Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of post-warming culture duration on clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles / 대한생식의학회지
Article in En | WPRIM | ID: wpr-897610
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective@#The objective of the study was to compare the effects of long-term and short-term embryo culture to assess whether there is a correlation between culture duration and clinical outcomes. @*Methods@#Embryos were divided into two study groups depending on whether their post-warming culture period was long-term (20–24 hours) or short-term (2–4 hours). Embryo morphology was analyzed with a time-lapse monitoring device to estimate the appropriate timing and parameters for evaluating embryos with high implantation potency in both groups. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the confounding factors across groups. The grades of embryos and blastoceles, morphokinetic parameters, implantation rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate were compared. @*Results@#No significant differences were observed in the implantation rate or ongoing pregnancy rate between the two groups (56.3% vs. 67.9%, p=0.182; 47.3% vs. 53.6%, p=0.513). After warming, there were more expanded and hatching/hatched blastocysts in the long-term culture group than in the short-term culture group, but there was no significant between-group difference in embryo grade. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, the completion of re-expansion was faster in women who became pregnant than in those who did not for both culture durations (long-term: 2.19±0.63 vs. 4.11±0.81 hours, p=0.003; short-term: 1.17±0.29 vs. 1.94±0.76 hours, p=0.018, respectively). @*Conclusion@#The outcomes of short-term culture and long-term culture were not significantly different in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Regardless of the post-warming culture time, the degree of blastocyst re-expansion 3–4 hours after warming is an important marker for embryo selection.
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Language: En Journal: Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine Year: 2020 Type: Article
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Language: En Journal: Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine Year: 2020 Type: Article