Construction and verification of interdisciplinary paper evaluation system:a case study on clinical medicine / 中华医学科研管理杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective This paper focuses on the field of clinical medicine,with the aim of verifying the feasibility of interdisciplinary literature evaluation model based on feature matching method,to provide support for further interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation.Methods Feature matching method,Delphi expert enquiry,and normalization method were adopted to establish an evaluation system in clinical medicine,which was further verified by case studies.Results The normalization coefficient reflects the difficulty of publishing articles with high impact factors.Through the process of feature matching and normalization,it was found that compared with the fields of Neurology,Psychiatry and Surgery,researchers in the fields of Oncology and Internal Medicine were more likely to publish articles with high impact factors.Conclusions Through case analysis,this study verifies the feasibility of interdisciplinary scientific paper evaluation system.The interdisciplinary paper evaluation system based on feature matching method and normalized evaluation method comprehensively considers the characteristics of various disciplines of clinical medicine and provides a new idea for the evaluation of clinical scientific research talents.