Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of root canal filling techniques on the bond strength of epoxy resin-based sealers
Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi; Souza, Angélica Moreira; Macedo, Luciana Martins Domingues; Raucci-Neto, Walter; Baratto-Filho, Flares; Silva, Bruno Marques; Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Corrêa.
Afiliação
  • Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Souza, Angélica Moreira; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Macedo, Luciana Martins Domingues; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Raucci-Neto, Walter; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Baratto-Filho, Flares; Universidade Positivo. School of Dentistry. Curitiba. BR
  • Silva, Bruno Marques; Universidade Positivo. School of Dentistry. Curitiba. BR
  • Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Corrêa; Universidade de Ribeirão Preto. School of Dentistry. Ribeirão Preto. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e24, 2016. tab
Article em En | LILACS | ID: biblio-952025
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different root canal filling techniques on the bond strength of epoxy resin-based sealers. Sixty single-rooted canines were prepared using ProTaper (F5) and divided into the following groups based on the root filling technique Lateral Compaction (LC), Single Cone (SC), and Tagger Hybrid Technique (THT). The following subgroups (n = 10) were also created based on sealer material used AH Plus and Sealer 26. Two-millimeter-thick slices were cut from all the root thirds and subjected to push-out test. Data (MPa) was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The push-out values were significantly affected by the sealer, filling technique, and root third (p < 0.05). AH Plus (1.37 ± 1.04) exhibited higher values than Sealer 26 (0.92 ± 0.51), while LC (1.80 ± 0.98) showed greater bond strength than THT (1.16 ± 0.50) and SC (0.92 ± 0.25). The cervical (1.45 ± 1.14) third exhibited higher bond strength, followed by the middle (1.20 ± 0.72) and apical (0.78 ± 0.33) thirds. AH Plus/LC (2.26 ± 1.15) exhibited the highest bond strength values, followed by AH Plus/THT (1.32 ± 0.61), Sealer 26/LC (1.34 ± 0.42), and Sealer 26/THT (1.00 ± 0.27). The lowest values were obtained with AH Plus/SC and Sealer 26/SC. Thus, it can be concluded that the filling technique affects the bond strength of sealers. LC was associated with higher bond strength between the material and intra-radicular dentine than THT and SC techniques.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Obturação do Canal Radicular / Colagem Dentária / Resinas Epóxi Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz. oral res. (Online) Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Obturação do Canal Radicular / Colagem Dentária / Resinas Epóxi Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz. oral res. (Online) Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article