Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of the shared care-based diabetes management among patients with type 2 diabetes / 中国实用护理杂志
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 2006-2011, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-803439
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the effect of shared care model on diabetes management among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), therefore, to establish a more efficient education and management model for patients with T2DM.@*Methods@#Through convenient sampling, a total of 210 patients with T2DM were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the endocrinology center at Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, from August to October, 2017. Patients were equally divided into two groups (n=105/group) intervention group and control group.The intervention group completed 103 cases and the control group 100 cases.The intervention group adopted the shared care education model, while the control group followed the conventional education management model. The follow up time of the intervention group was 12 months. The levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), Body Mass Index (BMI) and diabetes self-management behaviors were collected at baseline and at 12-months and compared between two groups. Measurement data were examined by t-test and rank-sum test; Count data were examined by chi square test, P<0.05 was thought to be statistically significant.@*Results@#At 12-month following the implementation of the management models, the HbAlc and BMI of the intervention group were (6.47 ± 0.66)%, (22.28 ± 2.41) kg/m2, and those of the control group were (6.90 ± 0.61)%, (23.49 ± 1.59) kg/m2, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (t=-4.63, 0.00, P< 0.01). The intervention group had healthy diet, exercise, self-blood sugar monitoring, blood sugar monitoring in compliance with doctor's advice, self-foot examination and medication scores of (6.08 ± 1.34), (6.06 ± 1.59), (5.18 ± 2.00), (5.28 ± 1.99), (4.64 ± 2.54), (6.80 ± 0.55) respectively, while the control group had (5.43 ± 1.71), (5.46 ± 1.89), (4.27 ± 1.64), (4.23 ± 1.64), (3.57 ± 2.74), (5.30 ± 2.68) respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (t=-4.03--2.73, P<0.05).@*Conclusion@#Compared with the traditional education and management model, the shared care model with a multi-disciplinary approach is more patient-centered, and could provide systematic, standardized and personalized management for patients with T2DM and showed greater improvement in diabetes management.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing Year: 2019 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing Year: 2019 Type: Article