Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals
Plotino, Gianluca; Grande, Nicola M; Mercade, Montse; Cortese, Teresa; Staffoli, Simone; Gambarini, Gianluca; Testarelli, Luca.
  • Plotino, Gianluca; Sapienza Università di Roma. Department of Endodontics. Rome. IT
  • Grande, Nicola M; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. Rome. IT
  • Mercade, Montse; Universitat de Barcelona. Facultad de Odontología. Barcelona. ES
  • Cortese, Teresa; Sapienza Università di Roma. Department of Endodontics. Rome. IT
  • Staffoli, Simone; Sapienza Università di Roma. Department of Endodontics. Rome. IT
  • Gambarini, Gianluca; Sapienza Università di Roma. Department of Endodontics. Rome. IT
  • Testarelli, Luca; Sapienza Università di Roma. Department of Endodontics. Rome. IT
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180045, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-975882
ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of different sonic and ultrasonic devices in the elimination of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. Materials and Methods A resin model of a transparent radicular canal filled with dentin debris was used. Five groups were tested, namely Group 1 - ultrasonic insert 15.02; Group 2 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI K; Group 3 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI S; Group 4 - sonic insert 20/28 Eddy on a vibrating sonic air-scaler handpiece; Group 5 - 20.02 K-file inserted on a Safety M4 handpiece. Two different irrigants (5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA) and 3 different times of activation (20, 40, and 60 seconds) were tested. Means and standard deviations were calculated and statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05). Results No statistically significant differences were found between the two irrigants used. Group 4 removed more debris than the other groups (p<0.05). Groups 1, 2, and 3 removed more debris than group 5 (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found for the time of activation in all groups and at all canal levels, except between 40 and 60 seconds in group 4 at coronal and middle third level (p>0.05). Conclusions No significant differences were found between 5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. When the time of activation rises, the dentin debris removal increases in all groups. Both sonic and ultrasonic activation demonstrate high capacity for dentin debris removal.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ultrasonic Therapy / Root Canal Preparation / Dental Instruments / Therapeutic Irrigation Type of study: Evaluation studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Italy / Spain Institution/Affiliation country: Sapienza Università di Roma/IT / Universitat de Barcelona/ES / Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore/IT

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Ultrasonic Therapy / Root Canal Preparation / Dental Instruments / Therapeutic Irrigation Type of study: Evaluation studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J. appl. oral sci Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2019 Type: Article Affiliation country: Italy / Spain Institution/Affiliation country: Sapienza Università di Roma/IT / Universitat de Barcelona/ES / Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore/IT