Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reviewing the therapeutic management of leprosy in primary care: demand case series referred to a University Hospital in the Midwest region of Brazil
Sousa, Pétra Pereira de; Sousa, Ana Lúcia Maroccolo de; Turchi, Marília Dalva.
Afiliação
  • Sousa, Pétra Pereira de; Universidade Federal de Goiás. Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública. Goiânia. BR
  • Sousa, Ana Lúcia Maroccolo de; Universidade Federal de Goiás. Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública. Goiânia. BR
  • Turchi, Marília Dalva; Universidade Federal de Goiás. Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública. Goiânia. BR
An. bras. dermatol ; 96(3): 301-308, May-June 2021. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS | ID: biblio-1285055
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Background:

Leprosy still represents a negleted public health problem in Brazil. Early and adequate treatment of leprosy, carried out in a primary health network is essential to reduce morbidity and sequelae.

Objective:

To analyze the therapeutic management of leprosy patients referred from primary healthy services to a specialized service.

Methods:

An analytical retrospective study using medical records and the Notifiable Diseases Information System. Patients diagnosed with leprosy, referred to a specialized outpatient clinic, between 2016 and 2017, in Goiás state, were included. The treatment carried out in the primary health services was compared to the Ministry of Health guidelines.

Results:

Two-hundred twenty-five leprosy patients were included, of whom 33.3% were referred by leprosy reactions, 27.1% by sequelae, and 10.2% by suspected recurrence or reinfection. Reviewing the therapeutic management, 123 (54.7%) were considered inadequate, 92 (40.9%) adequate, and 10 (4.4%) inconclusive. Of the 200 multibacillary patients, 39.5% had adequate management. In contrast, 12 (85.1%) out of 14 paucibacillary patients had adequate management (χ2= 11.43 and p < 0.001). Regarding the leprosy reactions and sequelae management, 56.9% and 19.5% were considered inadequate, respectively. There was no difference between the percentage of adequate or inadequate management when considering the Goiás health macroregions (χ2= 7.23; 4 degrees of freedom; p = 0.12). Study

limitations:

Use of recorded data, with incomplete medical records and lack of patient follow-up.

Conclusions:

The study demonstrated the equivocal multibacillaryleprosy management conducted in healthy primary care, with an emphasis on leprosy reactions and sequelae. Training and monitoring the medical staff in the primary healthy services could reduce the morbidity and sequelae of leprosy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Assunto principal: Hanseníase Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: An. bras. dermatol Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Assunto principal: Hanseníase Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: An. bras. dermatol Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article