Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Plus Laxative Is a Good Alternative to Conventional Large Volume Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Single-Blinded Trial
Gut and Liver
; : 494-501, 2015.
Article
de En
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-149100
Bibliothèque responsable:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We investigated whether sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus bisacodyl compares favorably with conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) with respect to bowel cleansing adequacy, compliance, and safety. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, single-blinded study in outpatients undergoing daytime colonoscopies. Patients were randomized into a split preparation SPMC/bisacodyl group and a conventional split PEG group. We compared preparation adequacy using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), ease of use using a modified Likert scale (LS), compliance/satisfaction level using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and safety by monitoring adverse events during the colonoscopy between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were evaluated by intention to treat (ITT) analysis, and 319 were evaluated by per protocol (PP) population analysis (153 for SPMC/bisacodyl, 166 for PEG). The mean total BBPS score was not different between the two groups in both the ITT and PP analyses (p>0.05). The mean VAS score for satisfaction and LS score for the ease of use were higher in the SPMC/bisacodyl group (p<0.001). The adverse event rate was lower in the SPMC/bisacodyl group than in the PEG group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The SPMC/bisacodyl treatment was comparable to conventional PEG with respect to bowel preparation adequacy and superior with respect to compliance, satisfaction, and safety.
Mots clés
Texte intégral:
1
Indice:
WPRIM
Sujet Principal:
Composés organométalliques
/
Picolines
/
Polyéthylène glycols
/
Soins préopératoires
/
Cathartiques
/
Méthode en simple aveugle
/
Coloscopie
/
Observance par le patient
/
Citrates
/
Satisfaction des patients
Type d'étude:
Clinical_trials
/
Guideline
Limites du sujet:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
langue:
En
Texte intégral:
Gut and Liver
Année:
2015
Type:
Article