Efficacy of rapamycin and paclitaxel eluting stent implantation in treatment of coronary artery disease / 中国组织工程研究

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical effect of drug-eluting stent implantation in treatment of coronary artery disease is good, but there may be some differences in the therapeutic effect between different stents. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical effect of different stent implantation in treatment of coronary artery disease. METHODS:A total of 278 patients with coronary artery disease were enroled and al underwent coronary artery stent implantation treatment, of which 91 patients underwent implanted rapamycin eluting stent, 92 patients underwent implanted paclitaxel eluting stent, and 95 patients underwent implanted bare metal stents. Al the patients were folowed up for 12 months after stents implantation. The occurrence of adverse cardiac events such as death, myocardial infarction, and the occurrence of coronary restenosis and host reaction were recorded. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The rates of coronary artery stenosis, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting or second-time percutaneous coronary interventional therapy in the paclitaxel eluting stent and rapamycin eluting stent groups were al lower than those in the bare metal stent group (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mortality between these three groups (P> 0.05). There was no stent shift, shedding, breakage, bad implantation position, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia and hemolysis in these three groups. These results demonstrate that the therapeutic effects of these two kinds of drug-eluting stents are al good enough, and better than those of bare metal stents.