Effects of supplemental parenteral nutrition on the postoperative nutritional status, immune function, and inflammatory response in patients with esophageal cancer after operation / 中国综合临床

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effects of supplemental parenteral nutrition on postoperative nutritional status, immune function and inflammatory response in patients with esophageal cancer after operation.Methods:A prospective study was performed on 72 patients with esophageal cancer who visited the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University from June 2018 to June 2020. According to the random table of new drug data statistics and processing software, they were randomly divided into experimental group (supplementary parenteral nutrition group) and the control group (complete enteral nutrition group), with 36 cases in each group. The experimental group was given enteral nutrition (EN) from the first day after operation, and EN and parenteral nutrition (PN) was given on the 4th to 8th day after operation. In the control group, EN was started on the first day after operation. The changes of nutritional status, immune function and inflammatory indexes in the perioperative period were compared between the two groups. Mann-Whitney U test was used for measurement data that did not meet the normality standard, and t test was used to compare measurement data that met the normality standard between groups. Nutrition indicators, inflammatory indicators and immune indicators used repeated measures analysis of variance. For enumeration data, Mann-Whitney U test was used for hierarchical classification data, and χ 2 test was used for unordered multi-classification data. Results:On the 1st day after operation, the prealbumin concentration ((95.34±37.93) mg/L and (81.60±37.68) mg/L) in the experimental group and the control group was significantly higher than that before the operation ((144.86±46.79) mg/L and (130.39±50.91) mg/L), and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (all P>0.05). Immunoglobulin (Ig) A ((0.48±0.39) g/L and (0.41±0.30) g/L), IgG ((4.21±3.44) g/L and (4.08±2.98) g/L), IgM( (0.32±0.26) g/L and (0.30±0.27) g/L) in the experimental group and the control group were compared with preoperative ((0.55±0.45) g/L and (0.47±0.39) g/L, (5.16±3.36) g/L and (5.48±3.30) g/L, (0.38±0.32) g/L and (0.35±0.30) g/L), and the difference was not statistically significant (all P>0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (all P>0.05). In the experimental group and the control group, CD3 ((31.75±11.81) % and (28.03±9.30)%) were lower than those before operation ((40.86±12.50)% and (42.31±8.09)%), CD4 ((14.19±5.39)% and (16.06±9.08)%) were lower than those before operation ((21.69±8.54)% and (24.11±12.09)%), CD4/CD8 ((0.24±0.09) and (0.29±0.18)) were lower than those before operation ((0.42±0.16) and (0.50±0.28)), and CD8 ((59.03±8.14)% and (56.39±7.42)%) were lower than those before operation ((51.25±6.64)% and (49.14±6.53)%), the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in C3, C4 and C reactive protein (CRP) compared with preoperatively (all P>0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (all P>0.05). On the 7th day after operation, the prealbumin concentration ((186.70±40.88) mg/L) in the experimental group was higher than that before operation and on the 1st day after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05), which was higher than that in the control group ((131.62±53.37) mg/L), the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05); the prealbumin concentration in the control group ((131.62±53.37) mg/L) was higher than that on the 1st day after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). IgA ((0.88±0.42) g/L), IgG ((10.70±4.39) g/L) in the experimental group was higher than that before operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05), and it was higher than that on the 1st day after operation, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05), lower than those in the control group ((0.59±0.44) g/L and (4.08±2.98) g/L), the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). In the test group, CD3 ((45.92±14.31)%), CD4 ((27.06±10.53)%), CD4/CD8 (0.66±0.33) increased and and CD8 (43.64±11.34%) decreased compared with the first day after operation, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The elevated levels of CD4 and CD4/CD8 were statistically significant compared with the control group (all P<0.05). The CRP ((8.90±7.56) mg/L) in the experimental group on the 7th postoperative day was lower than that before operation and on the 1st postoperative day, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05), which was lower than the control group ((16.24±13.53) mg/L), the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection (22.22% (8/36)), the incidence of anastomotic leakage (5.56% (2/36)), and the postoperative hospital stay ((14.17±4.79) d) in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (44.44% (16/36), 25.00% (9/36), (18.47±6.34) d), the total hospitalization expenses in the experimental group ((71 261.94±11 503.50) yuan) were higher than those in the control group ((65 226.81±10 106.43) yuan), the difference was statistically significant (the statistical values were χ 2=4.00, χ 2=5.26, t=3.74, t=2.37; P values were 0.046, 0.022, <0.001 and 0.021, respectively). Conclusion:Supplemental parenteral nutrition for perioperative esophageal cancer patients can effectively maintain nutritional status, improve immune function, and reduce the inflammatory stress response.