Comparison of Secondary Prevention Status between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Patients / Comparação de Prevenção Secundária em Intervenção Coronária Percutânea e Cirurgia de Revascularização Miocárdica

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background: Data are scarce regarding disparities in cardiovascular risk factor management between patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Objective: Whether the goal achievement rates of cardiovascular risk factors were different between PCI and CABG patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data retrieved from a clinical record database of patients admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, who underwent PCI or CABG. Results: Compared with the CABG group, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 1.8 mmol/L (28.6% vs. 24.7%; p < 0.01), LDL-C < 2.07 mmol/L (43.5% vs. 39.4%; p < 0.01) and blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg (85.6% vs. 77.7%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates were significantly higher in the PCI group. Compared with patients ≥ 60 years old patients < 60 years old had better BP < 140/90 mm Hg goal achievement rates (87.7% vs. 84.4%; p < 0.01) in the PCI group, and better fasting blood-glucose (FBG) < 7 mmol/L (79.4% vs.72.0%; p < 0.01) and HbA1c < 7% (79.4% vs. 70.1%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates in the CABG group. Compared with females males had better LDL-C < 2.07 mmol/L (24.7% vs. 28.5%; p < 0.01), FBG < 7 mmol/L (71.8% vs.75.2%; p < 0.01) and HbA1c < 7% (70.4% vs. 74.1%; p < 0.01) goal achievement rates in the PCI group. Conclusion: Patients in the PCI group were generally more likely than those in the CABG group to achieve LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L and BP goals. The control of cardiovascular risk factors differed between patients ≥ 60 years old and < 60 years old. Female patients were less likely to achieve LDL-C, FBG and HbA1c goals.

RESUMO

Resumo Fundamento Há poucos dados referentes às disparidades no manejo de fatores de risco cardiovascular entre pacientes tratados com intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) e aqueles tratados com cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica (CRM). Objetivo: Avaliar se as taxas de cumprimento de metas de fatores de risco cardiovascular diferiram entre pacientes submetidos a ICP ou a CRM. Métodos: Revisão retrospectiva de banco de dados de prontuários médicos de pacientes admitidos no Hospital Beijing Anzhen entre 1 de janeiro de 2014 e 31 de dezembro de 2014, submetidos a ICP ou a CRM. Resultados: Comparado ao grupo CRM, o grupo ICP apresentou taxas significativamente maiores de cumprimento de meta de colesterol da lipoproteína de baixa densidade (LDL-C) < 1,8 mmol/L (28,6% vs. 24,7%; p < 0,01), LDL-C < 2,07 mmol/L (43,5% vs. 39,4%; p < 0,01) e pressão arterial (PA) <140/90 mmHg (85,6% vs. 77,7%; p < 0,01). Comparados aos pacientes ≥ 60 anos de idade, aqueles < 60 anos de idade apresentaram melhor taxa de cumprimento de meta de PA < 140/90 mmHg (87,7% vs. 84,4%; p < 0,01) no grupo ICP, e melhores taxas de cumprimento de meta de glicemia de jejum (GJ) < 7 mmol/L (79.4% vs.72.0%; p < 0.01) e HbA1c < 7% (79.4% vs. 70.1%; p < 0.01) no grupo CRM. Comparados às mulheres, os homens apresentaram melhores taxas de cumprimento de meta de LDL-C < 2,07 mmol/L (24,7% vs. 28,5%; p < 0,01), GJ < 7 mmol/L (71,8% vs. 75,2%; p < 0,01) e HbA1c < 7% (70,4% vs. 74,1%; p < 0,01) no grupo ICP. Conclusão: Em geral, o grupo ICP apresentou maior probabilidade do que o grupo CRM de cumprir as metas de LDL-C < 1,8 mmol/L e PA. O controle dos fatores de risco cardiovascular diferiu entre pacientes ≥ 60 e < 60 anos de idade. As mulheres apresentaram menor probabilidade de cumprir as metas de LDL-C, GJ e HbA1c.