Comparison of clinical effects of different anterior surgical methods for the treatment of single segment cervical disc herniation / 中国骨伤
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
;
(12): 354-359, 2021.
Article
in Chinese
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-879443
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To compare the clinical effects of different anterior surgical methods in treating single segment cervical disc herniation.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 46 patients with single-segment cervical disc herniation underwent surgical treatment from September 2013 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to different surgical methods. Among them, 23 patients in the anterior percutanousendomic cervical dissection (APECD) group, there were 8 males and 15 females, aged (47±3) years old, prominent segments were C@*RESULTS@#All 46 patients were followed up for 12 to 24 (17.57±3.15)months. The follow-up time of APECD, CDR, ACDF groups were (17.30±3.25), (17.80±3.16), (17.85±2.88) months, and operation time were (95.48 ±13.85), (58.50±7.09), (76.00±15.72) min, respectively, there were no significant differences in follow-up time and operation time between two groups(@*CONCLUSION@#The three anterior surgical approaches can achieve satisfactory clinical results for the treatment of single-segment cervical disc herniation. However, the improvement rate of the CDR group and the activity of the retained responsibility segment are better than those of the other two groups. APECD surgery may have recurrence.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Spinal Fusion
/
Cervical Vertebrae
/
Retrospective Studies
/
Follow-Up Studies
/
Treatment Outcome
/
Diskectomy
/
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
/
Total Disc Replacement
Type of study:
Observational study
/
Prognostic study
Limits:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Language:
Chinese
Journal:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Year:
2021
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS