=0.60) and necrosis (HR 1.00, p=0.98) were associated with worst survival. All the pathological variables except tumor location (HR 0.95, p=0.66) were associated with worst CSS. For OS, only presence of CIS (HR 1.03, p=0.73) and tumor location (HR 1.05, p=0.74) were not predictor of survival.

Conclusions:

We noted tumor grade, stage, presence of LVI, lymph node metastasis, hydronephrosis, variant histology, sessile architecture, margin positivity and multifocality were associated with poor RFS, CSS and OS. Presence of CIS was associated with poor RFS and CSS but not OS. Tumor necrosis was associated with worst CSS and OS but not RFS. Tumor location was not a predictor of any of the survival parameters.


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: India Institution/Affiliation country: Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research/IN

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Type of study: Prognostic study / Systematic reviews Language: English Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: Urology Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: India Institution/Affiliation country: Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research/IN