An investigation on the misdiagnosis of acute pancreatitis in China / 国际外科学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To study the present situation of misdiagnosed acute pancreatitis(AP)in China and to im prove the identification of AP.Methods One hundred and forty.four documents of Chinese-language cases studies involving the misdiagnosis of AP published from 1988 to 2007 were identified by searching in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI).Retrospective study of misdiagnosed diseases,clinical manifestations,risk fac tors and accessory examinations etc,Was made in 1098 patients with AP.Results(1)The patients related to the departments of internal medicine,surgery,obstetrics and gynecology,and pediatrics and so on.The misdiagnosed diseases were over 63 kinds.The first five places successively werecholelithiasis combined with biliary infection (182 times),acute gastroenteritis(158 times),coronary heart disease(108 times),acute appendicitis(102 times),and intestinal obstruction(90 times).(2)Abdominal pain(878 cases)is the main manifestation in AP, and the first five regions of abdominal pain successively wereupper-middle abdomen(434 cases),whole abdomen (220 cases),right lower quadrant(79 cases),right upper quadrant(74 cases),left upper quadrant(71 cases). (3)Cholecystolithiasis(145 cases)was the first risk factor,and followed the order of fat meal(106 cases)＞chronic cholecystitis(72 eases)＞alcohol(67 times).(4)The number of cases diagnosed by operation was the most,up to 378;others successively were serum and urine amylase examinations(35 1 CtLSe8)and abdominal CT scan(135 cases),and abdominal ultrasound imaging(59 cases).Conclusions(1)The main causes of misdiag nasis were superficial understanding of predisposing condition,lack of correct analysis on clinical manifestations, and mistakes in the analysis Oil the accessory examinations.(2)Although amylase in serum or urine has limitation in diagnosis,it still Was the main method of diagnosis;and it Was necessary to be examined by abdominal CT or sur gical exploration for patients who were highly suspected as having AP but could not be diagnosed.