Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reporting criteria for clinical experts consensus of Chinese medicine / 中国中药杂志
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica ; (24): 4796-4800, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-771569
ABSTRACT
Due to its own characteristics and research status, traditional Chinese medicine research often faces the reality of "insufficient evidence" or "very low quality" when making clinical practice guidelines. Therefore, in many cases, clinical decision-making of traditional Chinese medicine should rely mainly on expert consensus to achieve. A clear and detailed list of expert consensus report specifications will provide a good reporting tool for Chinese clinical expert consensus makers, which is very important for promoting the quality of consensus production and the promotion and application of consensus results. The author consulted the internationally published authoritative expert consensus, summarized the main points of the reports, combined with the formulation process of the clinical experts consensus of Chinese medicine, and the demonstration of clinical experts and methodologists, and then formulated the list of items for clinical expert consensus reports adapt to the field of Chinese medicine. This article introduces the entire list of items and elaborates on the key parts. It is expected to provide reference for the standardization of future clinical expert consensus reports.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Consensus / Medicine, Chinese Traditional Type of study: Diagnostic study / Practice guideline / Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica Year: 2018 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Consensus / Medicine, Chinese Traditional Type of study: Diagnostic study / Practice guideline / Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica Year: 2018 Type: Article