Ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: risk factors for repeat procedures and outcome analysis
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
; : 55-65, 2021.
Article
Dans En
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-897971
Responsable en Bibliothèque :
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Background@#Although ultrasound-guided needle decompression (US-GND) can treat calcific tendinitis of the shoulder effectively, repeat procedures might be required for unresolved symptoms. We evaluated the overall clinical outcomes of US-GND with subacromial steroid injection and the final results and factors predisposing toward repeat procedures. @*Methods@#Ninety-eight patients who underwent US-GND for calcific tendinitis of the supraspinatus/infraspinatus were analyzed between March 2017 and December 2018. The clinical outcomes (pain visual analog scale, functional visual analog scale [FVAS], and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) and final subjective satisfaction were compared between groups A (single US-GND) and B (repeat US-GND). The factors predisposing toward repeated US-GNDs were analyzed. @*Results@#We found that 59.3% (58/98) of patient ASES scores were ≥80, and 73.5% of patients (72/98) were satisfied with the outcome. Group B (n=14) demonstrated a significantly higher rate of dominant-arm involvement compared to group A (78.6% vs. 48.8%, P=0.046). However, initial calcification size, shape, number, density, subscapularis involvement, lavage, and procedure time did not differ significantly between the groups. Group B showed poorer final FVAS (7 [interquartile range, 6–8] vs. 8 [interquartile range, 7–9], p=0.036) and subjective satisfaction compared to group A (satisfied 5 [35.7%] vs. 67 [79.8%], p<0.001]. @*Conclusions@#US-GND with subacromial steroid injection is a viable treatment option for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Dominant-arm involvement was the only independent factor for repeated US-GND. Final outcome of repeated US-GND for unimproved patients was promising; however, these outcomes were poor compared to those of the patients who improved after the first procedure.
Texte intégral:
1
Indice:
WPRIM
Type d'étude:
Etiology_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
langue:
En
Texte intégral:
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
Année:
2021
Type:
Article