Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Atualidades e perspectivas futuras da comissão consultiva em avaliação psicológica / Current affairs and future perspectives of the consultative commission on psychological assessment (CCAP) / Actualidades y perspectivas de futuro de la comisión consultiva en evaluación psicológica
Campos, Carolina Rosa; Alves, Rauni Jandé Roama; Bueno, José Maurício Haas; Andrade, Josemberg Moura de; Peixoto, Evandro Morais.
Affiliation
  • Campos, Carolina Rosa; Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Uberaba. BR
  • Alves, Rauni Jandé Roama; Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso. Cuiabá. BR
  • Bueno, José Maurício Haas; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Pernambuco. BR
  • Andrade, Josemberg Moura de; Universidade de Brasília. Brasília. BR
  • Peixoto, Evandro Morais; Universidade São Francisco. Campinas. BR
Psicol. ciênc. prof ; 43: e278674, 2023.
Article in Pt | LILACS, INDEXPSI | ID: biblio-1529223
Responsible library: BR1552.1
Localization: BR1.1
RESUMO
A Comissão Consultiva em Avaliação Psicológica (CCAP), atrelada ao Sistema de Avaliação de Testes Psicológicos (SATEPSI) do Conselho Federal de Psicologia (CFP), tem como objetivos emitir pareceres acerca de solicitações advindas da avaliação psicológica(AP), elaborar e propor atualizações de documentos técnicos e normativos do CFP relativos à AP, elaborar e propor diretrizes para o ensino e formação continuada em AP, conduzir o processo de avaliação dos instrumentos submetidos ao SATEPSI e discutir temas e propor ações no âmbito da AP. Nos últimos 20 anos, a CCAP vem buscando atender a esses objetivos, indicando novos caminhos para a área. Nesse sentido, este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar as principais atualidades e movimentos da CCAP, indicando caminhos possíveis e perspectivas futuras para a área de AP. São discutidas as ações atuais que vêm sendo desenvolvidas pela CCAP, bem como as ações futuras delineadas que buscam promover uma AP cada vez mais democrática. Concluímos que a AP é uma prática do(a) psicólogo(a) que deve ser operacionalizada com compromisso ético, atrelada aos direitos humanos e à justiça, com embasamento científico e alinhada às mudanças sociais.(AU)
ABSTRACT
The Consultative Commission on Psychological Assessment (CCAP), affiliated with the Psychological Test Evaluation System under the Federal Council of Psychology (CFP), has the following

objectives:

to provide expert opinions on requests stemming from psychological assessments (PA), to draft and propose updates to the CFP technical and normative documents pertaining to PA, to formulate and recommend guidelines for education and ongoing professional development in PA, to oversee the evaluation process of instruments submitted to SATEPSI, and to engage in discussions and propose initiatives within the PA. Over the past two decades, CCAP has diligently worked to achieve these goals, charting new avenues in the field. In this context, this study aims to describe the most current developments and initiatives of CCAP and outline prospective directions and future outlooks for the PA. This study delves into the current initiatives undertaken by CCAP and the prospective actions delineated to foster a progressively more inclusive PA. Thus, we claim that PA is a practice inherent to psychologists that demands ethical commitment, alignment with human rights and justice, a solid scientific foundation, and adaptation to evolving social dynamics.(AU)
RESUMEN
La Comisión Consultiva en Evaluación Psicológica (CCAP), vinculada al Sistema de Evaluación de Pruebas Psicológicas (SATEPSI) del Consejo Federal de Psicología (CFP), tiene como objetivo emitir opinión técnica sobre solicitudes derivadas de la evaluación psicológica (EP), elaborar y proponer actualizaciones de documentos técnicos y normativos del CFP relacionados con EP, desarrollar y proponer lineamientos para la enseñanza y la formación continua en EP, conducir el proceso de evaluación de los instrumentos presentados al SATEPSI y discutir temas y proponer acciones en el ámbito de EP. Durante los últimos veinte años, la CCAP ha buscado alcanzar estos objetivos indicando nuevos caminos para el área. En este sentido, este artículo tiene como objetivo presentar las principales actualidades y movimientos de la CCAP indicando posibles caminos y perspectivas de futuro para el área de EP. Se discuten las acciones actuales que ha desarrollado la CCAP, así como las acciones futuras perfiladas que buscan promover una EP cada vez más democrática. Se concluye que la EP es una práctica del psicólogo que debe ponerse en práctica con compromiso ético, vinculada a los derechos humanos y la justicia, con base científica y alineada con los cambios sociales.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans; Male; Female; Psychological Tests; Psychometrics; Social Justice; Psychological Techniques; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Human Rights; Personality Assessment; Personality Tests; Personnel Selection; Policy Making; Professional Staff Committees; Psychological Phenomena; Psychology; Public Policy; Research; Science; Social Behavior; Social Change; Social Class; Social Control, Formal; Social Identification; Social Isolation; Social Planning; Social Sciences; Social Work; Socioeconomic Factors; Therapeutics; Behavioral Sciences; Professional Review Organizations; Electronic Data Processing; Online Systems; Adaptation, Psychological; Career Choice; Surveys and Questionnaires; Sociometric Techniques; Health Strategies; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Disabled Persons; Total Quality Management; Cognition; Commerce; Technology Transfer; Concept Formation; Cultural Diversity; Behavioral Disciplines and Activities; Form; Resolutions; Advisory Committees; Decision Making; Behavior Control; Codes of Ethics; Diagnosis; Educational Status; Research and Development Projects; Population Studies in Public Health; Equity; Information Technology; Expert Testimony; Cultural Competency; Evidence-Based Practice; Executive Function; Social Norms; Data Accuracy; Problem Behavior; Behavior Rating Scale; Freedom; Sociocultural Territory; Civil Society; Psychological Distress; Gender Identity; Social Network Analysis; Document Analysis; Diversity, Equity, Inclusion; Information Sources; Institutional Analysis; Human Development; Judgment; Learning; Memory; Mental Health Services; Mental Processes; Morale; Neuropsychological Tests; Neuropsychology
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Psychological Tests / Psychometrics / Social Justice / Psychological Techniques / Evaluation Studies as Topic / Human Rights Type of study: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: Pt Journal: Psicol. ciênc. prof Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Psychological Tests / Psychometrics / Social Justice / Psychological Techniques / Evaluation Studies as Topic / Human Rights Type of study: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: Pt Journal: Psicol. ciênc. prof Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article