Evaluation of the clinical application efficacy of cryopreserved apheresis platelets and fresh apheresis platelets / 中国输血杂志
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
; (12): 730-733, 2017.
Article
in Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-607372
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of apheresis platelets throught heanalysisof case control on the clinical efficacy and safety of cryopreserved apheresis platelets and fresh apheresis platelets.Methods 2 035 clinical cases of platelet transfusion in August 2014 to December 2016 by Using the closed loop intelligent path management and evaluation information system,456 cases were selected as control cases.Platelets were divided into the cryopreserved apheresis platelets group (group A,n=199) and fresh apheresis platelets group (group B,n=257) according to the transfused platelet type.The clinical application value of cryopreserved single platelets was evaluated by comparing the basic data,the effective indexes and safety indexes of the two groups.Results 1) The cases were 43.6% (199/456) in A groups,and 56.4% (257/456) in B groups,there were no significant difference in gender,age and medical and surgical cases between A and B group (P>0.05);2) 199 cases in group A were cryopreserved platelets of 2 275 U,including 121 medicine cases,the total amount of transfusion was about 60.9% (1 385/2 275),78 surgical cases accounted for 39.1% (890/2 275);In the distribution of diseases,the blood system diseases accounted for 49.2% (1 120/2 275),the total amount of obstetrics and gynecology disease infusion accounted for 10.6% (240/2 275),and the amount of tumor radiotherapy and chemotherapy accounted for 6.2% (140/2 275);The proportion of ABO blood type distribution was O type 25.9%,A type 22.9%,Btype 20.7%,ABtype 30.5%,respectively;3) The Plt counts of group A and B were significantly different before and after transfusion (P <0.05).But there was no significant difference between the two groups of cases before transfusion and 24h Plt count after transfusion,the Plt counts difference,and 24 h CCI (P>0.05);4) The effective rates of platelet transfusion in group A and B were 76.9% and 76.7%,respectively.Which has no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05)).There was no significant difference between the two groups in medical and surgical cases (P>0.05),but the effective rate of surgical cases in group A (84.6%) was higher than that in B group (75.3%).The difference effect of medicine and surgery cases in B group were not statistically significant (P>0.05),but the difference effect of medicine and surgery cases in A group was statistically significant (P<0.05),platelet transfusion inefficient in surgical cases (15.4%) was significantly lower than that of cases (28.1%);5) The incidence of adverse reactions of blood transfusion was 3.5%,4.7% in group A and B,and the blood transfusion mortality rate was zero,the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05).Conclusion The clinical effectiveness and safety of cryopreserved apheresis platelets are similar to those of fresh apheresis platelets,and the former can be widely Used in clinic,in particular,it has certain advantages in the surgical hemostatic effect.but for repeated infusion cases or platelet transfusion ineffective cases should be given priority to fresh apheresis platelets.
Full text:
1
Index:
WPRIM
Language:
Zh
Journal:
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
Year:
2017
Type:
Article