Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment in vitro of brushing on dental surface roughness alteration by laser interferometry
Azevedo, Alessandra Miranda de; Panzeri, Heitor; Prado, Célio Jesus do; De-Mello, José Daniel Biasoli; Soares, Carlos José; Fernandes-Neto, Alfredo Julio.
Afiliação
  • Azevedo, Alessandra Miranda de; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Panzeri, Heitor; University of São Paulo. School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Prado, Célio Jesus do; Federal University of Uberlândia. School of Dentistry. Department of Removable Prosthodontics. Uberlândia. BR
  • De-Mello, José Daniel Biasoli; Federal University of Uberlândia. School of Mechanical Engineering. Uberlândia. BR
  • Soares, Carlos José; Federal University of Uberlândia. School of Dentistry. Department of Restorative Dentistry. Uberlândia. BR
  • Fernandes-Neto, Alfredo Julio; Federal University of Uberlândia. School of Dentistry. Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics, and Dental Materials. Uberlândia. BR
Braz. oral res ; 22(1): 11-17, Jan.-Mar. 2008. ilus, tab
Article em En | LILACS | ID: lil-480577
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are considered to be of multifactorial origin, normally associated with inadequate brushing. This study assessed the influence in vitro of simulated brushing on NCCL formation. Fifteen human premolars were submitted to brushing in the cementoenamel junction region, using hard-, medium- and soft-bristled brushes associated with a toothpaste of medium abrasiveness under a 200 g load, at a speed of 356 rpm for 100 minutes. The surface topography of the region was analyzed before and after brushing, by means of a laser interferometer, using "cut-off" values of 0.25 and considering roughness values in mm. The initial roughness (mm) results for dentin (D / bristle consistency 1 - soft, 2 - medium and 3 - hard) were as follows (D1) 1.25 ± 0.45; (D2) 1.12 ± 0.44; (D3) 1.05 ± 0.41. For enamel (E / bristle consistency 1 - soft, 2 - medium and 3 - hard), the initial results were (E1) 1.18 ± 0.35; (E2) 1.32 ± 0.25; (E3) 1.50 ± 0.38. After brushing, the following were the values for dentin (D1) 2.32 ± 1.99; (D2) 3.30 ± 0.96; (D3) Over 500. For enamel, the values after brushing were (E1) 1.37 ± 0.31; (E2) 2.15 ± 0.90; (E3) 1.22 ± 0.47. Based on the results of the ANOVA and Tukey statistical analyses (a = .05) it was concluded that soft, medium and hard brushes are not capable of abrading enamel, whereas dentin showed changes in surface roughness by the action of medium- and hard-bristled brushes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Assunto principal: Abrasão Dentária / Escovação Dentária / Esmalte Dentário / Dentifrícios / Dentina Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz. oral res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article / Project document
Texto completo: 1 Índice: LILACS Assunto principal: Abrasão Dentária / Escovação Dentária / Esmalte Dentário / Dentifrícios / Dentina Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz. oral res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article / Project document