Comparison of the effects of different types of silicone dressing on facial incision after surgical operation / 中国基层医药
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
; (12): 3739-3741, 2017.
Article
de Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-663282
Bibliothèque responsable:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical effect of silicone dressings spray (Unitrump) or silicone dressings paster(Mepiform) on facial incision after surgical operation.Methods 96 cases of facial incision after surgical operation were randomly divided into Unitrump group,Mepiform group and control group according to the digital table,32 cases in each group.The.clinical effects were evaluated according to scar property and subjective symptoms in patients after 1 month and 3 months.Results The effective rate of the Unitrump group was 53.13% after 1 month,90.63% after 3 months.The effective rate of the Mepiform group was 56.25% after 1 month,87.50% after 3 months.The effective rates of the Unitrump group and Mepiform group were higher than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant (x2 =6.667,7.943,all P < 0.05).The difference between the Unitrump group and Mepiform group was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).Conclusion Silicone dressings spray and silicone dressings paster facial are effective on after facial surgery with incision repair,with no obvious adverse reaction.Silicone dressings spray is more convenient to use.
Texte intégral:
1
Indice:
WPRIM
langue:
Zh
Texte intégral:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
Année:
2017
Type:
Article